98-16408. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision; San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 119 (Monday, June 22, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 33854-33855]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-16408]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CA 198-0077; FRL-6112-5]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
    California State Implementation Plan Revision; San Diego County Air 
    Pollution Control District; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution 
    Control District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the approval of revisions to the California 
    State Implementation Plan (SIP) proposed in the Federal Register on 
    October 10, 1997, and March 30, 1998. The revisions concern San Diego 
    County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) Rule 67.10 and San 
    Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) Rule 
    4401. SDCAPCD Rule 67.10 controls volatile organic compound (VOC) 
    emissions from kelp processing and bio-polymer manufacturing 
    operations, and SJVUAPCD Rule 4401 controls VOC emissions from steam-
    enhanced crude oil production well vents. This final action will 
    incorporate these rules into the Federally-approved SIP and will also 
    permanently stop the sanctions and Federal implementation plan clocks 
    that were started on February 14, 1996, and September 27, 1996, 
    respectively, when EPA published final limited disapproval actions for 
    the State's previous submittals of these rules. The intended effect of 
    approving these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance 
    with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or 
    the Act). Thus, EPA is finalizing the approval of these revisions into 
    the California SIP under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on 
    SIP submittals, SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air 
    quality standards and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This action is effective on July 22, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of these rules and EPA's evaluation report for each 
    rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are 
    available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
    S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460.
    San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, 9150 Chesapeake Drive, 
    San Diego, CA 92123-1096.
    San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1999 
    Tuolumne Street, Suite 200, Fresno, CA 93721.
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding SDCAPCD Rule 
    67.10, contact Patricia Bowlin, Rulemaking Office, (AIR-4), Air 
    Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne 
    Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, telephone: (415) 744-1188. For 
    questions on SJVUAPCD Rule 4401, contact Mae Wang at the same address, 
    telephone: (415) 744-1200.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Applicability
    
        The rules being approved into the California State Implementation 
    Plan (SIP) are San Diego County Air Pollution Control District 
    (SDCAPCD) Rule 67.10, Kelp Processing and Bio-Polymer Manufacturing 
    Operations, and San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 
    District (SJVUAPCD) Rule 4401, Steam-enhanced Crude Oil Production Well 
    Vents. These rules were submitted by the California Air Resources Board 
    (CARB) to EPA on August 1, 1997, and March 10, 1998, respectively.
    
    II. Background
    
        On October 10, 1997, in 62 FR 52959, EPA proposed to approve 
    SDCAPCD Rule 67.10, Kelp Processing and Bio-Polymer Manufacturing 
    Operations, into the California SIP. Rule 67.10 was adopted by SDCAPCD 
    on June 25, 1997. The rule was submitted by CARB to EPA on August 1, 
    1997. On March 30, 1998, in 63 FR 15116, EPA proposed to approve 
    SJVUAPCD Rule 4401, Steam-enhanced Crude Oil Production Well Vents, 
    into the California SIP. Rule 4401 was adopted by SJVUAPCD on January 
    15, 1998, and was submitted by CARB to EPA on March 10, 1998. Both 
    rules were submitted in response to EPA's 1988 SIP-Call and the 1990 
    Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) section 182(a)(2)(A) requirement that 
    nonattainment areas fix their reasonably available control technology 
    (RACT) rules for ozone in accordance with EPA guidance that interpreted 
    the requirements of the pre-amendment Act. A detailed discussion of the 
    background for each rule is provided in the appropriate proposed 
    rulemaking document cited above.
        EPA has evaluated the above rules for consistency with the 
    requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations and EPA interpretation of 
    these requirements as expressed in the various EPA policy guidance 
    documents referenced in the proposed rulemaking documents cited above. 
    EPA has found that the rules meet the applicable EPA requirements. A 
    detailed discussion of the rule provisions and evaluation has been 
    provided in each proposed rulemaking and in the technical support 
    documents available at EPA's Region IX office.
    
    III. Response to Public Comments
    
        A 30-day public comment period was provided in 62 FR 52959 and 63 
    FR 15116. No comments were received.
    
    IV. EPA Action
    
        EPA is finalizing action to approve the above rules for inclusion 
    into the California SIP. EPA is approving the rules under section 
    110(k)(3) as meeting the requirements of section 110(a) and Part D of 
    the CAA. This approval action will incorporate these rules into the 
    Federally-approved SIP and will also stop the sanctions process and 
    Federal implementation plan clocks, which were started on February 14, 
    1996, and September 27, 1996, when limited disapproval actions were 
    published in the Federal Register. The intended effect of approving 
    these rules is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds 
    (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the CAA.
        The final action on these rules serves as a final determination 
    that the deficiencies in these rules have been corrected. Therefore, on 
    July 22, 1998, any sanction or Federal implementation plan clock is 
    permanently stopped.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any state implementation plan. Each request for revision to 
    the state implementation
    
    [[Page 33855]]
    
    plan shall be considered separately in light of specific technical, 
    economic, and environmental factors, and in relation to relevant 
    statutory and regulatory requirements.
    
    V. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13045
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this regulatory 
    action from Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 review.
        This final rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection 
    of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' because 
    it is not an ``economically significant'' action under E.O. 12866.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the 
    Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the 
    Federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the 
    Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on 
    any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the 
    Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility 
    analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic 
    reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base 
    its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. 
    EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to 
    private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA must 
    select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative that 
    achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory 
    requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for 
    informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly 
    or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not 
    include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
    million or more to either state, local, or tribal governments in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
    existing requirements under state or local law, and imposes no new 
    Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to state, local, 
    or tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this 
    action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    E. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 21, 1998. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Dated: June 9, 1998.
    David Howekamp,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    
        Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart F--California
    
        2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c) (248) and (c) 
    (254) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (248) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were 
    submitted on August 1, 1997, by the Governor's designee.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District.
        (1) Rule 67.10 adopted June 25, 1997.
    * * * * *
        (254) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were 
    submitted on March 10, 1998 by the Governor's designee.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
        (1) Rule 4401 adopted January 15, 1998.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-16408 Filed 6-19-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/22/1998
Published:
06/22/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-16408
Dates:
This action is effective on July 22, 1998.
Pages:
33854-33855 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA 198-0077, FRL-6112-5
PDF File:
98-16408.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.220