96-15773. Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended (``Act'')  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 31568-31570]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-15773]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 35-26533]
    
    
    Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as 
    amended (``Act'')
    
    June 14, 1996.
        Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been 
    made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules 
    promulgated thereunder. All interested persons are referred to the 
    application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the 
    proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or 
    declaration(s) and any amendments thereto is/are available for public 
    inspection through the Commission's Office of Public Reference.
        Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the 
    application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in 
    writing by July 8, 1996, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange 
    Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549, and serve a copy on the relevant 
    applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the address(es) specified below. 
    Proof of service (by affidavit or, in case of an attorney at law, by 
    certificate) should be filed with the request. Any request for hearing 
    shall identify specifically the issues of fact or law that are 
    disputed. A person who so requests will be notified of any hearing, if 
    ordered, and will receive a copy of any notice or order issued in the 
    matter. After said date, the application(s) and/or declaration(s), as 
    filed or as amended, may be granted and/or permitted to become 
    effective.
    
    General Public Utilities Corporation, et al. (70-7926)
    
        General Public utilities Corporation (``GPU''), 100 Interpace 
    Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054, and its subsidiaries, Jersey 
    Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L''), 300 Madison Avenue, 
    Morristown, New Jersey 07962, Metropolitan Edison Company (``Met-Ed''), 
    P.O. Box 16001, Reading, Pennsylvania 19640, and Pennsylvania Electric 
    Company (``Penelec''), P.O. Box 16001, Reading, Pennsylvania 19640 
    (together, ``GPU Companies''), have filed a post-effective amendment to 
    their declaration under Sections 6(a) and 7 of the Act and rule 54 
    thereunder.
        By order dated October 26, 1994 (HCAR No. 26150) (``Order''), the 
    Commission, among other things, authorized the GPU Companies to enter 
    into an amendment to their Credit Agreement, dated as of March 19, 
    1992, with a group of commercial banks for which Citibank, N.A. and 
    Chemical Bank act as co-agents and Chemical Bank acts as the 
    administrative agent, in order to extend through December 31, 1997 the 
    period during which the GPU Companies were authorized to issue, sell 
    and renew their unsecured promissory notes (``Notes'') from time-to-
    time in amounts up to $250 million outstanding at any time. In 
    addition, on October 24, 1995, the GPU Companies entered into a Second 
    Amendment to the Credit Agreement which modified certain negative 
    covenants in the Credit Agreement (``Prior Credit Agreement'').
        Under the Order, the aggregate principal amount of Notes 
    outstanding at any time under the Prior Credit Agreement, together with 
    all other unsecured debt then outstanding, may not exceed the 
    limitations on such indebtedness imposed by the charters of each of 
    JCP&L, Met-Ed and Penelec, and $200 million in the case of GPU. As of 
    March 31, 1996, the charter limitations on such indebtedness for JCP&L, 
    Met-Ed and Penelec were $290 million, $133 million and $145 million, 
    respectively. At May 1, 1996, the GPU Companies
    
    [[Page 31569]]
    
    had unsecured indebtedness outstanding as follows:
    
    GPU--$102.7 million
    JCP&L--$213.4 million
    Med-Ed--$26.0 million
    Penelec--$111.2 million
    
