99-15339. Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Approval of Tungsten-Iron and Tungsten-Polymer Shots and Temporary Approval of Tungsten-Matrix and Tin Shots as Nontoxic for Hunting Waterfowl and Coots  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 116 (Thursday, June 17, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 32752-32756]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-15339]
    
    
    
    [[Page 32751]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part VII
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    
    
    Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Approval of Tungsten-Iron and Tungsten-
    Polymer Shots and Temporary Approval of Tungsten-Matrix and Tin Shots 
    as Nontoxic for Hunting Waterfowl and Coots; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 1999 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 32752]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    RIN 1018-AF65
    
    
    Migratory Bird Hunting; Final Approval of Tungsten-Iron and 
    Tungsten-Polymer Shots and Temporary Approval of Tungsten-Matrix and 
    Tin Shots as Nontoxic for Hunting Waterfowl and Coots
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) proposes to 
    grant final approval of tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer shots as 
    nontoxic for hunting waterfowl and coots. We also propose to grant 
    temporary approval of tungsten-matrix and tin shots as nontoxic for 
    hunting waterfowl and coots during the 1999-2000 hunting season only. 
    Acute toxicity studies reveal no adverse effects over a 30-day period 
    on mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) dosed with either tungsten-iron, 
    tungsten-polymer, tungsten-matrix, or tin shot. Reproductive/chronic 
    toxicity testing over a 150-day period indicated that tungsten-iron and 
    tungsten-polymer administered to adult mallards did not adversely 
    affect them or the offspring they produced. We will not consider final 
    approval of tungsten-matrix and tin shots until all required 
    reproductive/chronic toxicity tests are successfully completed and the 
    results are received and approved by the Director. Tungsten-iron and 
    tungsten-polymer shots are produced by Federal Cartridge Company 
    (Federal) of Anoka, Minnesota. Tungsten-matrix shot is produced by Kent 
    Cartridge Company (Kent) of Kearneysville, West Virginia. Tin shot is 
    produced by the International Tin Research Institute (ITRI) of 
    Uxbridge, Middlesex, Great Britain.
    
    DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received no later than 
    July 19, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to the Chief, Office of Migratory Bird 
    Management (MBMO), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1849 C Street, NW., 
    ms 634-ARLSQ, Washington, DC 20240. The public may inspect comments 
    during normal business hours in room 634, Arlington Square Building, 
    4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Andrew, Chief, Office of Migratory 
    Bird Management, (703) 358-1714.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since the mid-1970s, we have sought to 
    identify shot that does not pose a significant toxic hazard to 
    migratory birds or other wildlife. Currently, only steel and bismuth-
    tin shot are approved as nontoxic. We previously granted temporary 
    approval for tungsten-iron shot during the 1997-98 (August 13, 1997; 62 
    FR 43444) and 1998-99 (October 7, 1998; 63 FR 54016) migratory bird 
    hunting seasons. We also granted temporary approval for tungsten-
    polymer (October 7, 1998; 63 FR 54022) and tungsten-matrix (December 8, 
    1998; 63 FR 67619) shots during the 1998-99 migratory bird hunting 
    season. Compliance with the use of nontoxic shot has increased over the 
    last few years. We believe that compliance will continue to increase 
    with the approval and availability of other nontoxic shot types.
        Federal Cartridge Company's (Federal) tungsten-iron shot is an 
    alloy of approximately 55 percent tungsten and 45 percent iron, by 
    weight, and has a density of approximately 10.3 g/cm3. 
    Tungsten-polymer shot is a matrix of Nylon 6 or 11 polymer surrounding 
    particles of elemental tungsten. Shot made from this material has a 
    density of approximately 11.2 g/cm3 or approximately the 
    density of lead. The shot will contain approximately 95.5 percent 
    tungsten and 4.5 percent Nylon 6 or 11 by weight.
        Kent's original candidate shot was fabricated from what is 
    described in their application as a mixture of powdered metals in a 
    plastic matrix whose density is comparable to that of lead. All 
    component metals are present as elements, not compounds. The tungsten-
    matrix material from which pellets are formulated has a specific 
    gravity of 9.8 g/cm3 and is composed of 88 percent tungsten, 
    4 percent nickel, 2 percent iron, 1 percent copper, and 5 percent 
    polymers by mass. After consultation with us, Kent has subsequently 
    changed the composition of their shot and removed nickel and copper. 
    The new shot material being considered has a density of 10.7 g/
    cm3 and is composed of approximately 95.9 percent tungsten 
    and 4.1 percent polymers.
        ITRI's candidate shot is made from commercially pure tin; no 
    alloying or other alterations are intentionally made to the chemical 
    composition of the shot. This shot material has a density of 
    approximately 7.29 g/cm3, and is 99.9 percent tin, with a 
    low level of iron pickup due to the steel production equipment.
        Each of Federal's applications for tungsten-iron and tungsten-
    polymer include a description of the shot, a toxicological report (Barr 
    1996), results of a 30-day dosing study of the toxicity of the shot in 
    game-farm mallards (Bursian et al. 1996a, Bursian et al. 1996b), and 
    results of a 150-day reproductive/chronic toxicity study (Bursian et 
    al. 1999). Kent's application for tungsten-matrix includes a 
    description of the shot, a toxicological report (Thomas 1997a), and 
    results of a 30-day toxicity study (Wildlife International, Ltd. 
    1998a). The tin shot application from ITRI contains a description of 
    the shot, a toxicological report (Thomas 1997b), and results of a 30-
    day toxicity study (Wildlife International, Ltd. 1998b). Toxicological 
    reports for each shot type incorporates toxicity information (a 
    synopsis of acute and chronic toxicity data for mammals and birds, 
    potential for environmental concern, and toxicity to aquatic and 
    terrestrial invertebrates, amphibians and reptiles) and information on 
    environmental fate and transport (shot alteration, environmental half-
    life, and environmental concentration).
        Toxicity Information: There is considerable difference in the 
    toxicity of soluble and insoluble compounds of tungsten and iron. 
    Elemental tungsten and iron are virtually insoluble and are therefore 
    expected to be relatively nontoxic. Even though most toxicity tests 
    reviewed were based on soluble tungsten compounds rather than elemental 
    tungsten, there appears to be no basis for concern of toxicity to 
    wildlife for either candidate shot via ingestion by fish or mammals 
    (Bursian et al. 1996b, Gigiena 1983, Karantassis 1924, Patty 1982, 
    Industrial Medicine 1946). Detailed reviews of the toxicological 
    impacts of different tin compounds have been conducted by Eisler (1989) 
    and Cooney (1988). Both reviews indicate that elemental tin is non-
    toxic to animals. Tin shot designed for waterfowl hunting is utilized 
    in several European countries and no reports exist that suggest that 
    tin shot is causing toxicity problems for wildlife in those countries.
        The potential toxicity of nylon compounds due to degradation is 
    primarily associated with the stabilizers, antioxidants, plasticizers, 
    and unreacted prepolymers. Residual caprolactum has been found in some 
    commercial Nylon 6 products, but little concern regarding this compound 
    has been developed (Patty, 1982). The toxicity of Nylon 6 and 11 are 
    negligible due to their insolubilities.
        Environmental Fate and Transport: Tungsten is insoluble in water 
    and therefore not mobile in hypergenic environments. Tungsten is very 
    stable
    
