99-15487. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Increasing the Maximum Order Size on the Dow Jones High Yield Select 10 Index Eligible for Automatic Execution  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 32906-32907]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-15487]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-41509; File No. SR-CBOE-99-06]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. Increasing the 
    Maximum Order Size on the Dow Jones High Yield Select 10 Index Eligible 
    for Automatic Execution
    
    June 10, 1999.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On February 10, 1999, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. 
    (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to increase the maximum size of 
    orders on the Dow Jones High Yield Select 10 Index eligible for 
    automatic execution. Notice of the proposed rule change appeared in the 
    Federal Register on May 10, 1999.\3\ The Commission received no 
    comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41357 (April 30, 
    1999), 64 FR 25091.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The Exchange proposes to add an interpretation to CBOE Rule 6.8 
    allowing the appropriate Floor Procedure Committee (``FPC'') to 
    increase the maximum size of orders on the Dow Jones High Yield Select 
    10 Index (``Index'') \4\ eligible for execution through the CBOE's 
    Retail Automated Execution System (``RAES'') from 20 to 100 contracts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The Index is comprised of the ten highest yielding stocks 
    from the Dow Jones Industrial Average. See Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 39453 (December 6, 1997), 62 FR 67101 (December 23, 
    1997).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange believes that the proposal will enhance the depth and 
    liquidity of the market for options on the Index.\5\ Additionally, the 
    Exchange believes that the proposal will increase the number of timely 
    and cost-effective executions, enhance information gathering through 
    the audit trail, enhance fill reporting and price reporting, increase 
    customer confidence, and increase the efficiency in handling non-RAES 
    orders by reducing the number of transactions executed manually on the 
    trading floor.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ The Exchange expects that increasing the order size limit to 
    up to 100 contracts for Index options will enhance liquidity by 
    accommodating through RAES larger institutional and public customer 
    orders for Index options. Telephone conversation between Debora E. 
    Barnes, Senior Attorney, CBOE, and John C. Roeser, Attorney, 
    Division of Market Regulation, Commission, on March 16, 1999.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Discussion
    
        After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
    regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\6\ 
    In particular, the Commission believes that the proposal is consistent 
    with Section 6(b)(5),\7\ in that it is designed to promote just and
    
    [[Page 32907]]
    
    equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
    with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to 
    remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
    market and a national market system. Specifically, the Commission finds 
    that the proposal will facilitate transactions in securities and 
    protect investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that 
    increasing to up to 100 the maximum number of options contracts on the 
    Index executable through RAES should enable the Exchange to more 
    effectively and efficiently manage order flow in options on the Index 
    consistent with its obligations under the Act. Further, the Commission 
    believes that the RAES order size limit of 100 contracts for the Index 
    should result in the efficient and timely execution of customer orders. 
    The Commission notes that it has approved similar proposals by the 
    Exchange increasing the number of option contracts eligible for 
    automatic execution to a maximum of 100 contracts.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the 
    proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 
    formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
        \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38169 (January 14, 
    1997), 62 FR 3547 (January 23, 1997) (order approving an increase to 
    the maximum size of interest rate option orders eligible for 
    automatic execution to up to 100 contracts); Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 39202 (October 3, 1997), 62 FR 53358 (October 14, 1997) 
    (order approving proposal to allow the Exchange discretion to set 
    the eligible order size for RAES orders to up to 100 contracts for 
    options on the Dow Jones Industrial Average).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Based on representations from the CBOE, the Commission believes 
    that increasing the size of orders on the Index eligible for execution 
    through RAES will not expose the CBOE's options markets to risk of 
    failure or operational breakdown. Specifically, the CBOE represents 
    that the proposal will not impose any significant burden on the 
    operation, security, integrity, or capacity of RAES.
    
    IV. Conclusion
    
        For the foregoing reasons, the Commission believes that the 
    proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and 
    regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, 
    and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(5).\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-99-06) is approved.
    
        \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-15487 Filed 6-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/18/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-15487
Pages:
32906-32907 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-41509, File No. SR-CBOE-99-06
PDF File:
99-15487.pdf