98-16308. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 121 (Wednesday, June 24, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34271-34274]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-16308]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-178-AD; Amendment 39-10611; AD 98-11-52]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, 
    and -500 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment 
    adopting airworthiness directive (AD) T98-11-52 that was sent 
    previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Boeing Model 737-
    100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes by individual 
    telegrams. This AD requires removal of the fuel boost pump wiring in 
    the conduits of the wing and center fuel tanks; an inspection to detect 
    damage of the wiring, and corrective action, if necessary; and eventual 
    installation of teflon sleeving over the electrical cable. This action 
    is prompted by reports of severe wear of the fuel boost pump wiring due 
    to chafing between the wiring and the surrounding conduit inside the 
    fuel tank; pin-hole-sized holes in the conduit that appear to be the 
    result of arc-through of the conduit; and exposure of the main tank 
    boost pump wire conductor inside a conduit and signs of arcing to the 
    wall of the conduit. The actions specified by this AD are intended to 
    detect and correct chafing and electrical arcing between the fuel boost 
    pump wiring and the surrounding conduit, which, if not corrected, could 
    result in arc-through of the conduit, and consequent fire or explosion 
    of the fuel tank.
    
    DATES: Effective June 29, 1998, to all persons except those persons to 
    whom it was made immediately effective by telegraphic AD T98-11-52, 
    issued on May 14, 1998, which contained the requirements of this 
    amendment.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of June 29, 1998.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before August 24, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-NM-178-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
        The applicable service information may be obtained from Boeing 
    Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
    2207. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorr Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2684; fax (425) 227-1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Issuance of Telegraphic AD T98-10-51
    
        On May 7, 1998, the FAA issued telegraphic AD T98-10-51, applicable 
    to all Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, to 
    require removal of the fuel boost pump wiring in the conduits of the 
    wing fuel tanks; a one-time detailed visual inspection to detect damage 
    of the wiring; reinstallation of the wiring with teflon sleeving, or 
    replacement of damaged wiring with new wiring and teflon sleeving; and 
    submission of damaged parts to Boeing. Telegraphic AD T98-10-51 was 
    prompted by reports of severe wear of the fuel boost pump wiring due to 
    chafing between the in-tank fuel boost pump wiring and the surrounding 
    conduit inside the fuel tank, and pin-hole-sized holes in two sections 
    of the fuel boost pump conduit that appeared to be the result of arc-
    through of the conduit. The actions required by that telegraphic AD 
    were intended to detect and correct such chafing, which could result in 
    arc-through of the conduit, and consequent fire or explosion of the 
    fuel tank.
    
    Issuance of Telegraphic AD T98-11-51
    
        On May 10, 1998, the FAA issued telegraphic AD T98-11-51, which is 
    applicable to all Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series 
    airplanes. That AD superseded telegraphic AD T98-10-51 to continue to 
    require removal of the fuel boost pump wiring in the conduits of the 
    wing fuel tanks; a detailed visual inspection to detect damage of the 
    wiring; and corrective action, if necessary. Additionally, that 
    telegraphic AD required eventual installation of teflon sleeving over 
    the electrical cable, which terminated the requirements of the 
    telegraphic AD.
        Telegraphic AD T98-11-51 was prompted by a report indicating that 
    the left main tank boost pump power wire conductor was exposed at three 
    areas inside the conduit. At least one of the areas exhibited signs of 
    arcing to the wall of the conduit. In addition, several reports of 
    severe chafing had been received since the issuance of telegraphic AD 
    T98-10-51. The actions required by telegraphic AD T98-11-51 were 
    intended to detect and correct chafing and electrical arcing between 
    the fuel boost pump wiring and the surrounding conduit, which, if not 
    corrected, could result in arc-through of the conduit, and consequent 
    fire or explosion of the fuel tank.
        In telegraphic AD T98-11-51, the FAA required inspection of 
    airplanes that had accumulated between 40,000 and 50,000 total flight 
    hours based on the significance of the problems on the high-time 
    airplanes reported at that time, and the lack of available data for 
    airplanes that had accumulated between 40,000 and 50,000 total flight 
    hours. However, the FAA indicated in that telegraphic AD that it would 
    continue to monitor inspection reports to determine whether an 
    adjustment to the compliance time was warranted.
    
