[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29743-29749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-14213]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LITERACY
[CFDA No. 84.257F]
NIFL Regional Technology HUB Project; Notice Inviting
Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year 1997
AGENCY: The National Institute for Literacy (NIFL).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose
The purpose of these grants is to establish a second generation of
regional hubs to extend the Literacy Information aNd Communication
System (LINCS) infrastructure throughout the literacy community in each
region. Each hub will form a consortium with all states in the region--
``member states''--and, in cooperation with member states, a network of
targeted local literacy programs. Each regional hub will be expected to
build on the achievements of the region's previous hub and to build
strong partnerships with other technology efforts in the region. In the
process of enhancing the technological capacity of states and local
programs, regional hubs will--
Increase the literacy field's electronic knowledge base by
collecting and exchanging new literacy information resources,
especially locally developed materials, and creating in-depth
collections on important literacy topics.
Encourage the widespread use of the NIFL's systematic
procedures and uniform standards for information collection and
exchange.
Provide innovative delivery of high quality, easy-to-
access information resources to the adult education and literacy
community through the use of a variety of tools, including multi-media.
Enable member states and local programs to be self-
sufficient in their efforts to enhance the LINCS database and
communication tools.
Enhance communication and community-building by connecting
increasingly larger numbers of literacy stakeholders of all kinds--
researchers, practitioners, administrators, students, and
policymakers--and closing the gap between information ``haves'' and
``have nots.''
Integrate the use of technology into every aspect of
learning and teaching in the adult education and literacy field.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 17, 1997.
Eligible Applicants: State, regional, and national organizations,
or consortia of such organizations, in OVAE Regions II, III, and IV.
Available Funds: This announcement envisions a three-year
cooperative agreement. In the first year up to a total of $450,000 is
available for all grants. Year 2 and 3 funding is subject to program
authorization and availability of appropriations, and contingent upon
satisfactory completion of the first year plan of action.
Estimated Number of Awards: Three awards (one award in each of the
OVAE regions II, III, and IV).
Estimated Award Amount: $150,000.
Project Period: Three years.
Applicable Regulations: The National Institute for Literacy has
adopted the following regulations included in the Education Department
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR): 34 CFR part 74; 34 CFR part 75,
Secs. 75.50, 75.51, 75.102-75, 75.109, 75.117, 75.109-75.192, 75.200,
75.201, 75.215; 34 CFR parts 77, 80, 82, 85.
Note: The selection criteria used for this competition are set
out in this Notice. While the criteria are patterned on those used
generally by the U.S. Department of Education, they have been
adapted by the NIFL to meet the needs of this program. While the
NIFL is associated with the Departments of Education, Labor, and
Health and Human Services, the policies and procedures regarding
rulemaking and administration of grants are not adopted by the NIFL
except as expressly stated in this Notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaleh Behroozi Soroui, National
Institute for Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 200,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: 202-632-1506. FAX: 202-632-1512. E-
mail: jaleh@literacy.nifl.gov. Information about NIFL's funding
opportunities, including the Application Notices, Newsletters, Policy
Updates, etc., can be viewed on the LINCS WWW server (under Current
Events, under grants). LINCS URL: http://novel.nifl.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For purposes of this announcement the following definitions apply:
Literacy An individual's ability to read, write, and speak in
English, and compute and solve problems at levels of proficiency
necessary to function on the job and in society, to achieve one's goals
and develop one's knowledge and
[[Page 29744]]
potential (as stated in the National Literacy Act of 1991).
Adult Education and Literacy Community The aggregate of individuals
and groups at all levels nationwide that are actively involved with
adult education and literacy instruction, including individuals such as
researchers, practitioners, policymakers, adult learners, and
administrators, and groups such as state and local departments of
education, human services, and labor; libraries; community-based
organizations; businesses and labor unions; and volunteer and civic
groups.
State Literacy Resource Centers (SLRCs) State or regional
organizations supported through federal, state, or private funds for
the purpose of coordinating the delivery and improvement of literacy
services across agencies and organizations in the state or region,
enhancing the capability of state and local organizations to provide
literacy services, building a database of literacy-related information,
and working closely with the NIFL and other national literacy
organizations to enhance the national literacy infrastructure.