    [[Page 32753]]
    
    with acids and does not easily complex. Preferential uptake by plants 
    in acid soil suggests uptake of tungsten in the anionic form associated 
    with tungsten minerals rather than elemental tungsten (Kabata and 
    Pendias 1984). Tin pellets will undergo slow surface oxidation to form 
    hydrated tin oxide, which is extremely insoluble in water (Lide 1990). 
    Therefore dissolution will be slow, and highly localized aqueous 
    concentrations will not arise. This means that elemental tin will over 
    time remain largely in the same inorganic form as when it is 
    discharged. Tin pellets discharged into wetlands where sulphur ions are 
    released during organic decomposition would become coated with tin 
    sulphide, which is highly insoluble in water and resistant to aquatic 
    hydrolysis (Hoiland 1995).
        Environmental Concentration: The effective environmental 
    concentration (EEC) for a terrestrial ecosystem was calculated based on 
    69,000 shot per hectare (Pain 1990), assuming complete erosion of 
    material in 5 cm of soil. For tungsten-iron shot, the EEC for tungsten 
    in soil was calculated at 32.9 mg/kg. For tungsten-polymer shot, the 
    EECs for tungsten and Nylon (6 and 11) in soil are 58.3 mg/kg and 2.7 
    mg/kg, respectively. The EECs for tungsten and the 2 polymers found in 
    tungsten-matrix are 25.7 mg/kg, 4.2 mg/kg, and 0.14 mg/kg, 
    respectively. The EEC for tin in soil is 19.3 g/m3.
        The environmental concentration (EEC) for an aquatic ecosystem was 
    calculated assuming complete erosion of the shot in one cubic foot of 
    water. For tungsten-iron shot, the EEC in water for tungsten was 10.5 
    mg/L. For tungsten-polymer shot, the EECs in water for tungsten and 
    Nylon (6 and 11) are 18.7 mg/L and 0.9 mg/L, respectively. The EECs in 
    water for tungsten and the 2 polymers found in tungsten-matrix are 4.2 
    mg/L, 0.2 mg/L, and 0.02 mg/L, respectively. The EEC in water for tin 
    is 19.3 mg/L.
        Effects on Birds: An extensive literature review in each 
    application provided information on the toxicity of elemental tungsten 
    and tin to waterfowl and other birds. Ringelman et al. (1993) orally 
    dosed 20 8-week-old game-farm mallards with 12-17 (1.03 g average 
    weight) tungsten-bismuth-tin (TBT) pellets and monitored them for 32 
    days for evidence of intoxication. No birds died during the trial, 
    gross lesions were not observed during the postmortem examinations, 
    histopathological examinations did not reveal any evidence of toxicity 
    or tissue damage, and tungsten was not detectable in kidney or liver 
    samples. The authors concluded that TBT shot presented virtually no 
    potential for acute intoxication in mallards.
        Kraabel et al. (1996) assessed the effects of embedded TBT shot on 
    mallards and concluded that TBT was not acutely toxic when implanted in 
    muscle tissue. Inflammatory reactions to TBT shot were localized and 
    had no detectable systemic effects on mallard health.
        Nell (1981) fed laying hens (Gallus domesticus) 0.4 or 1.0 g/kg 
    tungsten in a commercial mash for five months to assess reproductive 
    performance. Weekly egg production was normal and hatchability of 
    fertile eggs was not affected. Exposure of chickens to large doses of 
    tungsten either through injection or by feeding resulted in an 
    increased tissue concentration of tungsten and a decreased 
    concentration of molybdenum (Nell 1981). The loss of tungsten from the 
    liver occurred in an exponential manner with a half-life of 27 hours. 
    The alterations in molybdenum metabolism seemed to be associated with 
    tungsten intake rather than molybdenum deficiency. Death due to 
    tungsten occurred when tissue concentrations increased to 25 mg/g 
    liver. At that concentration, xanthine dehydrogenase activity was zero.
        Ringelman et al. (1992) conducted a 32-day acute toxicity study 
