[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14585]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-6105-4]
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods
Applications for Reference or Equivalent Method Determinations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notification is given that the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has received five new applications for reference or equivalent
method determinations under 40 CFR part 53. The applications were
received from Rupprecht and Patashnick Company, Incorporated, Albany,
New York (two applications); Advanced Pollution Instrumentation,
Incorporated, San Diego, California; Horiba Instruments Incorporated,
Irvine, California; and DKK Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank F. McElroy, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-46), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711. Phone: (919) 541-2622, email:
mcelroy.frank@epamail.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
part 53, the EPA examines various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of certain pollutants in the ambient air. Methods that
are determined to meet specific requirements for adequacy are
designated as either reference or equivalent methods, thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR part 58 by States and other agencies
in determining attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. The EPA is hereby announcing that it has received five new
applications for reference or equivalent method determinations under 40
CFR part 53. Publication of a notice of receipt of such applications is
required by section 53.5.
On February 3, 1998, EPA received two applications from the
Rupprecht and Patashnick Company, Incorporated, 25 Corporate Circle,
Albany, New York 12203 to determine if methods based on that Company's
Partisol1-FRM Model 2000 (single) and Partisol-
Plus Model 2025 (sequential) PM-10 Air Samplers should be designated as
reference methods for PM10. The EPA received an application
on February 24, 1998, from Advanced Pollution Instrumentation,
Incorporated, 6565 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, California 92121 for
an equivalent method determination for their Model 400A UV Photometric
Ozone Analyzer. An application was received on March 26, 1998 from
Horiba Instruments Incorporated, 17671 Armstrong Avenue, Irvine,
California 92614 for an equivalent method determination for Horiba's
Model APSA-360ACE ambient SO2 monitor. And on April 14,
1998, the EPA received an application from DKK Corporation, 4-13-14,
Kichijoji Kitamachi, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8630, Japan for a
reference method determination for DKK's Model GLN-114E Nitrogen Oxides
Analyzer.
If, after appropriate technical study, the Administrator determines
that any or all of these methods should be designated as either
reference or equivalent methods, notice thereof will be published in a
subsequent issue of the Federal Register.
Thomas A. Clark,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 98-14585 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
