98-14462. Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Dental Research  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 30002-30005]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-14462]
    
    
    
    [[Page 30002]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    
    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
    Administration and the National Institutes of Health's National 
    Institute of Dental Research
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
    a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the National Institutes of 
    Health's National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) and three of 
    FDA's line organizations: the Center for Devices and Radiological 
    Health, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, and the Center for 
    Biologics Evaluation and Research. The purpose of the MOU is to 
    facilitate interactions between NIDR and FDA regarding improvements in 
    the quality and relevance of preclinical and clinical research, which 
    is directed to the development of products for use in oral healthcare.
    
    DATES: The agreement became effective August 10, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
        Susan Runner, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-410), 
    9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-443-8879, or
        Norman S. Braveman, National Institute of Dental Research, National 
    Institutes of Health, 45 Center Dr., MSC 6400, Bldg. 45, rm. 4AN-24, 
    Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, 301-594-2089.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
    states that all written agreements and MOU's between FDA and others 
    shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
    notice of this MOU.
    
        Dated: May 21, 1998.
    William K. Hubbard,
    Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    225-97-6000
    
    Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Institutes of Health, 
    National Institute of Dental Research and the Food and Drug 
    Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for 
    Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and 
    Research
    
    I. Purpose
    
        This Memorandum of Understanding hereby establishes a formal 
    collaborative arrangement between the National Institutes of 
    Health's National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) and three of 
    the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) line organizations: Center 
    for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research (CDER), and Center for Biologics Evaluation 
    and Research (CBER).
        This agreement has been developed to facilitate interactions 
    between the NIDR and the FDA regarding improvements in the quality 
    and relevance of pre-clinical and clinical research which is 
    directed to the development of products for use in oral health care. 
    The principal goal of this agreement is to reduce the time between 
    the research and development phase of a product's life cycle and its 
    commercial availability. This goal will be attained by enhancing the 
    quality of product-related research and thus facilitate and improve 
    premarket evaluations.
        This agreement also sets forth certain working arrangements 
    between both parties that will enable each to fulfill its respective 
    mission more efficiently and effectively.
    
    II. Background
    
        It is widely accepted that the United States has a world-class 
    health care system. This status is due in part to entrepreneurship 
    and capital investment in the private sector. It is also the result 
    of our nation's longstanding commitment to Federally-funded research 
    into health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, etiology and 
    pathogenesis, as well as cost-effective therapeutic approaches for 
    varied and complex health conditions. A third contributing factor is 
    the existence of a vigilant national regulatory system that ensures 
    health professionals and consumers are provided with safe, high 
    quality and clinically viable medical products. Despite the 
    reputation of the U.S. system, however, government agencies with 
    responsibility for the development, promotion and regulatory 
    oversight of new medical products are today, as always, striving to 
    eliminate operational inefficiencies that can act as barriers to the 
    development of new technologies and therapeutics and their timely 
    introduction into the marketplace. Leaders throughout the government 
    sector have intensified efforts to sharpen current modes of business 
    as a means to economize, to insure the expenditure of public funds 
    will yield commensurate public benefits, and to enable the Federal 
    government to better serve the contemporary needs of its 
    constituencies.
        Increasingly in recent years, NIDR and FDA component 
    organizations have harnessed their interdisciplinary skills and 
    professional expertise in a number of areas affecting the public 
    health. Although complementary and beneficial, these interactions 
    have largely been ad hoc and informal. Leaders of both agencies have 
    recognized the added benefits that can accrue from a broader, more 
    formal working arrangement. To this end, this agreement establishes 
    a generalized, cooperative framework with end-goals and categories 
    of activities that, taken together, provide the foundation for a 
    working relationship that is better focused and takes fuller 
    advantage of each organization's strengths and experience.
    
