97-15768. Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 116 (Tuesday, June 17, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 32699-32701]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-15768]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 116 / Tuesday, June 17, 1997 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 32699]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-119-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Dornier Model 328-100 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
    airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Dornier Model 328-100 
    series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive tightening of the 
    screws and quick-release fasteners on the wing/body fairing panels. 
    This proposed action would continue to require the repetitive 
    tightening of these parts on certain airplanes. The proposed AD also 
    would require the installation of new fastener systems for those panels 
    on certain airplanes and the application of new torque values. 
    Accomplishment of these actions would terminate the requirement for 
    repetitive tightening of the screws and fasteners of those airplanes. 
    In addition, the proposed AD would limit the applicability of the 
    existing AD by removing certain airplanes. This proposal is prompted by 
    the manufacturer's development of new fastener systems that will not 
    vibrate and loosen. The actions specified by the proposed AD are 
    intended to prevent separation of loosened wing/body fairing panels 
    from the airplane, which, if not corrected, could lead to structural 
    damage to the horizontal or vertical stabilizer, and potential injury 
    to persons on the ground.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by July 28, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-119-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH, P.O. Box 1103, D-82230 Wessling, 
    Germany. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Beane, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2796; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 96-NM-119-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 96-NM-119-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        On October 3, 1994, the FAA issued AD 94-21-02, amendment 39-9043 
    (59 FR 51361, October 11, 1994), applicable to all Dornier Model 328-
    100 series airplanes, to require repetitive tightening of the screws 
    and quick-release (camlock) fasteners on the wing/body fairing panels. 
    That action was prompted by reports of loosened wing/body fairing 
    panels. The requirements of that AD are intended to prevent structural 
    damage to the horizontal or vertical stabilizer and potential injury to 
    persons on the ground due to loosened wing/body fairing panels that may 
    separate from the airplane.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        Since the issuance of that AD, which the FAA considered to be 
    interim action, the manufacturer has developed new fastener systems to 
    keep these panels from separating from the airplane. The relative 
    movement between the wing spar box and adjacent fairing parts, as well 
    as settling of the panels in the area where the attachment screws are 
    located, causes the old fasteners to become loose. The newly developed 
    fastener systems are designed to eliminate vibration and loosening of 
    the fasteners.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        Dornier has issued Service Bulletin SB-328-53-144, Revision 2, 
    dated September 18, 1996, which describes procedures for the 
    installation of new fastener systems for the wing/body fairing panels 
    on certain airplanes, and application of new torque values to these 
    fasteners. These new systems are composed of such parts as anchor nuts 
    with longer threads, larger screws and anchor nuts for areas where 
    fairing panels are connected to the flange of the wing spar, flange 
    washers and rubber rings to prevent direct contact between the fairing 
    panels and the flange of the wing spar, and intermediate slide strips 
    between the fairing panels and the airplane structure. Installation of 
    these
    
    [[Page 32700]]
    
    new systems, with an increase in the torque values of those fasteners, 
    would eliminate the need to repetitively tighten those fasteners.
        The service bulletin also limits its effectivity to airplanes 
    having serial number 3005 through 3047 inclusive. Airplanes having 
    serial number 3048 and subsequent had the new fastener systems 
    installed during manufacture.
        The Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA), which is the airworthiness authority 
    for Germany, classified Revision 1 of this service bulletin as 
    mandatory and issued German airworthiness directive 94-009/4, dated 
    February 1, 1996, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of 
    these airplanes in Germany. (Revision 1, dated January 18, 1996, only 
    differs from Revision 2 in its notes and the dimensions of certain 
    figures.)
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Germany and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the LBA has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    LBA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, the proposed AD would supersede AD 94-21-02 to 
    continue to require repetitive tightening of the screws and quick-
    release fasteners on the wing/body fairing panels. The proposed action 
    also would require the installation of new fastener systems for these 
    panels, and the application of new torque values to these fasteners. 
    Accomplishment of this installation would terminate the current 
    requirement for repetitive tightening of the fasteners for these panels 
    on certain airplanes. Furthermore, the proposed AD would not apply to 
    airplanes on which the installation of these fastener systems had been 
    accomplished during production.
        The installation of the new fastener systems would be required to 
    be accomplished in accordance with the service bulletin described 
    previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 8 Dornier Model 328-100 series airplanes of 
    U.S. registry that would be affected by this proposed AD.
        The actions that are currently required by AD 94-21-02 take 
    approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact on 
    U.S. operators of the actions currently required is estimated to be 
    $1,440, or $180 per airplane.
        The new actions that are proposed in this AD action would take 
    approximately 120 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would provided by the 
    manufacturer at no cost to the operator. Based on these figures, the 
    cost impact on U.S. operators of the proposed requirements of this AD 
    is estimated to be $57,600, or $7,200 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the current or proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9043 (59 FR 
    51361, October 11, 1994), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), to read as follows:
    
    Dornier: Docket 96-NM-119-AD. Supersedes AD 94-21-02, Amendment 39-
    9043.
    
        Applicability: All Model 328-100 series airplanes having serial 
    number 3005 through 3047 inclusive, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent structural damage to the horizontal or vertical 
    stabilizer, and potential injury to persons on the ground due to 
    loosened wing/body fairing panels that may separate from the 
    airplane, accomplish the following:
    
    Restatement of the Requirements of AD 94-21-02, Amendment 39-9043
    
        (a) Within 25 hours time-in-service after October 26, 1994 (the 
    effective date of AD 94-21-02, amendment 39-9043), tighten the 
    screws and quick-release fasteners on the wing/body fairing panels, 
    in accordance with Dornier Alert Service Bulletin ASB-328-53-004, 
    dated August 2, 1994. Repeat these procedures thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 100 hours time-in-service.
    
        Note 2: The proper torque values are specified in the alert 
    service bulletin.
    
    Requirements of the Proposed AD
    
        (b) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, modify 
    the left and right top fairing attachments by installing new 
    fastener systems and increasing the torque values applied to these 
    fasteners, in accordance with
    
    [[Page 32701]]
    
    Dornier Service Bulletin SB-328-53-144, Revision 2, dated September 
    18, 1996. Accomplishment of this modification constitutes 
    terminating action for the repetitive tightening actions required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD.
    
        Note 3: Installation of the new fastener systems and the 
    application of new torque values accomplished prior to the effective 
    date of this AD in accordance with Dornier Service Bulletin SB-328-
    53-144, dated December 14, 1995, or Revision 1, dated January 18, 
    1996, is considered acceptable for compliance with the requirements 
    of paragraph (b) of this AD.
    
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, 
    FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 10, 1997.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-15768 Filed 6-16-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/17/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
97-15768
Dates:
Comments must be received by July 28, 1997.
Pages:
32699-32701 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-119-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-15768.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13