97-14304. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; District of Columbia; Interim Final Determination for Approval of the District of Columbia New Source Review Submittal  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 29668-29669]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-14304]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [SIPTRAX DC032-2005; FRL-5832-9]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    District of Columbia; Interim Final Determination for Approval of the 
    District of Columbia New Source Review Submittal
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, EPA has published a 
    proposed rule to approve the District of Columbia submittal of its New 
    Source Review program requirements into the State Implementation Plan 
    (SIP). Based on the proposed approval, EPA is making an interim final 
    determination by this action that the District has corrected the 
    deficiencies for which a sanctions clock began on March 24, 1995. This 
    action will stay the application of the offset sanction which was 
    imposed October 24, 1996 and defer the application of the highway 
    sanction to be imposed effective May 24, 1997. Although this action is 
    effective upon publication, EPA will take comment on this interim final 
    determination as well as EPA's proposed approval of the State's 
    submittal. After consideration of comments received on EPA's proposed 
    approval and this interim final action EPA will publish a final 
    rulemaking notice.
    
    DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 1997.
        Comment Date: Comments must be received by July 2, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to Kathleen Henry, Chief, Permits 
    Program Section, Mailcode 3AT23, Air, Radiation and Toxics Division, 
    U.S. EPA Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
    19107. The District's submittal and EPA's analysis for that submittal, 
    which are the basis for this action, are available for public review at 
    the above address and at the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory 
    Affairs, Environmental Regulation Administration, 2100 Martin Luther 
    King, Jr. Avenue, S.E., Suite 203, Washington, D.C. 20020.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Miller, (215) 566-2068, at the 
    EPA Region III address above or via e-mail at 
    miller.linda@epamail.epa.gov. While information may be requested via e-
    mail, comments must be submitted in writing to the EPA Region III 
    address above.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On October 22, 1993, the District submitted a New Source Review 
    regulation as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 
    submittal did not meet the applicable statutory and regulatory 
    requirements of the Clean Air Act, including sections 171, 172, 173, 
    182, 187, and 189. On March 24, 1995, EPA published a disapproval of 
    the submittal in the Federal Register. Pursuant to section 179 of the 
    Clean Air Act, this disapproval requires the imposition of sanctions in 
    two phases unless and until deficiencies are corrected. Phase I 
    sanctions require the imposition of 2:1 emission offsets for 
    construction of new sources or major modification to existing sources, 
    commencing 18 months after the effective date of disapproval. The 
    emission offset sanctions were imposed on October 24, 1996. Phase II 
    sanctions require the withholding of federal highway funds for all new 
    highway projects in the District, commencing 24 months after the 
    effective date of the disapproval. The required date for imposition of 
    Phase II sanctions is May 24, 1997.
        On May 2, 1997, the District submitted a complete SIP submittal 
    which corrects the deficiencies of the New Source Review program. In 
    the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, EPA has 
    proposed full approval of the District of Columbia's submittal of its 
    New Source Review program.
    
    [[Page 29669]]
    
    II. EPA Action
    
        Based on the proposed full approval set forth in today's Federal 
    Register, EPA believes that the District has corrected the original 
    disapproval deficiencies that started the sanction clock and, 
    therefore, EPA is taking this interim final action finding that the 
    District has corrected the disapproval deficiencies, effective on 
    publication. This action does not stop the sanction clock that started 
    under section 179 for this area on March 24, 1995. However, this action 
    will stay the application of the offset sanction and will defer the 
    application of the highway sanction. See 40 CFR 52.31. Publication of 
    final approval by EPA will stop the sanction clock and will permanently 
    lift any applied, stayed or deferred sanctions.
        Today EPA is also providing the public with an opportunity to 
    comment on this interim final action. If, based on any comments on this 
    action and any comments on EPA's proposed full approval of the State's 
    submittal, EPA determines that the State's submittal is not fully 
    approvable and this final action was inappropriate, EPA will take 
    further action to disapprove the State's submittal and to find that the 
    State has not corrected the original disapproval deficiency. As 
    appropriate, EPA will also issue an interim final determination or a 
    final determination that the deficiency has not been corrected. In 
    addition, the sanctions consequences described in the sanctions rule 
    will also apply. See 40 CFR 52.31.
    
    III. Administrative Requirements
    
        Because EPA has preliminarily determined that the District has an 
    approvable plan, relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly as 
    possible. Therefore, EPA is invoking the good cause exception under the 
    Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity for 
    comment before this action takes effect.1 5 U.S.C. 
    553(b)(B). The EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before 
    the effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the 
    public interest. The EPA has reviewed the District's submittal and, 
    through its proposed action, is indicating that the District has 
    corrected the deficiency that started the sanctions clock. Therefore, 
    it is not in the public interest to initially apply sanctions or to 
    keep applied sanctions in place when the State has most likely done all 
    that it can to correct the deficiency that triggered the sanctions 
    clock. Moreover, it would be impracticable to go through notice-and-
    comment rulemaking on a finding that the State has corrected the 
    deficiency prior to the rulemaking approving the State's submittal. 
    Therefore, EPA believes that it is necessary to use the interim final 
    rulemaking process to temporarily stay or defer sanctions while EPA 
    completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the District's 
    submittal. In addition, EPA is invoking the good cause exception to the 
    30-day notice requirement of the APA because the purpose of this notice 
    is to relieve a restriction. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ As previously noted, however, by this action EPA is 
    providing the public with a chance to comment on EPA's determination 
    after the effective date and EPA will consider any comments received 
    in determining whether to reverse such action.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from 
    review under Executive Order 12866.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 600 et. seq., 
    EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact 
    of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603 and 
    604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit 
    enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations 
    of less than 50,000.
        This action, pertaining to the interim final approval of 
    corrections to the District of Columbia's New Source Review regulation, 
    temporarily relieves sources of an additional burden potentially placed 
    on them by the sanction provisions of the Act. Therefore, I certify 
    that it does not have an impact on any small entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
    reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Reporting and recordkeeping, 
    Ozone, Volatile organic compounds, and nitrogen oxides.
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. Secs. 7401-7671q.
    
        Dated: May 21, 1997.
    William T. Wisniewski,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-14304 Filed 5-30-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/02/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule.
Document Number:
97-14304
Pages:
29668-29669 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
SIPTRAX DC032-2005, FRL-5832-9
PDF File:
97-14304.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52