    III. Substance of Agreement
    
        As noted above, this agreement charts a general course of 
    interaction between the NIDR and three of FDA's product centers that 
    encompasses the following areas:
        (A) information exchange;
        (B) state-of-the-science workshops and conferences;
        (C) staff development;
        (D) fellowship sponsorship;
        (E) policy development;
        (F) research; and
        (G) advisory committee and study section review and 
    appointments.
        The ``Implementation Work Plan'' attached to this agreement 
    identifies the range of specific projects and activities that fall 
    within each of the seven categories. The Work Plan also provides a 
    narrative description of the commitments made by each of the 
    signatory agencies and specifies relative priorities and projected 
    implementation timeframes, which are subject to change during the 
    period when this agreement is in effect.
        Both parties envisage this agreement and its components to be 
    implemented on an evolutionary and incremental basis in accordance 
    with available organizational resources and mutual determination of 
    the feasibility and anticipated benefit(s) of individual activities. 
    Moreover, both parties have agreed that whenever appropriate and 
    possible, interagency activities--either on a categorical or 
    individual basis--should be periodically evaluated to confirm that 
    the putative benefits in relation to administrative costs and other 
    considerations justify continuation or expansion of the activities 
    specified in this agreement. Evaluation of this pioneering agreement 
    may also serve to establish the basis for similar collaborative 
    arrangements between other NIH Institutes and FDA in the future.
    
    IV. Name and Address of Participating Parties
    
    (1) National Institute of Dental Research, National Institutes of 
    Health, 31 Center Drive, MSC 2290, Building 31, 2C39 Bethesda, MD 
    20892-2290, Telephone: 301-496-3571, FAX: 301-402-2185.
    (2) Food and Drug Administration (HF-1), 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301-827-3310, FAX: 301-443-3100.
        (a) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-1), 9200 
    Corporate Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850, Telephone: 301-443-4690, 
    FAX: 301-594-1320.
        (b) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-1), 5600 
    Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301-594-6740, FAX: 
    301-594-6197.
        (c) Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-1), 8800 
    Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-001, Telephone: 301-827-0548, 
    FAX: 301-827-0440.
    
    V. Liaison Officers
    
    For the National Institute of Dental Research:
    
        Dushanka V. Kleinman, D.D.S., M.Sc.D., Deputy Director, National 
    Institute of Dental Research, National Institutes of Health, 31 
    Center Drive, MSC 2290
    
    [[Page 30003]]
    
    Building 31, Room 2C39, Bethesda, MD 20892-2290, Telephone: 301-496-
    9469, FAX: 301-402-2185, E-mail: [email protected]
        Lois K. Cohen, Ph.D., Alternate Director, Division of Extramural 
    Research, National Institute of Dental Research, National Institutes 
    of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6400, Building 45, Room 4AN-18, 
    Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, Telephone: 301-594-7710, FAX: 301-480-8319, 
    E-mail: [email protected]
    
    For the Food and Drug Administration:
    
        Bernard A. Schwetz, D.V.M., Ph.D., Interim Chief Scientist, 
    Office of the Commissioner (HF-32), Food and Drug Administration, 
    5600 Fishers Lane, Room 17-35, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301-
    827-3340, FAX: 301-827-3042, E-mail: [email protected]
        Elizabeth D. Jacobson, Ph.D., Alternate Deputy Director for 
    Science, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-2), 9200 
    Corporate Boulevard, Room 100G, Rockville, MD 20850, Telephone: 301-
    443-4690, FAX: 301-594-1320, E-mail: [email protected]
    
    VI. Interagency Steering Committee
    
        To assist the Liaison Officers in the management, coordination 
    and oversight of this agreement and the concomitant Implementation 
    Work Plan, an interagency steering committee shall be established. 
    The Committee will be comprised of an equal number of member 
    representatives from the NIDR and FDA, including the Liaison 
    Officers who shall serve as co-chairs of the Committee. Member 
    appointments shall be authorized by the signatories to this 
    agreement and shall last for a period of one (1) year, unless 
    renewed by the agreement signatories upon recommendation from the 
    Liaison Officers. The Committee shall meet at least once every six 
    months for the first year of this agreement and then at least once 
    annually thereafter to review the progress of this agreement, 
    resolve any issues and disputes that may arise, re-direct specific 
    activities set forth in the Work Plan, and oversee necessary 
    modifications to the agreement.
        As of the date this agreement is approved and accepted, the 
    following persons are designated to serve on the Committee for the 
    initial one-year term.
    
