96-15569. Violence Prevention Programs (Longitudinal Evaluations)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 31137-31140]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-15569]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Announcement 634]
    
    
    Violence Prevention Programs (Longitudinal Evaluations)
    
    Introduction
    
        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announces the 
    availability of fiscal year (FY) 1996 funds for cooperative agreements 
    for Violence Prevention Programs (Longitudinal Evaluations). These 
    projects will evaluate injury prevention programs designed to reduce 
    the incidence of injuries, disabilities, and deaths due to 
    interpersonal violence among youth. The cooperative agreements will 
    extend and build upon the work begun in the group of cooperative 
    agreements funded under CDC's Program Announcement 329, which began in 
    fiscal year (FY) 1993. The cooperative agreements funded under Program 
    Announcement 329 supported the continuing development of applied 
    research to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and programs 
    designed to prevent violence-related injuries, disabilities, and deaths 
    among children, adolescents, and young adults.
        CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease 
    prevention objectives described in ``Healthy People 2000,'' a national 
    activity to reduce morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of 
    life. This announcement is related to the priority area of Violent and 
    Abusive Behavior (to order a copy of ``Healthy People 2000,'' see the 
    Section Where to Obtain Additional Information).
    
    Authority
    
        This program announcement is authorized under Sections 301, 317, 
    and 391-394 (42 U.S.C. 241, 247b, and 280b-280b-3) of the Public Health 
    Service Act, as amended.
    
    Smoke-Free Workplace
    
        CDC strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-
    free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products, and 
    Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in 
    certain facilities that receive Federal funds in which education, 
    library, day care, health care, and early childhood development 
    services are provided to children.
    
    Eligible Applicants
    
        Applications will be accepted from public and private, non-profit 
    and for-profit organizations and governments and their agencies. Thus, 
    community-based organizations, other public and private organizations, 
    State, territorial, and local governments or their bona fide agents, 
    federally recognized Indian tribal governments, Indian tribes, or 
    Indian tribal organizations, hospitals, and small, minority- and/or 
    women-owned businesses, universities, colleges, and other research 
    institutions, are eligible to apply.
    
    Availability of Funds
    
        Approximately $500,000 is available in FY 1996 to fund up to four 
    follow-up evaluations of previously implemented and evaluated violence 
    prevention programs that targeted youth below the age of 19 years. 
    Institutions may request funds for more than one project as long as the 
    proposed projects are submitted separately and are distinctly 
    different. Awards are expected to range from $100,000 to $166,000 with 
    an average award of $125,000 for each 12-month budget period.
        It is expected that the new awards will begin on or about September 
    30, 1996, and will be made for a 12-month budget period. Programs 
    funded under this announcement will have a 3-year project period. 
    Funding estimates may vary and are subject to change.
        Continuation funds within the project periods will be awarded on 
    the basis of satisfactory progress as evidenced by required reports and 
    the availability of funds. The estimates outlined above may vary, based 
    on the quality of the applications received within each project period.
    
    Purpose
    
        The purpose of this cooperative agreement is to support extended 
    assessments of the impact of previously implemented and evaluated 
    violence prevention programs that targeted youth below the age of 19 
    years which demonstrated promising outcomes. Specifically, this 
    announcement seeks applications to assess the residual effects of 
    previously evaluated interventions that initially exhibited significant 
    effects in reducing violent behavior, violence-related injuries, or 
    intermediate indicators (e.g. aggressiveness).
        Of particular interest are: (1) assessing whether the effects of 
    the initial intervention persist, and (2) assessing the effects of 
    continued long-term intervention such as efforts to reinforce gains 
    made in the initial intervention against both those who receive no 
    significant additional reinforcement and those who received no 
    significant intervention.
    
    Program Requirements
    
        Successful completion of the project will require a close working 
    relationship between the recipient and CDC. Recipient and CDC 
    Activities are listed below:
    
    A. Recipient Activities
    
        In conducting activities to achieve the purpose of this program, 
    the recipient will:
        1. Collect, compile, and analyze information relevant to the 
    proposed project.
        2. Develop a final written protocol for a comprehensive 
    longitudinal evaluation of the intervention's impact.
        This protocol must contain the following elements:
        a. Statement of the questions to be answered (hypotheses to be 
    tested);
        b. Description of the intervention to be evaluated;
        c. Specific monitoring data that has been collected and analyzed;
    
    [[Page 31138]]
    
        d. Specific impact assessment data that will be collected and 
    analyzed;
        e. A description of methods (both scientific and operational) for 
    collecting impact assessment data;
        f. A description of how data will be maintained (i.e., in what 
    format and databases, and how subjects' confidentiality will be 
    protected); and,
        g. A description of statistical techniques that will be used to 
    analyze the data.
        3. Obtain the necessary clearances and agreements to proceed with 
    all aspects of the proposed violence prevention project. These shall 
    include appropriate human subjects clearances and agreements with other 
    organizations and individuals needed to complete the project.
        4. Identify or develop, and pilot test data collection instruments.
        5. Establish baseline rates for pertinent outcomes within the 
    target group.
        6. Monitor progress toward achievement of project goals through the 
    use of realistic, measurable, time-oriented objectives for all phases 
    of the project.
        7. Evaluate the longitudinal impact of the intervention.
        8. Develop collaborative relationships with voluntary, community-
    based public and private organizations and agencies already involved in 
    preventing violence.
    