    which involved dosing game-farm mallards with a shot alloy of tungsten-
    bismuth-tin (TBT), which was 39, 44.5 and 16.5 percent by weight, 
    respectively. No dosed birds died during the trial, and behavior was 
    normal. Examination of tissues post-euthanization revealed no toxicity 
    or damage related to shot exposure. This study concluded that ``* * * 
    TBT shot presents virtually no potential for acute intoxication in 
    mallards under the conditions of this study.''
        Several studies have been conducted in which pellets made of tin or 
    tin alloys have been placed inside the digestive tract or tissues of 
    ducks to determine if toxic effects occur. Grandy et al. (1968) and the 
    Huntingdon Research Centre (1987) conducted 30- and 28-day, 
    respectively, acute toxicity tests on mallard ducks and reported that 
    all treatment ducks survived with insignificant weight loss or 
    development of pathological lesions. The potential for bismuth-tin (BT) 
    shot to produce toxicological effects in ducks during reproduction has 
    been investigated under both acute and chronic testing conditions. Tin 
    as a 2% component of the tested shot, did not pose a toxic risk to 
    ducks when fed a nutritionally-imbalanced, corn-based diet. Neither has 
    BT shot been shown to pose an adverse risk to the health of ducks, the 
    reproduction by male and female birds, nor the survival of ducklings 
    over the long term (Sanderson et al. 1997a, b).
        Nylon 6 is the commercially important homopolymer of caprolactum. 
    Most completely polymerized nylon materials are physiologically inert, 
    regardless of the toxicity of the monomer from which they are made 
    (Peterson 1977). Few data exist on the toxicity of Nylon 6 in animals. 
    Most toxicity studies are related to thermal degradation products and 
    so are not relevant to the exposure of wildlife to shot containing 
    nylon. Montgomery (1982) reported that feeding Nylon 6 to rats at a 
    level of 25 percent of the diet for 2 weeks caused a slower rate of 
    weight gain, presumably due to a decrease in food consumption and feed 
    efficiency. However, the rats suffered no anatomic injuries due to the 
    consumption of nylon.
        The two plastic polymers used in tungsten-matrix shot act as a 
    physical matrix in which the tungsten is distributed as ionically-bound 
    fine particles. Most completely polymerized nylon materials are 
    physiologically inert, regardless of the toxicity of the monomer from 
    which they are made (Peterson 1977). A literature review did not reveal 
    studies in which either of the two polymers were evaluated for toxicity 
    in birds.
        Acute Toxicity Studies: Federal contracted with Michigan State 
    University--Department of Animal Science, to conduct an acute toxicity 
    study of tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer. Both Kent and ITRI 
    contracted with Wildlife International Ltd. to conduct an acute 
    toxicity study of tungsten-matrix and tin shots, respectively. The 
    acute toxicity test is a short-term (30-day) study where ducks are 
    dosed with shot and fed commercially available duck food. Survival, 
    body weight, blood hematocrit, and organ analysis are recorded.
        Tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer: The 30-day dosing study 
    revealed no adverse effects when mallards were dosed with either 8 BB 
    size tungsten-iron shot or 8 BB size tungsten-polymer shot and 
    monitored over a 30-day period (Bursian et al. 1996a, Bursian et al. 
    1996b). Eight male and 8 female adult mallards were dosed with either 8 
    No. 4 steel shot, 8 No. 4 lead shot, 8 BB size tungsten-iron shot, or 8 
    BB size tungsten-polyer shot and observed over a 30-day period. An 
    additional 8 males and 8 females received no shot. Fifty percent of the 
    lead-dosed birds (5 males and 3 females) died during the 30-day test 
    while there were no mortalities in
    
