99-15512. Listing of Color Additives For Coloring Meniscal Tacks; D&C Violet No. 2  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 32803-32805]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-15512]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 74
    
    [Docket No. 98C-0158]
    
    
    Listing of Color Additives For Coloring Meniscal Tacks; D&C 
    Violet No. 2
    
    Agency:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    Action: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the color 
    additive regulations to provide for the safe use of D&C Violet No. 2 to 
    color absorbable meniscal tacks made from poly(L-lactic acid). This 
    action responds to a petition filed by Linvatec Corp.
    
    DATES: This regulation is effective July 20, 1999; except as to any 
    provisions that may be stayed by the filing of proper objections; 
    written objections and requests for a hearing by July 19, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written objections to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
    Rockville, MD 20852.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen M. Waldron, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 
    200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3089.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        In a notice published in the Federal Register of March 13, 1998 (63 
    FR 12473), FDA announced that a color additive petition (CAP 8C0255) 
    had been filed by Linvatec Corp., P.O. Box 2917, Largo, FL 33779-2917. 
    The petition proposed to amend the color additive regulations in 
    Sec. 74.3602 D&C Violet No. 2 (21 CFR 74.3602) to provide for the safe 
    use of D&C Violet No. 2 to color absorbable meniscal tacks made from 
    poly(L-lactic acid). The petition was filed under section 721(d)(1) of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 
    379e(d)(1)).
    
    [[Page 32804]]
    
    II. Regulatory History
    
        The regulatory history of D&C Violet No. 2 was summarized in a 
    final rule published in the Federal Register of May 7, 1990 (55 FR 
    18865). Since the publication of the May 7, 1990, final rule, other 
    uses of D&C Violet No. 2 have been approved by the agency. For example, 
    in a final rule published in the Federal Register on April 23, 1998 (63 
    FR 20096), FDA amended Sec. 74.3602 to list D&C Violet No. 2 as a color 
    additive in glycolide/dioxanone/trimethylene carbonate tripolymer 
    absorbable sutures for use in general surgery.
    
    III. Applicability of the Act
    
        With the passage of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (Pub. L. 
    94-295), Congress mandated the listing of color additives for use in 
    medical devices when the color additive in the device comes into direct 
    contact with the body for a significant period of time (section 721(a) 
    of the act). D&C Violet No. 2 is added to absorbable meniscal tacks 
    made from poly(L-lactic acid) in such a way that at least some of the 
    color additive will come into contact with the body when the tacks are 
    in place. In addition, the meniscal tacks are intended to be absorbed 
    by the body, and during the absorption, the color additive will be 
    deposited in body tissue. Thus, the color additive will be in direct 
    contact with the body for a significant period of time. Consequently, 
    the petitioned use of the color additive is subject to the statutory 
    listing requirement.
    
    IV. The Color Additive
    
        D&C Violet No. 2 is principally 1-hydroxy-4-[(4-
    methylphenyl)amino]-9,10-anthracenedione (CAS Reg. No. 81-48-1). It is 
    manufactured by either condensation of quinizarin with p-toluidine or 
    by condensation of 1-hydroxy-halogenoanthroquinone with p-toluidine. 
    Because no chemical reaction consumes all the starting materials and 
    yields only the desired product, both the resulting reaction mixture 
    and commercial product will contain residual amounts of the starting 
    materials, including p-toluidine. This fact is significant because 
    Weisburger et al., have demonstrated that p-toluidine is a carcinogen 
    in the mouse (Ref. 1).
        Residual amounts of reactants, such as p-toluidine, and 
    manufacturing aids are commonly found as impurities in chemical 
    products, including color additives.
    
    V. Determination of Safety
    
        Under the general safety standard of the act (section 721(b)(4)) 
    for color additives, a color additive cannot be approved for a 
    particular use unless a fair evaluation of the data available to FDA 
    establishes that the color additive is safe for that use. FDA's color 
    additive regulations (21 CFR 70.3(i)) define ``safe'' as ``reasonable 
    certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of the color 
    additive.''
        The color additives anticancer, or Delaney, clause of the color 
    additive amendments (section 721(b)(5)(B)) provides that no noningested 
    color additive shall be deemed safe and shall be listed if, after tests 
    that are appropriate for evaluating the safety of the additive for such 
    use, it is found to induce cancer in man or animal. Importantly, 
    however, the Delaney clause applies to the additive itself and not to 
    impurities in the additive. That is, where an additive itself has not 
    been shown to cause cancer, but contains a carcinogenic impurity, the 
    additive is properly evaluated under the general safety standard using 
    risk assessment procedures to determine whether there is reasonable 
    certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of the 
    additive (Scott v. FDA, 728 F.2d 322 (6th Cir. 1984)).
    