    Issuance of Telegraphic AD T98-11-52
    
        Since the issuance of telegraphic AD T98-11-51, the FAA has 
    received inspection results indicating that exposed copper wire and 
    significant chafing was found on other Model 737-200 series airplanes 
    that had accumulated flight hours below those specified in earlier 
    reports.
        The FAA has determined that it is necessary to expand the 
    inspection requirement to airplanes that have accumulated less than 
    40,000 total flight hours. This is necessary to ensure that these 
    airplanes have not also developed a problem with chafing and electrical 
    arcing between the fuel boost pump wiring and the surrounding conduit.
        When telegraphic AD T98-11-51 superseded telegraphic AD T98-10-51, 
    the FAA had received inspection reports indicating that the center fuel 
    tank boost pump wiring was not showing chafing and did not present a 
    safety of flight problem on Model 737-100 and -200 series airplanes. 
    (It should be noted that the center fuel tank boost pump wiring
    
    [[Page 34272]]
    
    is located in the main tanks, not within the center fuel tank itself.) 
    As a result, the requirement for inspection of the center fuel tank 
    boost pump wiring on Model 737-100 and -200 series airplanes was 
    removed in telegraphic AD T98-11-51. Inspection results received since 
    the issuance of telegraphic AD T98-11-51 indicate that chafing has 
    occurred in the center fuel tank boost pump wiring of some Model 737-
    100 and -200 series airplanes. Telegraphic AD T98-11-52 restores the 
    requirement to inspect the center fuel tank boost pump wiring on all 
    affected models.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status 
    Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 
    03, dated May 9, 1998. The alert service bulletin describes procedures 
    for removal of the fuel boost pump wiring in the conduits of the wing 
    fuel tanks and center fuel tanks; an inspection to detect damage of the 
    wiring; and corrective action, if necessary. (The corrective actions 
    include replacing the wiring or conduit with new or serviceable parts.) 
    This alert service bulletin also describes procedures for eventual 
    installation of teflon sleeving over the electrical cable. The NSC's 
    provide information concerning optional parts and procedures.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of the Rule
    
        Since the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop 
    on other airplanes of the same type design, the FAA issued telegraphic 
    AD T98-11-52 to detect and correct chafing and electrical arcing 
    between the fuel boost pump wiring and the surrounding conduit, which, 
    if not corrected, could result in arc-through of the conduit, and 
    consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank. This AD supersedes 
    telegraphic AD T98-11-51 to continue to require removal of the fuel 
    boost pump wiring in the conduits of the wing fuel tanks; a detailed 
    visual inspection to detect damage of the wiring; and corrective 
    action, if necessary. Additionally, this AD continues to require 
    eventual installation of teflon sleeving over the electrical cable, 
    which terminates the requirements of the AD.
        This AD requires inspection of airplanes that have accumulated less 
    than 40,000 total flight hours. In addition, this AD adds a requirement 
    for inspection of the fuel boost pump wiring in the conduits of the 
    center fuel tanks on Model 737-100 and -200 series airplanes that have 
    accumulated 40,000 or more total flight hours.
        The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with 
    alert service bulletin and notices of status change described 
    previously.
        Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required, 
    notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were 
    impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause 
    existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual telegrams 
    issued on May 14, 1998, to all known U.S. owners and operators of all 
    Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. 
    These conditions still exist, and the AD is hereby published in the 
    Federal Register as an amendment to section 39.13 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13) to make it effective to all 
    persons.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-NM-178-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-11-52  BOEING: Amendment 39-10611. Docket 98-NM-178-AD.
    