    [[Page 32754]]
    
    the other groups. Lead-dosed birds were the only ones to display green 
    excreta, lethargy, and ataxia. Body weights were not significantly 
    altered by any of the treatments, although lead-dosed birds which died 
    during the trial lost an average of 30 percent of their body weight. 
    Hematocrit, hemoglobin concentrations, and ALAD activity were 
    significantly depressed at day 15 in the lead-dosed females, while 
    lead-dosed males had significantly depressed hematocrit and hemoglobin 
    concentration compared with the other four groups. There were no 
    significant differences in these whole-blood parameters at day 30. 
    Three tungsten-polymer-dosed males developed mild biliary stasis. The 
    authors attributed this to the intubating of mallards with 8 BBs of 
    tungsen-polymer shot inducing a pathological condition--however 
    slight--that was not found in the control birds. No other 
    histopathological lesions were found. Tungsten was detected in the 
    femur of two tungsten-polymer-dosed females and the kidneys of two 
    tungsten-polymer-dosed birds; in both tissues, concentrations were only 
    slightly above detection limits. In general, no adverse effects were 
    seen in mallards given 8 BB-size tungsten-polymer shot and monitored 
    over a 30-day period.
        Tungsten-matrix: Kent's 30-day dosing study (Wildlife International 
    Ltd. 1998a) included 4 treatment and 1 control group of game-farm 
    mallards. Treatment groups were exposed to 1 of 3 different types of 
    shot: 8 #4 steel, 8 #4 lead, or 8 #4 tungsten-matrix; whereas the 
    control group received no shot. The 2 tungsten-matrix treatment groups 
    (1 group deficient diet, 1 group balanced diet) each consisted of 16 
    birds (8 males and 8 females); whereas remaining treatment and control 
    groups consisted of 6 birds each (3 males and 3 females). All tungsten-
    matrix-dosed birds survived the test and showed no overt signs of 
    toxicity or treatment-related effects on body weight. There were no 
    differences in hematocrit or hemoglobin concentration between the 
    tungsten-matrix treatment group and either the steel shot or control 
    groups. No histopathological lesions were found during gross necropsy. 
    In general, no adverse effects were seen in mallards given 8 #4 size 
    tungsten-matrix shot and monitored over a 30-day period. Tungsten was 
    found to be below the limit of detection in all samples of femur, 
    gonad, liver, and kidney from treatment groups.
        Tin: ITRI's 30-day dosing study (Wildlife International Ltd. 1998b) 
    included 4 treatment and 1 control group of game-farm mallards. 
    Treatment groups were exposed to 1 of 3 different types of shot: 8 #4 
    steel, 8 #4 lead, or 8 #4 tin shot; whereas the control group received 
    no shot. The 2 tin treatment groups (1 group deficient diet, 1 group 
    balanced diet) each consisted of 16 birds (8 males and 8 females); 
    whereas remaining treatment and control groups consisted of 6 birds 
    each (3 males and 3 females). All tin-dosed birds survived the test and 
    showed no overt signs of toxicity or treatment-related effects on body 
    weight. There were no differences in hematocrit or hemoglobin 
    concentration between the tin treatment group and either the steel shot 
    or control groups. No histopathological lesions were found during gross 
    necropsy. In general, no adverse effects were seen in mallards given 8 
    #4 size tin shot and monitored over a 30-day period. No levels of tin 
    above the limit of detection were observed in any tissues collected 
    from either tin treatment group.
        Reproductive/chronic Toxicity Study: Federal contracted with 
    Michigan State University--Department of Animal Science, to conduct an 
    a reproductive/chronic toxicity studies for both tungsten-iron and 
    tungsten-polymer shot types. The reproductive/chronic toxicity study is 
    a long-term (150-day) study where ducks are dosed with shot and fed 
    commercially available duck food. Survival, body weight, blood 
    hematocrit, organ analysis, and reproductive performance are recorded.
        Tungsten-iron and Tungsten-polymer: The reproductive/chronic 
    toxicity study revealed no adverse effects when mallards were dosed 
    with either 8 No. 4 size tungsten-iron shot, or 8 No. 4 size tungsten-
    polymer shot, and monitored over a 150-day period (Bursian et al. 
    1999). Sixteen male and 16 female adult mallards were orally dosed with 
    either 8 No. 4 steel shot, 8 No. 4 tungsten-iron shot, or 8 No. 4 
    tungsten-polymer shot. An additional 6 male and 6 female mallards were 
    dosed with 8 No. 4 lead shot. All lead-dosed birds died by day 25 of 
    the study, whereas no mortalities occurred in the other test groups. 
    Lead-dosed birds had significantly decreased hematocrit, hemoglobin 
    concentration and whole-blood delta aminolevulinic dehydratase activity 
    on day 7 of the study. Mallards dosed with tungsten-iron or tungsten-
    polymer shot had occasional significant differences in hematocrit and 
    plasma chemistry values when compared to steel-dosed mallards over the 
    150-day period, but these changes were within the normal range reported 
    for mallards and were not considered to be deleterious. Relative 
    kidney, heart, brain and gizzard weights of lead-dosed birds were 
    significantly greater in comparison to relative weights of those organs 
    in the other 3 treatment groups. Marked liver hemosiderosis was present 
    in all steel and tungsten-dosed males, in 5 of 8 steel- and 3 of 8 
    tungsten-iron-dosed females, and in 1 tungsten-polymer-dosed male 
    examined. Small amounts of tungsten were detected in gonad and kidney 
    samples from males and females, in femur samples of males, and in liver 
    samples from females dosed with tungsten-polymer shot. Higher 
    concentrations of tungsten were detected in femur, gonad, kidney, and 
    liver samples from tungsten-iron-dosed ducks. The rate of shot erosion 
    was 99% for tungsten-polymer, 72% for tungsten-iron, 55% for steel, and 
    37% for lead. There were no significant differences in percent egg 
    production, and percent fertility and hatchability of eggs from 
    tungsten-iron- and tungsten-polymer-dosed ducks when compared to steel-
    dosed ducks. There were no biological differences in percent 
    survivability and body weight of ducklings from tungsten-iron- or 
    tungsten-polymer-dosed ducks when compared to ducklings from steel-
    dosed ducks. The hematocrit of ducklings from tungsten-iron-dosed ducks 
    was slightly but significantly lower when compared to ducklings from 
    steel-dosed ducks. Histological examination of duckling kidneys and 
    liver indicated no abnormalities. Tungsten was detected in 25%, 9%, and 
    13% of the femur, kidneys, and liver samples, respectively, from 
    ducklings of the tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer groups. Overall, 
    results of this study indicated that tungsten-iron and tungsten-polymer 
    shot repeatedly administered to adult mallards did not adversely affect 
    them or the offspring they produced during the 150-day trial.
    
    Nontoxic Shot Approval
    
        The first condition for nontoxic shot approval is toxicity testing. 
    Based on the results of the toxicological report and the toxicity tests 
    (Tiers 1, 2, and 3) discussed above, we conclude that tungsten-iron and 
    tungsten-polymer shot does not pose a significant danger to migratory 
    birds or other wildlife and their habitats. Based on the results of 
    toxicological reports and acute toxicity tests (Tier 1 and 2), we 
    conclude that tungsten-matrix and tin shots do not appear to pose a 
    significant danger to migratory birds or other wildlife and their 
    habitats. However, final approval of either shot type will not be 
    considered until all required reproductive/chronic toxicity tests have 
    been successfully completed and our Director has reviewed and approved 
    the results.
    
