[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 117 (Monday, June 19, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32046-32084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-14817]
[[Page 32045]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part II
Department of Health and Human Services
_______________________________________________________________________
Administration for Children and Families
_______________________________________________________________________
Developmental Disabilities; Availability of Financial Assistance for
Projects of National Significance for Fiscal Year 1995; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 1995 /
Notices
[[Page 32046]]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
(Program Announcement No. 93631-95-02)
Developmental Disabilities: Availability of Financial Assistance
for Projects of National Significance for Fiscal Year 1995
AGENCY: Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD),
Administration for Children and Families (ACF).
ACTION: Announcement of availability of financial assistance for
Projects of National Significance for fiscal year 1995.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration on Developmental Disabilities,
Administration for Children and Families, announces that applications
are being accepted for funding of Fiscal Year 1995 Projects of National
Significance.
This program announcement consists of five parts. Part I, the
Introduction, discusses the goals and objectives of ACF and ADD. Part
II provides the necessary background information on ADD for applicants.
Part III describes the review process. Part IV describes the priorities
under which ADD solicits applications for Fiscal Year 1995 funding of
projects. Part V describes in detail how to prepare and submit an
application. All of the forms and instructions necessary to submit an
application are published as part of this announcement following Part
V.
No separate application kit is either necessary or available for
submitting an application. If you have a copy of this announcement, you
have all the information and forms required to submit an application.
Grants will be awarded under this program announcement subject to
the availability of funds for support of these activities.
DATES: The closing date for submittal of applications under this
announcement is August 3, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Applications should be mailed to: Department of Health and
Human Services, ACF/Division of Discretionary Grants, Sixth Floor, 370
L'Enfant Promenade SW, Washington, DC 20447, Attn: 93.631 ADD--Projects
of National Significance.
Hand-delivered applications are accepted during the normal working
hours of 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, on or prior to the
established closing date at: Administration for Children and Families,
Division of Discretionary Grants, 6th Floor OFM/DDG, 901 D Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20447.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adele Gorelick, Program Development
Division, Administration on Developmental Disabilities, (202) 690-5982.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Part I. Introduction
A. Goals of the Administration on Developmental Disabilities
The Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) is located
within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Department
of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Although different from the other
ACF program administrations in the specific populations it serves, ADD
shares a common set of goals that promote the economic and social well-
being of families, children, individuals and communities. Through
national leadership, ACF and ADD envision:
Families and individuals empowered to increase their own
economic independence and productivity;
Strong, healthy, supportive communities having a positive
impact on the quality of life and the development of children;
Partnerships with individuals, front-line service
providers, communities, States and Congress that enable solutions which
transcend traditional agency boundaries;
Services planned and integrated to improve client access;
and
A strong commitment to working with Native Americans,
persons with developmental disabilities, refugees and migrants to
address their needs, strengths and abilities.
A community-based approach that recognizes and expands on
the resources and benefits of diversity. Emphasis on these goals and
progress toward them will help more individuals, including people with
developmental disabilities, to live productive and independent lives
integrated into their communities. The Projects of National
Significance Program is one means through which ADD promotes the
achievement of these goals.
B. Purpose of the Administration on Developmental Disabilities
The Administration on Developmental Disabilities (ADD) is the lead
agency within ACF and DHHS responsible for planning and administering
programs which promote the self-sufficiency and protect the rights of
persons with developmental disabilities.
The Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act
(42 U.S.C. 6000, et seq.) (the Act) supports and provides assistance to
States and public and private nonprofit agencies and organizations to
assure that individuals with developmental disabilities and their
families participate in the design of and have access to culturally
competent services, supports, and other assistance and opportunities
that promote independence, productivity and integration and inclusion
into the community.
The Act points out that:
Disability is a natural part of the human experience that
does not diminish the right of individuals with developmental
disabilities to enjoy the opportunity for independence, productivity
and inclusion into the community;
Individuals whose disabilities occur during their
developmental period frequently have severe disabilities that are
likely to continue indefinitely;
Individuals with developmental disabilities often require
lifelong specialized services and assistance, provided in a coordinated
and culturally competent manner by many agencies, professionals,
advocates, community representatives, and others to eliminate barriers
and to meet the needs of such individuals and their families; The Act
further finds that:
Individuals with developmental disabilities, including
those with the most severe developmental disabilities, are capable of
achieving independence, productivity, and integration and inclusion
into the community, and often require the provision of services,
supports and other assistance to achieve such;
Individuals with developmental disabilities have
competencies, capabilities and personal goals that should be
recognized, supported, and encouraged, and any assistance to such
individuals should be provided in an individualized manner, consistent
with the unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
and capabilities of the individual;
Individuals with developmental disabilities and their
families are the primary decision makers regarding the services and
supports such individuals and their families receive; and play decision
making roles in policies and programs that affect the lives of such
individuals and their families; and
It is in the nation's interest for people with
developmental disabilities to be employed, and to live
[[Page 32047]] conventional and independent lives as a part of families
and communities.
Toward these ends, ADD seeks to enhance the capabilities
of families in assisting people with developmental disabilities to
achieve their maximum potential to support the increasing ability of
people with developmental disabilities to exercise greater choice and
self-determination; to engage in leadership activities in their
communities; as well as to ensure the protection of their legal and
human rights.
Programs funded under the Act are:
Federal assistance to State developmental disabilities
councils;
State system for the protection and advocacy of individual
rights;
Grants to University Affiliated Programs for
interdisciplinary training, exemplary services, technical assistance,
and information dissemination; and
Grants for Projects of National Significance.
Part II. Background Information
A. Description of Projects of National Significance
Under Part E of the Act, grants and contracts are awarded for
projects of national significance that support the development of
national and State policy to enhance the independence, productivity,
and integration and inclusion of individuals with developmental
disabilities through:
Data collection and analysis;
Technical assistance to enhance the quality of State
developmental disabilities councils, protection and advocacy systems,
and university affiliated programs; and
Other projects of sufficient size and scope that hold
promise to expand or improve opportunities for people with
developmental disabilities, including:
--Technical assistance for the development of information and referral
systems;
--Educating policy makers;
--Federal interagency initiatives;
--The enhancement of participation of minority and ethnic groups in
public and private sector initiatives in developmental disabilities;
--Transition of youth with developmental disabilities from school to
adult life; and
--Special pilots and evaluation studies to explore the expansion of
programs under part B (State developmental disabilities councils) to
individuals with severe disabilities other than developmental
disabilities.
B. Comments on FY 1995 Proposed Priority Areas
The notice soliciting comments on the FY 1995 proposed priority
areas was published in the Federal Register on January 11, 1995 (60 FR
2760). A 60-day period was required to allow the public to comment on
the proposed areas. After review and analysis of these comments, ADD is
publishing its final priorities in this announcement.
The public comment notice requested specific comments and
suggestions on the proposed funding priorities, in addition to
recommendations for additional priority areas which would assist in
bringing about the increased independence, productivity, and
integration into the community of people with developmental
disabilities.
ADD received a total of 62 letters and 193 inquiries by the closing
date in response to the public comment notice. Commentary was from the
following sources:
Advocacy agencies, which includes national organizations
and associations, national advocacy groups and State/local advocacy
groups;
Service organizations, which includes agencies that
provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities as
well as providing advocacy services on behalf of a particular
disability, including developmental disabilities councils;
Educational systems, which includes schools, colleges, and
universities, programs located within a university setting and
University Affiliated Programs;
Private agencies, which includes national, State, and
local nonprofit organizations;
Government agencies, which includes Federal, State,
county, and local government agencies;
Private individuals; and
Foundations.
The comments ranged from requests for copies of the final
application solicitation to general support to substantive, insightful
responses for this year's proposed funding priorities and
recommendations for other priority areas. The vast majority were
supportive of and expanded upon what we proposed in the announcement,
in addition to relating specifically to the program goals and
priorities of the particular agencies submitting the comments.
The comments received were helpful in highlighting the concerns of
the developmental disabilities field and have been used in refining the
final priority areas.
Comment: Six letters were submitted to ADD recommending additional
funding priorities for FY 1995. Suggestions included projects
addressing the need for accessible and inclusive programs within the
developmental disabilities network; the needs of aging persons with
developmental disabilities and their families, especially those in
rural areas; the need for research and training on Abusive Head Trauma,
which includes Shaken Baby Syndrome; and transportation needs related
to accessing jobs and services. There was a recommendation for priority
areas for potential grantees to propose their own issues and for small,
grassroots organizations to have the opportunity to develop their own
solutions in their local communities.
Response: ADD continues to press for accessible and inclusive
programs and project products. Through funding criteria, site visits,
and monitoring of reports this principle is conveyed and its
implementation evaluated.
ADD has funded projects related to aging in the past and continues
to support projects and activities in this area through the University
Affiliated Program. We share concerns that were expressed about the
aging of individuals with developmental disabilities, which is
reflected in our mission to promote the independence, productivity,
integration, and inclusion of all people with developmental
disabilities in their communities.
ADD will consult with the Administration on Aging and others to
identify the need and opportunity for future focused efforts in this
area.
We welcome the sharing of information with regard to medical
conditions having implications for projects addressing abuse, violence,
the need for early assessments and intervention, and family-centered
approaches. The specifics regarding Abusive Head Trauma, Shaken Baby
Syndrome, and Failure-to-Thrive will be included in appropriate
priority areas.
ADD sees the element of transportation as a crucial factor in the
success of any program. In stressing outcome-oriented approaches and
ongoing mechanisms for evaluation and identification of barriers, ADD
will include transportation concerns.