NIFL Standards NIFL's guidelines and standards for organizing
materials in a uniform format for posting on the Internet. These
standards are found in NIFL's ``Starting Point'' manual and Adult
Literacy Thesaurus (ALT).
OVAE Regions The four regions of the United States designated by
the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Vocational and Adult
Education (OVAE):
Region I: Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania,
Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virgin Islands.
Region II: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Virginia, West Virginia.
Region III: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin.
Region IV: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho,
Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, Federal
States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, No. Mariana Islands.
Regional Hub or Regional Technology Hub An Internet-based
electronic information retrieval and communication site that serves
states in a particular OVAE region by acting as the focal point for
LINCS activity, including training and technical assistance.
Background
The National Institute For Literacy (NIFL), as authorized by the
National Literacy Act of 1991, has the legislative mandate to develop a
national literacy database. The intent of this mandate is to assure the
consolidation and accessibility of scattered and hard-to-access
information resources for literacy.
As a first step in carrying out this charge, the NIFL conducted a
study in 1992 of the literacy community's information needs by type of
users and quality and format of existing literacy databases. In 1993,
following up on the results of this survey, the NIFL formed eight work
groups of representatives from the literacy community to develop a
vision and work plan for establishing an information and communication
system, which is called LINCS. The work groups used a consensus-
building process to produce a framework, standards, and guidelines for
LINCS, which are presented in the NIFL's ``Starting Point'' manual.
In order to implement the work groups' vision and plans, NIFL
developed a LINCS on-line prototype to examine and demonstrate the
potential and capabilities of an Inernet-based national literacy
information and communication network. The LINCS prototype was
developed as a World Wide Webb system on the Internet, accessible by
multi-media tools (such as Mosaic or Netscape) and text-based tools
(such as Lynx). LINCS was designed to access literacy data available in
multiple locations and to feature searchable literacy holdings and
other literacy resources.
In 1995, the NIFL initiated the funding of regional hubs in all
OVAE regions in order to build a nationwide infrastructure for
extending LINCS services throughout the adult education and literacy
community. Grants were made to state agencies in all four regions, and
grantees--called lead states--had the task of creating regional
networks for LINCS by helping all states and territories in their
regions to acquire the technological capabilities and expertise to
establish their own LINCS home pages, populate their site with locally
produced materials, and extend LINCS services to local programs and
users. To date, 38 states have established LINCS home pages on the
Internet, and 130 local programs have received training and technical
assistance in accessing LINCS.
LINCS currently permits simultaneous search across the home pages
of all existing regional hubs and member states, as well as many major
national and international organizations and databases. In addition,
LINCS provides the literacy community with important up-to-the-minute
information on adult education and literacy policies, an event
calendar, funding announcements, and information on other literacy
initiatives. LINCS also provides members of the literacy community with
opportunities for sharing expertise and resources on major literacy-
related issues through several moderated forums/listservs.
Plans for the Future
Over the past five years, the NIFL has provided the leadership and
tools to prepare the adult literacy community for the 21st century
through major system-building initiatives, including the creation of
LINCS and its regional hubs. The NIFL intends to sustain the momentum
of building systems that helps professionalize the adult literacy
community by continuing its initiatives in technology. During the next
three years, the NIFL plans to expand LINCS use as widely as possible
throughout the literacy community, to enhance LINCS resources and
features, and to offer a range of services through LINCS that will
increase the qualitative and quantitative technological capabilities of
the field. The success of these plans will depend on--
Increased collaboration among the NIFL, regional hubs,
member states, and all other major technology initiatives nationwide.
Maintaining compatibility and consistency of LINCS efforts
among the NIFL and regional hubs.
Continuous enhancement of LINCS based on the state-of-the-
art technology.
Overview of Regional Technology Hubs
The NIFL will award grants to public and private organizations, or
consortia of organizations, for the support of regional technology hubs
in OVAE Regions II, III, and IV. No more than one grant will be made in
each of the three regions.
