97-16474. Rules of Procedure for E-Z Trials  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 121 (Tuesday, June 24, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 34031-34032]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16474]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
    
    29 CFR Part 2200
    
    
    Rules of Procedure for E-Z Trials
    
    AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document contains revisions to the procedural rules 
    governing the E-Z Trial program. These revisions are intended to assist 
    the E-Z Trial process in meeting its objective of allowing parties in 
    less complex cases to argue their cases before the Commission with as 
    few legal formalities as possible.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by July 24, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: All comments concerning these proposed rules should be 
    addressed to Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General Counsel, Occupational Safety 
    and Health Review Commission, 1120 20th Street NW., 9th Floor, 
    Washington, DC 20036-3419..
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Earl R. Ohman, Jr., General Counsel, (202) 606-5410.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 14, 1995, the Occupational Safety 
    and Health Review Commission published in the Federal Register (60 FR 
    41805) new procedural rules for a pilot program designed to simplify 
    and accelerate adjudication for those cases appropriate for a less 
    formal process. Designated ``E-Z Trial,'' the pilot program was to run 
    for one year, beginning on October 1, 1995, and terminating on 
    September 30, 1996, under a ``sunset provision'' unless extended by the 
    Commission. On September 27, 1996, the Commission extended the sunset 
    provision until March 31, 1997, to allow for an evaluation of the pilot 
    program (61 FR 50711). During that period, the Commission held focus 
    groups with parties, including small employers, safety consultants, 
    representatives of employers, and attorneys from the Cleveland office 
    of the Solicitor of Labor, who had participated in E-Z Trial 
    proceedings, The participants were given an opportunity to comment on 
    the E-Z Trial process and to suggest changes that would enable the E-Z 
    Trial program to more effectively achieve its goals. The Commission 
    also solicited comments and experiences from Commission judges who had 
    conducted E-Z Trials. On March 28, 1997, the Commission further 
    extended the sunset provision until July 31, 1997 (62 FR 14821) in 
    order to evaluate the comments it had received about the E-Z Trial 
    program. Based on that evaluation, the Commission has proposed 
    revisions to its procedural rules involving the eligibility of cases 
    for E-Z Trial and mandatory disclosure by the parties. Specifically, 
    the Commission has determined that cases involving fatalities or 
    allegations of repeat violations are not appropriate for E-Z Trial 
    designation, and that cases involving aggregated proposed penalties of 
    more than $10,000, but not more than $20,000, may be designated for E-Z 
    Trial at the discretion of the Chief Administrative Law Judge, if 
    otherwise appropriate. Additionally, the Commission believes that the 
    goal of E-Z Trial is best served by requiring the Secretary to turn 
    over to the employer any photographs or videotapes that the Secretary 
    anticipates using at the hearing. Having received many comments 
    concerning the increased use of videotapes and photographs during 
    inspections, the Commission believes that the disclosure of such 
    evidence will promote fairness and will help expedite the resolution of 
    E-Z Trial cases. The Commission invites comments from the public 
    regarding these proposed changes.
    
    List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2200
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Hearing and appeal 
    procedures.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Occupational Safety 
    and Health Review Commission proposes to amend Title 29, Chapter XX, 
    Part 2200, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 2200--RULES OF PROCEDURE
    
        1. The authority citation continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 29 U.S.C. 661(g).
    
        2. Section 2200.202 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 2200.202  Eligibility for E-Z Trial.
    
        (1) Those cases selected for E-Z Trial will be those that do not 
    involve complex issues of law or fact. Cases appropriate for E-Z Trial 
    would generally include those with one or more of the following 
    characteristics:
        (a) relatively few citation items,
        (b) an aggregate proposed penalty of not more than $10,000,
        (c) no allegation of willfulness or a repeat violation,
        (d) not involving a fatality,
        (e) a hearing that is expected to take less than two days, or
        (f) a small employer whether appearing pro se or represented by 
    counsel.
        (2) Those cases with an aggregate proposed penalty of more than 
    $10,000, but not more than $20,000, if otherwise appropriate, may be 
    selected for E-Z Trial at the discretion of the Chief Administrative 
    Law Judge.
        3. Section 2200.206(a) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 2200.206  Disclosure of information.
    
        (a) Disclosure to employer. (1) Within 12 working days after a case 
    is designated for E-Z Trial, the Secretary shall provide the employer, 
    free of charge, copies of the narrative (Form OSHA 1-A) and the 
    worksheet (Form OSHA 1-B), or their equivalents.
        (2) Within 30 calendar days after a case is designated for E-Z 
    Trial, the Secretary shall provide the employer with reproductions of 
    any photographs or videotapes that the Secretary anticipates using at 
    the hearing.
        (3) The Judge shall act expeditiously on any claim by the employer 
    that the Secretary improperly withheld or redacted any portion of the 
    documents,
    
    [[Page 34032]]
    
    photographs, or videotapes on the grounds of confidentiality or 
    privilege.
    * * * * *
        4. Section 2200.207(a) is amended by revising the first sentence to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 2200.207  Pre-hearing conferences.
    
        (a) When held. As early as practicable after the employer has 
    received the documents set forth in Sec. 2200.206(a)(1), the presiding 
    Judge will order and conduct a pre-hearing conference. * * *
    * * * * *
        Dated: June 18, 1997.
    Earl R. Ohman, Jr.,
    General Counsel.
    [FR Doc. 97-16474 Filed 6-23-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7600-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/24/1997
Department:
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
97-16474
Dates:
Comments must be received by July 24, 1997.
Pages:
34031-34032 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-16474.pdf
CFR: (3)
29 CFR 2200.202
29 CFR 2200.206
29 CFR 2200.207