        Applicability: All Model 737-100, -200, -300, -400, and -500 
    series airplanes, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability
    
    [[Page 34273]]
    
    provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or 
    repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For 
    airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the 
    performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
    operator must request approval for an alternative method of 
    compliance in accordance with paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. The 
    request should include an assessment of the effect of the 
    modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct chafing and electrical arcing between the 
    fuel boost pump wiring and the surrounding conduit, which, if not 
    corrected, could result in arc-through of the conduit, and 
    consequent fire or explosion of the fuel tank, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) For all airplanes that have accumulated 50,000 or more total 
    flight hours as of the effective date of this AD: Prior to further 
    flight, remove the fuel boost pump wiring from the in-tank conduit 
    for the aft boost pumps in main tanks #1 and #2, and perform a 
    detailed visual inspection to detect damage of the wiring, in 
    accordance with the procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of 
    Status Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, 
    and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998.
        (b) For all airplanes that have accumulated less than 50,000 
    total flight hours as of receipt of telegraphic AD T98-11-51: Prior 
    to the accumulation of 40,000 total flight hours, or within 14 days 
    after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, remove 
    the fuel boost pump wiring from the in-tank conduit for the aft 
    boost pumps in main tanks #1 and #2, and perform a detailed visual 
    inspection to detect damage of the wiring, in accordance with the 
    procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, 
    dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status Change NSC 01, 
    dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 
    9, 1998.
        (c) For all airplanes: Remove the fuel boost pump wiring from 
    the in-tank conduit for the center tank left and right boost pumps, 
    and perform a detailed visual inspection to detect damage of the 
    wiring, in accordance with the procedures specified in Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by 
    Notices of Status Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated 
    May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998. Accomplish the 
    inspection at the earliest of the times specified in paragraphs 
    (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3).
        (1) For Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes: Inspect 
    prior to the accumulation of 40,000 total flight hours, or within 14 
    days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
        (2) For Model 737-100 and -200 series airplanes: Inspect prior 
    to the accumulation of 40,000 total flight hours, or within 10 days 
    after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
        (3) For all airplanes: Inspect prior to the accumulation of 
    50,000 total flight hours, or within 5 days after the effective date 
    of this AD, whichever occurs later.
        (d) For all airplanes: Prior to the accumulation of 30,000 total 
    flight hours or within 45 days after the effective date of this AD, 
    whichever occurs later, remove the fuel boost pump wiring from the 
    in-tank conduit for the aft boost pumps in main tanks #1 and #2, and 
    the center tank left and right boost pumps, and perform a detailed 
    visual inspection to detect damage of the wiring, in accordance with 
    the procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
    28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status 
    Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 
    03, dated May 9, 1998.
        (e) If red, yellow, blue, or green wire insulation cannot be 
    seen through the outer jacket of the electrical cable during any 
    inspection required by this AD: Prior to further flight, accomplish 
    paragraph (e)(1), (e)(2), or (e)(3) of this AD in accordance with 
    procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, 
    dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status Change NSC 01, 
    dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 
    9, 1998.
        (1) Install teflon sleeving over the electrical cable, and 
    reinstall the cable. Or
        (2) Reinstall the electrical cable without teflon sleeving over 
    the cable. Within 500 flight hours after accomplishment of the 
    reinstallation, repeat the inspection described in paragraph (d) of 
    this AD; and install teflon sleeving over the cable. Or
        (3) Replace the electrical cable with new cable without teflon 
    sleeving. Within 18 months or 6,000 flight hours, whichever occurs 
    first, repeat the inspection specified in paragraph (d) of this AD, 
    and install teflon sleeving over the cable.
        (f) If red, yellow, blue, or green wire insulation can be seen 
    through the outer jacket of the electrical cable during any 
    inspection required by this ad, but no evidence of electrical arcing 
    is found: Prior to further flight, accomplish either paragraph 
    (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD in accordance with the procedures 
    specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 
    24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status Change NSC 01, dated May 
    7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998.
        (1) Replace the damaged electrical cable with a new cable, 
    install teflon sleeving over the cable, and reinstall the cable. Or
        (2) Replace the electrical cable with a new cable without teflon 
    sleeving. Within 18 months or 6,000 flight hours, whichever occurs 
    first, repeat the inspection described in paragraph (d) of this AD; 
    and install teflon sleeving over the cable.
        (g) If any evidence of electrical arcing but no evidence of fuel 
    leakage is found on the removed electrical cable during any 
    inspection required by this AD: Prior to further flight, accomplish 
    paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD in accordance with the 
    procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, 
    dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status Change NSC 01, 
    dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 
    9, 1998.
        (1) Verify the integrity of the conduit in accordance with the 
    instructions contained in NSC 03 to the alert service bulletin. And
        (2) Accomplish either paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this 
    AD in accordance with the alert service bulletin.
        (i) Replace the damaged electrical cable with a new cable, 
    install teflon sleeving over the cable, and reinstall the cable. Or
        (ii) Replace the electrical cable with a new cable without 
    teflon sleeving. Within 18 months or 6,000 flight hours, whichever 
    occurs first, repeat the inspection described in paragraph (d) of 
    this AD; and install teflon sleeving over the cable.
        (h) If any evidence of fuel is found on the removed electrical 
    cable during any inspection required by this AD: Prior to further 
    flight, accomplish paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD in 
    accordance with the procedures specified in Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of 
    Status Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, 
    and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998.
        (1) Replace the conduit section where electrical arcing was 
    found. And
        (2) Accomplish either paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (h)(2)(ii) of this 
    AD.
        (i) Replace the damaged electrical cable with a new cable, 
    install teflon sleeving over the cable, and reinstall the cable. Or
        (ii) Replace the electrical cable with a new cable without 
    teflon sleeving. Within 18 months or 6,000 flight hours, whichever 
    occurs first, repeat the inspection described in paragraph (d) of 
    this AD; and install teflon sleeving over the cable.
        (i) For Groups 1 and 2 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998: Concurrent with 
    the first accomplishment of corrective action in accordance with 
    paragraph (e), (f), (g), or (h) of this AD, as applicable, replace 
    the case ground wire with a new wire in accordance with Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998; as revised by 
    Notices of Status Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated 
    May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998.
        (j) Installation of teflon sleeving over any electrical cable 
    that is new or has been inspected in accordance with paragraph (a), 
    (b), (c), or (d) of this AD, constitutes terminating action for the 
    requirements of this AD.
        (k) If any damage specified in paragraph (f), (g), or (h) of 
    this AD is found during any inspection required by this AD, within 
    10 days after accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph 
    (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this AD, as applicable, accomplish 
    paragraphs (k)(1) and (k)(2) of this AD. Information collection 
    requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have 
    been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
        (1) Submit any damaged electrical cables and conduits to Boeing, 
    in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated 
    April 24, 1998, as revised by Notices of Status Change NSC 01, dated 
    May 7, 1998,
    
