97-15889. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Partial Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Rule 722, Margin Accounts  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 117 (Wednesday, June 18, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 33147-33149]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-15889]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-38735; File No. SR-Phlx-97-14]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Partial Accelerated 
    Approval to a Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, 
    Inc. Relating to Rule 722, Margin Accounts
    
    June 11, 1997.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On May 8, 1997, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend certain 
    sections of the Exchange's rules to comply with changes to Regulation T 
    which became effective June 1, 1997. Phlx submitted Amendment No. 1 on 
    May 20, 1997.\1\ Phlx submitted Amendment No. 2 on May 28, 1997.\2\ 
    Phlx submitted Amendment No. 3 on May 30, 1997.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See Letter from Michele R. Weisbaum, Vice President and 
    Associate General Counsel, Phlx, to Michael Walinskas, Senior 
    Special Counsel, Division of Market Regulation (``Market 
    Regulation''), Commission, dated May 19, 1997 (``Amendment No. 1''). 
    Amendment No. 1 supersedes the original rule filing in its entirety 
    by addressing technical changes by making corrections to certain 
    typographical errors appearing in the rule filing. Amendment No. 1 
    also makes a number of substantive changes.
        \2\ See Letter from Michele R. Weisbaum, Vice President and 
    Associate General Counsel, Phlx, to Michael Walinskas, Senior 
    Special Counsel, Market Regulation, Commission, dated May 28, 1997 
    (``Amendment No. 2). Amendment No. 2 supersedes Amendment No. 1 with 
    regard to certain portions of the rule filing the Commission is 
    approving today by accelerated approval.
        \3\ See Letter from Diane Anderson, Vice President, Examinations 
    Department, Phlx, to Michael Walinskas, Senior Special Counsel, 
    Market Regulation, Commission, dated May 30, 1997 (``Amendment No. 
    3''). Amendment No. 3 corrects an inadvertent omission to Amendment 
    No. 2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change, including the amendments, was published 
    for comment, and partial accelerated approval of the proposal was 
    granted in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38711 (June 2, 1997).\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The Notice and Order has not been published in the Federal 
    Register as of June 11, 1997. See SEC Release No. 34-38711 for a 
    discussion of those provisions of the proposed rule change that were 
    approved in that release.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This order grants partial approval to a portion of the proposed 
    rule change.
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The fall description of the proposed rule change set forth in File 
    No. SR-Phlx-97-14 can be found in SEC Release No. 34-38711. The 
    following description covers only those sections of Rule 722 (``Rule'') 
    being approved through this order, specifically paragraph (d) of Rule 
    722--Covered Margin Accounts--Derivative Securities.
    
    Customer Margin Accounts
    
        The Exchange is proposing to rearrange Rule 722 so that all 
    provisions concerning customer margin accounts are in the same section. 
    Specific provisions relevant to options and warrants will be covered in 
    paragraph (d) of the Rule, entitled Derivative Securities.
        New proposed section (d) of Rule 722 is entitled Customer Margin 
    Accounts-Derivative Securities, and will contain all of the provisions 
    applicable to options and warrants in customer margin accounts. The 
    first paragraph of proposed Rule 722(d) states that active securities 
    dealt in on a recognized exchange will be valued at current market 
    prices but that other securities will be valued conservatively and that 
    substantial additional margin will be required where the securities are 
    unusually volatile or illiquid. This provision is being moved, 
    unchanged, from section (c)(1) of the Rule.
        The next provision of the Rule sets forth the continuing rule that 
    long positions in listed options and warrants will not have any loan 
    value for purposes of computing margin in customer accounts. It is 
    being moved from current paragraph (c)(2) and is renamed, Long 
    Positions-Listed Options and Currency, Currency Index or Stock Index 
    Warrants.
        Paragraph (d)(3) of Rule 722 restates the existing provisions of 
    current paragraph (c)(2)(B)(i) regarding short listed options and 
    warrants. The paragraph and accompanying chart sets forth the margin 
    requirements for equity options, index options, foreign currency 
    options, currency warrants, currency index warrants and stock index 
    warrants listed or traded on a national securities exchange. It is not 
    applicable to OTC options which are provided for in section (f) of the 
    rule (current subsection (ii) to paragraph (c)(2)(B) which dealt with 
    OTC options is also being deleted at this time). The one addition to 
    the existing rule is the exception for short put options that would cap 
    the margin requirement at no less than the option market value plus the 
    minimum percentage applicable to that type of option in column II of 
    the
    