ADD is committed to inclusion and input from advocates and
grassroots efforts. It has funded projects to strengthen families
through national and grassroots strategies, partnerships in
policymaking, and People First self-advocacy. Future priority areas
will include opportunities for design options and local community
initiatives.
ADD appreciates the suggestions for additional priority areas. With
the [[Page 32048]] proposed fiscal year 1995 priority areas we have
developed our most extensive array of project possibilities and will
make concentrated efforts to support effective work in these areas. The
suggestions have been considered significant and have been incorporated
where appropriate.
Comment: ADD received 8 comments on Proposed Priority Area 1,
Collaboration Between Youth Service Providers and Disabilities
Advocates to Enhance Services to Youth With Developmental Disabilities.
There was strong support for collaborative efforts, including memoranda
of understanding and fiscal participation, and a recommendation to
expand the scope of this priority area. Suggestions included language
regarding information sharing and networking efforts that include all
stakeholders, the identification of barriers, and the development of
materials and strategies and the resources of technology and assistive
devices.
One comment urged inclusion of the capability to address and
correct the breakdown in the school-to-work transition process and
another stressed the importance of completing school as imperative for
employment.
A comment from one State was that there was only minuscule risk in
that particular State of youth with developmental disabilities running
away or becoming involved with delinquent behavior.
Response: ADD is committed to collaborative efforts whenever
possible, with or without fiscal participation, and we feel the focus
of this priority area is appropriate at this time. It builds on the
Family and Youth Services Bureau efforts with respect to at-risk youth
and expands to include ADD's concerns. Prevention of and response to
these issues will in fact necessitate a holistic approach.
Both agencies regard employment as a major goal, which must be
addressed much earlier in the school experience than has been done, as
well as attention to the principles of the Americans with Disabilities
Act. The comments on project criteria contributed an appreciated
refinement of announcement language.
As for the numbers of youth at risk, ADD feels strongly that such
youth with developmental disabilities are particularly vulnerable and
inadequately served. It is therefore essential that we explore and
devise models which hold more promise for these young people.
Comment: ADD received 14 comments on Proposed Priority Area 2,
Americans With Developmental Disabilities and the Criminal Justice
System. The comments received in this priority area were supportive of
what ADD proposed in the published notice. There was strong support for
programs to institute ongoing training for law enforcement and court
personnel and to address prevention strategies as well. Involving self-
advocates was strongly urged as essential, with projects directed by
self-advocates and conducted by and through organizations of self-
advocates in collaboration with the developmental disabilities network.
One comment noted that this area would not impact a large segment of
the population of the writer's State.
It was also suggested that there be a component emphasizing the
need for mental health services to children in the criminal justice
system. Other comments recommended funding for the transition from
incarceration to the community, the inclusion of legal and safety
concerns during enforcement, training with respect to impaired judgment
resulting from fetal alcohol syndrome, and a study of the factors
contributing to delinquency.
Response: ADD is committed to supporting leadership and direction
by self-advocates, whose experience and perspective will ensure
effective projects, a major goal along with ongoing and replicable
projects. The specific concerns regarding mental health and transition
to the community will clearly be identified in a required analysis of
barriers to effective programs and desirable outcomes. ADD hopes to
address these components in future PNS projects.
Medical issues should be an element of any proposed project so that
justice system personnel are aware of symptoms and of indications of
abuse and violence as well as substance abuse. As for the suggested
numbers of individuals who may be impacted by the issues of this
priority area in a particular State, ADD reiterates its commitment to
the vulnerable individuals with developmental disabilities and to the
inadequately served among them.
Comment: ADD received 11 comments on Proposed Priority Area 3,
First Jobs--Introducing Young Persons With/Without Developmental
Disabilities to the World of Work and Community Service. There was
strong support for moving from segregated work settings to supported
employment programs and a comment urging that individuals with the most
severe disabilities who have not benefitted from supported employment
not be ignored and remain unserved. There was support for ADD's
approach with regard to its Americorps projects, which include
individuals with and without disabilities, and for collaboration among
nonprofit agencies, Head Start, Vocational Rehabilitation, the Job
Training Partnership Act Program (JTPA), and other public resources.
Meaningful vocational assessments and a focus on consumer choice and
quality of life were stressed, as was the importance of planning and
partnerships so that first jobs lead to second jobs and ultimate career
paths. One commenter had concerns about the Jobs Opportunities and
Basic Skills (JOBS) program and training for JOBS staff unaccustomed to
working with individuals with developmental disabilities, about the
necessary long-term investment, and about funding for modifications to
automated systems.
Comments from individuals involved concerns regarding personal
assistance services. There was also a suggestion that this priority
area be combined with the priority area for youth at risk for running
away who need access to supports and services which lead to
independence. Another suggestion was that people with developmental
disabilities receive training to be personal assistants.
Response: ADD is in agreement with the movement toward a cultural
shift to recognition of abilities and choice and away from control of
employment resources by providers of employment and vocational
services. We feel the community as a whole benefits from inclusion of
individuals with developmental disabilities in the workplace. The
benefits of diversity are seen in supported employment, which includes
the development of natural supports reflecting participation of all co-
workers.
Collaborative linkages are also critical as we strive to expand
access to earlier educational/vocational experiences for children and
youth with disabilities. Maximum efforts should be made to assure that
individuals with the most severe disabilities are afforded these
essential opportunities. Consideration of assistive technology,
transportation needs, and accommodations for personal assistance
services are essential components.
While there is some overlap with the issues addressed in Priority
Area 1, ADD intends to fund each of these areas with their particular
foci and demonstrate its commitment to contributions to the community
that individuals with developmental disabilities make. ADD would
consider, however, funding projects which effectively address essential
requirements of both areas. [[Page 32049]]
Comment: ADD received 18 comments on Proposed Priority Area 4,
Child Care and Early Intervention: Linkages for Successful Inclusion of
Young Children With Disabilities. All were supportive and many offered
recommendations for project design or additional components. There were
suggestions for including effective advocacy strategies and protection
of ADA rights, for addressing the needs of children with severe
disabilities, for training on the condition of nonorganic failure to
thrive as well as the sequelae of Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head
Trauma, for prevention of secondary disabilities, and for broadening
the priority to include life-span services and ``seamless'' interagency
collaboration.
There were also recommendations for inclusion of training for staff
in after-school programs, assistive technology, and systems conversion.
Because of high staff turnover there is a need for ongoing program
support, possibly through mentorship, and there is good opportunity for
young adults with disabilities to work as educational aides.
There were requests that preference be given to projects addressing
the needs of families with low income or living in poverty, migrant
families, and homeless families, with a specific suggestion that the
Early Prevention, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program be
utilized.
There were several comments urging attention to multicultural
issues and the need for early intervention with respect to children
with developmental disabilities at risk for delinquent behavior. Also
suggested was establishment of a national task force to assist states
and local communities in implementing policies and services and
combining this priority area with Children at Risk: The Impact of Abuse
and Violence on Children with Disabilities.
Response: ADD was pleased to see the point made that the experience
of inclusion has benefits for children with and without disabilities.
The community benefits of diversity are an ongoing focus of ADD. We are
also committed to the development of tools and strategies for the
implementation of the ADA for all children, with focused attention on
those who have been unserved and inadequately served, such as
individuals with severe disabilities, families with low income or
living in poverty, migrant or homeless families, those living in rural
areas, and immigrant and refugee families.
We appreciate the information and suggestions regarding failure to
thrive, Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma, and prevention
concerns, which will be incorporated in appropriate priority areas, as
well as attention to after-school personnel and the implementation of
assistive technology. We have introduced the collaboration of
individuals with and without disabilities in projects with the Family
and Youth Services Bureau and our Americorps projects.
ADD will fund separate projects under the youth service providers
and disabilities advocates and abuse and violence priority areas. As
for a focus on multicultural issues, ADD includes this requirement in
the design of all projects and will have a major funding priority area
(Priority 5) addressing the development of models for technical
assistance.
Comment: ADD received 15 comments on Proposed Priority Area 5. All
but one agreed with the need for this proposed priority and many
offered recommendations on the design and operation of projects, while
others had concerns about sufficient funding and the need for ongoing
projects in a multicultural network.
There was agreement that it is time for innovative approaches to
identifying areas of need and developing action strategies to meet
those needs. Advocacy groups hoped to be included when the various
components are collaborating. Nationwide technical assistance within
the developmental disabilities network was recommended to implement
programs for training service coordinators from culturally diverse
backgrounds to guide individuals with developmental disabilities and
their families. It was suggested that coalition building and
recruitment and retention efforts outside the network depend on the
achievement of cultural competence within the network. The dissenting
commenter felt that the Commissioner has already begun to build this
network and these issues should not be in a separate priority area.
Another commenter felt that if the goal is to provide agency-
integrated, comprehensive services to families, the multicultural theme
should be a strong, clearly developed part of each project. Another
suggestion with regard to this issue proposed a state project targeted
for demonstrating model practices for further development of
collaboration among the network components.
There was also commentary on including all ages, including young
adults, middle aged, and older parents of aging individuals with
developmental disabilities in multicultural communities, and on the
need for training in self-advocacy and empowerment to address effective
actions for overcoming identified barriers.
Response: The issue of building a strong, effective multicultural
network within the developmental disabilities system is a major concern
of ADD. The Commissioner's Forum as well as the careful consideration
of the discussions of the ADD Multicultural Committee and numerous
other entities and individuals, including grassroots and larger
advocacy groups, are reflections of the high priority of this area of
proposed funding.