    [[Page 34274]]
    
    NSC 02, dated May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998; include 
    the serial number of the airplane, the number of total flight hours 
    and flight cycles accumulated on the airplane, and the location of 
    the electrical cable on the airplane.
        (2) For airplanes that are inspected after the effective date of 
    this AD, submit the serial number of the airplane, the number of 
    total flight hours and flight cycles accumulated on the airplane, 
    and the location of the electrical cable on the airplane to the 
    Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056; fax (425) 227-1181.
        (l)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit 
    their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance 
    Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, 
    Seattle ACO.
        (l)(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in 
    accordance with telegraphic AD T98-10-51 or telegraphic AD T98-11-51 
    are approved as alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (m) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (n) The actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 737-28A1120, dated April 24, 1998, as revised by 
    Notices of Status Change NSC 01, dated May 7, 1998, NSC 02, dated 
    May 8, 1998, and NSC 03, dated May 9, 1998. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, 
    Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (o) This amendment becomes effective on June 29, 1998, to all 
    persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately 
    effective by telegraphic AD T98-11-52, issued on May 14, 1998, which 
    contained the requirements of this amendment.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 12, 1998.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-16308 Filed 6-23-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/29/1998
Published:
06/24/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
98-16308
Dates:
Effective June 29, 1998, to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by telegraphic AD T98-11-52, issued on May 14, 1998, which contained the requirements of this amendment.
Pages:
34271-34274 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-178-AD, Amendment 39-10611, AD 98-11-52
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-16308.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13