Selection Criteria
(a)(1) In evaluating applications for a grant under this
competition, the Director uses the following selection criteria.
(2) The maximum score for all the criteria in this section is 100
points.
(3) The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in
parentheses with the criterion.
[[Page 29745]]
(b) The Criteria--(1) Mission and Strategy (5 points). The Director
reviews each application to determine the appropriateness of the
applicant's stated mission and strategy for the proposed regional hub,
including consideration of:
(i) The degree to which the stated mission and strategy for
operating a regional hub reflect an understanding of the NIFL's goals
and purposes for LINCS;
(ii) The degree to which the application demonstrates an
understanding of the previous regional hub's strengths and weaknesses;
and
(iii) The quality and coherence of proposed strategies for
providing leadership to member states and targeted local programs.
(2) Institution Capability (20 points). The Director reviews each
application to determine the capabilities of the organization to
sustain a long-term, high quality, and coherent program, including
consideration of:
(i) The applicant's experience in establishing and carrying out
collaborative working relationships with other states, other state
agencies, local programs, and other public and private groups;
(ii) The applicant's experience in the use of technology to enhance
accessibility of information and ease of communication;
(iii) The capabilities of staff who will oversee project
implementation;
(iv) The applicant's capacity to provide resources--including
hardware, software, and training--to member states and local programs;
and
(v) The applicant's willingness and ability to continue the project
at the end of the three-year grant period.
(3) Plan of Operation (30 points). The Director reviews each
application to determine the quality of the plan of operation,
including consideration of:
(i) The quality of the design of the project;
(ii) How well the objectives of the project relate to the intended
purposes of the regional technology hubs, as outlined in this request
for applications;
(iii) The quality of the applicant's plan to use its resources and
personnel to achieve each project objective;
(iv) The extent to which the plan of management is effective and
ensures proper and efficient administration of the project;
(v) The quality of the plan to establish effective working
relationships with other organizations in the region as required for
effective development of the project;
(vi) The quality of the plan for leveraging additional resources
for the project at the regional level and in each member state; and
(vi) The extent to which the applicant's plan includes sound
methods for achieving measurable goals.
(4) Technical Soundness (15 points). The Director reviews each
application to determine the technical soundness of the proposed
project, including consideration of:
(i) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates knowledge of
current Internet technologies, databases, telecommunications practices,
equipment configurations, and maintenance;
(ii) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates a thorough
knowledge of literacy data collections, dissemination, and NIFL
standards;
(iii) The extent to which the applicant demonstrates a commitment
to provide technical support, training, and equipment to member states;
(iv) The extent to which the applicant will consider the
perspectives of a variety of service providers in carrying out the work
of the regional hub;
(v) The extent to which the proposed training content is
comprehensive and at appropriate levels; and
(vi) The extent to which training methods, mechanisms, and
structures are likely to be effective.
(5) Budget and Cost Effectiveness (10 points). The Director reviews
each application to determine the extent to which:
(i) The budget is adequate to support project activities;
(ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the
project;
(iii) The budgets for any subcontracts are detailed and
appropriate; and
(iv) The budget details resources, cash and in-kind, that the
applicant and others, especially member states, will provide to the
project in addition to grant funds.
(6) Evaluation Plan (10 points). The Director reviews each
application to determine the quality of the evaluation plan for the
project, including consideration of:
(i) The quality of methods and mechanisms to be used to document
and evaluate progress in relation to the project's mission and goals;
(ii) The strength of the applicant's statement of measurable
outcomes for all project goals; and
(iii) The quality of methods that will be used to document and
evaluate the impact of the project's program on target audiences.
(7) Quality of Key Personnel (10 points). The Director reviews each
application to determine the quality of key personnel for all project
activities, including consideration of:
(i) The qualifications of the project director;
(ii) The qualifications of other key personnel;
(iii) The experience and training of key personnel in leading a
consortium of states and working in fields related to project
objectives; and
(iv) The applicant's policy, as part of its nondiscriminatory
employment practices, to ensure that its personnel are selected for
employment without regard to race, color, national origin, religion,
gender, age, or disability.