ADD continues to emphasize cultural competency and recognition of
the value of cultural diversity to individuals, families, and the
larger community. This will be a required element in the design of
projects to be funded. The suggestions for inclusion of all ages will
be added to inclusion of unserved and inadequately served individuals.
In proposing to fund three State projects, ADD feels that models will
be developed for utilizing the resources of appropriate organizations
including Historically Black Colleges and Universities and that these
intense efforts will provide replicable practices and strategies for
focused efforts by others.
Comment: ADD received 12 comments on Priority Area 6, Accessing
Telecommunication Services for Persons With Developmental Disabilities.
They were supportive and one suggested that a requirement of funding be
that grantees establish electronic communication with other recipients.
The ideal outcome of projects in this area would be a clearinghouse
system that is interactive, assistive, and empowering of individuals
seeking services and information including, for example, location of
accessible housing, availability of assistive technology, details of
Social Security programs, medical developments, and best practices.
Response: ADD agrees that the fast-growing capabilities occurring
in cyberspace are going to be factors in communications for previously
unserved and inadequately served individuals. Working out how
individuals access this technology is the challenge. ADD is funding one
Training Initiative Project under its University Affiliated Program
which is exploring this issue, and ADD does already link its grantees
through teleconferences, Internet, meetings, and forums. We would like
to see more consumers, families, and providers accessing and sharing
information, calendars, [[Page 32050]] concerns, and strategies for
removal of barriers.
We will consider funding this priority area in future years. All
newly funded PNS initiatives are expected to develop the capacity to
communicate and disseminate information and technical assistance
through e-mail and other effective, affordable, and accessible forms of
electronic communication.
Comment: ADD received 12 comments on Priority Area 7, Meeting the
Mental Health Needs of Individuals With Developmental Disabilities. ADD
received many commendations for including a priority area on the mental
health aspects of mental retardation and other developmental
disabilities issues. Comments cited lack of training in this area and
the critical need for partnerships to stimulate interagency agreements
and other needed projects. It was recommended that single points of
entry be established and that services follow the individual into the
community.
There was a suggestion that ADD consider as a funding requirement a
letter of agreement between the State mental health system and the
State developmental disabilities system. There were suggestions for
projects aimed at improving both the community and social presence and
social skills of persons with dual diagnoses and for involvement in
arts and leisure programming. Training was urged for all network
participants in such issues as inclusion, psychoactive medications,
anger management, and legal aspects. There was also strong support for
consumer outcome measures to evaluate program impact.
Response: ADD has long felt strongly that the mental health needs
of persons with developmental disabilities do not receive adequate
attention. ADD was at the forefront of promoting nonaversive approaches
and has funded a Project of National Significance to develop training
materials for mental health professionals to help bridge the gap
between systems. A number of ADD-funded University Affiliated Programs
and Developmental Disabilities Councils have projects in their local
areas. Community inclusion requires understanding on the part of
providers and network participants and individuals and families as
well. There is also great need to raise the general standard of
practice regarding psychoactive medications.
The next stage of addressing this issue will be broader
implementation of strategies and best practices. Effective advocacy
through recruitment and training will contribute toward appropriate
systems change.
Comment: ADD received l5 comments on Priority Area 8, Children at
Risk: The Impact of Abuse and Violence on Children With Disabilities,
all of which were supportive of the overall approach. Many commenters
noted the great need for this area to be addressed. Some commented that
the issue involves both the abuse of children with disabilities and
disabilities caused by abuse and neglect of children. Many stated that
a comprehensive multi-system, multi-agency approach must be taken to
adequately address the significant issue of prevention, intervention,
and treatment of abuse and neglect of children with, and at risk of,
disabilities. Many commenters noted the need for coordination among a
wide variety of State and local agencies in abuse cases. Several
recommendations specifically stressed the need for coordinated
investigations, including the importance of sharing data among agencies
when abuse or neglect of a child is alleged. One commenter reported
that Child Advocacy Centers throughout the country are attempting to
coordinate all of the investigating entities involved in child abuse
cases.
One organization noted that non-organic failure-to-thrive typically
results from neglect, abuse, and poor knowledge of care giving. Another
commenter recommended the need for training of professionals and
research on the incidence and prevalence of Abusive Head Trauma,
including Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS), which was reported as the leading
cause of disability among abused children.
One commenter noted that provision of adequate child care can help
to reduce the incidence of abuse and neglect and that child care
workers are a good source of identifying children at risk of abuse and
neglect. Another commenter stated that a ``safety net'' could be
designed to identify and enroll families at risk of abusing their
children. Such families would then be provided with education and
training designed to increase their parenting skills and reduce the
risk of abuse and neglect.
One commenter recommended funding a group of local projects in a
given State to bring about a coordinated strategy from the ``bottom
up'' rather than from a Statewide demonstration which then filters
change down to the local level. Another organization stressed the need
for information, education, and training of a variety of audiences,
disciplines, and professions, including children and youth themselves.
ADD was also urged to collaborate with appropriate agencies at the
Federal level to address the abuse problem.
One commenter reported how well a comprehensive Statewide approach
very similar to the one described by ADD in this priority area is
working in one State to prevent child abuse of children with
disabilities. The strategy being used involves a wide range of agencies
including the State Departments of Education, Human Resources, Mental
Health and Mental Retardation, as well as the State Developmental
Disabilities Planning Council and Protection and Advocacy Agency,
Children's Trust Fund, Corporate Foundation for Children, a major
university, and several other agencies. Besides including these
entities, another organization recommended also involving the State
Child Care, Health and Criminal Justice systems as well as Head Start
programs.
Response: ADD is pleased to see the very favorable response to this
priority area and the comprehensive approach we selected. ADD has
worked over the last year, in collaboration with other Federal
agencies, to help focus national attention on the problem of abuse of
children with disabilities and the fact that abuse often causes
disabilities. We believe that a multi-system, multi-agency coordinated
approach must be used at the local, State, and national level in order
to adequately address this serious problem. In this announcement, ADD
will stress the need for coordination and collaboration among all
agencies involved in allegations of abuse as well as in prevention
activities, including the need to share data among all agencies.
We appreciate the information regarding non-organic failure to
thrive and Abusive Head Trauma, including Shaken Baby Syndrome, and
will address these in this announcement. ADD agrees that appropriate
child care may help reduce abuse and neglect, and we will address the
need for inclusive child care in Priority Area 4. Moreover, we hope
child care agencies will be involved as relevant agencies in any
comprehensive State or local child abuse strategy. Concerning the
recommendation that a ``safety net'' approach be used of enrolling and
training parents at risk of abusing their children, ADD agrees that
parent skill training can help reduce the risk of abuse and neglect,
but we leave the individual elements of any strategy selected to the
State or local community involved.
ADD believes that with limited funds it is best to demonstrate the
comprehensive, coordinated strategy at a State level first, especially
given the flow of Federal funds for the various agencies involved which
usually go to [[Page 32051]] the State level first and then to local
communities. However, if a State wishes to develop a grant application
which is focused on developing a comprehensive multi-system, multi-
agency statewide strategy and then proposes to test implementation of
the strategy in a number of local communities before implementation
statewide, we would be interested in considering funding for this
approach. ADD urges any State applying for funds to include all the
relevant agencies, systems, disciplines, and other pertinent entities
in its proposed strategy and grant application.
In addition to this PNS priority area, ADD will continue its
interagency and interdepartmental activities to prevent and reduce the
incidence of abuse of children with disabilities and all other children
who are abused, many of whom develop disabilities.
Comment: ADD received 9 comments on Proposed Priority Area 9,
Technical Assistance Projects. The hope was expressed that ADD could
continue to provide the catalyst to generate advocacy and support for
individuals to protect their legal and human rights under the ADA,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub.L. 102-569), and the
Constitution. Efforts such as the Advocacy Training/Technical
Assistance Center were reported to have provided valuable technical
assistance to the protection and advocacy systems. One commenter
proposed a national technical assistance project independent from the
existing Protection and Advocacy System.
There was a recommendation that ADD direct its resources not only
to improve each component of the ADD network (Protection and Advocacy
Systems, University Affiliated Programs, and Developmental Disabilities
Councils) but to realize the impact of cooperative and coordinated
activities focused on common goals. Commenters urged ADD to include in
any training the application of the 14 principles of quality
improvement developed by W. Edwards Deming for private industry, which
are seen as applicable to disability issues, as well as the nine
principles delineated in Reinventing Government, which reinforce such
goals as outcome orientation, responsiveness to consumers, empowerment,
and teamwork.
There was encouragement to separate technical assistance from
program monitoring and to allow program components to direct the
technical assistance provided to them. Exploring different methods of
utilizing stipends or vouchers for technical assistance when needed
from recognized experts was also suggested. There was also strong
support for collaborative network efforts at the Federal level through
memoranda of understanding and fiscal participation, which, along with
deliverable products, will enable progress to go far beyond
communication toward realization of supports and service benefits at
the local level.
Response: The thoughtful commentary on this priority area is timely
and appreciated. ADD will closely consider the input received and seek
out additional consultations with the network and other stakeholders on
this issue.
Comment: ADD received 27 general comments on the priority areas.
They were vastly supportive of what had been proposed. Several comments
were received that commended us for the way in which we approached this
year's priorities through considerable consultation, discussion, and
reflection and the inclusion of such issues as increasing interagency
collaboration and outcome measurement methodology, consumer
empowerment, system conversion, strategies for addressing abuse and
violence, employment opportunities through community service, unserved
and inadequately served individuals, and individuals with developmental
disabilities in the criminal justice system.