    VI. Safety of The Petitioned Use of The Additive
    
        FDA estimates that the petitioned use of the additive, D&C Violet 
    No. 2, will result in exposure to no greater than 105 microgram 
    (g) per person over a 70-year lifetime or an estimated daily 
    intake (EDI) of 4 nanograms per person per day (ng/p/d) (Ref. 2).
        FDA does not ordinarily consider chronic toxicological studies to 
    be necessary to determine the safety of an additive whose use will 
    result in such low exposure levels (Ref. 3), and the agency has not 
    required such testing here. However, the agency has reviewed the 
    available toxicological data on the additive and concludes that the 
    estimated small daily exposure resulting from the proposed use of this 
    additive is safe.
        FDA has evaluated the safety of this additive under the general 
    safety standard, considering all available data and using risk 
    assessment procedures to estimate the upper-bound limit of lifetime 
    human risk presented by p-toluidine, the carcinogenic chemical that may 
    be present as an impurity in the additive. The risk evaluation of p-
    toluidine has two aspects: (1) Assessment of exposure to the impurity 
    from the proposed use of the additive, and (2) extrapolation of the 
    risk observed in the animal bioassay to the conditions of exposure to 
    humans.
    
    A. p-Toluidine
    
        FDA has estimated the lifetime exposure to p-toluidine from the 
    petitioned use of D&C Violet No. 2 in absorbable meniscal tacks made 
    from poly(L-lactic acid) to be no more than 0.008 ng/p/d (Ref. 4). The 
    agency used data from a long-term rodent bioassay on p-toluidine 
    conducted by Weisburger et al. (Ref. 1), to estimate the upper-bound 
    limit of lifetime human risk from exposure to this chemical resulting 
    from the proposed use of the additive. The authors reported that the 
    rodent bioassay showed that the test material caused an increased 
    incidence of hepatomas (liver tumors).
        Based on the agency's estimate that exposure to p-toluidine will 
    not exceed 0.008 ng/p/d, FDA estimates that the upper-bound limit of 
    lifetime human risk from the petitioned use of the subject additive is 
    5.3 x 10-13 or 5.3 in 10 trillion (Ref. 4). Because of the 
    numerous conservative assumptions used in calculating the exposure 
    estimate, the actual lifetime-averaged individual exposure to p-
    toluidine is likely to be substantially less than the estimated 
    exposure, and therefore, the probable lifetime human risk would be less 
    than the upper-bound limit of lifetime human risk. Thus, the agency 
    concludes that there is reasonable certainty that no harm from exposure 
    to p-toluidine would result from the proposed use of the additive.
    
    B. Specifications
    
        The agency also has considered whether specifications are necessary 
    to control the amount of p-toluidine present as an impurity in D&C 
    Violet No. 2. The additive is currently produced as a certified color 
    additive for use in externally applied drugs and cosmetics, in sutures, 
    and in contact lenses in accordance with 21 CFR part 80. Based upon the 
    low level of exposure to p-toluidine that results under the current 
    specifications for D&C Violet No. 2 in Sec. 74.1602 (21 CFR 74.1602), 
    the agency concludes that the specifications listed in Sec. 74.1602 are 
    adequate to ensure the safe use of this color additive and to control 
    the amount of p-toluidine that may exist as an impurity in the color 
    additive when used in absorbable meniscal tacks made from poly(L-lactic 
    acid).
    
    VII. Conclusions on Safety
    
        FDA has evaluated the data and information in the petition and 
    other relevant material. Based on this information the agency concludes 
    that: (1) The proposed use of D&C Violet No. 2, at a level not to 
    exceed 0.15 percent
    
    [[Page 32805]]
    
    by weight of the tack material, for coloring absorbable meniscal tacks 
    made from poly(L-lactic acid) is safe; and (2) the color additive will 
    achieve its intended coloring effect, and thus, is suitable for this 
    use. Further, the agency concludes that the color additive regulations 
    in Sec. 74.3602 should be amended as set forth below.
    