Application Requirements
Project Narrative
The project narrative is critical and must thoroughly reflect the
capacity of the applicant to lead the regional technology effort and
build on the achievements of the previous regional hub. The narrative
must clearly describe the applicant's plan for attaining measurable
goals as identified in each of the sections listed below.
The narrative should not exceed twenty (20) single-spaced pages, or
forty (40) double-spaced pages. The narrative may be amplified by
material in attachments and appendices, (not exceeding 20 pages) but
the body should stand alone to give a complete picture of the project.
Proposals that exceed 20 single-spaced pages or 40 double-spaced pages
will not be reviewed.
The narrative must encompass the full three years of project
activities, with detailed plans for Year 1 and milestones for Years 2
and 3. The applicant must address the following areas, which correspond
to the funding criteria:
1. Mission and Strategy
The applicant must state goals, objectives, and overall expected
project achievements for the three-year grant period, including:
a. How the applicant's goals and objectives relate to NIFL's
purposes for LINCS and the regional hubs, as outlined under Plans for
the Future and Overview of the Regional Technology Hubs in this notice.
b. How the project will build on the work of the previous regional
hub in enhancing the technological capacity of the region's adult
education and literacy community.
c. What services will be provided to all member states and targeted
local programs in the region.
d. How the project will serve the entire adult education and
literacy community, including the full range of public and private
programs (including libraries, local education agencies, community
colleges, volunteer and community-based organizations, etc.).
[[Page 29746]]
2. Institutional Capabilities
The applicant must describe its qualifications to act as the lead
site of a regional consortium of all member states in carrying out the
proposed project, including evidence of the following:
a. The organizational capacity to lead member states in achieving
project goals and objectives.
b. A successful leadership track record for working closely with
other agencies in the region in implementing a coordinated regional
plan.
c. The ability to secure the support and involvement of member
states, including their involvement in the development of the
application.
d. The capacity to maintain and continuously enhance a sizable
literacy collection on the Internet.
e. The availability of sufficient hardware, software, and technical
expertise to maintain a home page and provide the necessary support to
member states.
f. A secure funding basis for the duration of the project.
g. The ability to leverage other funding and resources to sustain
the project beyond the grant.
3. Plan of Operation
The applicant must develop a three-year plan of operation that is
both ambitious and realistic. While aiming high, the applicant must
demonstrate an awareness of the constraints inherent in each particular
situation. In addition to being reasonable and achievable, the plan
must address both the immediate needs and the future vision and
direction of the project. The plan must clearly identify the measurable
outcomes that will result from project implementation. The description
of the plan must address the following:
a. Creating the regional hub: How the applicant will establish and
maintain a regional hub on the Internet that--
(1) Reflects knowledge of the previous hub's strengths and
weaknesses, and builds on its achievements.
(2) Provides a seamless and uninterrupted transition of services
and resources from the previous hub.
(3) Mirrors the LINC's information structure and the system
architecture, and is consistent with the NIFL vision for building a
technology infrastructure, including hardware, software, and networking
system compatibilities.
b. Supporting member states: How the applicant will help member
states become technologically self-sufficient and develop the
management capabilities to use and contribute to LINCS, including
states' ability to:
(1) Maintain a strong home page with a seamless interface with the
applicant's and LINCS home pages.
(2) Provide technical assistance, training, and high quality,
updated resources to local adult education and literacy programs.
c. Enhancing the knowledge base: How the applicant will work with
member states to gather information that broadens and deepens the
literacy field's knowledge base and enhances LINCS content, including--
(1) A measurable plan for the region and all member states that
describes how the applicant will:
(a) Assess the information available in each member state and how
it can be collected for use on LINCS.
(b) Provide for the collection of information that responds to end
users' educational and training needs.
(c) Focus on the collection of high quality resources,
instructional materials, and tools, including information on exemplary
projects.
(d) Make provisions for including print and non-print materials,
such as audio and video materials, in their entirety.
(e) Be organized according to the NIFL standards.
(2) A plan for developing a special in-depth collection of
information that represents the region's particular strengths in terms
of resources and expertise.