    For the National Institute of Dental Research:
    
        Dushanka V. Kleinman, D.D.S., M.Sc.D., Co-Chair
        Lois K. Cohen, Ph.D., Alternate
        Norman S. Braveman, Ph.D., Chief, Program Development Branch, 
    Division of Extramural Research, National Institute of Dental 
    Research, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6400, 
    Building 45, Room 4AN-24, Bethesda, MD 20892-6400, Telephone: 301-
    594-2089, FAX: 301-480-8318, E-mail: [email protected]
        Henning Birkedal-Hansen, D.D.S., Ph.D., Scientific Director, 
    Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Dental 
    Research, National Institutes of Health, 30 Convent Drive, MSC 4326, 
    Building 30, Room 132, Bethesda, MD 20892-4326, Telephone: 301-496-
    1483, FAX: 301-402-8318, E-mail: [email protected]
    
    For the Food and Drug Administration:
    
        Bernard A. Schwetz, D.V.M., Ph.D., Co-Chair
        Elizabeth D. Jacobson, Ph.D., Alternate
        Michael Weintraub, M.D., Director, Office of Drug Evaluation V 
    (HFD-105), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 9201 Corporate 
    Boulevard, Room S219, Rockville, MD 20850, Telephone: 301-827-2250, 
    FAX: 301-827-2317, E-mail: [email protected]
        Philip D. Noguchi, M.D., Director, Division of Cellular and Gene 
    Therapies (HFM-515), Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center 
    for Biologics Evaluation and Research, 8800 Rockville Pike, Building 
    N29B, Room 2NN20, Bethesda, MD 20892-001, Telephone: 301-827-0680, 
    FAX: 301-827-0449, E-mail: [email protected]
    
    VII. Period of Agreement
    
        Upon acceptance by both parties, this agreement will become 
    effective immediately and remain in effect for a period of three (3) 
    years from the date of signature by authorized officials from both 
    agencies unless extended by the parties. The terms of this agreement 
    may be modified upon mutual written consent, or terminated by either 
    party with a minimum 30-day advance written notice to the other 
    party. Evaluation of the terms and success of this agreement will be 
    made periodically throughout the existence of the interagency 
    arrangement. Within ninety (90) days prior to expiration of this 
    agreement, a formal written evaluation shall be prepared by both 
    parties and submitted to appropriate officials of both agencies with 
    recommendations regarding the furtherance or discontinuation of the 
    agreement.
    
    VIII. Funding
    
        No funding will be provided or exchanged by either party as part 
    of this agreement. NIDR and FDA personnel will collaborate on 
    projects of mutual interest. Facilities and equipment of each party 
    will be made available to the other on an as needed basis in 
    accordance with the individual project and activity plans and 
    arrangements.
    
    IX. Reporting Requirements
    
        In addition to the evaluation report(s) referenced in section 
    VII. above, reporting responsibilities will be determined on a case-
    by-case basis and as required by individual projects and activities. 
    Reports will be provided to all Liaison Officers named in this 
    agreement.
    
    X. Schedules and Milestones
    
        Schedules and milestones for all collaborative projects and 
    activities authorized by this agreement will be developed by mutual 
    agreement on a case-by-case basis. Schedules and milestones may be 
    set by interagency working groups established and tasked to 
    implement the specific projects and activities outlined in the 
    Implementation Work Plan appended to this agreement.
    
    XI. Disposition of Data
    
        The plan for each project and activity set forth in the 
    Implementation Work Plan as appended to this agreement will specify 
    the disposition of data and other information that may result from 
    or be used during the course of a project or activity. Publication 
    or public dissemination of data and information exempt from public 
    disclosure under applicable law shall not occur without prior 
    notification and concurrence of the Liaison Officers of both 
    parties.
    
    XII. Sharing Data and Information
    
        Both parties agree that a free exchange of data and information 
    is vital to the successful execution of this agreement. Therefore, 
    to the extent allowed under 21 U.S.C. 331(j), 21 U.S.C. 360j(c), 42 
    U.S.C. 353g(d), 42 U.S.C. 263i(e), 21 CFR Part 20, or other 
    applicable law, the parties agree to share data and information as 
    necessary. No exchange of non-public information will occur unless 
    appropriate safeguards are established and set forth in individual 
    work plans and first approved by the agencies' Liaison Officers.
    
    XIII. Disclosure of Data and Information in Response to Requests
    
        If disclosure of data or information received by a party under 
    this agreement is requested under the Freedom of Information Act, a 
    Congressional inquiry or pursuant to other duties and 
    responsibilities of either party to this agreement, the agency that 
    receives the request shall notify the agency that provided the 
    information. The notified agency will be responsible for making any 
    requisite contact with the submitter of the protected information 
    and will accept full responsibility for evaluating the submitter's 
    comments prior to rendering a disclosure determination.
        To preserve maximum control over actual disclosure of their 
    respective records, each party to this agreement shall retain legal 
    authority and the concomitant responsibility regarding disclosure of 
    documents provided to the other agency.
    
