03-15712. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the Pacific Exchange, Inc., To Eliminate the Lead Market Maker Concentration Limit of 15% of the Issues Traded on the Exchange's Options Floor
-
Start Preamble
June 13, 2003.
On April 22, 2002, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (“PCX” or “Exchange”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),[1] and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2] a proposed rule change to eliminate the concentration limit for the number of issues that a Lead Market Maker (“LMM”) on the Exchange may be allocated. Notice of the proposed rule change was published Start Printed Page 37188for comment in the Federal Register on May 9, 2003.[3] No comments were received on the proposed rule change.
Current PCX Rule 6.82 requires the Options Allocations Committee (“OAC”) to allocate option issues to LMMs based on an overall evaluation of such factors as a candidate's adequacy of capital, operational capacity, support personnel, trading crowd evaluations and history of adherence to Exchange rules and securities laws. However, absent extraordinary circumstances, no LMM may be allocated more than 15% of the number of issues traded on the options floor.
The Exchange now proposes to eliminate this fixed concentration limit. Instead, PCX would add the number and quality of issues already allocated to an LMM to the list of factors considered by the OAC. Additionally, PCX would adopt a guideline requiring the OAC to consider the concentration of an LMM's issues if an event or proposal would cause the LMM to meet either of the following criteria: (i) The number of issues allocated to it (and any affiliated LMM) is 25% or more of the total number of issues traded on the PCX; or (ii) the volume in the issues allocated to it (and any affiliated LMM) is 50% or more of the total volume of the PCX or 25% or more of the total volume in equity option issues of the PCX. If an LMM met either of these criteria, the guideline would require the OAC to evaluate whether the event or proposal would result in an unacceptable level of concentration. If so, the OAC could exercise its discretion and take action to lower the resulting level of concentration or to deny the subject proposal. The OAC would also retain the discretion to review an LMM's level of concentration at any time, regardless of whether the above criteria are met.
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.[4] Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,[5] which requires, among other things, that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market, and to protect investors and the public interest.
The Commission has previously noted that PCX's concentration limits serve the purpose of minimizing the disturbance to a fair and orderly market that might otherwise result from the failure of an LMM.[6] However, as the Commission has also noted, other exchanges do not impose specified mandatory limits on the number of options that may be allocated to specialists.[7] The Commission believes that the approach proposed by PCX is similar to one employed by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (“CBOE”). Like the proposed PCX Rule and Guidelines, CBOE Rule 8.84 and Regulatory Guideline 99-135 do not impose a mandatory cap on the number of issues that may be allocated to a Designated Primary Market-Maker (“DPM”). Instead, the CBOE guideline provides that a review with the relevant committee may be triggered when, inter alia, the number of classes allocated to a DPM is 25% or more of the total number of classes traded on CBOE. The Commission believes that it is permissible for the PCX to adopt a similar approach. The Commission further believes that the proposed rule changes should provide PCX with an appropriate degree of regulatory flexibility, and allow it to compete more effectively with other exchanges. At the same time, the proposal should preserve the Exchange's ability to minimize the risks associated with potential LMM failures.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,[8] that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-PCX-2002-25) be, and it hereby is, approved.
Start SignatureFor the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.[9]
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
Footnotes
3. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47795 (May 5, 2003), 68 FR 25074.
Back to Citation4. In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78(c)(f).
Back to Citation6. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42583 (March 28, 2000), 65 FR 17689 (April 4, 2000).
Back to Citation7. Id. at 17690; Chicago Board Options Exchange Rule 8.84, Regulatory Guideline 99-135; American Stock Exchange Rule 26, Interp. 03.
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 03-15712 Filed 6-20-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Document Information
- Published:
- 06/23/2003
- Department:
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Entry Type:
- Notice
- Document Number:
- 03-15712
- Pages:
- 37187-37188 (2 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- Release No. 34-48029, File No. SR-PCX-2002-25
- EOCitation:
- of 2003-06-13
- PDF File:
- 03-15712.pdf