There was strong support for giving highest priority to the areas
of cultural diversity, consumer involvement, and technical assistance
and for recognizing that collaboration and cooperation are not outcomes
in themselves but means to successful programmatic results. Focusing on
deliverable products, such as model memoranda of agreement, training
curricula, procedural plans, or memoranda for joint funding, and on
outcomes was seen as increasing the replicability of the proposed
priorities.
ADD was urged to seek assurance that people with disabilities are
included in implementation of funded projects through participation in
advisory bodies and quality management and evaluation teams. ADD was
also urged to promote culturally appropriate approaches with respect to
information dissemination and recruitment of professionals and
nonprofessionals.
In addition, there was strong support for ADD's continued funding
of national data collection and analysis projects and a recommendation
that data should reflect current best thinking of the developmental
disabilities network about housing and individual supports, not
facilities, and about jobs, not sheltered employment, and that
duplication of effort be avoided. One commenter wished to see increased
government incentives, such as tax credits, for the promulgation of
charitable donations of time, assets such as housing or equipment, and
funds to advance the concerns of the Projects of National Significance
and other efforts.
Two comments reflected regret over lack of continuation of projects
in leadership initiatives and personal assistance services and another
would like to have seen more latitude for choice of project design
within priority areas. More focus was called for on the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) through a dynamic model of empowerment for ADA
compliance at the grass roots level utilizing the significant
Protection and Advocacy resource.
There were some questions about targeting specific priority areas
to address concerns that should already be under development by
Councils and about creating or enhancing specialized structures instead
of providing appropriate supports from within generic service systems.
Response: The unusual depth and range of commentary on the proposed
FY 1995 funding priorities reflects an impressive intensity and
commitment. ADD expended considerable energy to develop these
initiatives, utilizing the resources of its network and staff, and we
have applied the same diligence in consideration of comments,
suggestions, and recommendations. We believe the final priority areas
reflect the input received from the public comment process and a
sensitivity to the concerns expressed in each of the letters received.
Clearly, not every issue raised can be addressed and incorporated.
When in the past we proposed only a few priority areas, it was
thought by some that the full range of needs was ignored. Proposing
several priority areas has been seen by some as attempting too much.
The purpose of the ADD Projects of National Significance is to chart
courses that others can follow. A component of all Projects of National
Significance is the development and implementation of programs and
approaches that will be ongoing beyond funding periods. We have been
challenged by the call to reinvent government and charged by our
constituencies to promote systems change for effective response to
identified needs.
ADD hopes that the description of comments received and its
responses will be viewed as a forum, for we have seen an unusual range
of feedback which tells us and those who read this announcement what
the best thinking is [[Page 32052]] by those who share our interests
and concerns. In the course of responding to proposed ADD priority
areas, numerous coalitions have been formed and/or strengthened. The 62
comment letters received by the close of the comment period, the 5
letters postmarked after that date, and the 193 telephone inquiries
indicate a growing nationwide force. Though we cannot fund every
proposal, we will not allow the intense efforts to consult and
collaborate to dissipate if a project is not funded. ADD will seek ways
to create linkages so that the energy in this repository can become an
ever greater resource.
Part III. The Review Process
A. Eligible Applicants
Before applications are reviewed, each will be screened to
determine that the applicant is eligible for funding, as specified
under the selected priority area. Applications from organizations which
do not meet the eligibility requirements for the priority area will not
be considered or reviewed in the competition, and the applicant will be
so informed.
Only public or non-profit private entities, not individuals, are
eligible to apply under any of the priority areas. On all applications
developed jointly by more than one agency or organization, the
applications must identify only one organization as the lead
organization and official applicant. The other participating agencies
and organizations can be included as co-participants, subgrantees or
subcontractors.
Any nonprofit organization submitting an application must submit
proof of its nonprofit status in its application at the time of
submission. One means of accomplishing this is by the nonprofit agency
providing a copy of the applicant's listing in the Internal Revenue
Service's most recent list of tax-exempt organizations described in
section 501(c)(3) of the IRS code or by providing a copy of the
currently valid IRS tax exemption certificate, or by providing a copy
of the articles of incorporation bearing the seal of the State in which
the corporation or association is domiciled.
ADD cannot fund a nonprofit applicant without acceptable proof of
its nonprofit status.
B. Review Process and Funding Decisions
Applications from eligible applicants that meet the deadline date
requirements under Part V, Section C will be reviewed and scored
competitively. Experts in the field, generally persons from outside of
the Federal government, will use the appropriate evaluation criteria
listed later in this Part to review and score the applications. The
results of this review are a primary factor in making funding
decisions.
ADD reserves the option of discussing applications with, or
referring them to, other Federal or non-Federal funding sources when
this is determined to be in the best interest of the Federal government
or the applicant. It may also solicit comments from ADD Regional Office
staff, other Federal agencies, interested foundations, national
organizations, specialists, experts, States and the general public.
These comments, along with those of the expert reviewers, will be
considered by ADD in making funding decisions.
In making decisions on awards, ADD may give preference to
applications which focus on or feature: Culturally diverse minority or
ethnic populations; a substantially innovative strategy with the
potential to improve theory or practice in the field of human services;
a model practice or set of procedures that holds the potential for
replication by organizations involved in the administration or delivery
of human services; substantial involvement of volunteers; substantial
involvement (either financial or programmatic) of the private sector; a
favorable balance between Federal and non-Federal funds available for
the proposed project; the potential for high benefit for low Federal
investment; a programmatic focus on those most in need; and/or
substantial involvement in the proposed project by national or
community foundations. This year, 5 points will be awarded in scoring
for any project that includes partnership and collaboration with the
112 Empowerment Zones/Enterprise Communities.
To the greatest extent possible, efforts will be made to ensure
that funding decisions reflect an equitable distribution of assistance
among the States and geographical regions of the country, rural and
urban areas, and ethnic populations. In making these decisions, ADD may
also take into account the need to avoid unnecessary duplication of
effort.
C. Evaluation Criteria
Using the evaluation criteria below, a panel of at least three
reviewers (primarily experts from outside the Federal government) will
review the applications. Applicants should ensure that they address
each minimum requirement in the priority area description under the
appropriate section of the Program Narrative Statement.
Reviewers will determine the strengths and weaknesses of each
proposal in terms of the evaluation criteria, provide comments, and
assign numerical scores. The point value following each criterion
heading indicates the maximum numerical weight that each section may be
given in the review process.
1. Objectives and Need for Assistance (20 Points)
The extent to which the application pinpoints any relevant
physical, economic, social, financial, institutional or other problems
requiring a solution; demonstrates the need for the assistance; states
the principal and subordinate objectives of the project; provides
supporting documentation or other testimonies from concerned interests
other than the applicant; and includes and/or footnotes relevant data
based on the results of planning studies. The application must identify
the precise location of the project and area to be served by the
proposed project. Maps and other graphic aids should be attached.
2. Results or Benefits Expected (20 Points)
The extent to which the application identifies the results and
benefits to be derived, the extent to which they are consistent with
the objectives of the proposal, and the extent to which the application
indicates the anticipated contributions to policy, practice, theory
and/or research. The extent to which the proposed project costs are
reasonable in view of the expected results.
3. Approach (35 Points)
The extent to which the application outlines a sound and workable
plan of action pertaining to the scope of the project, and details how
the proposed work will be accomplished; cites factors which might
accelerate or decelerate the work, giving acceptable reasons for taking
this approach as opposed to others; describes and supports any unusual
features of the project, such as design or technological innovations,
reductions in cost or time, or extraordinary social and community
involvements; and provides for projections of the accomplishments to be
achieved. Activities to be carried out should be listed in
chronological order, showing a reasonable schedule of accomplishments
and target dates.
The extent to which, when applicable, the application identifies
the kinds of data to be collected and maintained, and discusses the
criteria to be used to evaluate the results and successes of the
project. The extent to which the [[Page 32053]] application describes
the evaluation methodology that will be used to determine if the needs
identified and discussed are being met and if the results and benefits
identified are being achieved. The application also lists each
organization, agency, consultant, or other key individuals or groups
who will work on the project, along with a description of the
activities and nature of their effort or contribution.
4. Staff Background and Organization's Experience (25 Points)
The application identifies the background of the project director/
principal investigator and key project staff (including name, address,
training, educational background and other qualifying experience) and
the experience of the organization to demonstrate the applicant's
ability to effectively and efficiently administer this project. The
application describes the relationship between this project and other
work planned, anticipated or under way by the applicant which is being
supported by Federal assistance.
D. Structure of Priority Area Descriptions
Each priority area description is composed of the following
sections:
Eligible Applicants: This section specifies the type of
organization which is eligible to apply under the particular priority
area.
Purpose: This section presents the basic focus and/or
broad goal(s) of the priority area.
Background Information: This section briefly discusses the
legislative background as well as the current state-of-the-art and/or
current state-of-practice that supports the need for the particular
priority area activity. Relevant information on projects previously
funded by ACF and/or other State models are noted, where applicable.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: This section
presents the basic set of issues that must be addressed in the
application. Typically, they relate to project design, evaluation, and
community involvement. This section also asks for specific information
on the proposed project. Inclusion and discussion of these items is
important since they will be used by the reviewers in evaluating the
applications against the evaluation criteria. Project products,
continuation of the project effort after the Federal support ceases,
and dissemination/utilization activities, if appropriate, are also
addressed.
Project Duration: This section specifies the maximum
allowable length of time for the project period; it refers to the
amount of time for which Federal funding is available.
Federal Share of Project Costs: This section specifies the
maximum amount of Federal support for the project.