(3) The resources to be made available to help member states
achieve their measurable goals for information collection.
(4) How the applicant and member states will collect and update
local program data according to NIFL standards.
(5) How the applicant will exercise quality control of the hub's
home page.
d. Extending LINCS use to local programs: How the applicant will
work with member states to extend LINCS use to targeted local programs,
including:
(1) Determining how to enhance the technical capacity of local
programs and end users.
(2) Selecting a specified number of local programs to target.
(3) The support to be provided to each member state for serving
local programs, including--
(a) The kind of resources to be provided.
(b) The kind of hardware and software to be used.
(c) The training and technical assistance to be provided.
(4) Leveraging other resources for working with local programs.
(5) Evaluating the success of the project at the local level.
(6) The specific outcomes expected in year 1.
e. Delivering resources: How innovative technologies will be used
to provide easy and efficient methods of delivering resources to the
adult education and literacy community, including--
(1) What tools will be used.
(2) What hardware, software, and technical assistance will be
provided for using these tools.
(3) How multi-media resources will be incorporated into project
activities.
(4) How these tools will enable literacy practitioners to access
LINCS' variety of resources in all available formats.
(5) How these tools will help learners with low skill levels and
learners with special needs use LINCS resources.
f. Enhancing communication and community-building: How the
applicant will enhance communication throughout the adult education and
literacy community across and within member states through the use of
telecommunications tools (such as listservs, forums, audio/video
conferencing and networking, and virtual workspace programs),
including--
(1) The kind of tools to be used.
(2) The specific content to be offered.
(3) How these tools will be used to link up literacy researchers,
practitioners, administrators, students, and policymakers.
(4) How these tools will provide a medium for professional
development within and among the member states and targeted local
programs.
g. Integrating technology into teaching and learning: How the
applicant, in partnership with member states and local programs, will
develop a three-year implementation plan for integrating technology
into the daily teaching and learning routine of the adult education and
literacy system, including--
(1) How the applicant will assess the existing level of integration
in every member state.
(2) How the applicant will identify and use information about other
national, state, and local efforts to integrate technology into
teaching and learning.
(3) What resources will be recruited for the development of the
three-year plan.
(4) How the applicant will support member states in developing and
implementing plans for technology integration, including the selection
of local programs as pilot sites.
(5) What kind of partnership will be developed with other regional
and state agencies involved in similar efforts.
[[Page 29747]]
(6) How the applicant will evaluate progress in integrating
technology.
(7) The minimum outcomes expected in Year 1.
h. Organization and management: How the applicant will ensure
appropriate project organization and management that will--
1. Empower member states to become technologically independent in
implementing project's activities.
2. Use and build on the strength and expertise of member states.
3. Ensure close collaboration and coordination of technology
efforts among member states.
4. Ensure close collaboration with NIFL and other regional hubs,
including cooperation in implementing new requirements or standards
developed by NIFL in concert with regional hubs to assure uniformity
across the LINCS network.
The description of plans for organization and management should
include--
(1) How the applicant involved member states in developing the
application.
(2) How the applicant will involve member states and local programs
in overseeing project implementation and evaluating progress.
(3) How the applicant will provide for expanding the roles of
member states in carrying out project activities (i.e., by providing
states with resources and funds appropriate to their level of need and
expertise).
(4) How the applicant will provide for developing a formal
agreement with all member states that clearly identifies the rights,
roles, and responsibilities of each state with regard to all project
activities.
(5) What tools will be used to maintain communication among the
applicant and member states.
(6) How the applicant will provide for the management of any other
partnership, consultant, or subcontract arrangement.
(7) How the applicant will help member states to--
(a) Explore and leverage other sources of financial support and
market their achievements.
(b) Develop active state-level partnerships, especially with state
education agencies.
(8) How the applicant will identify agencies within each state
(including at a minimum the state literacy resource center and state
office of adult education) to be involved in regional hub activities.
