95-15107. Almonds Grown in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 21, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 32262-32264]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-15107]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    7 CFR Part 981
    
    [Docket No. FV95-981-1IFR]
    
    
    Almonds Grown in California; Expenses and Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This interim final rule authorizes expenditures and 
    establishes an assessment rate under Marketing Order No. 981 for the 
    1995-96 crop year. Authorization of this budget enables the Almond 
    Board of California (Board) to incur expenses that are reasonable and 
    necessary to administer the program. Funds to administer this program 
    are derived from assessments on handlers.
    
    DATES: Effective beginning July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996. 
    Comments received by July 21, 1995, will be considered prior to 
    issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the Docket 
    Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 
    2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, FAX # (202) 720-5698. Comments 
    should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this 
    issue of the Federal Register and will be available for public 
    inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business 
    hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kate Nelson, Marketing Assistant, 
    California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, 
    USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721, 
    telephone (209) 487-5901, or FAX # (209) 487-5906; or Kathleen M. Finn, 
    Marketing Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2522-S, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456, telephone (202) 720-1509 or FAX # (202) 720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This interim final rule is issued under 
    Marketing Agreement and Order No. 981 (7 CFR part 981), both as 
    amended, hereinafter referred to as the ``order,'' regulating the 
    handling of almonds grown in California. The order is effective under 
    the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
    601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This interim final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 
    12778, Civil Justice Reform. Under the provisions of the marketing 
    order now in effect, California almonds are subject to assessments. It 
    is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein will be 
    applicable to all assessable almonds handled during the 1995-96 crop 
    year, which begins July 1, 1995, and ends June 30, 1996. This interim 
    final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this 
    rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A), any 
    handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a petition 
    stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation 
    imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and 
    request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such 
    handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. 
    After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the petition. The Act 
    provides that the district court of the United States in any district 
    in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal 
    place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is filed not later 
    than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 7,000 producers of California almonds under 
    this marketing order, and approximately 115 handlers. Small 
    agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business 
    Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual receipts of less 
    than $500,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as 
    those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. The majority of 
    [[Page 32263]] California almond producers and handlers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        The budget of expenses for the 1995-96 crop year was prepared by 
    the Board, the agency responsible for local administration of the 
    marketing order, and submitted to the Department for approval. The 
    members of the Board are producers and handlers of California almonds. 
    They are familiar with the Board's needs and with the costs of goods 
    and services in their local area and are thus in a position to 
    formulate an appropriate budget. The budget was formulated and 
    discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have 
    had an opportunity to participate and provide input.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected receipts of California 
    almonds. Because that rate will be applied to handlers' actual 
    receipts, a rate must be established that will provide sufficient 
    income to pay the Board's budgeted expenses.
        The Board met on May 12, 1995, and unanimously recommended a 1995-
    96 budget of $4,952,591, as compared to the $5,235,262 ultimately 
    budgeted for the previous year. For the 1994-95 year, the Board 
    initially recommended, and the Department approved, expenditures 
    totalling $9,435,262. Of that total amount, $6.575 million was budgeted 
    for promotional activities and $300,000 was intended to be added to the 
    Board's monetary reserve. The assessment rate for the 1994-95 crop year 
    was initially set at 2.25 cents per kernel pound of almonds. However, 
    because of uncertainty created by legal decisions regarding the Board's 
    former advertising and promotion program, the Board ultimately 
    postponed certain advertising activities and recommended reducing its 
    assessment rate on handlers to .25 cents per pound. As approved by the 
    Department, budgeted expenditures for promotional activities were 