    B. CDC Activities
    
        As required for the proper direction of these cooperative 
    agreements, CDC will:
        1. Provide technical consultation on determining the impact of the 
    evaluation; and on designing the scientific protocols;
        2. Collaborate in the design of all phases of the project;
        3. Advise the awardee on data collection instruments and 
    procedures;
        4. Monitor implementation of collection and analysis of impact 
    assessment data;
        5. Arrange for information sharing among the various evaluation 
    projects;
        6. Provide up-to-date scientific information about youth violence 
    prevention; and
        7. Assist in the transfer of information and methods developed in 
    these projects to other prevention programs.
    
    Evaluation Criteria
    
        Applications will be reviewed and evaluated according to the 
    following criteria (maximum 100 total points):
    
    A. Intervention Description, Initial Evaluation Results (25%)
    
        The extent to which the applicant describes in detail the 
    intervention to be evaluated, including the theoretical and scientific 
    bases for the intervention's potential effectiveness in reducing 
    violent behavior or injury among youth.
        1. The extent to which the influence of gender, ethnicity, life 
    experiences, and social setting on pertinent risk and protective 
    factors are addressed.
        2. The extent to which the applicant provides quantitative evidence 
    that the initial intervention achieved significant behavioral 
    improvement in the target group exposed to the intervention.
    
    B. Goals and Objectives (10%)
    
        1. The extent to which the applicant has included goals which are 
    relevant to the purpose of the application and feasible to be 
    accomplished during the project period, and the extent to which these 
    goals are specific and measurable.
        2. The extent to which the applicant has included objectives which 
    are feasible to be accomplished during the budget period, and which 
    address all activities necessary to achieve the stated goals of the 
    application.
        3. The extent to which the objectives are specific, time-framed, 
    and measurable.
    
    C. Evaluation (30%)
    
        1. The extent to which the applicant provides a comprehensive plan 
    for evaluating the long-term effects of the intervention that includes:
        a. A detailed description of the evaluation design and methods, and 
    the analysis plan to be used to answer research questions and to 
    evaluate the previously implemented intervention.
        b. A discussion of the feasibility and ethical considerations 
    relevant to the selected evaluation method.
        c. A reasonable and complete schedule for implementing all project 
    activities.
        d. A detailed data management plan which describes how monitoring 
    and impact assessment data will be collected, processed, and maintained 
    for analysis.
        2. The extent to which barriers to validity are described and 
    addressed.
        3. The extent to which the sample population is described, 
    including:
        a. Selection methods for assignment to treatment or control groups;
        b. A description of the community in which the target group lives;
        c. A discussion that demonstrates that the target group is of 
    sufficient size to yield an adequate sample for testing the proposed 
    evaluation questions; and
        d. A detailed discussion of the effect of attrition on sample size, 
    and the applicant's plan for preserving access to the target group in 
    spite of this threat.
    
    D. Project Management (20%)
    
        1. The extent to which roles of each unit, organization, or agency 
    are described, and coordination and supervision of staff, organizations 
    and agencies involved in activities is apparent.
        2. The extent to which documentation of program organizational 
    location is clear, and shows a coordinated relationship among staff and 
    collaborators in the applicant's evaluation effort.
        3. The extent to which position descriptions, CV's, and lines of 
    command are appropriate to accomplishment of program goals and 
    objectives.
        4. The extent to which concurrence with the applicant's plans by 
    all other involved parties, including consultants, is specific and 
    documented.
        In addition, the degree to which the applicant has met the CDC 
    policy requirements regarding the inclusion of women, ethnic, and 
    racial groups in the proposed research. This includes:
        a. The proposed plan for the inclusion of both sexes and racial and 
    ethnic minority populations for appropriate representation.
        b. The appropriateness of the proposed justification when 
    representation is limited or absent.
        c. Whether the design of the study is adequate to measure 
    differences when warranted.
        d. Whether the plans for recruitment and outreach for study 
    participants include the process of establishing partnerships with 
    community(ies) and recognition of mutual benefits.
    