I. Broad-based collaboration: How the applicant will work with
member states to develop collaborative relationships with other
agencies, organizations, and projects that will--
1. Widen LINCS usage in the field.
2. Provide global access to all literacy-related resources.
3. Further project objectives.
4. Be a potential source for future project support.
The description should include--
(1) How the applicant will work with member states to secure the
active cooperation and partnership of appropriate state agencies,
especially those dealing with education, labor, and human services.
(2) How the applicant will identify and develop partnerships with
technology-based educational projects, especially those in the areas of
telecommunications, on-line services, networking, and multi-media.
(3) How the applicant will pursue partnerships with private
entities, including telecommunication and high tech business and
industry.
4. Technical Soundness
Describe how the applicant will provide for the provision of
hardware, software, and networking system that will--
(1) Address issues of interpretability and scalability,
(2) Support using audio-video, multi-media, and interactive
Internet tools, and
(3) Keep pace with high-end technology.
The description should include assurances that the following will
be in place--
(1) An electronic system for the regional hub that mirrors the
LINCS structure, which consist of a UNIX-based server capable of
providing the following services for the regional HUB and its member
states:
(a) World Wide Web (WWW) HTTP services;
(b) Wide Area Information Server (WAIS) database services;
(c) Character-based web browser (LYNX) services,
(d) Internet Electronic Mail (SMTP) services;
(e) File Transfer Protocol (FTP) services;
(f) List (listproc, majordomo) services;
(g) Connectivity to the Internet via a dedicated Internet
connection of sufficient capacity that will allow a sustained usage
that must not exceed 30% of the total circuit capacity, and the
combined circuit and web server must be able to transfer an average web
page at a rate of 20 kilobytes in three seconds to a client web browser
at NIFL, during peak usage times, and must also be able to deliver
quality audio and video products at useable rates to multiple
concurrent users;
(h) Maintain information both HTML documents and WAIS databases;
(i) Serve as the HUBS WWW, WAIS, Audio and Video server; and
(j) Provide dial-in and Internet access to users via a command line
Web browser (e.g., Lynx), for those that do not have the ability to run
graphical browsers such as Netscape, Internet Explorer, Mosaic, etc.
Provide user accounts on the local server for these users, dial-in
model access, etc. (Note that all the software developed for the NIFL
homepage by the Logistics Management Institute and UUCOM is freely
available for re-use.
(2) Provide assurances that applicant will create a home page
design that is similar to the LINCS home page, so that the same ``look
and feel'' can be achieved throughout the network.
(3) Provide assurances that the applicant will, at a minimum, have
(a) appropriately scaled Internet connectivity described above
(connectivity may vary); (b) a WAIS database server(s) on the Internet
(configuration is based on the LINC Search multiple database search
program); (c) LINCS Locally Produced Materials and Organization forms
and guidelines on the HUB's server; and (d) the WAIS database(s) with
literacy collections and program data, using ``Starting Point'' record
structures, standards and Adult Literacy Thesaurus.
(4) Describe how the applicant will provide technical assistance,
funding, and other resources to assure that all member states have
their own directory of resources on the hub server or their own WAIS
server, as well as the technical capacity to update their databases
according to NIFL standards.
(5) Provide assurances that the applicant will for each member
state, at a minimum, have--
(a) Assessment of the equipment needs.
(b) Inventory of equipment provided to implement project
activities.
(c) Plans for purchasing or upgrading equipment, as well as
software and networking systems.
(6) Describe how the applicant's measurable training and technical
assistance activities will--
(a) Focus on raising awareness and educating practitioners on
resources available through LINCS (broad-based training).
(b) Build greater knowledge, and skills in using the LINCS
technology for teaching and learning (targeted training).
(c) Result in establishing a team of trainers at the regional level
and for every member state.
[[Page 29748]]
(d) Assist member states to become independent in implementing
state training plans and maintaining their web site.
(e) Adopt or develop training models (i.e., training trainers,
workshops supplemented by peer coaching or modeling, etc.) that can be
used to meet the needs of geographically dispersed staff at various
levels of knowledge and skills.
(f) Provide methods, mechanisms, structures, and materials for
training--both on line and off line--that can be replicated,
maintained, easily accessible, and updated beyond the life of this
project.