    XIV. Government Property/Facilities/Personnel
    
        Both parties to this agreement will make available personnel and 
    facilities as required by individual projects and activities as set 
    forth in the mutually developed work plans. NIDR personnel enlisted 
    to serve as Federal consultants or liaisons on FDA advisory 
    committees and panels will be subject to the same rights, 
    privileges, obligations and restrictions as all other special 
    government employees who serve on the agency's advisory bodies. 
    Similarly, all FDA employees selected to serve in a consultative 
    capacity on NIDR research study sections and advisory bodies will be 
    bound by the same rules and allowances that apply to all other 
    consultants appointed by NIDR.
        Approved and Accepted for the National Institute of Dental 
    Research:
    By: Harold C. Slavkin, D.D.S.
    Title: Director, National Institutes of Dental Research, NIH
    National Institutes of Health
    
    [[Page 30004]]
    
    Date: August 1, 1997
        Approved and Accepted for the Food and Drug Administration:
    By: Michael A. Friedman, M.D.
     Title: Lead Deputy Commissioner
    Food and Drug Administration
    Date: August 10, 1997
    
    Appendix: Implementation Work Plan
    
    Appendix
    
    Implementation Work Plan for Memorandum of Understanding Between the 
    National Institute of Dental Research and the Food and Drug 
    Administration
    
    Introduction
    
        The National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR) and the Food 
    and Drug Administration (FDA) have embarked upon a formal 
    collaborative arrangement whose dual aims are to: (1) facilitate the 
    development and market introduction of newly-emerging, safe and 
    effective health care products to enable oral health professionals 
    and auxiliaries to provide higher quality services and equip 
    consumers with the tools necessary to improve and sustain their own 
    oral, dental and cranio-facial health; and (2) provide complementary 
    support and expertise to enable each agency to better fulfill its 
    public health mission.
        This Implementation Work Plan describes the specific projects 
    and activities that initially constitute the substance of the 
    collaborative arrangement between the two agencies. The information 
    that follows is intended to serve as an overall work plan or 
    framework for NIDR and FDA personnel assigned individual projects 
    and activities. The specific outcomes, completion timeframes, 
    interaction mechanisms, etc. associated with each project and 
    activity will be defined by those persons designated by each agency 
    to serve on interagency working groups. The relative priority of 
    each project/activity is identified by the use of the letters ``I'' 
    (immediate-- within 3 mos.), ``S'' (short-term--within 6-12 mos.), 
    and ``L'' (long-term--beyond 12 mos.).
    
    A. Information Exchange
    
        In this area of collaboration, NIDR and FDA agree to pursue the 
    following activities:
         Initiation of an ongoing series of introductory 
    meetings and orientation briefings to acquaint NIDR and FDA 
    personnel with each other's statutory obligations, programs, 
    operational capacities, policies, processes, etc. that are relevant 
    to this agreement. [I]
         Identification of key contact persons at each agency 
    and preparation of a contact/referral directory to facilitate 
    interagency communication and information exchange. [I]
         Establishment of a hyperlink between existing FDA and 
    NIDR Internet websites to permit continual and instantaneous access 
    to routine and late-breaking information of mutual interest. [I]
         Establishment of an internal exchange forum to enable a 
    periodic two-way sharing of information related to new research 
    initiatives by both agencies, market applications for important new 
    products pending with FDA, emerging public health issues and 
    emergencies and policy development. Biomimetics is a case in point 
    and could be used as a case study to identify optimal methods for 
    both parties to monitor an issue from the conceptual stage through 
    research and development. [S]
         Creation of a ``Oral, Dental and Cranio-Facial Forum'' 
    in which NIDR and FDA can interact periodically with leading 
    representatives of the regulated industry, academia, the research 
    community and others on issues relating to technology development 
    and transfer (including regulatory processes for acquiring market 
    clearance), product utilization and treatment outcomes, adverse 
    event reporting, etc. [S]
         Assessment of the viability of NIDR and/or FDA experts 
    serving as Federal ``ombudsmen'' to oversee state-of-the-art 
    advances in oral, dental and cranio-facial technologies and 
    therapeutics through direct, ``in the field'' interactions with 
    clinical investigators, product developers, scientific researchers, 
    etc. The ombudsmen would act as conduits through which regulatory 
    process and research funding information could be funneled to the 
    industrial and research sectors. Information on emerging products, 
    in both the concept and development stage, could in turn be fed back 
    to NIDR and FDA with the end goal of accelerating the flow of new 
    products that are safe and effective from the R&D arena to the 
    clinical environment. [L]
        This feasibility assessment could also encompass the concept of 
    an ombudsman or independent, non-government expert(s) conducting an 
    evaluation of a sampling of dental products whose basic research 
    costs are underwritten by NIDR that traces the developmental 
    histories through patent acquisitions and FDA market clearances. The 
    purpose of such evaluations would be to augment the existing patient 
    evaluation study by providing documentation of selected impact(s) of 
    NIDR-funded research on public health and the ``bench-to-chairside'' 
    delivery of important new oral care products. [L]
    