    E. Collaboration (15%)
    
        The extent to which the applicant:
        1. Describes current and proposed collaborations with appropriate 
    government, health, youth agencies, community-based organizations, 
    minority organizations, and other researchers working with the 
    specified target group;
        2. Documents collaborative relationships with letters of support 
    and memoranda of understanding which precisely specify the nature of 
    past, present, and proposed collaborations, and the data products or 
    services to be provided to the applicant through the project period.
    
    F. Budget and Justification (Not Weighted)
    
        The extent to which the applicant provides a detailed budget and 
    narrative justification consistent with stated objectives and planned 
    program activities.
    
    [[Page 31139]]
    
    G. Human Subjects (Not Weighted)
    
        The extent to which the applicant describes the review process 
    which will govern the participation of human subjects in order to 
    insure their protection and privacy.
    
    Executive Order 12372 Review
    
        Applications are subject to Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
    Programs as governed by Executive Order (E.O.) 12372. E.O. 12372 sets 
    up a system for State and local government review of proposed Federal 
    assistance applications. Applicants (other than federally recognized 
    Indian tribal governments) should contact their State Single Point of 
    Contact (SPOC) as early as possible to alert them to the prospective 
    applications and receive any necessary instructions on the State 
    process. For proposed projects serving more than one State, applicants 
    are advised to contact the SPOC of each affected State. A current list 
    of SPOCs is included in the application kit. If SPOCs have any State 
    process recommendations on applications submitted to CDC, they should 
    send them to Ronald S. Van Duyne, Grants Management Officer, Grants 
    Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease 
    Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., Room 300, 
    Mailstop E13, Atlanta, GA 30305, no later than 30 days after the 
    application deadline. (The appropriation for this financial assistance 
    program was received late in the fiscal year and would not allow for 
    the application receipt date which would accommodate the 60-day State 
    recommendation process period.) The Announcement Number and Program 
    Title should be referenced on the document. The granting agency does 
    not guarantee to ``accommodate or explain'' for State process 
    recommendations it receives after that date.
        Indian tribes are strongly encouraged to request tribal government 
    review of the proposed application. If tribal governments have any 
    tribal process recommendations on applications submitted to CDC, they 
    should forward them to Ronald S. Van Duyne, Grants Management Officer, 
    Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., 
    Room 300, Mailstop E13, Atlanta, GA 30305, no later than 30 days after 
    the application deadline. The Announcement Number and Program Title 
    should be referenced on the document. The granting agency does not 
    guarantee to ``accommodate or explain'' for tribal process 
    recommendations it receives after that date.
    
    Public Health System Reporting Requirements
    
        This program subject to the Public Health System Reporting 
    Requirements. Under these requirements, all community-based 
    nongovernmental applicants must prepare and submit the items identified 
    below to the head of the appropriate State and/or local health 
    agency(s) in the program area(s) that may be impacted by the proposed 
    project no later than the receipt date of the Federal application. The 
    appropriate State and/or local health agency is determined by the 
    applicant. The following information must be provided:
        A. A copy of the face page of the application.
        B. A summary of the project that should be titled ``Public Health 
    System Impact Statement'' (PHSIS), not exceed one page, and include the 
    following:
        1. A description of the population to be served;
        2. A summary of the services to be provided; and
        3. A description of the coordination plans with the appropriate 
    State and/or local health agencies.
        If the State and/or local health official should desire a copy of 
    the entire application, it may be obtained from the State Single Point 
    of Contact (SPOC) or directly from the applicant.
    
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
    
        The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number is 93.136.
    
    Other Requirements
    
    A. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        Projects that involve the collection of information from 10 or more 
    individuals and funded by cooperative agreement will be subject to 
    review by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act.
    
    B. Protection of Human Subjects
    
        If the proposed project involves research on human subjects, the 
    applicant must comply with the Department of Health and Human Services 
    Regulations (45 CFR Part 46) regarding the protection of human 
    subjects. Assurance must be provided (in accordance with the 
    appropriate guidelines and form provided in the application kit) to 
    demonstrate that the project will be subject to initial and continuing 
    review by an appropriate institutional review committee. In addition to 
    other applicable committees, Indian Health Service (IHS) institutional 
    review committees also must review the project if any component of IHS 
    will be involved or will support the research. If any American Indian 
    community is involved, its tribal government must also approve that 
    portion of the project applicable to it. The applicant will be 
    responsible for providing assurance in accordance with the appropriate 
    guidelines and form provided in the application kit.
    
    C. Confidentiality of Records
    
        All identifying information obtained in connection with the 
    provision of services to any person in any program that is being 
    carried out with a cooperative agreement made under this announcement 
    shall not be disclosed unless required by a law of a State or political 
    subdivision thereof unless written, voluntary informed consent is 
    provided by persons who received services.
    
