96-16067. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to Multiple Representation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 32868-32870]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-16067]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37316; File No. SR-CBOE-96-10]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to 
    Multiple Representation
    
    June 17, 1996.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On March 6, 1996, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. 
    (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend 
    CBOE Rule 6.55, ``Multiple Orders Prohibited,'' to provide that, except 
    in accordance with procedures established by the appropriate Floor 
    Procedure Committee, or with such Floor Procedure Committee's 
    permission in individual cases, no market maker shall enter or be 
    present in a trading crowd while a floor broker present in the trading 
    crowd is holding an order on behalf of the market maker's individual 
    account or an order initiated by the market maker for an account in 
    which the market maker has an interest.
        Notice of the proposal was published for comment and appeared in 
    the Federal Register on March 28, 1996.\1\ No comments were received on 
    the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36996 (March 20, 
    1996), 61 FR 13907.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        Currently, CBOE Rule 6.55 provides that no CBOE member, for any 
    account in which he has an interest or on behalf of a customer, shall 
    maintain with more than one broker orders for the purchase or sale of 
    the same option contract or other security, or the same combination of 
    option contracts or other securities, with the knowledge that such 
    orders are for the account of the same principal. According to the 
    Exchange, the purpose of CBOE Rule 6.55 is to prevent a person from 
    being disproportionately represented in a trading crowd.
        In furtherance of this purpose, the Exchange also has had a long-
    standing policy of prohibiting market makers from entering or being 
    present in a trading crowd while a floor broker present in the trading 
    crowd is holding an order on behalf of the market maker's individual 
    account or an order initiated by the market maker for an account in 
    which the market maker has an interest, except in accordance with 
    procedures established by the appropriate Floor Procedure Committee or 
    with such Floor Procedure Committee's permission in individual 
    cases.\2\ This policy prevents a market maker from avoiding CBOE Rule 
    6.55 by placing an order with a floor broker for a particular option 
    contract or other security and also representing himself or herself in 
    the trading crowd for such option contract or other security. The 
    purpose of the proposal is to specifically delineate this policy in the 
    Exchange's rules by including it in a new paragraph (b) to CBOE Rule 
    6.55.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Exceptions to this policy which have been approved by a 
    Floor Procedure Committee are contained in Exchange Regulatory 
    Circular RG95-64, which concerns the trading activities of joint 
    account participants in the Standard & Poor's (``S&P'') 100 
    (``OEX'') and S&P 500 (``SPX'') index option classes. See also 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36977 (March 15, 1996) (order 
    approving File No. SR-CBOE-95-65) (approving regulatory circular 
    which provides that a joint account trading in equity options may be 
    represented simultaneously in a trading crowd by participants 
    trading in person) (``Joint Account Circular'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the CBOE proposes to add Interpretation and Policy .01 
    to CBOE Rule 6.55 to specify three alternative procedures that govern 
    how a market maker may permissibly enter a trading crowd in which a 
    floor broker is present who holds an order on behalf of the market 
    maker's individual account or an order initiated by the market maker 
    for an account in which the market maker has an interest.
        Under the first alternative, the market maker must make the floor 
    broker aware of the market maker's intention to enter the trading crowd 
    and the floor broker
    
    [[Page 32869]]
    