    B. Science Transfer & State-of Science Workshops/Conferences
    
         Participation by FDA regulatory policy-makers and 
    program officials in various conferences in 1997-98 sponsored by 
    NIDR or in which NIDR has a planning/participant role. FDA 
    involvement could entail formal workshops (e.g., FY99 meeting of 
    AADR/AADS meeting), individual presentations, use of existing 
    videotaped FDA teleconferences on selected regulatory policy and 
    process issues, technology transfer, etc. In addition, NIDR staff 
    will participate in FDA-sponsored workshops and conferences with 
    relevance to oral and dental health care products and services. 
    Collaborative discussions and planning between NIDR and FDA could 
    serve to focus the form and content of information conducive to each 
    presentation setting and ensure proper coverage by both agencies at 
    key outside conferences and meetings. [I/S]
         Development and joint sponsorship of conferences, 
    symposia and workshops whose foci and outputs will mutually benefit 
    NIDR and FDA, e.g., in the area of technology transfer. [S/L]
         Review of the feasibility and utility of live, jointly-
    produced videoteleconferences using FDA/CDRH and/or NIDR facilities 
    to communicate to each agency's constituencies on topical areas of 
    interest, fast-moving events, new research and regulatory 
    initiatives, etc. [S]
         Development, pilot testing and nationwide dissemination 
    of a regulatory training module for U.S. dental school instructors, 
    dental students, clinical trial sponsors and investigators to 
    broaden their understanding of FDA's market clearance requirements 
    and product evaluation processes. [L]
    
    C. Staff Development and Collaborations
    
         Arrange for the temporary exchanges of NIDR and FDA 
    specialists for pre-set periods of time (e.g., 6-12 months). These 
    cross-appointments, which could include rotation of FDA scientists 
    and clinicians through the NIH Clinical Center where research is 
    performed, could enhance the understanding of each party to the 
    policies and procedures of the other. This cross-fertilization of 
    knowledge and experience could subsequently be shared with in-house 
    colleagues and outside constituent groups in ways that could 
    expedite technology transfer. [S]
         Provide for FDA scientists and regulatory process 
    experts to participate in NIDR reviews of research applications 
    (e.g., SBIR/STTR) as a means of gaining insights into future 
    research and product development directions, which in turn would 
    enable FDA product reviewers to better anticipate and prepare for 
    scientific and clinical issues associated with future product 
    applications. [S]
         Provide for NIDR experts to directly participate in 
    premarket evaluations of selected new dental products whose 
    scientific and clinical aspects may be complex or controversial, in 
    addition to submissions seeking FDA authorization to conduct 
    clinical studies involving experimental products. [S]
         Involvement of NIDR experts in a ground-breaking 
    initiative relating to FDA's review process for medical devices, 
    specifically the Product Development Protocol, a mechanism 
    authorized by Federal law by which FDA and device producers can 
    reach agreement at the front end of the premarket review process on 
    test endpoints that, once satisfied, provide for a higher degree of 
    assurance (but no guarantee) of market clearance. Resident 
    scientific and clinical expertise at NIDR could be relied upon as 
    this mechanism is pilot tested and in actual ``negotiations'' with 
    product manufacturers and study sponsors. [S]
         Development of reference documents describing FDA 
    investigational product and market approval processes for use by 
    NIDR reviewers in conferring with prospective research grantees and 
    contractors to better assure their clinical studies conform to FDA 
    marketing requirements, which will help spur the clinical 
    availability of valuable new products. Such documents could be 
    adaptations of the regulatory training module discussed in Section 
    B. of this document. [S]
         Evaluation of the feasibility of NIDR requiring 
    prospective research contractors
    