    [[Page 33148]]
    
    option's aggregate exercise price amount. The purpose of this cap is to 
    assure that the margin requirement does not continue to increase as the 
    risk of the put position decreases as it becomes farther out-of-the-
    money.
        Existing paragraph (c)(2)(C) of the Rule is being renumbered as 
    (d)(4) and certain omitted words caused by typographical errors are 
    being corrected.
        The margin treatment for various related securities positions 
    involving listed options and warrants carried in a customer margin 
    account has been revised and rearranged from what is in the current 
    rule. Current paragraph (c)(2)(D) of the Rule is renumbered as 
    (d)(5)(A)(i) and entitled Straddles/Combinations. The provision has not 
    been changed and thus continues to state that where a call option 
    contract (on a stock, index or foreign currency) is carried in a short 
    position for the same customer for which a short put option is held, 
    the margin on the put or call, whichever amount is greater, plus the 
    current market value of the other option is required to be maintained. 
    The first two paragraphs of current subpart (c)(2)(F)(i) of the Rule 
    applicable to warrant straddles has been moved into this section and 
    numbered as (d)(5)(A) (ii) and (iii). Former subparagraph (E) of the 
    Rule is renumbered as (d)(5)(B) and entitled, Short option offset by 
    long option where long option expires with or after short option. The 
    substance of the section has not been changed but has been redrafted 
    for the sake of clarity and brevity. The margin treatment for spread 
    positions on stock index, currency and currency index warrants in the 
    present rule (in section (c)(2)(F)(i) is continued in section 
    (d)(5)(C). The margin treatment for covered write convertibles which 
    was formerly in subparagraph (F)(i) of the Rule will now be in 
    subparagraph (d)(5)(D) of the Rule; however, the language in that 
    section applicable to short puts will be deleted because it is covered 
    under a new subsection (d)(5)(E) which is being added for covered calls 
    and covered puts. Finally, a new provision for short equity call 
    options offset by a warrant to purchase the underlying security has 
    been added in new subsection (d)(5)(F) of the Rule. The provision, 
    which is consistent with Regulation T, requires no margin for this 
    position if the warrant to purchase the underlying security does not 
    expire on or before the expiration date of the short call, and if the 
    amount (if any) by which the exercise price of the warrant exceeds the 
    exercise price of the short call is deposited in the account.
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds the following portions of the proposed rule 
    change to be consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules 
    and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities 
    exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) 
    of the Act: \5\ proposed paragraph (d) of Rule 722, Customer Margin 
    Accounts--Derivative Securities, with the exception of Rule 
    722(d)(5)(E) Covered Calls/Covered Puts which is not being approved at 
    this time.\6\ Section 6(b)(5) requires, among other things, that the 
    Exchange have rules that are designed to promote just and equitable 
    principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the 
    mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect 
    investors and the public interest.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
        \6\ The Commission also is not approving at this time (1) 
    proposed Commentary .14 to the Rule, which addresses several items 
    regarding options specialists and market-maker permitted offsets and 
    (2) the definition of ``qualified stock basket'' in Rule 722(a)(7). 
    Collectively, these are the only portions of the filing that have 
    not been approved as of the date of this order.
        \7\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the 
    proposed rule's impact on efficiency, completion, and capital 
    formation. 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78c(f).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange is proposing to rearrange Rule 722 so that all 
    provisions concerning customer margin accounts are in the same section. 
    Specific provisions relevants to options and warrants will be covered 
    in paragraph (d) of the Rule entitled Derivative Securities. These 
    changes are non-substantive and reasonable.
        New proposed section (d) of Rule 722 is entitled Customer Margin 
    Accounts-Derivative Securities, and will contain all of the provisions 
    applicable to options and warrants in customer margin accounts. The 
    first paragraph states that active securities dealt in on a recognized 
    exchange will be valued at current market prices but that other 
    securities will be valued conservatively and that substantial 
    additional margin will be required where the securities are unusually 
    volatitle or illiquid. This provision is being moved, unchanged, from 
    section (c)(1), and, accordingly, raises no new regulatory issues. The 
    Commission finds the relocation of this provision to be reasonable.
        The next provision of the Rule is being moved from current 
    paragraph (c)(2) and is renamed, Long Positions-Listed Options and 
    Currency, Currency Index or Stock Index Warrants. This provision is 
    also unchanged and, accordingly, raises no new regulatory issues, and 
    is reasonable.
        Paragraph (d)(3) of the Rule restates the existing provisions of 
    current paragraph (c)(2)(B)(i) regarding short listed options and 
    warrants. The only addition to the existing rule is the exception for 
    short put options that would cap the margin requirement at no less than 
    the option market value plus the minimum percentage applicable to that 
    type of option in column III of the option's aggregate exercise price 
    amount. The Exchange states that the purpose of this cap is to assure 
    that the margin requirement does not continue to increase as the risk 
    of the put position decreases as it becomes farther out-of-the-money. 
    The changes to this provision are substantially identical to changes 
    adopted by the other options exchanges recently, and, accordingly, the 
    Commission finds it reasonable for Phlx to adopt this provision.\8\ 
    Existing paragraph (c)(2)(C) of the Rule is being renumbered as 
    paragraph (d)(4) and certain omitted words caused by typographical 
    errors are being corrected. It is not the intention of Phlx to change 
    the meaning of this provisions and, accordingly, this change raises no 
    new regulatory issues. The Commission finds the adoption of this 
    provision reasonable.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ See, e.g., SEC Release No. 34-38709 (June 2, 1997) approving 
    changes to the Chicago Board Options Exchange's (``CBOE'') margin 
    rules.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Current paragraph (c)(2)(D) of the Rule is renumbered as 
    (d)(5)(A)(i) and entitled Straddles/Combinations. The first two 
    paragraphs of current subpart (c)(2)(F)(i) of the Rule applicable to 
    warrant straddles has been moved into this section and numbered as 
    (d)(5)(A) (ii) and (iii). The provisions have not been changed and 
    therefore raise no new regulatory issues. The Commission finds the 
    relocation of these provisions to be reasonable.
        Former subparagraph (E) of the Rule is renumbered as (d)(5)(B) and 
    entitled, Short option offset by long option where long option expires 
    with or after short option. The Exchange states that the substance of 
    the section has not been changed but has been redrafted for the sake of 
    clarity and brevity. The Commission concurs that the provision is 
    substantially identical to a similar provision contained in the CBOE's 
    rules.\9\ Accordingly, the change raises no new regulatory issues and 
    is reasonable.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ See CBOE Rule 12.3(c)(5)(B)(3).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The margin treatment for spread positions on stock index, currency 
    and currency index warrants in the present rule (in section 
    (c)(2)(F)(i)) is continued in section (d)(5)(C) of the Rule. This 
    section has not been changed, and,
    