    [[Page 32755]]
    
        The second condition for approval is testing for residual lead 
    levels. Any shot with lead levels equal to or exceeding 1 percent will 
    be considered toxic and, therefore, illegal. We have determined that 
    the maximum environmentally acceptable level of lead in any nontoxic 
    shot is trace amounts of <1 percent,="" and="" incorporated="" this="" requirement="" in="" the="" nontoxic="" shot="" approval="" process="" that="" was="" published="" on="" december="" 1,="" 1997="" (62="" fr="" 63608).="" federal="" has="" documented="" that="" tungsten-iron="" and="" tungsten-polymer="" shots="" meet="" this="" requirement.="" kent="" and="" itri="" have="" documented="" that="" tungsten-matrix="" and="" tin="" shot,="" respectively,="" meet="" this="" requirement.="" the="" third="" condition="" for="" approval="" involves="" enforcement.="" in="" the="" august="" 18,="" 1995,="" federal="" register="" (60="" fr="" 43314),="" we="" indicated="" that="" approval="" of="" any="" nontoxic="" shot="" would="" be="" contingent="" upon="" the="" development="" and="" availability="" of="" a="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" device.="" this="" requirement="" was="" incorporated="" in="" the="" nontoxic="" shot="" approval="" process="" that="" was="" published="" on="" december="" 1,="" 1997="" (62="" fr="" 63608).="" tungsten-iron="" shotshells="" can="" be="" drawn="" to="" a="" magnet="" as="" a="" simple="" field="" detection="" method.="" electronic="" field="" testing="" devices="" can="" distinguish="" shells="" containing="" tungsten-polymer="" and="" tungsten-matrix="" from="" shells="" containing="" lead.="" at="" the="" present="" time,="" we="" are="" not="" aware="" of="" any="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" devices="" for="" distinguishing="" shells="" containing="" tin="" shot="" from="" those="" containing="" lead.="" we="" will="" not="" consider="" final="" approval="" of="" tin="" shot="" until="" such="" a="" device,="" or="" other="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" method,="" has="" been="" developed="" for="" identifying="" tin="" shot.="" this="" proposed="" rule="" would="" amend="" 50="" cfr="" 20.21(j)="" by="" approving="" tungsten-iron="" and="" tungsten-polymer="" shots="" as="" nontoxic="" for="" migratory="" bird="" hunting.="" it="" is="" based="" on="" the="" toxicological="" reports,="" acute="" toxicity="" studies,="" and="" reproductive/chronic="" toxicity="" studies="" submitted="" by="" federal.="" results="" of="" these="" studies="" indicate="" the="" absence="" of="" any="" deleterious="" effects="" of="" tungsten-iron="" or="" tungsten-polymer="" shot="" when="" ingested="" by="" captive-reared="" mallards="" or="" to="" the="" ecosystem.="" we="" also="" propose="" to="" grant="" temporary="" approval="" to="" tungsten-matrix="" and="" tin="" shots="" for="" the="" 1999-2000="" hunting="" season="" only.="" temporary="" approval="" would="" be="" based="" on="" the="" toxicological="" reports="" and="" acute="" toxicity="" studies="" submitted="" by="" kent="" and="" itri.="" we="" have="" reduced="" the="" public="" comment="" period="" from="" 60="" days="" to="" 30="" days="" in="" order="" to="" complete="" the="" rulemaking="" process="" prior="" to="" the="" start="" of="" the="" hunting="" season.="" this="" will="" facilitate="" planning="" efforts="" by="" vendors="" and="" state="" wildlife="" agencies.="" references="" barr="" engineering="" company.="" 1996.="" toxicology="" report="" on="" new="" shot.="" bursian,="" s.j.,="" m.e.="" kelly,="" r.j.="" aulerich,="" d.c.="" powell,="" and="" s.="" fitzgerald.="" 1996a.="" thirty-day="" dosing="" test="" to="" assess="" the="" toxicity="" of="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" in="" game-farm="" mallards.="" report="" to="" federal="" cartridge="" co.="" 77="" pp.="" bursian,="" s.j.,="" m.e.="" kelly,="" r.j.="" aulerich,="" d.c.="" powell,="" and="" s.="" fitzgerald.="" 1996b.="" thirty-day="" dosing="" test="" to="" assess="" the="" toxicity="" of="" tungsten-polymer="" shot="" in="" game-farm="" mallards.="" report="" to="" federal="" cartridge="" co.="" 71="" pp.="" bursian,="" s.j.,="" r.m.="" mitchell,="" r.j.="" tempelman,="" r.j.="" aulerich,="" and="" s.d.="" fitzgerald.="" 1999.="" chronic="" dosing="" study="" to="" assess="" the="" health="" and="" reproductive="" effects="" of="" tungsten-iron="" and="" tungsten-polymer="" shot="" on="" game-farm="" mallards.="" report="" to="" federal="" cartridge="" co.="" 115="" pp.="" cooney,="" j.j.="" 1988.="" microbial="" transformations="" of="" tin="" and="" tin="" compounds.="" j.="" industr.="" microbiol.="" 3:195-204.="" eisler,="" r.="" 1989.="" tin="" hazards="" to="" fish,="" wildlife,="" and="" invertebrates:="" a="" synoptic="" review.="" biological="" rep.="" 85="" (1.15).="" contaminant="" hazard="" reviews="" report="" no.="" 15.="" fish="" and="" wildlife="" service,="" u.s.="" dept.="" interior.="" washington,="" d.c.="" 85="" pp.="" gigiema="" i.="" sanitariya.="" 1977.="" mezhdunarodnaya="" kniga.="" moscow,="" ussr.="" 42(8):30.="" gigiema="" i.="" sanitariya.="" 1983.="" mezhdunarodnaya="" kniga.