96-14841. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Independent Research and Development/Bid and Proposal in Cooperative Arrangements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Page 31796]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-14841]
    
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 31795]]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part VIII
    
    Department of the Defense
    
    General Services Administration
    
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    48 CFR Part 31
    
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Independent Research and Development/
    Bid and Proposal in Cooperative Arrangements; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 120 / Thursday, June 20, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 31796]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Part 31
    
    [FAR Case 95-024]
    RIN 9000-AH03
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Independent Research and 
    Development/Bid and Proposal in Cooperative Arrangements
    
    AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
    (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Defense, General Services Administration, 
    and National Aeronautics and Space Administration are proposing to 
    amend Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 31 to permit contractor 
    contributions of independent research and development (IR&D) costs 
    under NASA cooperative arrangements to be treated as allowable indirect 
    costs. This regulatory action was not subject to Office of Management 
    and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 
    1993. This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
    
    DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before August 19, 1996 to be 
    considered in the formulation of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested parties should submit written comments to: 
    General Services Administration, FAR Secretariat (MVRS), 18th & F 
    Streets, NW, Room 4037, Washington, DC 20405.
        Please cite FAR case 95-024 in all correspondence related to this 
    case.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeremy Olson at (202) 501-3221 in 
    reference to this FAR case. For general information, contact the FAR 
    Secretariat, Room 4037, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501-
    4755. Please cite FAR case 95-024.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        NASA published a class deviation (interim rule) in the May 2, 1994, 
    Federal Register (59 FR 22521) with the final rule published in the 
    September 8, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 46359). The class deviation 
    eliminates the prohibition at FAR 31.205-18(e) against treatment of 
    contractor IR&D contributions under NASA cooperative arrangements as 
    allowable indirect costs. This proposed FAR rule would eliminate the 
    need for the NASA class deviation.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This proposed rule is not expected to have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of 
    the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because most 
    contracts awarded to small entities are awarded on a competitive fixed-
    price basis, and the cost principles do not apply. The cost principles 
    only apply to contracts for which cost or pricing data has been 
    submitted. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has, therefore, 
    not been performed. Comments from small entities concerning the 
    affected FAR subpart will be considered in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610 
    of the Act. Such comments must be submitted separately and should cite 
    FAR case 95-024 in correspondence.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act-
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 96-511) does not apply because 
    the proposed rule does not impose recordkeeping or information 
    collection requirements, or collections of information from offerors, 
    contractors, or members of the public which require the approval of the 
    Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. 
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 31
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Dated: June 6, 1996.
    Edward C. Loeb,
    Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 48 CFR Part 31 be amended as set 
    forth below:
    
    PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
    
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 31 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
    U.S.C. 2473(c).
    
        2. Section 31.205-18(e) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    31.205-18  Independent research and development and bid and proposal 
    costs.
    
    * * * * *-
        (e) Cooperative arrangements. IR&D costs may be incurred by 
    contractors working jointly with one or more non-Federal entities 
    pursuant to a cooperative arrangement (for example, joint ventures, 
    limited partnerships, teaming arrangements, and collaboration and 
    consortium arrangements). IR&D costs may also include costs contributed 
    by contractors in performing cooperative research and development 
    agreements, or similar arrangements, entered into under
        (1) Section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Transfer Act of 
    1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710(a));
        (2) Sections 203(c) (5) and (6) of the National Aeronautics and 
    Space Act of 1958, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2473(c) (5) and (6));
        (3) 10 U.S.C. 2371 for the Defense Advanced Research Projects 
    Agency, or
        (4) Other equivalent authority. IR&D costs incurred by a contractor 
    pursuant to these types of cooperative arrangements should be 
    considered as allowable IR&D costs if the work performed would have 
    been allowed as contractor IR&D had there been no cooperative 
    arrangement.
    
    [FR Doc. 96-14841 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/20/1996
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
96-14841
Dates:
Comments should be submitted on or before August 19, 1996 to be considered in the formulation of a final rule.
Pages:
31796-31796 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FAR Case 95-024
RINs:
9000-AH03
PDF File:
96-14841.pdf
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 31