Matching Requirement: This section specifies the minimum
non-Federal contribution, either through cash or in-kind match, that is
required to the maximum Federal funds requested for the project.
Anticipated Number of Projects To Be Funded: This section
specifies the number of projects that ADD anticipates it will fund in
the priority area.
CFDA: This section identifies the Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number and title of the program under which
applications in this priority area will be funded. This information is
needed to complete item 10 on the SF 424.
Please note that applications that do not comply with the specific
priority area requirements in the section on ``Eligible Applicants''
will not be reviewed.
Applicants must clearly identify the specific priority area under
which they wish to have their applications considered, and tailor their
applications accordingly. In addition, previous experience has shown
that an application which is broader and more general in concept than
outlined in the priority area description is less likely to score as
well as one which is more clearly focused on and directly responsive to
the concerns of that specific priority area.
E. Available Funds
ADD intends to award new grants resulting from this announcement
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 1995, subject to the
availability of funding. The size of the actual awards will vary. Each
priority area description includes information on the maximum Federal
share of the project costs and the anticipated number of projects to be
funded.
The term ``budget period'' refers to the interval of time (usually
12 months) into which a multi-year period of assistance (project
period) is divided for budgetary and funding purposes. The term
``project period'' refers to the total time a project is approved for
support, including any extensions.
Where appropriate, applicants may propose project periods which are
shorter than the maximums specified in the various priority areas. Non-
Federal share contributions may exceed the minimums specified in the
various priority areas when the applicant is able to do so.
For multi-year projects, continued Federal funding beyond the first
budget period, but within the approved project period, is subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee and a
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
F. Grantee Share of Project Costs
Grantees must provide at least 25% percent of the total approved
cost of the project. The total approved cost of the project is the sum
of the ACF share and the non-Federal share. The non-Federal share may
be met by cash or in-kind contributions, although applicants are
encouraged to meet their match requirements through cash contributions.
Therefore, a project requesting $100,000 in Federal funds (based on an
award of $100,000 per budget period) must include a match of at least
$33,333 (25% total project cost).
An exception to the grantee cost-sharing requirement relates to
applications originating from American Samoa, Guam, the Virgin Islands,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Applications from
these areas are covered under section 501(d) of Pub. L. 95-134, which
requires that the Department waive ``any requirement for local matching
funds for grants under $200,000.''
The applicant contribution must generally be secured from non-
Federal sources. Except as provided by Federal statute, a cost-sharing
or matching requirement may not be met by costs borne by another
Federal grant. However, funds from some Federal programs benefitting
Tribes and Native American organizations have been used to provide
valid sources of matching funds. If this is the case for a Tribe or
Native American organization submitting an application to ADD, that
organization should identify the programs which will be providing the
funds for the match in its application. If the application successfully
competes for PNS grant funds, ADD will determine whether there is
statutory authority for this use of the funds. The Administration for
Native Americans and the DHHS Office of General Counsel will assist ADD
in making this determination.
G. Cooperation in Evaluation Efforts
Grantees funded by ADD may be requested to cooperate in evaluation
efforts funded by ADD. The purpose of these evaluation activities is to
learn from the combined experience of multiple projects funded under a
particular priority area. [[Page 32054]]
H. Closed Captioning for Audiovisual Efforts
Applicants are encouraged to include ``closed captioning'' in the
development of any audiovisual products.
Part IV. Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Areas for Projects of National
Significance
The following section presents the final priority areas for Fiscal
Year 1995 Projects of National Significance (PNS) and solicits the
appropriate applications.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 1: ADD and ACYF, Family and Youth
Services Bureau Collaboration Between Youth Service Providers and
Disabilities Advocates to Enhance Services to Youth With Developmental
Disabilities
Eligible Applicants: Basic Center Programs for Runaway and
Homeless Youth (RHY), Transitional Living Programs for RHY, Drug Abuse
and Prevention Programs for RHY, and Youth Gang Drug Prevention
Programs currently funded by the Family and Youth Services Bureau and
University Affiliated Programs, State Developmental Disabilities
Councils, and Protection and Advocacy Programs currently funded by the
Administration on Developmental Disabilities.
Purpose: Under this priority area, the Administration on
Developmental Disabilities (ADD) and the Family and Youth Services
Bureau (FYSB) of the Administration on Children, Youth and Families
(ACYF) will jointly award demonstration grant funds to foster
collaboration between its grantee programs. The purpose of these grants
will be to provide improved access to services and supports for youth
with developmental disabilities who are at risk of running away or
becoming involved in gang activities or delinquent behavior. Both ADD
and FYSB are interested in applications that will support a youth
development approach to serving young people. The FYSB encourages local
youth service agencies to offer a holistic service approach that
acknowledges young people's strengths and contributions while
responding to their needs. ADD advocates for services that enable young
people with developmental disabilities to live independently through
employment. This goal is achieved by drawing on both the support of the
community and the youth's own resources. Employment is an important
outcome for all youth with developmental disabilities.
These projects, to be conducted jointly by ADD and FYSB funded
grantees, would strengthen the ability of at-risk youth with
developmental disabilities (12-21 years of age) to achieve their full
potential and grow to be successful, independent adults. Specifically,
ADD and FYSB are seeking applications that explore methods for
assisting their respective grantees to ensure access to appropriate
services and supports by youth with developmental disabilities who
participate in their programs.
Background Information: Youth with developmental
disabilities face enormous odds. Too often, as with all people with
developmental disabilities, they lack the basics of American life: A
good education, a job, and a real home. Tagged with diagnostic labels
and segregated and discriminated against, many lack the information,
assistance, and support they need to make informed choices. Their
abilities are not recognized; and their differences set them apart,
even from family members who love them but cannot afford or manage
their special needs. Situations such as these increase the odds that
youth with developmental disabilities will join the ranks of other
runaway and homeless youth and youth involved in gangs or negative
behaviors, thereby increasing their vulnerability.
To address these needs, FYSB and ADD established a three-year
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance coordination between the
two agencies with the goal of increasing access to generic and
specialized services for youth with developmental disabilities.
The FYSB administers the Runaway and Homeless Youth Program, the
Transitional Living Program for Homeless Youth, the Drug Abuse
Prevention Program for Runaway and Homeless Youth, and the Youth Gang
Drug Prevention Program. These programs were created in response to
widespread concern about the alarming number of runaway and homeless
youth and youth at-risk of gang involvement. Today, an estimated
500,000 to 1.5 million youth run away from, or are forced out of their
homes, and an estimated 200,000 are homeless. While there are no
reliable estimates of youth at-risk of becoming involved or involved in
gangs, all States have reported the rise of youth gangs and their
illegal activities.
ADD grantees are involved in a variety of State and local efforts
which specifically address this population. For example, addressing the
transition of youth from school to the workplace is a priority for
virtually all State Developmental Disabilities Councils. The Protection
and Advocacy agencies advocate for the inclusion of youth with
disabilities in regular classrooms and other community activities. In
addition, University Affiliated Programs have as one of their mandated
activities the provision of training and technical assistance to
community agencies serving individuals with developmental disabilities,
including youth.
FYSB and ADD are accepting applications developed jointly by at
least one ADD and one FYSB funded grantee to demonstrate the need for
and effectiveness of collaborations between the FYSB and ADD grantee
programs to enable at-risk youth with developmental disabilities to
make a successful transition from adolescence to adulthood.
Agencies interested in submitting applications under this priority
area should contact FYSB at (202) 205-8060 or ADD at (202) 690-6897 for
information regarding their respective programs and existing grantees.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: These projects
must be conducted collaboratively between at least one ADD and one
FYSB-funded grantee. Both collaborating agencies must be located in the
same or neighboring communities to facilitate collaboration.
Collaborations should be functional; letters of agreement are not
enough. Each collaborating agency should be actively involved and
should provide an essential component of service to the program.
Applications should be culturally sensitive, family based, and
community focused. The population to be served by the projects should
include both youth who are and who are not at-risk of running away from
home or becoming involved in gang activity or delinquent behavior. In
addition, both youth who have and who do not have a developmental
disability should be included in the target population.
ADD and FYSB are particularly interested in supporting projects
which plan to undertake the following activities:
Improve coordination of services through increased
networking and information sharing among Federal, State, and local
organizations involved in providing services. These efforts should
include all stakeholders, with at-risk youth and their families at the
center of the collaborative partnerships.
Identify existing programs that are providing effective
services to at-risk youth with developmental disabilities.
Enhance service delivery through the identification of the
risks, issues, problems and needs of at-risk youth with developmental
disabilities.
Enhance service delivery through the identification of the
existing barriers to full collaborative partnerships
[[Page 32055]] designed to advance the independence, individual choice,
and empowerment of at-risk youth with disabilities and their families
and break the dependence these youth may ultimately have on the service
delivery system.
Improve access to supports and services through the
identification and development of collaborative and comprehensive
systems of support including training materials and strategies for
technical assistance in state-of-the-art services and supports which
promote the independence of at-risk youth with disabilities. The
activities of these projects may include a technology component for
youth for whom assistive devices become the key to independence.
As a general guide, we will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that are
Family focussed.
Community based.
Culturally competent.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for project periods up to three years under this priority
area. Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-
year budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee and
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $150,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $450,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $150,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $150,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $50,000 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to three (3) projects will be funded.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities--Projects of National
Significance. FYSB's CFDA numbers are 93.623, Runaway and Homeless
Youth Program, 93.550, Transitional Living Program, and 93.660, Youth
Gang Drug Prevention Program.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 2: Americans With Developmental
Disabilities and the Criminal Justice System
Eligible Applicants: Self-advocacy groups, independent
living centers, private nonprofit organizations, or agencies.