    D. Women, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
    
        It is the policy of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
    (CDC) to ensure that individuals of both sexes and the various racial 
    and ethnic groups will be included in CDC-supported research projects 
    involving human subjects, whenever feasible and appropriate. Racial and 
    ethnic groups are those defined in OMB Directive No.15 and include 
    American Indian, Alaskan Native, Asian, Pacific Islander, Black and 
    Hispanic. Applicants shall ensure that women racial and ethnic minority 
    populations are appropriately represented in applications for research 
    involving human subjects. Where a clear and compelling rationale exists 
    that inclusion is inappropriate or not feasible, this situation must be 
    explained as part of the application. This policy does not apply to 
    research studies when the investigator cannot control the race, 
    ethnicity, and/or sex of subjects. Further guidance to this policy is 
    contained in the Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, pages 47947-47951, 
    dated Friday, September 15, 1995.
    
    E. Accounting Systems
    
        The services of a certified public accountant licensed by the State 
    Board of Accountancy or equivalent must be retained throughout the 
    budget period as a part of the recipient's staff, or as a consultant to 
    the recipient's accounting personnel. These services may include the 
    design, implementation, and maintenance of an accounting system that 
    will record receipts and expenditures of Federal funds in accordance 
    with accounting principles,
    
    [[Page 31140]]
    
    Federal regulations, and terms of the cooperative agreement.
    
    F. Audits
    
        Funds claimed for reimbursement under this cooperative agreement 
    must be audited annually by an independent certified public accountant 
    (separate and independent of the consultant referenced above or 
    recipient's staff certified public accountant). This audit must be 
    performed within 60 days after the end of the budget period, or at the 
    close of an organization's fiscal year. The audit must be performed in 
    accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (established by 
    the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant (AICPA)), 
    governmental auditing standards (established by the General Accounting 
    Office (GAO)), and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-
    133.
    
    Application Submission and Deadline
    
        The original and two copies of the application PHS Form 5161-1 (OMB 
    Number 0937-0189) must be submitted to Joanne A. Wojcik, Grants 
    Management Specialist, Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants 
    Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East 
    Paces Ferry Road, NE., Room 300, Mailstop E13, Atlanta, GA 30305, on or 
    before August 15, 1996.
    
    A. Deadlines
    
        Applications shall be considered as meeting the deadline if they 
    are either:
        1. Received on or before the deadline date; or
        2. Sent on or before the deadline date and received in time for 
    submission to the independent review committee. For proof of timely 
    mailing, applicants must request a legibly dated U.S. Postal Service 
    postmark or obtain a legibly dated receipt from a commercial carrier or 
    the U.S. Postal Service. Private metered postmarks will not be 
    acceptable as proof of timely mailing.
    
    Late Applications
    
        Applications that do not meet the criteria in A.1. or A.2. above 
    are considered late. Late applications will not be considered in the 
    current competition and will be returned to the applicant.
    
    Where To Obtain Additional Information
    
        To receive additional information call (404) 332-4561. You will be 
    asked to leave your name, address and phone number and will need to 
    refer to Announcement 634. You will receive a complete program 
    description, information on application procedures and application 
    forms. The announcement is also available through the CDC home page on 
    the Internet. The address for the CDC home page is http://www.cdc.gov.
        If you have questions after reviewing the contents of all 
    documents, business management assistance may be obtained from Joanne 
    A. Wojcik, Grants Management Specialist, Grants Management Branch, 
    Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and 
    Prevention (CDC), 255 E. Paces Ferry Road, NE., Mailstop E13, Atlanta, 
    GA 30305, telephone (404) 842-6535, or INTERNET address 
    jcw6@opspgo1.em.cdc.gov.
        Programmatic assistance may be obtained from Mark S. Long, Division 
    of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and 
    Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford 
    Highway, NE., Mailstop K60, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, telephone: (770) 
    488-4224, E-mail: msl1@cipcod1.em.cdc.gov.
    
        Note: Please refer to announcement number 634 when requesting 
    information and submitting an application.
    
        There may be delays in mail delivery as well as difficulty in 
    reaching the CDC Atlanta offices during the 1996 Summer Olympics (July 
    19 - August 4). Therefore, in order to receive more timely response to 
    questions please use INTERNET/E-Mail, follow all instructions in this 
    announcement and leave messages on the contact person's voice mail.
        Potential applicants may obtain a copy of ``Healthy People 2000'' 
    (Full Report, Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or ``Healthy People 2000'' 
    (Summary Report, Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) referenced in the 
    Introduction through the Superintendent of Documents, Government 
    Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, telephone, (202) 512-1800.
    
        Dated: June 11, 1996.
    Joseph R. Carter,
    Acting Associate Director for Management and Operations, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
    [FR Doc. 96-15569 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/19/1996
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-15569
Pages:
31137-31140 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Announcement 634
PDF File:
96-15569.pdf