(g) Provide technical assistance for member states and local
programs that help staff and end users at varying levels of technical
sophistication, with special attention to non-technical staff.
(h) Assist member states in selection and installation of hardware
and software within the proposed timeline.
5. Budget and Cost-Effectiveness
The applicant must describe plans for managing the project budget
and ensuring cost-effectiveness, including--
a. Provisions for ensuring the most efficient and cost-effective
use of project funds.
b. Provisions for identifying and securing additional funds to
continue and expand the project beyond the end of the grant.
c. A time line for the project, consisting of a table or diagram
listing major tasks or milestones and including estimates of funds,
time, training schedules, personnel, facilities, and equipment
allocated to each program area, as well as the timing of progress and
other reports, meetings, and other similar events.
6. Monitoring and Evaluation
The applicant must describe a plan for monitoring and evaluation
that is based on the measurable goals of the project. The description
of the plan must include how the applicant will--
a. Demonstrate the project's effectiveness in achieving its
objectives.
b. Assess the project's impact on member states and the broader
literacy community.
c. Evaluate the effectiveness of the lead site's role in working
with member states.
d. Use on-line methods (such as web tools) to collect and analyze
data on the effectiveness of the resources presented.
e. Evaluate the project's impact on targeted local programs.
f. Confirm and report evaluation results.
7. Key Personnel
The applicant must describe how it will ensure the capacity of key
personnel to carry out the work of the project, including--
a. A description of the main qualifications of key personnel to
carry out project tasks.
b. Identification of key staff members at the regional and member
state level, their specific roles, and the number of hours to carry out
their tasks.
Other Application Requirements
The application shall include the following:
Project Summary: The proposal must contain a 200-word summary of
the proposed project suitable for publication. It shall not be an
abstract of the proposal, but rather a self-contained description of
the activities that would explain the proposal. The summary should be
free of jargon and technical terminology, and should be understandable
by a non-specialist reader.
Budget Proposal: ED Form 524 must be completed and submitted with
each application. The form consists of Sections A, B, amd C. On the
back of the form are general instructions for completion of the budget.
All applicants must complete Sections A and C. If Section B is
completed, include the nature and source of non-federal funds. Attach
to Section C a detailed explanation and amplification of each budget
category. Included in the explanation should be complete justification
of costs in each category. Additional instructions include:
Prepare a separate itemization and brief narrative for
each of the member states in the region in addition to submitting an
itemized budget narrative for the project as a whole.
Personnel items should include names (titles or position)
of key staff, number of hours proposed and applicable hourly rates.
Include the cost, purpose, and justification for travel,
equipment, supplies, contractual and other. Training stipends are not
authorized under this program.
Clearly identify in all instances contributed costs and
support from other sources, if any.
Show budget detail for financial aspects of any cost-
sharing, joint or cooperative funding.
Disclosure of Prior NIFL Support: If any consortium member state
has received NIFL funding in the past 2 years, the following
information on the prior awards is required.
NIFL award number, amount and period of support;
A summary of the results of the completed work; and
A brief description of available materials and other
related research products not described elsewhere.
If the applicant has received a prior award, the reviewers will be
asked to comment on the quality of the prior work described in this
section of the proposal.
Current and Pending Support: All current project support from
whatever source (such as Federal, State, or local government agencies,
private foundations, commercial organizations) must be listed. The list
must include the proposed project and all other projects requiring a
portion of time of the Project Director and other project personnel,
even if they receive no salary support from the project(s). The number
of person-months or percentage of effort to be devoted to the projects
must be stated, regardless of source of support. Similar information
must be provided for all proposals that are being considered by or will
be submitted soon to other sponsors.
If the project not being submitted has been funded previously by
another source, the information requested in the paragraph above should
be furnished for the immediately preceding funding period. If the
proposal is being submitted to other possible sponsors, all of them
must be listed. Concurrent submission of a proposal to other
organizations will not prejudice its review by the NIFL.