Purpose: Under this priority area, ADD will award
demonstration grant funds for projects addressing the consequences of
becoming involved in the criminal justice system by individuals with
developmental disabilities. The Americans with Disabilities Act
requires police to take steps, including training when necessary, to
avoid discriminatory treatment on the basis of disability. States and
localities require direction and assistance to carry out these
provisions.
Background Information: Both as victims and those accused
and convicted of committing crimes, individuals with developmental
disabilities (especially mental retardation) are becoming increasingly
involved in the criminal justice system. Moreover, these individuals
often face unequal justice at the hands of police and the courts
precisely because the current system is not educated or prepared to
respond or adapt to their disabilities and self-advocates have not been
considered as essential elements of the educational process.
Advocates, scholars, and others argue that people who have been
very carefully taught all their lives to trust and please authority
figures sometimes confess to crimes they have not and could not have
committed. Police, prosecutors, and the public need to learn about the
raw vulnerability of many of these citizens.
Much more focused effort must be placed on identifying and
replicating best and promising practices in this area. This is
especially true if the critical concept of community policing is going
to be applied to individuals with disabilities in a fair and effective
manner throughout our Nation.
Greater emphasis, therefore, must be placed on providing current
police and new recruits with the training and technical assistance
needed to afford people with disabilities who are victims or alleged
perpetrators of crime with equal justice under the law.
The input and participation of people with developmental and other
disabilities is crucial for familiarizing police and others with the
unique range of needs and abilities of such individuals.
Additional training is needed to better prepare individuals with
disabilities to avoid conduct that might place them at risk of becoming
victims or accused perpetrators of criminal activities and to negotiate
in the criminal justice system should they become involved with it. An
understanding of Miranda rights and responses is crucial.
ADD is particularly interested in receiving applications from
national, State, and local self-advocacy networks, with the capacity to
work collaboratively with the developmental disabilities network,
service providers, law enforcement officials, criminal justice
agencies, the civil rights community, and others, who would be able to
spearhead such efforts.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: ADD is
particularly interested in supporting projects which include the
following:
Initiation and coordination by a self-advocacy network
working collaboratively with the developmental disabilities network,
disability groups, Mentally Retarded Defendants Programs, and those
agencies included in the criminal justice system.
A survey and list of programs, materials, curricula that
have been developed and implemented, including relevant legal statutes.
The implementation of an ongoing procedure for soliciting
discussion, exploring experiences and perceptions, and strategizing
steps for prevention, for dealing with sexual harassment, and for
navigating through legal procedures, which may include focus groups,
interviews following incarceration, and video presentations with a view
toward receiving input and direction from individuals with
developmental disabilities.
The development of self-produced materials in such media
as dramatic presentations, artwork, or music to convey issues regarding
prevention of involvement and negotiating involvement with the criminal
justice system.
The development or adaptation of model programs at the
local level, including coverage of sexual harassment, for
implementation with individuals with developmental
[[Page 32056]] disabilities, family members, service providers, police,
court personnel, health and rehabilitation liaison, and others involved
with the criminal justice system. Materials should be developed in
easy-to-understand language.
The development of strategies for establishing a pre-trial
intervention program providing counseling, education, and family
support.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, and migrant, homeless, and
refugee families.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.
Development and establishment of practices and programs
beyond project period.
Dissemination of models, products, best practices, and
strategies for distribution between the networks and beyond. A plan
describing initial activities is needed between funded projects as well
as at the end of the project period. These activities should maintain
and share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/
experts, and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the
network.
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for a three-year project period under this priority area.
Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget period,
although project periods may be for three years. Applications for
continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-year
budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee, and
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $70,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $210,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $70,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $70,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $23,333 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to two (2) projects will be funded. Subject to
availability of additional resources in FY 1996 and the number of
acceptable applications received as a result of this program
announcement, the ADD Commissioner may elect to select recipients for
the FY 1996 cohort of programs out of the pool of applications
submitted for FY 1995 funds.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities-- Projects of National
Significance. This information is needed to complete item 10 on the SF
424.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 3: First Jobs--Introducing Persons With/
Without Developmental Disabilities to the World of Work and Community
Service
Eligible Applicants: State agencies, independent living
centers, public or private nonprofit organizations, the AmeriCorps
program of the Corporation for National and Community Service,
institutions or agencies.
Purpose: Under this priority area, ADD will award model
research and demonstration funds on introducing young people to the
world of work and community service. The initiative intends to target
young people with/without developmental disabilities and other
significant disabilities from culturally diverse backgrounds to enable
them to gain first time job or community service experience that will
lead to second jobs and ultimate career paths. We are particularly
interested in applications that explore job opportunities for young
adults (15-25 years of age).
These projects should encourage the inclusion of matches with
individuals with developmental disabilities and those without
developmental disabilities in job settings which would lead to a
stronger workplace and community for the future.
Background Information: Nationally, the employment outlook
for young Americans with developmental disabilities is bleak. Progress
is being made supporting people with significant disabilities in real
jobs, but the following facts speak for themselves:
1. Only about 10 percent of students with developmental
disabilities graduating from school go on to competitive or supported
employment.
2. In 1990, only about half of people with developmental
disabilities surveyed indicated they had any choice in what job they
held.
3. Last, 90 cents of every Federal dollar and 80 cents of every
State dollar spent on providing services to people with developmental
disabilities during the day is spent on keeping individuals in
segregated, non-productive settings.
The cultural change that needs to occur is a redirection of the
efforts of service providers and a shifting of focus onto the abilities
and skills of individuals with disabilities. First-time job support can
result from partnerships with young people without disabilities. This
emphasis on inclusion provides mutual benefit as young people in their
first community service or employment experiences benefit from the
resources of diversity.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: The projects must
address [[Page 32057]] strategies for first jobs that will lead to
second jobs and ultimate career paths. Research should include
assessments of current practices and of necessary supports, such as
transportation, adaptive technology, and personal assistance services.
Collaborative linkages among service/support providers should be
explored as well as matches with individuals with developmental
disabilities and those without developmental disabilities in job
settings. Strategies for success should include and stress consumer
choice and empowerment as essential approaches in the development and
implementation of projects that will be culturally competent, ongoing,
and have measurable outcomes.
The strategy should include the following components:
The identification of the barriers encountered in putting
young people to work and strategies found effective in doing so.
The development of model memoranda of understanding among
schools, businesses, and agencies at the local level as called for in
the School-to-Work Opportunities Act of 1994.
The development of policy recommendations on transitions
from school-to-work.
The development of recommendations on needed technical
assistance at local and State levels.
The development of recommendations on what roles
Developmental Disabilities Councils, University Affiliated Programs,
and Protection and Advocacy systems can play in increasing school-to-
work opportunities.
The evaluation of whether job sharing among young people
with and without disabilities is an effective strategy for increasing
the employment opportunities for both groups.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, and migrant, homeless, and
refugee families.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.
Development and establishment of practices and programs
beyond project period.
Dissemination of models, products, best practices, and
strategies for distribution between the networks and beyond. A plan
describing initial activities is needed between funded projects as well
as at the end of the project period. These activities should maintain
and share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/
experts, and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the
network.
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for project periods up to three years under this priority
area. Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-
year budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee and
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $100,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $300,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $100,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $100,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $33,333 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to two (2) projects will be funded. Subject to
availability of additional resources in FY 1996 and the number of
acceptable applications received as a result of this program
announcement, the ADD Commissioner may elect to select recipients for
the FY 1996 cohort of programs out of the pool of applications
submitted for FY 1995 funds.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities--Projects of National
Significance. This information is needed to complete item 10 on the SF
424.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 4: Child Care and Early Intervention:
Linkages for Successful Inclusion of Young Children with Disabilities
Eligible Applicants: State agencies, public and private
nonprofit organizations, institutions or agencies.
Purpose: ADD will award demonstration grant funds for
projects which will increase the capacity of child care and development
programs to meet the needs of young children with disabilities. Child
care services need to be included among the essential partner agencies
in the provision of early, continuous, intensive, and comprehensive
child development and family support services to children with
disabilities and their families. The primary goals of projects would be
increasing access to quality child care services for children with
disabilities birth through age 5 and increasing the delivery of early
intervention and related services to children in natural and inclusive
environments.
Background Information: Although inclusion of children
with disabilities within child care is not a new occurrence, few formal
mechanisms support effective coordination between the child care and
disability communities. These systems remain separate and apart even as
they are called upon to provide services to the same children and
families. Families of [[Page 32058]] young children with disabilities
continue to rank child care among the highest of their unmet needs.
Furthermore, early findings of the Part H Early Intervention Program
for infants and toddlers show no significant number of young children
receiving these services within child care or other natural
environments outside the home.
Access to quality child care services for children with
disabilities was significantly strengthened and is protected by the
passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in July 1992. The
ADA explicitly prohibits discrimination of children with disabilities
in public and private child care settings. The ADA opens many doors and
provides the legal protections to assure access to children with
disabilities, but this prohibition of discrimination, in and of itself,
is limited in its ability to increase the capacity of child care
programs to successfully include children with disabilities. Even when
providers understand their obligations under the ADA, they continue to
need ongoing access to training, technical assistance, mentorship, and
consultation to implement meaningful and inclusionary policies and
programs.