    VIII. Inspection of Documents
    
        In accordance with Sec. 71.15 (21 CFR 71.15), the petition and the 
    documents that FDA considered and relied upon in reaching its decision 
    to approve the petition are available for inspection at the Center for 
    Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (address above) by appointment with 
    the information contact person listed above. As provided in Sec. 71.15, 
    the agency will delete from the documents any materials that are not 
    available for public disclosure before making the documents available 
    for inspection.
    
    IX. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has previously considered the potential environmental 
    effects of this rule as announced in the notice of filing for the 
    petition (63 FR 12473, March 13, 1998). No new information or comments 
    have been received that would affect the agency's previous 
    determination that there is no significant impact on the human 
    environment and that an environmental impact statement is not required.
    
    X. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    
        This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, 
    clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
    
    XI. Objections
    
        Any person who will be adversely affected by this regulation may at 
    any time on or before July 19, 1999, file with the Dockets Management 
    Branch (address above) written objections thereto. Each objection shall 
    be separately numbered, and each numbered objection shall specify with 
    particularity the provisions of the regulation to which objection is 
    made and the grounds for the objection. Each numbered objection on 
    which a hearing is requested shall specifically so state. Failure to 
    request a hearing for any particular objection shall constitute a 
    waiver of the right to a hearing on that objection. Each numbered 
    objection for which a hearing is requested shall include a detailed 
    description and analysis of the specific factual information intended 
    to be presented in support of the objection in the event that a hearing 
    is held. Failure to include such a description and analysis for any 
    particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to a 
    hearing on the objection. Three copies of all documents shall be 
    submitted and shall be identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document. Any objections received in 
    response to the regulation may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    XII. References
    
        The following references have been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) and may be seen by interested persons 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        1. Weisburger, E. K. et al., ``Testing of Twenty-one 
    Environmental Aromatic Amines or Derivatives for Long-Term 
    Toxicology or Carcinogenicity,'' Journal of Environmental Pathology 
    and Toxicology, 2:325-356, 1978.
        2. Memorandum from the Division of Product Manufacture and Use, 
    Chemistry Review Team (FDA), to the Division of Product Policy 
    (FDA), concerning ``CAP 8C0255 (MATS M2.0 & 2.1): Linvatec, Inc. 
    (Submission of 28 January, 1998). Petition for the Safe Use of of 
    [sic] D&C Violet #2 to Tint Poly(L-lactic acid) Meniscal Taks.'' 
    dated April 13, 1998.
        3. Kokoski, C. J., ``Regulatory Food Additive Toxicology'' in 
    Chemical Safety Regulation and Compliance, edited by F. Homburger 
    and J. K. Marquis, published by S. Karger, New York, NY, pp. 24-33, 
    1985.
        4. Memorandum from Division of Petition Control (FDA), to 
    Executive Secretary, Quantitative Risk Assessment Committee (FDA), 
    concerning ``Estimate of the Upper Bound Lifetime Risk From p-
    toluidine in D&C Violet No. 2 Used as a Color Additive for Meniscal 
    Tacks Made from Poly(L-lactic acid): CAP 8C0255,'' dated September 
    28, 1998.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 74
    
        Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
    74 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 74--LISTING OF COLOR ADDITIVES SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 74 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355, 
    361, 362, 371, 379e.
    
        2. Section 74.3602 is amended by redesignating paragraph (b)(4) as 
    paragraph (b)(5) and by adding new paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 74.3602  D&C Violet No. 2.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (4) The color additive, D&C Violet No. 2, may be safely used for 
    coloring absorbable meniscal tacks made from poly (L-lactic acid) at a 
    level not to exceed 0.15 percent by weight of the tack material.
    * * * * *
    
        Dated: June 3, 1999.
    Margaret M. Dotzel,
    Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    [FR Doc. 99-15512 Filed 6-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/20/1999
Published:
06/18/1999
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-15512
Dates:
This regulation is effective July 20, 1999; except as to any provisions that may be stayed by the filing of proper objections; written objections and requests for a hearing by July 19, 1999.
Pages:
32803-32805 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98C-0158
PDF File:
99-15512.pdf
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 74.3602