    [[Page 33149]]
    
    accordingly, raises no new regulatory issues. The Commission finds the 
    provision to be reasonable.
        The margin treatment for covered write convertibles which was 
    formerly in subparagraph (F)(i) of the Rule will now be in (d)(5)(D) of 
    the Rule; however, the language in that section applicable to short 
    puts is being deleted because it will be covered under proposed 
    subsection (E) relating to covered calls and covered puts. Subparagraph 
    (d)(5)(D) is not being changed substantively and raises no new 
    regulatory issues. The Commission finds it reasonable for the Exchange 
    to delete the language relating to short puts from this subparagraph, 
    but notes that proposed subsection (E) is not being approved at this 
    time.
        Finally, a new provision for short equity call options offset by a 
    warrant to purchase the underlying security has been added in new 
    subsection (d)(5)(F). The proposed treatment for a short listed call 
    covered by a warrant is new to Rule 722 but it is substantially similar 
    with the current treatment under Regulation T, 12 CFR 220.4(b) and, 
    accordingly, is reasonable.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ The Commission notes that other exchanges have recently 
    adopted identical provisions. See, e.g., SEC Release 34-38709 (June 
    2, 1997).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the portions of the 
    proposed rule change discussed above prior to the thirtieth day after 
    the date of publication thereof in the Federal Register.\11\ The 
    portions of the filing approved today are either (1) non-substantive 
    changes that move or consolidate existing Phlx margin provisions or (2) 
    nearly identical to provisions contained in the existing margin rules 
    of the CBOE. Together, the changes make Phlx's margin provisions easier 
    to understand and more uniform with the margin provisions of the other 
    options exchanges.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ The Commission invited interested persons to submit written 
    data, views and arguments concerning the proposed rule change and 
    amendments in SEC Release 34-38711 (June 2, 1997). See, IV 
    Solicitation of Comments.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\12\ that the portions of the proposed rule change and amendments 
    (SR-Phlx-97-14) relating to proposed Rule 722, paragraph (d), Customer 
    Margin Accounts--Derivative Securities (with the exception of proposed 
    paragraph (d)(5)(E)) are approved.
    
        \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-15889 Filed 6-17-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/18/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-15889
Pages:
33147-33149 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-38735, File No. SR-Phlx-97-14
PDF File:
97-15889.pdf