Furthermore, the linkages between childhood disability and poverty
have long gone unnoticed and unaddressed. Nearly 8 percent of children
on AFDC have disabilities. Without intervention and support, children
in poverty are also at risk for disability. Often overlooked by the
child care system are children from homeless shelters. There are
indications that many of these children exhibit higher levels of
developmental problems. There is also a need for training in the
implications of fetal alcohol syndrome, failure to thrive, lead
poisoning, abusive head trauma, shaken baby syndrome, pediatric AIDS,
and learning delay related to hearing loss from viral infection and
congestion.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: ADD is
particularly interested in local and Statewide projects that promote a
seamless interagency approach to better serve children with
disabilities, especially those children with disabilities who live in
poverty. To develop child care services which are responsive to the
needs of young children with disabilities and their families, the
protections of the ADA must be joined with best practices in the field
of early childhood education, early intervention, and family support
services.
The following are types of activities projects may wish to engage
in:
Develop and implement a training program to meet the needs
of the child care community, providers, and parents of children with
disabilities regarding the ADA and its protections and obligations.
Identify and demonstrate strategies and mechanisms which
support and expand training opportunities across systems. Strategies
should illustrate how resources and expertise can be shared, as well as
establishing opportunities for technical assistance and ongoing
mentorship including mentorship by parents of children with
disabilities, parents with disabilities, and other individuals with
disabilities.
Develop formal and informal linkages to increase the
knowledge, awareness, and access to resources and services among
families, child care providers, early childhood educators, disability
service providers, and others who work with children with disabilities
and their families.
Identify and document replicable programs and projects
which promote supported inclusion, that is, service coordination for
individualizing inclusion of children with disabilities into generic
child care programs.
Produce cost effective models to combine sources of funds
or other strategies that will facilitate parents accessing child care
settings of their choice.
Projects may expand their focus to children older than 5 if the
primary focus is on children birth to 5. Projects may address the needs
of siblings of children with disabilities as a family support if the
primary focus is on children with disabilities from birth to 5.
ADD is interested in funding projects reflecting these values in
culturally competent, inclusive, family-centered and measurably
outcome-oriented approaches that can establish ongoing relationships.
In addition, ADD is interested in joint efforts of projects such as
the Americorps program of the Corporation for National and Community
Service and the Job Opportunities Basic Skills (JOBS) program, whereby
young people with disabilities may participate in jobs and community
service as personal assistants and inclusion aides.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, and migrant, homeless, and
refugee families.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub.L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.
Development and establishment of practices and programs
beyond project period.
Dissemination of models, products, best practices, and
strategies for distribution between the networks and beyond. A plan
describing initial activities is needed between funded projects as well
as at the end of the project period. These activities should maintain
and share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/
experts, and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the
network.
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for project periods up to three years under this priority
area. Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-
year budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the
[[Page 32059]] grantee, and determination that continued funding would
be in the best interest of the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $100,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $300,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $100,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $100,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $33,333 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects To Be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to two (2) projects will be funded. Subject to
availability of additional resources in FY 1996 and the number of
acceptable applications received as a result of this program
announcement, the ADD Commissioner may elect to select recipients for
the FY 1996 cohort of programs out of the pool of applications
submitted for FY 1995 funds.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities--Projects of National
Significance. This information is needed to complete item 10 on the SF
424.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 5: Building a Multi-Cultural Network
Within the Developmental Disabilities System Which Increases Service
Equity, Opportunities, and Inclusion for Individuals From Racial and
Ethnic Minority Groups
Eligible Applicants: Consortium of a State Developmental
Disabilities Council, University Affiliated Programs, the Protection
and Advocacy Program, national developmental disabilities associations,
and other multicultural institutions and organizations.
Purpose: ADD is proposing to fund model demonstration
projects that will enable State developmental disabilities networks in
partnership with advocacy groups and self-advocates to gain and
maintain the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to serve and
empower a culturally diverse constituency. These projects should assist
the components of the State developmental disabilities networks
(Developmental Disabilities Councils, Protection and Advocacy Agencies,
and University Affiliated Programs) in obtaining appropriate tools to
identify areas of need and to develop action strategies that will
address not only current needs but have as a goal institutionalizing
cultural competency in every aspect of these programs. In some
instances, assistance in cultural competence should be implemented at
the community or policy/advocacy level whereas other programs will need
assistance at a more basic internal/programmatic level. At the State
level, building linkages or connections among and between the
Developmental Disabilities Councils, P&As, and UAPs with cultural/
ethnic organizations that are representative of community demographics
will be essential as these components of the developmental disabilities
network develop and implement action strategies. Within and outside the
developmental disabilities system are existing resources, both material
and human, that these projects should identify and utilize through a
range of individuals having personal and/or professional expertise in
this area.
Background Information: The reality of an American society
in which racial and ethnic cultural minorities are increasing in
numbers and influence is becoming more evident each day. There are an
estimated four million American children and adults with developmental
disabilities, including a disproportionate number who are members of
racial and ethnic minority groups. Many of these individuals and
families from culturally diverse backgrounds remain outside of the
various disability systems designed for their benefit; they are unable
to gain access to the service systems, let alone fully participate in
or benefit from them. Successful individuals of color with disabilities
are often not encouraged or identified to serve as role models for
other individuals having disabilities. In large part, the developmental
disabilities network does not reflect this new multicultural reality--
not among faculty, planners, staffs, trainees, or advocates.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: The program
components of ADD (UAPs, DD Councils, and P&As) have recognized the
need to make their programs culturally competent. Each are making
efforts to address this need. If any major, long-term progress is to be
made a concerted, comprehensive initiative must occur.
For applications to successfully compete under this priority they
must include the following:
Provide an overview of a range of approaches for assisting
the program components and the State developmental disabilities network
as a whole to acquire and achieve appropriate knowledge, skills, and
competencies for serving a culturally diverse constituency.
Develop State-level coalitions between Developmental
Disabilities Councils, Protection and Advocacy Systems, University
Affiliated Programs, and Historically Black Colleges and Universities
(HBCUs) and other institutions of higher education with high minority
and/or bilingual student enrollment, major civil rights organizations,
cultural/ethnic associations, and developmental disability-advocacy
organizations.
Develop an equity service plan to bring the unserved and
inadequately served individuals from culturally diverse backgrounds up
to greater parity in the distribution of services.
Develop new ways to gain information from and convey
information to members of racial/ethnic/cultural groups.
Coordinate with national developmental disabilities
associations and ethnic and cultural organizations to develop and
evaluate a replication package that has as its characteristics that it
is user-friendly, relevant to the functions of the program components,
and addresses various levels of cultural competency. As part of the
evaluation it should be tested in another state.
Produce a comprehensive dissemination package of best
practices, materials, and strategies for distribution between the
networks and beyond. A plan for dissemination describing initial
activities needs to take place between funded projects as well as at
the end of the project period.
Coordinate with national developmental disabilities
associations and ethnic and cultural organizations to maintain and
share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/experts,
and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the network.
Delineate an outreach plan which has as its focus the
sharing of project outcomes and training strategies to the
representative associations of the program components, at an ADD
national function, to other organizations within the developmental
disabilities/advocacy network and the disability field, as well as
major civil rights organizations, other minority organizations, and
institutions of higher education such as HBCUs with the goal of leading
to further collaboration and partnership at the State level in the
continued development of cultural competency. Outreach activities can
[[Page 32060]] occur at the national, regional, and/or State level.
Provide an action plan for the professional recruitment
and retention of individuals who are from culturally diverse
backgrounds with disabilities into all aspects of the three components
of the Developmental Disabilities network, especially in research,
training, policy, and administration, and for diverse volunteers to
serve as advisors to boards and advocacy organizations.
Describe measurable outcomes with regard to program
components becoming more representative of community demographics in
their staff, board members, advisory committees, constituency; or
establish memoranda of understanding with the various entities
representing racial/ethnic constituencies to implement strategies
reflective of the project's outcomes.
Describe an evaluation component which will measure the
project's effectiveness in achieving stated objectives, ensuring that
larger numbers of individuals from racial/ethnic/cultural groups are
served.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, and migrant, homeless, and
refugee families.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.
Development and establishment of practices and programs
beyond project period.
Dissemination of models, products, best practices, and
strategies for distribution between the networks and beyond. A plan
describing initial activities is needed between funded projects as well
as at the end of the project period. These activities should maintain
and share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/
experts, and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the
network.
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for project periods up to three years under this priority
area. Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-
year budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee, and
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $100,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $300,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $100,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $100,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $33,333 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to three (3) projects will be funded. Subject to
availability of additional resources in FY 1996 and the number of
acceptable applications received as a result of this program
announcement, the ADD Commissioner may elect to select recipients for
the FY 1996 cohort of programs out of the pool of applications
submitted for FY 1995 funds.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities--Projects of National
Significance. This information is needed to complete item 10 on the SF
424.
Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 6: Meeting the Mental Health Needs of
Individuals With Developmental Disabilities
Eligible Applicants: State agencies, public or private
nonprofit organizations, institutions or agencies.
Purpose: For this priority area, ADD will award
demonstration grant funds on addressing the mental health needs of
individuals with developmental disabilities. ADD intends to target
individuals, specifically focusing on young adults who are
transitioning out of the MR/DD system and into the community with a
dual diagnosis of developmental disability and mental illness, and
individuals and families of individuals who live in the community and
who might be on waiting lists.
Background Information: Meeting the mental health needs of
individuals with developmental disabilities is a ``quality of life''
goal, but often community service personnel have neither the skills nor
the desire to effectively treat individuals with developmental
disabilities who have mental health needs. In addition, these consumers
are often caught between two service delivery systems (mental health
and developmental disabilities) where the type and continuity of
resources required for effective treatment and improved life quality
are inefficient, ineffective, or non-existent. Improving the adequacy
and availability of such resources will depend on better training for
both specialized and generic service providers.