    reduced to $2.675 million and the Board curtailed its plans to add 
    $300,000 to its reserve.
        For the 1995-96 year, the Board has budgeted $2.358 million for a 
    line item entitled information and research, with the bulk of these 
    funds targeted for public relations, food service and industrial 
    promotional programs, and research. In addition, the Board has budgeted 
    $150,000 for China and Indonesia Consumer Education, thus maintaining a 
    presence in foreign markets. Unlike the 1994-95 crop year, the Board 
    will not be receiving any funds through the marketing promotion program 
    conducted by the Department's Foreign Agricultural Service for the 
    1995-96 crop year.
        Items which have decreased compared to those budgeted for 1994-95 
    (in parentheses) are: Salaries, $598,251 ($795,318), employee benefits, 
    $37,391 (50,000), retirement benefits, $44,869 ($64,000), payroll 
    taxes, $45,766 ($55,400), travel, $75,000 ($100,000), meetings, $13,000 
    ($35,000), office rent, $70,000 ($90,000), storage rent, $4,000 
    ($5,000), equipment rent, $3,000 ($5,000), security, $1,000 ($2,500), 
    utilities, $12,000 ($13,500), alliances with other organizations to 
    provide information on almonds to consumers, $11,000 ($20,000), 
    econometric model and statistical analysis, $10,000 ($40,000), program 
    accountability analyses to assess the effectiveness of the advertising 
    and market development programs, $100,000 ($150,000), furniture and 
    fixtures, $0 ($10,000), and computers and software, $20,000 ($25,000).
        Budget items for 1995-96 which have increased compared to those 
    budgeted for 1994-95 (in parentheses) are: Research conference, $30,000 
    ($25,000), contract labor and consultants, $55,000 ($30,000), 
    compliance audits and analysis, $95,000 ($75,000), data processing, 
    $10,000 ($6,000), postage and delivery, $40,000 ($32,000), office 
    supplies, $17,500 ($15,000), printing, $17,500 ($12,000), repairs and 
    maintenance, $15,500 ($12,500), publications, $15,500 ($3,500), dues, 
    subscriptions, and registration fees, $12,000 ($7,500), newsletters and 
    releases, $45,000 ($25,000), production research, $512,650 ($489,134), 
    crop estimate, $90,736 ($85,600), acreage survey, $37,429 ($35,310), 
    nutrition and issues research, $175,000 ($50,000), vehicles, $20,000 
    ($15,000), office equipment, $20,000 ($15,000), and the addition of 
    $25,000 for aflatoxin monitoring.
        The Board also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of .75 
    cents per kernel pound, .50 cents higher than last year. Revenues for 
    the 1995-96 crop year are expected to be $3,096,000 from administrative 
    assessments (based on an estimate of 412.8 million pounds of marketable 
    almonds), $100,000 from interest, and $16,000 from the almond industry 
    conference, for a total of $3,212,000. The Board plans on using money 
    from its reserve to meet the estimated expenses of $4,952,591 for the 
    year. In addition, any unexpended funds from 1995-96 may be carried 
    over to cover expenses during the first four months of the 1996-97 crop 
    year.
        This action will impose an obligation on handlers to pay 
    assessments. The assessments are uniform for all handlers. The 
    assessment cost will be offset by the benefits derived by the operation 
    of the marketing order.
        Therefore, the Administrator of the AMS has determined that this 
    action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities.
        After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the 
    information and recommendations submitted by the Board and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good 
    cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 
    interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into 
    effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date 
    of this action until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register 
    because: (1) The Board needs to have sufficient funds to pay its 
    expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the crop year 
    begins on July 1, 1995, and the marketing order requires that the rate 
    of assessment for the crop year apply to all assessable California 
    almonds handled during the crop year; (3) handlers are aware of this 
    action which was unanimously recommended by the Board at a public 
    meeting and is similar to other budget actions issued in past years; 
    and (4) this interim final rule provides a 30-day comment period, and 
    all comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization 
    of this rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
    
        Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        Note: This section will not appear in the Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
        2. A new Sec. 981.342 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 981.342  Expenses and assessment rate.
    
        Expenses of $4,952,591 by the Almond Board of California are 
    authorized for the crop year ending June 30, 1996. An assessment rate 
    for the crop year payable by each handler in [[Page 32264]] accordance 
    with Sec. 981.81 is fixed at .75 cents per kernel pound of almonds.
    
        Dated: June 15, 1995.
    Sharon Bomer Lauritsen,
    Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 95-15107 Filed 6-20-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/1/1995
Published:
06/21/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
95-15107
Dates:
Effective beginning July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996. Comments received by July 21, 1995, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
32262-32264 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV95-981-1IFR
PDF File:
95-15107.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 981.342