        The Notes issued under the Prior Credit Agreement mature not more 
    than six months from their date of issue and the annual interest rate 
    on each borrowing is either: (1) the Alternate Base Rate, as in effect 
    from time-to-time; (2) the CD Rate, as in effect from time-to-time, 
    plus an amount (``CD Applicable Margin'') ranging from .375% to .625% 
    depending on the senior secured non-credit enhanced long-term debt 
    rating (``Debt Rating'') of the borrower or, in the case of GPU, the 
    Debt Rating of JCP&L; or (3) the Eurodollar Rate, as in effect from 
    time-to-time, plus an amount (``Eurodollar Applicable Margin'') ranging 
    from .25% to .50% depending upon the Debt Rating of the borrower or, in 
    the case of GPU, the Debt Rating of JCP&L. In addition, the GPU 
    Companies pay a facility fee ranging from .125% to .375% per annum, 
    depending on the Debt Ratings of JCP&L, MetEd and Penelec, of the total 
    amount of the commitments, a competitive bid fee of $2,500 for each 
    request for a competitive bid, and an annual administrative fee of 
    $15,000. The GPU Companies also paid aggregate agency fees of $50,000 
    upon signing of the First Amendment to the Credit Agreement.
        On May 6, 1996, the GPU Companies entered into an Amended and 
    Restated Credit Agreement with the banks named therein (and banks that 
    may subsequently become parties thereto) and The Chase Manhattan Bank, 
    N.A. (successor to Chemical Bank), as Administrative Agent, and 
    Citibank, N.A., as Syndication Agent (``Restated Credit Agreement''), 
    which, subject to receipt of the authorization herein requested, 
    permits borrowings thereunder through May 6, 2001 and increases the 
    amount that GPU may borrow thereunder to up to $250 million outstanding 
    at any time. The Restated Credit Agreement also modified in material 
    respects a number of the covenants contained in the Prior Credit 
    Agreement. Accordingly, the GPU Companies have agreed, subject to 
    Commission authorization, to an increased facility fee equal to .50% 
    (rather than .375%) per annum of the total amount of the commitments 
    under the Restated Credit Agreement in the event that the applicable 
    Debt Rating is BB or below as rated by Standard & Poor's or Duff & 
    Phelps, or Ba or below as rated by Moody's Investor Services, or if 
    these is no Debt Rating.
        The CD Applicable Margin will be .75% (rather than .625%) if the 
    applicable Debt Rating is BB+ as rated by Standard & Poor's or Duff & 
    Phelps, or Ba1 as rated by Moody's Investor Services, and 1.37% (rather 
    than .625%) if the applicable Debt Rating is BB or below as rated by 
    Standard & Poor's or Duff & Phelps, or Ba or below as rated by Moody's 
    Investor Services, or if there is no Debt Rating. The Eurodollar 
    Applicable Margin will be .625% (rather than .50%) if the applicable 
    Debt Rating is BB+ as rated by Standard & Poor's or Duff & Phelps, or 
    Ba1 as rated by Moody's Investor Services, and 1.25% (rather than .50%) 
    if the applicable Debt Rating is BB or below as rated by Standard & 
    Poor's or Duff & Phelps, or Ba or below as rated by Moody's Investor 
    Services, or if there is no Debt Rating. All other CD and Eurodollar 
    Applicable Margins and all other fees remain unchanged, except that 
    there are no new agency fees payable by the GPU Companies in connection 
    with the Restated Credit Agreement. Other provisions, including those 
    relating to conditions to borrowing, acceleration and prepayment, also 
    remain unchanged.
        At the date of filing of the post-effective amendment, the Debt 
    Ratings of JCP&L, Met-Ed and Penelec were as follows (neither GPU nor 
    El Energy, Inc. presently has a Debt Rating):
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Standard &      Duff &                 
                                       Poor's        Phelps        Moody's  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    JCP&L.........................  BBB+          BBB+          Baa1        
    Met-Ed........................  BBB+          A-            Baa1        
    Penelec.......................  A-            A-            A3          
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        As a result, the higher facility fee and the higher CD and 
    Eurodollar Applicable Margins would not now be applicable.
    
    New England Electric System, et al. (70-7950)
    
        New England Electric System (``NEES''), a registered holding 
    company, its service company subsidiary, New England Power Service 
    Company (``NEPSCO'') and its nonutility subsidiary company, New England 
    Electric Resources, Inc. (``NEERI'') (together, ``Applicants''), all 
    located at 25 Research Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts 01582, have 
    filed a post-effective amendment under sections 6(a), 7, 9(a), 10, 
    12(b), 13(b), 32 and 33 of the Act and rules 45, 54, 87, 90 and 91 
    thereunder to their application-declaration previously filed under 
    sections 6(a), 7, 9(a), 10, 12(b) and 13(b) and rules 45, 87, 90 and 91 
    thereunder.
        By order dated September 4, 1992 (HCAR No. 25621), the Commission 
    authorized NEERI to perform consulting services on electric utility 
    matters for nonassociates, through December 31, 1997. By order dated 
    April 1, 1994 (HCAR No. 26017), the Commission authorized NEERI to 
    undertake electrical related services and consulting contracts, through 
    December 31, 1997. Both orders permitted NEPSCO to provide certain 
    overhead services for NEERI at cost and for NEES to make capital 
    contributions to NEERI in amounts of up to $2 million. The types of 
    services NEERI was authorized to perform include designing, 
    engineering, assisting in licensing and permitting, procuring materials 
    and equipment, and installing, removing or constructing electrical 
    related materials.
        The Applicants are now requesting authority, through December 31, 
    1999: (1) To expand the services NEERI may perform for nonassociate 
    entities; (2) to have NEPSCO continue to provide services for NEERI at 
    cost; and (3 to have NEES continue to provide capital contributions to 
    NEERI in an increased amount of up to $10 million.
        Following is a list of the types of new services NEERI proposes to 
    perform:
        (1) Sale of technical, operational, management, and other similar 
    kinds of services and expertise, developed in the course of utility 
    operations in such areas as power plant and transmission system 
    engineering, development, design and rehabilitation; construction; 
    maintenance and operation; fuel and other goods and services 
    procurement, delivery, and management; environmental licensing, 
    testing, and remediation; and other similar areas, including, without 
    limitation, transmission line services, environmental control services, 
    maintenance and construction services, engineering services, mechanical 
    and repair services, structural services, construction contract 
    administration and support services;
        (2) Energy conservation and demand-side management services;
        (3) Sale, installation, and servicing of electric and compressed 
    natural gas powered vehicles and ownership and operation of related 
    refueling and recharging equipment; and
        (4) Sale, installation, and servicing of electric and gas 
    appliances for residential, commercial, and industrial heating and 
    lighting.
        No system employees will be assigned to a NEERI services project if 
    such assignment would interfere with the normal operation of the 
    system. Utility
    
    [[Page 31570]]
    
    operating companies within the system will at all times have first 
    priority in the use of system employees, including employees of NEPSCO. 
    During the course of a calender year, the system will not assign more 
    than the full-time equivalent of five percent of its employees to 
    service projects for NEERI.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-15773 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/20/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-15773
Pages:
31568-31570 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 35-26533
PDF File:
96-15773.pdf