The challenge of the 1990s is to provide for a coordinated,
collaborative human service delivery system that will enable
individuals with developmental disabilities to receive services in an
expeditious and coordinated manner. The creation of such a system will
allow for full community integration and inclusion of individuals who
also need mental health services.
Minimum Requirements for Project Design: ADD is interested
in projects which demonstrate the potential for creative and humanizing
approaches to designing, implementing, and evaluating projects which
assist [[Page 32061]] community agencies in coordinating efforts in the
mental health and developmental disabilities service systems; educate
self-advocates, family members, advocates, individuals with
developmental disabilities, and service providers on state-of-the-art
practices in the field of mental illness and developmental
disabilities; and develop and disseminate methods for working with the
mental health and developmental disabilities networks to promote full
inclusion and membership in the community.
In order to successfully compete under this priority area, the
application must include activities which would:
Develop a model and train a team consisting of
professionals/paraprofessionals, families, advocates, and self-
advocates to help bridge the gap between systems.
Develop and disseminate a handbook of consensus opinion on
psychopharmacology. The Handbook will indicate the opinions of a large
panel of consumers, scientists, and practitioners regarding what drugs
should be used for what conditions, what best practices should be
followed, and how consumers can provide effective oversight.
Develop strategies to disseminate the Handbook to
consumers, Protection and Advocacy agencies, oversight committees, and
professionals/paraprofessionals.
Train people who work in Protection and Advocacy in issues
related to Mental Retardation/Mental Health.
Disseminate anger management training that has been
developed for people with mental retardation on a broad national level.
Develop consumer outcome measures to evaluate the impact
of programs. These measures should address the following questions: (1)
Are hospitalizations reduced? (2) Do coordinated services enable
individuals with developmental disabilities to remain in the community?
(3) What is the feasibility of replication in other States? (4) What
are the barriers in providing coordinated services? and (5) What is the
efficacy of a single point of entry?
Provide evidence of the applicant's ability to establish
an advisory committee comprised of individuals with developmental
disabilities and families to address what their expectations are from
mental health and developmental disabilities services.
Provide a signed letter of agreement between the State
mental health system and the State developmental disabilities system of
the selected project.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those applications
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, and migrant, homeless, and
refugee families.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.
Development and establishment of practices and programs
beyond project period.
Dissemination of models, products, best practices, and
strategies for distribution between the networks and beyond. A plan
describing initial activities is needed between funded projects as well
as at the end of the project period. These activities should maintain
and share ongoing information, existing resources of consultants/
experts, and curriculum/materials with funded projects and within the
network.
Project Duration: This announcement is soliciting
applications for project periods up to three years under this priority
area. Awards, on a competitive basis, will be for a one-year budget
period, although project periods may be for three years. Applications
for continuation grants funded under this priority area beyond the one-
year budget period, but within the three-year project period, will be
entertained in subsequent years on a non-competitive basis, subject to
the availability of funds, satisfactory progress of the grantee, and
determination that continued funding would be in the best interest of
the Government.
Federal Share of Project Costs: The maximum Federal share
is not to exceed $100,000 for the first 12-month budget period or a
maximum of $300,000 for a three-year project period.
Matching Requirement: Grantees must provide at least 25
percent of the total approved cost of the project. The total approved
cost of the project is the sum of the ACF share and the non-Federal
share. The non-Federal share may be met by cash or in-kind
contributions, although applicants are encouraged to meet their match
requirements through cash contributions. Therefore, a project
requesting $100,000 in Federal funds (based on an award of $100,000 per
budget period) must include a match of at least $33,333 (25% total
project cost).
Anticipated Number of Projects to be Funded: It is
anticipated that up to one (1) project will be funded. Subject to
availability of additional resources in FY 1996 and the number of
acceptable applications received as a result of this program
announcement, the ADD Commissioner may elect to select recipients for
the FY 1996 cohort of programs out of the pool of applications
submitted for FY 1995 funds.
CFDA: ADD's CFDA (Code of Federal Domestic Assistance)
number is 93.631--Developmental Disabilities--Projects of National
Significance. This information is needed to complete item 10 on the SF
424.
Proposed Fiscal Year 1995 Priority Area 7: Children at Risk: The Impact
of Abuse and Violence on Children With Disabilities
Eligible Applicants: A State agency to act as the lead
agency in the State for the grant project.
Purpose: ADD is interested in funding one or more State
demonstration projects for development and implementation of a
Statewide collaboration/coordination strategy to reduce the incidence
of abuse and neglect of children with disabilities and reduce the
incidence of abuse and neglect of children which causes or
[[Page 32062]] contributes to the development of disabilities.
Background Information: Children with disabilities have
been found to be abused at two to ten times the rate of children
without disabilities. Most perpetrators of the abuse are well known to
the victim. Some of them are service providers, but most are family
members. Maltreatment can include physical, sexual, and emotional abuse
and physical, educational, and emotional neglect.
In addition, a significant percentage of developmental disabilities
are caused by abuse. Victims of child neglect sustain such permanent
disabilities as mental retardation and learning and cognitive
disabilities. Abusive Head Trauma is a significant cause of disability
in abused children and non-organic failure to thrive typically results
from abuse or neglect. Over half the fatalities related to child abuse
occur from 0 to 1 year and 90 percent of such fatalities occur in
children under 5 years of age.
Clearly, there is an epidemic of abuse and neglect of children--3
million reported cases in 1993. Public awareness as well as
governmental and professional intervention are urgently needed.
Minimum Requirements for the Project Design: The project
should involve developing a comprehensive Statewide strategy with a
multi-agency, multi-system approach to address the problem of
maltreatment of children with disabilities as well as abuse which leads
to disabilities. This coordination and collaboration strategy should
involve all pertinent State agencies/programs, including Child Welfare
Services, Education, the Developmental Disabilities Protection and
Advocacy Agency, Developmental Disabilities Council, Child Care, any
State Head Start Coordinator, Health (including mental health and
substance abuse, maternal and child health), Human Services/Welfare
(AFDC, Medicaid, etc.), Mental Retardation, the criminal justice
system, and any other pertinent entities such as a Children's Trust
Fund. The project should also involve appropriate State Councils and
planning entities including those for Family Preservation and Support,
State Interagency Coordinating Council for Part H, IDEA, and other
public and private programs/resources including the Developmental
Disabilities University Affiliated Program in the State and consumer
agencies.
The strategy should include the following components:
The development of a plan to conduct interdisciplinary
training in both the field of child abuse and neglect and the field of
disability, simultaneously, which is designed for State and local
agency personnel and other providers concerning the risk,
investigation, reporting, assessment, intervention, and follow-up of
cases of maltreatment involving children with disabilities and those at
risk, including training on how to work collaboratively on an ongoing
basis to prevent and reduce the incidence of abuse of children with
disabilities and the development of disabilities caused by abuse.
Design for formation of interdisciplinary teams which
include disability specialists to assess and treat cases of abuse and
neglect involving children with disabilities, including (1)
consideration of the nature of the child's disability (e.g.,
osteogenesis imperfecta, self-injury) and (2) awareness of such
disabilities as Abusive Head Trauma, including Shaken Baby Syndrome,
and non-organic failure to thrive.
The development of ongoing interagency agreements to
facilitate coordination and collaboration of all relevant agencies/
programs concerned with maltreatment cases involving children with
disabilities and those children at risk of disability, including
emphasizing the importance of sharing data on abuse cases among
agencies involved.
A plan for providing comprehensive community-based
services for the treatment of abuse and neglect involving children with
disabilities or children at risk of disability due to abuse.
A design for prevention activities to reduce incidence of
maltreatment cases involving children with disabilities or children at
risk of disability, including family support programs, child abuse and
neglect training for families of children with disabilities, and
training for children which includes appropriate training for those
with disabilities.
Mechanisms to promote implementation of this same multi-
agency/multi-system approach in local communities in the State. A State
may choose to implement its project in several selected communities or
try different approaches in different communities, before implementing
its strategy Statewide.
Applications for funding for Statewide demonstration projects and
models of prevention and intervention should include an inventory of
resources and best practices, plans for replication and dissemination,
and methods for the evaluation of outcomes. They should reflect
cultural competency and an understanding of legal issues as well as the
political realities of decentralization of service delivery and
empowerment of community-based efforts.
As a general guide, ADD will expect to fund only those proposals
for projects that incorporate the following elements:
Consumer/self-advocate orientation and participation.
Key project personnel with direct life, parental, or
familial experience with living with a disability.
Strong advisory components that consist of 51% individuals
with disabilities and a structure where individuals with disabilities
make real decisions that determine the outcome of the grant.
Research reflecting the principles of participatory
action.
Cultural competency.
A description of how individuals with disabilities and
their families will be involved in all aspects of the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the project.
Attention to unserved and inadequately served individuals,
having a range of disabilities from mild to severe, from multicultural
backgrounds, rural and inner-city areas, migrant, homeless, and refugee
families, with severe disabilities.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended by the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-569).
Collaboration through partnerships and coalitions.
Development of the capacity to communicate and disseminate
information and technical assistance through e-mail and other
effective, affordable, and accessible forms of electronic
communication.
A community-based approach.
Responsiveness through systems change.
Identification of barriers and strategies for overcoming
barriers.
Outcome orientation.
Measurement and ongoing evaluation, including the
participation of individuals with disabilities in formulation and
implementation.