    must time-stamp the order ticket for the market maker order and write 
    the notation ``Cancel'' or ``CXL'' next to the time stamp. If the 
    market maker wishes to re-enter the order via the floor broker upon the 
    market maker's exit from the trading crowd, the floor broker must at 
    that time again time stamp the order ticket and write the notation 
    ``Reentry'' or ``RNTRY'' next to such subsequent time stamp.
        Under the second alternative, the market maker must cancel the 
    market maker order by giving the floor broker a written cancellation of 
    the order which is time-stamped by the market maker immediately prior 
    to its transmission to the floor broker. If the market maker wishes to 
    re-enter the order upon his exit from the trading crowd, a new order 
    ticket must be used by the representing floor broker.
        Under the third alternative, the market maker must cancel the 
    market maker order by taking the order ticket for the order back from 
    the floor broker, provided that the market maker allows the floor 
    broker to retain a copy of the order ticket (which the floor broker 
    must time-stamp at the time of cancellation and retain for the floor 
    broker's records). If the market maker wishes to re-enter the order 
    upon his exit form the trading crowd, a new order ticket must be used.
        The CBOE states that the proposed amendment to CBOE Rule 6.55 also 
    codifies past practice by providing that the appropriate Floor 
    Procedure Committee may adopt other procedures which, if followed, 
    would permit a market maker to be exempt from the requirements of 
    paragraph (b) of CBOE Rule 6.55, or may grant permission for a market 
    maker to enter a trading crowd in a particular instance notwithstanding 
    the requirements of that paragraph.\3\ Proposed Interpretation and 
    Policy .02 advises members to consult CBOE regulatory circulars 
    concerning joint accounts in connection with procedures governing the 
    simultaneous presence in a trading crowd of participants in and orders 
    for the same joint account.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ The CBOE has represented that this provision is intended to 
    provide the Exchange with the flexibility to address special 
    situations that may arise infrequently. One such situation would 
    exist where there is exceptionally high activity in a small trading 
    crowd. In this case, the CBOE may grant permission to market makers 
    to enter the trading crowd for a limited time. Telephone 
    conversation between Mike Meyer, Schiff Hardin & Waite, and Yvonne 
    Fraticelli, Attorney, Office of Market Supervision, Division of 
    Market Regulation, Commission, on May 13, 1996.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the proposal changes the title of CBOE Rule 6.55 from 
    ``Multiple Orders Prohibited'' to ``Multiple Representation 
    Prohibited'' in order to more accurately reflect the scope of the 
    amended rule.
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) \4\ in that it is 
    designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free 
    and open securities market and to facilitate transactions in 
    securities, while protecting investors and the public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988 & Supp. V 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Currently, CBOE Rule 6.55 prohibits members from placing identical 
    orders for the account of the same principal with several floor 
    brokers. According to the Exchange, CBOE Rule 6.55 is designed to 
    prevent a person from being represented disproportionately in a trading 
    crowd. An account using multiple orders would be represented 
    disproportionately because, when an execution is divided among 
    competing brokers, an account using multiple orders would receive a 
    larger share of the execution that an account using a single order.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ See File No. SR-CBOE-80-11 (proposal to adopt CBOE Rule 
    6.55).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposal, which codifies an existing CBOE policy, is designed 
    to prevent a market maker from avoiding CBOE Rule 6.55 by placing an 
    order with a floor broker for a particular option contract or other 
    security and also representing himself or herself in the trading crowd 
    for that option contract or security. By prohibiting a market maker 
    from entering or being present in a trading crowd while a floor broker 
    in the trading crowd holds an order on behalf of the market maker's 
    individual account or an order initiated by the market maker for an 
    account in which the market maker has an interest, the proposal 
    furthers the objectives of CBOE Rule 6.55 and prevents a person from 
    being represented disproportionately in a trading crowd.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ In addition, the proposal is consistent with the provisions 
    of the Joint Account Circular, which was approved recently by the 
    Commission. See note 2, supra. Specifically, the Joint Account 
    Circular notes, among other things, that members may not enter 
    orders in a particular crowd with floor brokers for their individual 
    or joint account whenever they are trading in person in that crowd.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes that it is appropriate for the CBOE to 
    adopt Interpretation and Policy .01, which includes procedures that 
    will allow a market maker to cancel his order with a floor broker and 
    enter a trading crowd in which a floor broker is present who was 
    holding an order on behalf of the market maker's individual account or 
    an order initiated by the market maker for an account in which the 
    market maker has an interest.\7\ The Commission believes that the 
    procedures proposed in Interpretation and Policy .01 are consistent 
    with the purpose of CBOE Rule 6.55 in that they allow a market maker to 
    enter the trading crowd after cancelling his order with the floor 
    broker, thereby ensuring that the market maker is not represented 
    disproportionately in the trading crowd. In addition, Interpretation 
    and Policy .01 should help the CBOE to maintain a fair and orderly 
    market by clearly specifying procedures that will allow market maker to 
    enter a trading crowd in which a floor broker holds an order on behalf 
    of the market maker, and providing procedures that will allow the 
    market maker to re-enter the order with the floor broker upon the 
    market maker's exit from the trading crowd.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ The procedures provided in Interpretation and Policy .01 for 
    cancelling an order are as follows: (1) The market maker makes the 
    floor broker aware of the market maker's intention to enter the 
    trading crowd and the floor broker time stamps the order ticket for 
    the order and writes the notation ``Cancel'' or ``CXL'' next to the 
    time stamp; (2) the market maker cancels his order by giving the 
    floor broker a written cancellation of the order which is time-
    stamped by the market maker immediately prior to its transmission to 
    the floor broker; or (3) the market maker cancels his order by 
    taking the order ticket for the order back from the floor broker, 
    provided that the market maker allows the floor broker to retain a 
    copy of the order ticket (which the floor broker must time-stamp at 
    the time of cancellation and retain for the floor broker's records). 
    Interpretation and Policy .01 also provides procedures that allow 
    the market maker to re-enter the order with the floor broker upon 
    the market maker's exit from the trading crowd.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission notes that CBOE Rule 6.55(b) allows the appropriate 
    Floor Procedure Committee to create exceptions to CBOE Rule 6.55(b) by 
    establishing procedures or granting permission to a market maker in 
    individual cases. The Commission believes that this provision is 
    appropriate and consistent with the Act because it will add flexibility 
    to CBOE Rule 6.55(b) by allowing the CBOE to create an exception to the 
    rule under extraordinary circumstances \8\ or to develop special 
    trading procedures, such as those established in RG95-64.\9\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ The Commission expects that the CBOE will grant such 
    exceptions only in limited and truly extraordinary circumstances. 
    See note 3, supra.
        \9\ See note 2, supra. The Commission notes that the 
    establishment of such procedures would require a rule filing with 
    the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) under the Act.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Finally, the Commission believes that it is reasonable for the CBOE 
    to amend the title of CBOE Rule 6.55 to clarify the scope of the rule, 
    and to adopt Interpretation and Policy .02, which
    
    [[Page 32870]]
    
    advises members to consult Exchange regulatory circulars for procedures 
    governing the simultaneous presence in a trading crowd of participants 
    in and orders for the same joint account.
    
    IV. Conclusion
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-96-10) is approved.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-16067 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/25/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-16067
Pages:
32868-32870 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37316, File No. SR-CBOE-96-10
PDF File:
96-16067.pdf