97-16244. Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews: Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products From Korea; Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Korea  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 33587-33588]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16244]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-580-815, A-580-816]
    
    
    Notice of Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Reviews: Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products 
    From Korea; Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from 
    Korea
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of amendment to final results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On April 15, 1997, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    published the final results of its administrative review of the 
    antidumping duty order on certain cold-rolled carbon steel flat 
    products from Korea, and certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat 
    products from Korea (62 FR 18404). The period of review (POR) is August 
    1, 1994, through July 31, 1995. On April 23, 1997, Pohang Iron and 
    Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) alleged, in a timely fashion, that the 
    Department had made six ministerial errors with respect to the final 
    results for POSCO and the companies collapsed with POSCO (Pohang Coated 
    Steel Co., Ltd. (POCOS) and Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. (PSI)), 
    collectively referred to below as the POSCO Group. POSCO therefore 
    requested that we amend the final results of the review as published on 
    April 15, 1997. On April 30, 1997, petitioners asserted that none of 
    the issues raised by POSCO in its April 23, 1997, submission 
    constituted ministerial errors.
        The Department has determined that one of the alleged errors is in 
    fact a ministerial error. We have corrected the error in question and 
    recalculated the dumping margins for the POSCO Group. The margin for 
    cold-rolled products has changed from 0.54 percent to 0.49 percent, and 
    the margin for corrosion-resistant products remains at 0.09 percent.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: June 20, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Bezirganian or Alain Letort, AD/
    CVD Enforcement Group III--Office 8, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone 
    202/482-1395 (Bezirganian) or 202/482-4243 (Letort), fax 202/482-1388.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise 
    indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are to the 
    current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in 
    the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
    
    Background
    
        On April 15, 1997, the Department published the final results of 
    its administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on certain 
    cold-rolled and corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from 
    Korea, for the period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995 (62 FR 
    18404). The reviews covered shipments of the merchandise from Korea by 
    the POSCO Group that entered the United States during the period August 
    1, 1994 through July 31, 1995.
        Subsequent to the publication of the final results, POSCO alleged, 
    in a timely fashion, that the Department had made six ministerial 
    errors with respect to the final results for the POSCO Group. POSCO 
    therefore requested that we amend the final results of the review as 
    published on April 15, 1997. Petitioners
    
    [[Page 33588]]
    
    subsequently asserted that none of the alleged errors cited by POSCO 
    constituted ministerial errors.
        Section 353.28(d) of the Department's regulations defines a 
    ``ministerial error'' as ``an error in addition, subtraction, or other 
    arithmetic function, clerical error resulting from inaccurate copying, 
    duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error 
    which the Secretary considers ministerial.'' 19 CFR Sec. 353.28(d). The 
    first error that POSCO alleged was the Department's failure to reflect 
    in its margin calculations the methodology explicitly stated in the 
    final results with regard to the deduction from U.S. price of one-half 
    of the POSTRADE markup. See the May 2, 1997, memorandum from Steve 
    Bezirganian for John Kugelman. We agree with POSCO that this 
    constituted a ministerial error as defined by 19 CFR Sec. 353.28(d), 
    and have corrected the error in question.
        The Department has determined that the other five ministerial 
    errors alleged by POSCO are not ministerial errors. See the May 2, 
    1997, memorandum from Steve Bezirganian for John Kugelman. Therefore, 
    we did not amend the final results on those five points.
    
    Amended Final Results of Review
    
        As a result of the correction, we have determined that the 
    following de minimis percentage weighted-average margins exist for the 
    period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Weighted- 
                                                                   average  
                   Manufacturer/producer/exporter                   margin  
                                                                  (percent) 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POSCO......................................................         0.49
    ------------------------------------------------------------            
             Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products         
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POSCO......................................................         0.09
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Department shall determine, and the United States Customs 
    Service shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
    The Department shall issue appraisement instructions directly to the 
    Customs Service.
        Furthermore, the following deposit requirements shall be effective, 
    upon publication of this notice for all shipments of the subject 
    merchandise from Korea that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
    for consumption, on or after the date of publication of this notice, as 
    provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
    (``the Act''): (1) The cash deposit rates for POSCO and the collapsed 
    companies (POCOS and PSI) shall be zero percent; (2) for previously 
    reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit 
    rate shall continue to be the company-specific rate published for the 
    most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in these 
    reviews, or the original investigations, but the manufacturer is, the 
    cash deposit rate shall be that established for the most recent period 
    for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the 
    exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in these or any 
    previous reviews, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 14.44 
    percent (for certain cold-rolled carbon steel flat products) and 17.70 
    percent (for certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products), 
    which were the ``all others'' rates in the LTFV investigations.
        These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
    until publication of the final results of the next administrative 
    review.
        This notice also serves as final reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of 
    antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during 
    this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could 
    result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping 
    duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
    duties.
        This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
    disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 353.34(d). Failure 
    to comply is a violation of the APO.
        These amended final results of administrative review and notice are 
    in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR Sec. 353.28(c).
    
        Dated: June 13, 1997.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 97-16244 Filed 6-19-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/20/1997
Published:
06/20/1997
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of amendment to final results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
97-16244
Dates:
June 20, 1997.
Pages:
33587-33588 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-580-815, A-580-816
PDF File:
97-16244.pdf