Any fee proposed to be paid to a collaborating or ``partner'' for-
profit entity should be indicated. (Fees will be negotiated by the
Grants Officer.) Any copyright, patent or royalty agreements (proposed
or in effect) must be described in detail, so that the rights and
responsibilities of each party are made clear.
If any part of the project is to be subcontracted, a budget and
work plan prepared and duly signed by the subcontractor must be
submitted as part of the overall proposal and addressed in the
narrative.
Reporting: In addition to working closely with the Institute, the
applicant will be required to submit a final annual report of
activities. This report will be presented to the Institute staff, the
National Institute Advisory Board and the Interagency Group. Detailed
specifications for the report will be provided to the consortium within
3 months after the awards.
For planning purposes, the applicant may assume that the following
information will be provided:
Project(s) Title
[[Page 29749]]
Project Abstract
A concise narrative describing in layman's language the subject
purposes, methods, expected outcomes (including products), and
significance of the project.
Significant Products: A list of significant holdings
available for access associated with the consortium.
Significant Accomplishments.
A past-tense abstract that describes the consortium's
accomplishments, known uses of the holdings and evidence of positive
impact.
The grantee must also submit the following reports:
Quarterly Performance: A brief 4-5 page report of
progress--Due: Within 30 days at the end of each quarter.
Acknowledgment of Support and Disclaimer: An acknowledgment of NIFL
support and a disclaimer must appear in publications of any material,
whether copyrighted or not, based on or developed under NIFL supported
projects:
This material is based upon work supported by NIFL under Grant No.
(grantee should enter NIFL grant number).
Except for articles or papers published in professional journals,
the following disclaimer should be included:
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the NIFL.
Instructions for Transmittal of Applications
(a) To apply for a cooperative agreement grant--
(1) Mail the original and seven (7) copies of the application on or
before the deadline date of July 17, 1997 to: National Institute for
Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC
20006,, Attention: Jaleh Behroozi-Soroui (CFDA #84.257F).
(2) Hand deliver the application by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time)
on the deadline date to the address above.
(b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service,
the Director does not accept either of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should
check with the local post office.
(3) The NIFL will mail a Grant Applicant Receipt Acknowledgment to
each applicant. If an applicant fails to receive the notification of
application receipt within 15 days from the date of mailing the
application, the applicant should call the NIFL at (202) 632-1525 or
(202) 632-1500.
(4) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and in Item 10 of
the application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA
number of the competition under which the application is being
submitted.
Application Instructions and Forms: The appendix to this
application is divided into three parts plus a statement regarding
estimated public reporting burden and various assurances and
certifications. These parts and additional materials are organized in
the same manner that the submitted application should be organized. The
parts and additional materials are as follows:
Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev.
4-94)) and instructions.
Part II. Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs (ED Form
524) and instructions.
Part III: Application Narrative.
Additional Materials: Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
Assurances-Non--Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
Certification Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and Other
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED 80-
0013).
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014, 9/90)
and instructions.
Note: ED 80-0014 is intended for the use of recipients and
should not be transmitted to the NIFL.
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL) (if
applicable) and instructions.
An applicant may submit information on a Photostat copy of the
application and budget forms, the assurances and the certifications.
However, the application form, the assurances, and certifications must
each have an original signature. No award can be made unless a complete
application has been received.
Information about NIFL's funding opportunities, including copies of
application notices for discretionary grant competitions, can be viewed
on the NIFL homepage--LINCS--on the World Wide Web at: (http://
novel.nifl.gov/Grants.html). However, the official application notice
for a discretionary grant competition is the notice published in the
Federal Register.
Instructions for Estimated Public Reporting Burden: According to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond
to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The valid OMB control number for this information is under OMB
control number 3430 0004, Expiration date: May, 2000. The time required
to complete this information collection is 55 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and disseminating the data needed, and completing
and reviewing the collection of information. If you have any comments
concerning the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for
improving this form, please write to: the National Institute for
Literacy, 800 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006-
2712.
[Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1213C]
Dated: May 23, 1997.
Carolyn Y. Staley,
Deputy Director, National Institute for Literacy.
[FR Doc. 97-14213 Filed 5-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6055-01-M
