94-13456. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management District  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 105 (Thursday, June 2, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-13456]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 2, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [OAQPS CA38-5-6308; FRL-4890-6]
    
     
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California 
    State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management 
    District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the California State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP) which concern the control of volatile organic 
    compound (VOC) emissions from pleasure craft coating operations and set 
    general recordkeeping requirements for VOC emissions.
        The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to 
    regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the 
    Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). EPA's final action 
    on this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) will incorporate these 
    rules into the federally approved SIP. EPA has evaluated each of these 
    rules and is proposing to approve them under provisions of the CAA 
    regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and 
    secondary ambient air quality standards and plan requirements for 
    nonattainment areas.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 5, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Daniel A. Meer, Rulemaking 
    Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
        Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each 
    rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region 9 office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revisions 
    are also available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley 
    Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182.
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 L Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Stamos (A-5-3), Air and Toxics 
    Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
    Street, San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 744-1187.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rules being proposed for approval into 
    the California SIP are: South Coast Air Quality Management District 
    (SCAQMD) Rule 1106.1, Pleasure Craft Coating Operations and Rule 109, 
    Recordkeeping for Volatile Organic Compound Emissions. These rules were 
    submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to EPA on 
    September 14, 1992.
    
    Background
    
        On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment 
    areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 
    (1977 CAA or pre-amended Act), that included the Los Angeles-South 
    Coast Air Basin. 43 FR 8964, 40 CFR 81.305. Because this area was 
    unable to meet the statutory attainment date of December 31, 1982, 
    California requested under section 172(a)(2), and EPA approved, an 
    extension of the attainment date to December 31, 1987. 40 CFR 52.238. 
    On May 26, 1988, EPA notified the Governor of California, pursuant to 
    section 110(a)(2)(H) of the pre-amended Act, that the SCAQMD's portion 
    of the California SIP was inadequate to attain and maintain the ozone 
    standard and requested that deficiencies in the existing SIP be 
    corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act 
    Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, 
    codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q. In amended section 182(a)(2)(A) of 
    the CAA, Congress statutorily adopted the requirement that 
    nonattainment areas fix their deficient reasonably available control 
    technology (RACT) rules for ozone and established a deadline of May 15, 
    1991 for states to submit corrections of those deficiencies.
        Section 182(a)(2)(A) applies to areas designated as nonattainment 
    prior to enactment of the amendments and classified as marginal or 
    above as of the date of enactment. It requires such areas to adopt and 
    correct RACT rules pursuant to pre-amended section 172(b) as 
    interpreted in pre-amendment guidance.1 EPA's SIP-Call used that 
    guidance to indicate the necessary corrections for specific 
    nonattainment areas. The Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin is 
    classified as extreme;2 therefore, this area was subject to the 
    RACT fix-up requirement and the May 15, 1991 deadline.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of 
    those portions of the proposed Post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide 
    policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues 
    Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, 
    Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register 
    Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the 
    Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control 
    technique guidelines (CTGs).
        \2\ The Los Angeles South Coast Air Basin retained its 
    designation and was classified by operation of law pursuant to 
    sections 107(d) and 181(a) upon the date of enactment of the CAA. 
    See 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The State of California submitted many revised RACT rules for 
    incorporation into its SIP on September 14, 1992, including the rules 
    being acted on in this document. This document addresses EPA's proposed 
    action for SCAQMD Rule 1106.1, Pleasure Craft Coating Operations, and 
    for SCAQMD Rule 109, Recordkeeping for Volatile Organic Compound 
    Emissions. SCAQMD adopted Rule 1106.1 on May 1, 1992 and Rule 109 on 
    March 6, 1992. These submitted rules were found to be complete on 
    November 20, 1992 pursuant to EPA's completeness criteria that are set 
    forth in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V3 and are being proposed for 
    approval into the SIP.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990 
    (55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, 
    revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Rule 1106.1 requires the use of low VOC coatings for marine 
    pleasure craft coating operations and coating application methods with 
    high transfer efficiencies, and Rule 109 sets out general recordkeeping 
    requirements for regulating volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions 
    for a variety of source categories. VOCs contribute to the production 
    of ground level ozone and smog. The rules were adopted as part of the 
    district's efforts to achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
    (NAAQS) for ozone and in response to EPA's SIP-Call and the section 
    182(a)(2)(A) CAA requirement. The following is EPA's evaluation and 
    proposed action for these rules.
    
    EPA Evaluation and Proposed Action
    
        In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate 
    the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA 
    regulations, as found in section 110 and part D of the CAA and 40 CFR 
    part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
    Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements, 
    which forms the basis for today's action, appears in the various EPA 
    policy guidance documents listed in footnote 1. Among those provisions 
    is the requirement that a VOC rule must, at a minimum, provide for the 
    implementation of RACT for stationary sources of VOC emissions. This 
    requirement was carried forth from the pre-amended Act.
        For the purpose of assisting state and local agencies in developing 
    RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG) 
    documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act 
    and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source 
    categories. Under the CAA, Congress ratified EPA's use of these 
    documents, as well as other Agency policy, for requiring States to 
    ``fix-up'' their RACT rules. See section 182(a)(2)(A). Rule 1106.1 
    controls emissions from a source category for which EPA has not issued 
    a CTG and Rule 109 is a general recordkeeping rule and therefore does 
    not have a corresponding CTG. Further interpretations of EPA policy are 
    found in the Blue Book, referred to in footnote 1. In general, these 
    guidance documents have been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are 
    fully enforceable and strengthen or maintain the SIP.
        SCAQMD's submitted Rule 109, includes the following significant 
    changes from the current SIP:
         Adds a definition for Exempt Compounds,
         Removes Executive Officer Discretion from sections (c)(2) 
    and (c)(3) as prescribed in the Technical Support Document (TSD) (dated 
    January 15, 1992), and
         Adds EPA-approved test methods.
        SCAQMD Rule 1106.1 is a new rule which was adopted to regulate 
    emissions for the coating of marine pleasure craft.
        EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they 
    are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
    Therefore, SCAQMD Rule 1106.1 and Rule 109 are being proposed for 
    approval under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements 
    of section 110(a) and Part D.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation plan shall be considered separately in light 
    of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in 
    relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
    
    Regulatory Process
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 600 et. 
    seq., EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the 
    impact of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 
    and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301 and subchapter I, part D 
    of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, it does not 
    have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, due 
    to the nature of the federal-state relationship under the CAA, 
    preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The 
    CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. 
    Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 
    42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action by the Regional 
    Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on 
    January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993, 
    memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. A future notice will inform the general public of 
    these tables. On January 6, 1989, the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) waived Table 2 and Table 3 SIP revisions (54 FR 222) from the 
    requirements of Section 3 of Executive Order 12291 for 2 years. The EPA 
    has submitted a request for a permanent waiver for Table 2 and Table 3 
    SIP revisions. The OMB has agreed to continue the temporary waiver 
    until such time as it rules on EPA's request. This request continues in 
    effect under Executive Order 12866 which superseded Executive Order 
    12291 on September 30, 1993.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
        Dated: May 18, 1994.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 94-13456 Filed 6-1-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/02/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
94-13456
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before July 5, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 2, 1994, OAQPS CA38-5-6308, FRL-4890-6
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52