96-16023. Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Supplement to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) to Control Air Pollution in Areas of Bernalillo County Designated Nonattainment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 32339-32341]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-16023]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [NM-23-1-7101a; FRL-5500-7]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
    New Mexico; Supplement to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan 
    (SIP) to Control Air Pollution in Areas of Bernalillo County Designated 
    Nonattainment
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action approves a revision to the SIP consisting of the 
    ``October 12, 1994, Supplement to the New Mexico State Implementation 
    Plan to Control Air Pollution in Area(s) of Bernalillo County 
    Designated Nonattainment''. This revision updates the narrative portion 
    of the previously approved April 14, 1993, Supplement to the New Mexico 
    SIP to Control Air Pollution in Areas of Bernalillo County Designated 
    Nonattainment (see the December 21, 1993 Federal Register to reflect 
    EPA's approval for lifting the construction ban in Bernalillo County. 
    The construction ban was put in place by the Governor of New Mexico on 
    May 20, 1980. The ban was repealed by EPA approval effective May 16, 
    1994, and appearing in the March 16, 1994 Federal Register.
    
    DATES: This action is effective on August 23, 1996, unless notice is 
    postmarked by July 24, 1996 that someone wishes to submit adverse or 
    critical comments. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will 
    be published in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed to Jole C. Luehrs, Chief, Air 
    Permits Section (6PD-R), U.S. EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
    Texas 75202-2733. Copies of the State's
    
    [[Page 32340]]
    
    petition and other information relevant to this action are available 
    for inspection during normal hours at the following locations:
    
    U.S. EPA, Region 6, Air Permits Section (6PD-R), 1445 Ross Avenue, 
    Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75202-2733.
    Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. EPA, 401 M 
    Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    City of Albuquerque, Environmental Health Department, One Civic Plaza, 
    Albuquerque, NM 87103.
    
        Anyone wishing to review this petition at the Region 6 EPA office 
    is asked to contact the person below to schedule an appointment 24 
    hours in advance.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Samuel R. Mitz, Air Permits 
    Section (6PD-R), U.S. EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 
    75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-8370.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On December 21, 1993, EPA approved an Albuquerque/Bernalillo County 
    permit SIP revision which included the April 14, 1993, Supplement to 
    the New Mexico SIP to Control Air Pollution in Area(s) of Bernalillo 
    County Designated Nonattainment (58 FR 67326). This Supplement included 
    a paragraph which stated that upon approval of Albuquerque/ Bernalillo 
    County Air Quality Control Regulations (AQCR) 20 (Authority-to-
    Construct Permits), 29 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration) and 32 
    (Construction Permits for Nonattainment Areas) and the accompanying SIP 
    supplements, there would be no need to continue the Governor's 
    construction moratorium of May 20, 1980, which appeared in 40 Code of 
    Federal Regulations (CFR) 52.1620(e)(18).
        On December 21, 1993, EPA approved revised AQCRs 29 and 32. On 
    March 16, 1994, EPA approved AQCR 20, which brought the Albuquerque/
    Bernalillo County New Source Review permitting program up to date and 
    provided for the revocation of the construction ban for Albuquerque 
    County. In response, on October 12, 1994, the State of New Mexico 
    adopted a revised Supplement to the New Mexico State Implementation 
    Plan to Control Air Pollution in Area(s) of Bernalillo County 
    Designated Nonattainment, which noted the repeal of the construction 
    moratorium.
    
    Final Action
    
        The EPA is approving the revised New Mexico SIP narrative entitled 
    October 12, 1994 Supplement to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan 
    to Control Air Pollution in Area(s) of Bernalillo County Designated 
    Nonattainment, which acknowledges the repeal of the construction 
    moratorium of May 20, 1980.
        The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because 
    EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    unless adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be 
    effective August 23, 1996, unless adverse or critical comments are 
    postmarked by July 24, 1996. If EPA receives such comments, this action 
    will be withdrawn before the effective date by publishing a subsequent 
    document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments 
    received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
    this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a 
    second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in 
    commenting on this action should do so at this time. If no such 
    comments are received on this action, the public is advised that this 
    action will be effective August 23, 1996.
    
    Regulatory Process
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). 
    Alternatively, under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), EPA may certify that the rule 
    will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities (see 46 FR 8709). Small entities include small businesses, 
    small not-for-profit enterprises, and governmental entities with 
    jurisdiction over populations of less than 50,000. SIP approvals under 
    section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not 
    create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the 
    State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP-approval 
    does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does not have a 
    significant impact on small entities. Moreover, due to the nature of 
    the Federal-State relationship under the CAA, preparation of a 
    regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into 
    the economic reasonableness of State action. The CAA forbids EPA from 
    basing its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. 
    v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 
    7410(a)(2).
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by August 23, 1996. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration of this final rule by the Administrator does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for purposes of judicial review; nor does it 
    extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, or postpone the effectiveness of this rule. This action may not 
    be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see 
    section 307(b)(2)).
        Nothing in this action shall be construed as permitting, allowing, 
    or establishing a precedent for any future request for a revision to 
    any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered 
    separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental 
    factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory 
    requirements.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 
    1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed 
    or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in 
    estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector, or to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
        Through submission of this SIP or plan revision approved in this 
    action, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have 
    elected to adopt the program provided for under section 110 of the CAA. 
    The rules and commitments approved in this action may bind State, 
    local, and tribal governments to perform certain actions and also 
    require the private sector to perform certain duties. To the extent 
    that the rules and commitments being approved by this action will 
    impose or lead to the imposition of any mandate upon the State, local, 
    or tribal governments, either as the owner or operator of a source or 
    as a regulator, or would impose or lead to the imposition of any 
    mandate upon the private sector, EPA's action will impose no new 
    requirements; such sources are already subject to these requirements 
    under State law. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or 
    tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action. 
    Therefore, EPA has determined that this final action does not include a 
    mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate or to the private 
    sector.
    
    [[Page 32341]]
    
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review
    
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator 
    for Air and Radiation. The OMB has exempted this regulatory action from 
    Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Nonattainment areas.
    
        Dated: April 11, 1996.
    Lynda F. Carroll,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    
        40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart GG--New Mexico
    
        2. Section 52.1620 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(61) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.1620  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (61) A revision to the New Mexico SIP to udpate the Supplement to 
    the New Mexico State Implementation Plan to Control Air Pollution in 
    Area(s) of Bernalillo County Designated Nonattainment to reflect EPA's 
    approval for lifting the construction ban in Bernalillo County, 
    superseding the supplement dated April 14, 1993.
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) October 12, 1994 Supplement to the New Mexico State 
    Implementation Plan to Control Air Pollution in Area(s) of Bernalillo 
    County Designated Nonattainment as approved by the Albuquerque/
    Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board on November 9, 1994.
    
    [FR Doc. 96-16023 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/23/1996
Published:
06/24/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
96-16023
Dates:
This action is effective on August 23, 1996, unless notice is postmarked by July 24, 1996 that someone wishes to submit adverse or critical comments. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
32339-32341 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
NM-23-1-7101a, FRL-5500-7
PDF File:
96-16023.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.1620