="" moscow,="" ussr.="" 48(7):71.="" grandy,="" j.w.,="" l.n.="" locke,="" and="" g.e.="" bagley.="" 1968.="" relative="" toxicity="" of="" lead="" and="" five="" proposed="" substitute="" shot="" types="" to="" pen-reared="" mallards.="" j.="" wildl.="" manage.="" 32(3):483-488.="" hoiland,="" k.="" 1995.="" reaction="" of="" some="" decomposer="" basidiomycetes="" to="" toxic="" elements.="" nordic="" j.="" bot.="" 15:305-318.="" huntingdon="" research="" centre="" ltd.="" 1987.="" the="" effects="" of="" dosing="" mallard="" ducks="" with="" safe="" shot.="" huntingdon,="" cambridge,="" u.k.="" report="" dated="" dec.="" 19,="" 1987.="" 15pp.="" industrial="" medicine.="" 1946.="" 15:482.="" interagency="" ecosystem="" management="" task="" force.="" 1995.="" the="" ecosystem="" approach:="" healthy="" ecosystems="" and="" sustainable="" economics.="" volume="" ii--="" implementation="" issues.="" kabata-pendias,="" a.="" and="" h.="" pendias.="" 1984.="" trace="" elements="" in="" soil="" and="" plants.="" crc="" press,="" inc.="" boca="" raton,="" fl.="" karantassis,="" t.="" 1924.="" on="" the="" toxicity="" of="" compounds="" of="" tungsten="" and="" molybdenum.="" ann.="" med.="" 28:1541-1543.="" kraabel,="" f.w.,="" m.w.="" miller,="" d.m.="" getzy,="" and="" j.k.="" ringleman.="" 1996.="" effects="" of="" embedded="" tungsten-bismuth-tin="" shot="" and="" steel="" shot="" on="" mallards.="" j.="" wildl.="" dis.="" 38(1):1-8.="" lide,="" d.r.="" 1990.="" crc--handbook="" of="" chemistry="" and="" physics.="" 71st="" edition,="" 1990-1991.="" crc="" press,="" boca="" raton,="" florida.="" montgomery,="" r.r.="" 1982.="" polymers.="" in="" patty's="" industrial="" hygiene="" and="" toxicology,="" vol.="" iiia="" (g.d.="" clayton="" and="" f.e.="" clayton,="" eds.)="" pp.="" 4209-4526.="" john="" wiley="" and="" sons,="" ny.="" nell,="" j.a.,="" e.f.="" annison,="" and="" d.="" balnave.="" 1981.="" the="" influence="" of="" tungsten="" on="" the="" molybdenum="" status="" of="" poultry.="" br.="" poult.="" sci.="" 21:193-202="" pain,="" d.j.="" 1990.="" lead="" shot="" ingestion="" by="" waterbirds="" in="" the="" carmarque,="" france:="" an="" investigation="" of="" levels="" and="" interspecific="" difference.="" environ.="" pollut.="" 66:273-285.="" patty's="" industrial="" hygiene="" and="" toxicology.="" 1982.="" wiley="" interscience.="" wiley="" &="" sons,="" inc.="" ny,="" ny.="" third="" ed.="" peterson,="" j.e.="" 1977.="" industrial="" health.="" prentice-hall,="" englewood="" cliffs,="" nj.="" ringelman,="" j.k.,="" m.w.="" miller,="" and="" w.f.="" andelt.="" 1992.="" effects="" of="" ingested="" tungsten-bismuth-tin="" shot="" on="" mallards.="" co="" div.="" wildl.,="" fort="" collins,="" 24="" pp.="" ringelman,="" j.k.,="" m.w.="" miller,="" and="" w.f.="" andelt.="" 1993.="" effects="" of="" ingested="" tungsten-bismuth-tin="" shot="" on="" captive="" mallards.="" j.="" wildl.="" manage.="" 57:725-732.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" w.l.="" anderson,="" g.l.="" foley,="" l.m.="" skowron,="" j.d.="" brawn,="" and="" j.w.="" seets.="" 1997a.="" acute="" toxicity="" of="" ingested="" bismuth="" alloy="" shot="" in="" game="" farm="" mallards.="" illinois="" nat.="" history="" survey="" bull.="" 35:185-216.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" w.l.="" anderson,="" g.l.="" foley,="" k.l.="" duncan,="" l.m.="" skowron,="" j.d.="" brawn,="" and="" j.w.="" seets.="" 1997b.="" toxicity="" of="" ingested="" bismuth="" alloy="" shot="" in="" game="" farm="" mallards:="" chronic="" health="" effects="" and="" effects="" on="" reproduction.="" illinois="" nat.="" history="" survey="" bull.="" 35:217-="" 252.="" thomas,="" v.g.="" 1997a.="" application="" for="" approval="" of="" tungsten-matrix="" shot="" as="" non-toxic="" for="" the="" hunting="" of="" migratory="" birds.="" 39="" pp.="" thomas,="" v.g.="" 1997b.="" application="" for="" approval="" of="" tin="" shot="" as="" non-="" toxic="" for="" the="" hunting="" of="" migratory="" birds.="" 26="" pp.="" wildlife="" international,="" ltd.="" 1998a.="" tungsten-matrix="" shot:="" an="" oral="" toxicity="" study="" with="" the="" mallard.="" project="" no.="" 475-101.="" 162="" pp.="" wildlife="" international,="" ltd.="" 1998b.="" tin="" shot:="" an="" oral="" toxicity="" study="" with="" the="" mallard.="" project="" no.="" 476-101.="" 158="" pp.="" nepa="" consideration="" in="" compliance="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" section="" 102(2)(c)="" of="" the="" national="" environmental="" policy="" act="" of="" 1969="" (42="" u.s.c.="" 4332(c)),="" and="" the="" council="" on="" environmental="" quality's="" regulation="" for="" implementing="" nepa="" (40="" cfr="" 1500-1508),="" we="" prepared="" draft="" environmental="" assessments="" (ea)="" in="" may,="" 1999.="" the="" eas="" are="" available="" to="" the="" public="" at="" the="" location="" indicated="" under="" the="" addresses="" caption.="" endangered="" species="" act="" considerations="" section="" 7="" of="" the="" endangered="" species="" act="" (esa)="" of="" 1972,="" as="" amended="" (16="" u.s.c.