    [[Page 30005]]
    
    and grantees, as a condition for a funding award, to submit review 
    protocols or criteria that FDA can use in performing premarket 
    reviews of breakthrough products used in the prevention, diagnosis 
    and treatment of oral, dental and cranio-facial diseases and 
    conditions. [S]
         Investigation into methods by which NIDR and FDA can 
    jointly and individually promote the availability and use of FDA's 
    adverse incident reporting systems (e.g., MedWatch) among oral 
    health professionals and other health and dental product user 
    groups. [S]
         Enlistment of NIDR technical, statistical and clinical 
    experts to assist FDA in the design and content development of 
    guidance documents that FDA product reviewers can use to assess 
    product safety and effectiveness. [L]
    
    D. Fellowship Sponsorship
    
         Investigation into the merits and legal aspects of 
    establishing non-Federal fellowships in which interested parties 
    from the private sector would subsidize individuals with an interest 
    in FDA regulatory processes for one-year residency periods. Under 
    such an arrangement, NIDR could serve as fiduciary in order to 
    prevent appearances of conflict-of-interest. Fellowship assignments 
    would entail generalized exposure to and experience with FDA 
    regulatory procedures so as to also avoid access to protected, 
    product-specific information that could be used for competitive 
    advantage. Fellows would also be subjected to the controls, rights, 
    privileges and restrictions to which all other FDA-recruited special 
    government employees are subjected. [L]
    
    E. Policy Development
    
         Continuation of current interchanges and expert 
    consultations on selected policy issues that engender wide-scale 
    interest among consumers and/or oral health professionals, involve 
    products or therapies that pose a known or potential health risk to 
    the general public, relate to research and regulatory processes 
    affecting the pace of technology transfer, etc. This activity should 
    extend to other matters of major import such as the Surgeon 
    General's report on oral health which NIDR has been charged to 
    produce and to which FDA can substantively contribute. [I]
    
    F. Research
    
         Continuation of ongoing research collaborations, such 
    as those between CBER and NIDR's Division of Intramural Research.
         Coordination of NIDR's biological and clinical 
    resources and the CDRH's engineering and life sciences expertise to 
    address a number of diverse issues relating to cleaning, infection 
    and sensitivity reactions to new biomaterials. [S]
         Establishment of one or more patient registries for 
    purposes of monitoring adverse incidents linked to particular dental 
    products in addition to product-specific performance trends. Such an 
    activity could be jointly undertaken by FDA and NIDR, as well as in 
    conjunction with involvement by other organizations such as USP and 
    various dental professional and product user organizations. [L]
         Initiation of collaborative research aimed at 
    developing fundamental data and methods needed to assess long-term 
    performance of dental devices and systems. Such research could 
    include the joint development of physical, animal and computer-based 
    models to adequately evaluate long-term clinical performance of 
    marketed and evolving dental devices (e.g., osseous integration of 
    dental implants, fatigue performance of ceramic porcelains, etc.). 
    [L]
    
    G. Advisory Committee & Study Section Review/Appointments
    
         Provision of ad hoc or liaison status to FDA officials 
    on the NIDR National Advisory Dental Research Council (including 
    access to closed sessions of the Council on a case-by-case, need-to-
    know basis), in addition to DRG and other study sections/review 
    groups for the purpose of assisting NIDR in its review of extramural 
    research submissions. [S]
         Expansion of current NIDR participation as consultants 
    and/or Federal liaisons on dental-related advisory committees and 
    panels managed by FDA (including access to closed sessions on a 
    case-by-case, need-to-know basis) for the purpose of augmenting the 
    scientific and clinical expertise that is brought to bear on product 
    applications and proposed policies on which outside advice is sought 
    by the agency. [S]
         Formal solicitation of advice by each party from the 
    other on candidate nominations for appointment to NIDR and FDA 
    review and advisory bodies. [S]
    [FR Doc. 98-14462 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/10/1997
Published:
06/02/1998
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
98-14462
Dates:
The agreement became effective August 10, 1997.
Pages:
30002-30005 (4 pages)
PDF File:
98-14462.pdf