="" 1531="" et="" seq.),="" provides="" that="" federal="" agencies="" shall="" ``insure="" that="" any="" action="" authorized,="" funded="" or="" carried="" out="" *="" *="" *="" is="" not="" likely="" to="" jeopardize="" the="" continued="" existence="" of="" any="" endangered="" species="" or="" threatened="" species="" or="" result="" in="" the="" destruction="" or="" adverse="" modification="" of="" (critical)="" habitat="" *="" *="" *''="" we="" are="" completing="" a="" section="" 7="" consultation="" under="" the="" esa="" for="" this="" proposed="" rule.="" the="" result="" of="" our="" consultation="" under="" section="" 7="" of="" the="" esa="" will="" be="" available="" to="" the="" public="" at="" the="" location="" indicated="" under="" the="" addresses="" caption.="" [[page="" 32756]]="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act="" the="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act="" of="" 1980="" (5="" u.s.c.="" 601="" et="" seq.)="" requires="" the="" preparation="" of="" flexibility="" analyses="" for="" rules="" that="" will="" have="" a="" significant="" effect="" on="" a="" substantial="" number="" of="" small="" entities,="" which="" includes="" small="" businesses,="" organizations="" or="" governmental="" jurisdictions.="" this="" rule="" would="" approve="" additional="" types="" of="" nontoxic="" shot="" that="" may="" be="" sold="" and="" used="" to="" hunt="" migratory="" birds;="" this="" rule="" would="" provide="" 4="" types="" of="" shot="" in="" addition="" to="" the="" existing="" 2="" that="" are="" approved.="" we="" have="" determined,="" however,="" that="" this="" rule="" will="" have="" no="" effect="" on="" small="" entities="" since="" the="" approved="" shot="" merely="" will="" supplement="" nontoxic="" shot="" already="" in="" commerce="" and="" available="" throughout="" the="" retail="" and="" wholesale="" distribution="" systems.="" we="" anticipate="" no="" dislocation="" or="" other="" local="" effects,="" with="" regard="" to="" hunters="" and="" others.="" this="" rule="" was="" not="" subject="" to="" office="" of="" management="" and="" budget="" (omb)="" review="" under="" executive="" order="" 12866.="" executive="" order="" 12866="" this="" rule="" is="" not="" subject="" to="" office="" of="" management="" and="" budget="" (omb)="" review="" under="" executive="" order="" 12866.="" e.o.="" 12866="" requires="" each="" agency="" to="" write="" regulations="" that="" are="" easy="" to="" understand.="" we="" invite="" comments="" on="" how="" to="" make="" this="" rule="" easier="" to="" understand,="" including="" answers="" to="" questions="" such="" as="" the="" following:="" (1)="" are="" the="" requirements="" in="" the="" rule="" clearly="" stated?="" (2)="" does="" the="" rule="" contain="" technical="" language="" or="" jargon="" that="" interferes="" with="" its="" clarity?="" (3)="" does="" the="" format="" of="" the="" rule="" (grouping="" and="" order="" of="" sections,="" use="" of="" headings,="" paragraphing,="" etc.)="" aid="" or="" reduce="" its="" clarity?="" (4)="" would="" the="" rule="" be="" easier="" to="" understand="" if="" it="" were="" divided="" into="" more="" (but="" shorter)="" sections?="" (5)="" is="" the="" description="" of="" the="" rule="" in="" the="" ``supplementary="" information''="" section="" of="" the="" preamble="" helpful="" in="" understanding="" the="" rule?="" what="" else="" could="" we="" do="" to="" make="" the="" rule="" easier="" to="" understand?="" section="" 20.21="" may="" be="" written="" in="" plain="" language="" format="" in="" the="" final="" rule.="" paperwork="" reduction="" act="" an="" agency="" may="" not="" conduct="" or="" sponsor,="" and="" a="" person="" is="" not="" required="" to="" respond="" to,="" a="" collection="" of="" information="" unless="" it="" displays="" a="" currently="" valid="" omb="" control="" number.="" we="" have="" examined="" this="" regulation="" under="" the="" paperwork="" reduction="" act="" of="" 1995="" (44="" u.s.c.="" 3501)="" and="" found="" it="" to="" contain="" no="" information="" collection="" requirements.="" however,="" we="" do="" have="" omb="" approval="" (1018-0067;="" expires="" 06/30/2000)="" for="" information="" collection="" relating="" to="" what="" manufacturers="" of="" shot="" are="" required="" to="" provide="" to="" us="" for="" the="" nontoxic="" shot="" approval="" process.="" for="" further="" information="" see="" 50="" cfr="" 20.134.="" unfunded="" mandates="" reform="" we="" have="" determined="" and="" certify="" pursuant="" to="" the="" unfunded="" mandates="" act,="" 2="" u.s.c.="" 1502,="" et="" seq.,="" that="" this="" rulemaking="" will="" not="" impose="" a="" cost="" of="" $100="" million="" or="" more="" in="" any="" given="" year="" on="" local="" or="" state="" government="" or="" private="" entities.="" civil="" justice="" reform--executive="" order="" 12988="" we,="" in="" promulgating="" this="" rule,="" have="" determined="" that="" these="" regulations="" meet="" the="" applicable="" standards="" provided="" in="" sections="" 3(a)="" and="" 3(b)(2)="" of="" executive="" order="" 12988.="" takings="" implication="" assessment="" in="" accordance="" with="" executive="" order="" 12630,="" these="" rules,="" authorized="" by="" the="" migratory="" bird="" treaty="" act,="" do="" not="" have="" significant="" takings="" implications="" and="" do="" not="" affect="" any="" constitutionally="" protected="" property="" rights.="" these="" rules="" will="" not="" result="" in="" the="" physical="" occupancy="" of="" property,="" the="" physical="" invasion="" of="" property,="" or="" the="" regulatory="" taking="" of="" any="" property.="" in="" fact,="" these="" rules="" allow="" hunters="" to="" exercise="" privileges="" that="" would="" be="" otherwise="" unavailable;="" and,="" therefore,="" reduce="" restrictions="" on="" the="" use="" of="" private="" and="" public="" property.="" federalism="" effects="" due="" to="" the="" migratory="" nature="" of="" certain="" species="" of="" birds,="" the="" federal="" government="" has="" been="" given="" responsibility="" over="" these="" species="" by="" the="" migratory="" bird="" treaty="" act.="" these="" rules="" do="" not="" have="" a="" substantial="" direct="" effect="" on="" fiscal="" capacity,="" change="" the="" roles="" or="" responsibilities="" of="" federal="" or="" state="" governments,="" or="" intrude="" on="" state="" policy="" or="" administration.="" therefore,="" in="" accordance="" with="" executive="" order="" 12612,="" these="" regulations="" do="" not="" have="" significant="" federalism="" effects="" and="" do="" not="" have="" sufficient="" federalism="" implications="" to="" warrant="" the="" preparation="" of="" a="" federalism="" assessment.="" government-to-government="" relationship="" with="" tribes="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" president's="" memorandum="" of="" april="" 29,="" 1994,="" ``government-to-government="" relations="" with="" native="" american="" tribal="" governments''="" (59="" fr="" 22951)="" and="" 512="" dm="" 2,="" we="" have="" evaluated="" possible="" effects="" on="" federally="" recognized="" indian="" tribes="" and="" have="" determined="" that="" there="" are="" no="" effects.="" authorship="" the="" primary="" author="" of="" this="" proposed="" rule="" is="" james="" r.="" kelley,="" jr.,="" office="" of="" migratory="" bird="" management.="" list="" of="" subjects="" in="" 50="" cfr="" part="" 20="" exports,="" hunting,="" imports,="" reporting="" and="" recordkeeping="" requirements,="" transportation,="" wildlife.="" accordingly,="" we="" propose="" to="" amend="" part="" 20,="" subchapter="" b,="" chapter="" 1="" of="" title="" 50="" of="" the="" code="" of="" federal="" regulations="" as="" follows:="" part="" 20--[amended]="" 1.="" the="" authority="" citation="" for="" part="" 20="" continues="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" authority:="" 16="" u.s.c.="" 703-712="" and="" 16="" u.s.c.="" 742="" a-j.="" 2.="" section="" 20.21="" is="" amended="" by="" revising="" the="" section="" title,="" revising="" paragraph="" (j)="" introductory="" text,="" revising="" paragraphs="" (j)(2)="" and="" (j)(3),="" and="" removing="" paragraph="" (j)(4)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" 20.21="" what="" hunting="" methods="" are="" illegal?="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (j)="" while="" possessing="" shot="" (either="" in="" shotshells="" or="" as="" loose="" shot="" for="" muzzleloading)="" other="" than="" steel="" shot,="" or="" bismuth-tin="" (97="" parts="" bismuth:="" 3="" parts="" tin="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" tungsten-="" iron="" (55="" parts="" tungsten:="" 45="" parts="" iron="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" tungsten-polymer="" (95.5="" parts="" tungsten:="" 4.5="" parts="" nylon="" 6="" or="" 11="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" tungsten-matrix="" (95.9="" parts="" tungsten:="" 4.1="" parts="" polymer="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" tin="" (99.9="" percent="" tin="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" such="" shot="" approved="" as="" nontoxic="" by="" the="" director="" pursuant="" to="" procedures="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 20.134,="" provided="" that:="" (1)="" *="" *="" *="" (2)="" tungsten-matrix="" shot="" (95.9="" parts="" tungsten:="" 4.1="" parts="" polymer="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" is="" legal="" as="" nontoxic="" shot="" for="" waterfowl="" and="" coot="" hunting="" for="" the="" 1999-2000="" hunting="" season="" only,="" and="" (3)="" tin="" shot="" (99.9="" percent="" tin="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" is="" legal="" as="" nontoxic="" shot="" for="" waterfowl="" and="" coot="" hunting="" for="" the="" 1999-2000="" hunting="" season="" only.="" dated:="" june="" 8,="" 1999.="" stephen="" c.="" saunders,="" acting="" assistant="" secretary="" for="" fish="" and="" wildlife="" and="" parks.="" [fr="" doc.="" 99-15339="" filed="" 6-16-99;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 4310-55-p="">

Document Information

Published:
06/17/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
99-15339
Dates:
Comments on the proposed rule must be received no later than July 19, 1999.
Pages:
32752-32756 (5 pages)
RINs:
1018-AF65
PDF File:
99-15339.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 20