96-16165. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated Relating To Assignment and Reassignment of NASDAQ/NMS Issues  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 32870-32872]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-16165]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37327; File No. SR-CHX-96-15]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Incorporated Relating To 
    Assignment and Reassignment of NASDAQ/NMS Issues
    
    June 19, 1996.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on May 16, 1996, the Chicago 
    Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule 
    change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have 
    been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is 
    publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
    from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Exchange proposes to amend interpretation and policy .01 of 
    Rule 1 of Article XXX relating to assignments and reassignments of 
    Nasdaq National Market (``NM'') securities. Below is the text of the 
    proposed rule change. Proposed new language is italicized:
    
    CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE RULES
    
    ARTICLE XXX
    
    Specialists
    
    Registration and Appointment
    
    Rule 1.
    
    * * * Interpretations and Policies
    
        .01  Committee on Specialist Assignment & Evaluation.
    
    Assignment Function
    
    I. Events Leading to Assignment Proceedings
    
        Pursuant to Article XXX, Rules 1 and 8, the Committee may, when 
    circumstances require, assign or reassign a security. Seven 
    circumstances may lead to the need for assignment or reassignment of 
    a security. They are:
        1. New listing or obtaining unlisted trading privilege;
        2. Specialist request;
        3. Corporation request;
        4. Split-up and/or merger of specialist units;
        5. Fundamental change of specialist unit;
        6. Unsatisfactory performance action; or
        7. Disciplinary action.
        The following guidelines have been adopted by the Committee for 
    its use in the assignment or reassignment of stocks among 
    specialists and co-specialists. These guidelines set forth the 
    general policy of the Committee concerning the posting and 
    allocation of stocks. They are not, however, rigid rules to be 
    strictly followed regardless of unique circumstances. These 
    guidelines form only the starting point of the Committee's 
    deliberations; they will be applied in light of the facts in each 
    individual case.
    
    1. New Listing--Unlisted Trading Privilege.
    
        (a) Initial listing of a security or obtaining unlisted trading 
    privileges from the S.E.C. for a security will lead automatically to 
    an assignment proceeding..
        (b) Nasdaq/NM Securities--Subsequent Exchange Listing..
        (i) Initial 100 stocks in Nasdaq/NM Pilot. In the event that one 
    of the initial 100 Nasdaq/NM Securities currently assigned to a 
    specialist unit under the Exchange's Nasdaq/NM Pilot Program becomes 
    a Dual Trading System issue, the Committee will utilize the 
    following guidelines in determining whether the security should be 
    posted and re-assignment proceedings should be initiated or whether 
    the specialist unit should be allowed to continue as the specialist 
    unit for the security:.
        (A) If the specialist unit has designated the security as a 
    security that the specialist unit desires to continue to trade as a 
    Dual Trading System Issue (``Non-Reassignment Issue''), the 
    Committee, under normal circumstances, will not post the security or 
    initiate re-assignment proceedings. Each specialist unit may 
    designate five (5) issues as Non-Reassignment Issues under this 
    paragraph (A), which designation may be changed no more than once a 
    year. In the event that a Non-Reassignment Issue becomes a Dual 
    Trading System issue, the total number of stocks that the specialist 
    unit can designate as a Non-Reassignment Issue will be decremented. 
    For example, if 2 Non-Reassignment Issues become Dual Trading System 
    Issues, the specialist will only be able to designate a total of 
    three (3) issues as Non-Reassignment Issues going forward..
        (B) If the specialist unit has not designated the issues as a 
    Non-Reassignment Issue, the specialist unit can nonetheless 
    designate its interest to continue to trade the issue as a Dual 
    Trading System Issue. Such designation can only be made for one out 
    of every three Nasdaq/NM issues that the specialist unit trades that 
    becomes a Dual Trading System Issue. If such designation is made by 
    the specialist, the Committee, under normal circumstances, will not 
    post the issue or initiate re-assignment proceedings. If no such 
    designation is made by the specialist, the Committee will post the 
    issue and initiate re-assignment proceedings. In such event, the 
    specialist unit trading the issue will not be eligible to apply for 
    the security in such proceedings. The specialist unit cannot 
    accumulate the number of stocks for designation. If the specialist 
    unit does not make such designation for any of three consecutive 
    issues that become Dual Trading System issues, he or she cannot 
    carry forward the unused designation.
        (ii) All other Nasdaq/NM Stocks. In the event that a Nasdaq/NM 
    Security (other than a security described in (i) above) currently 
    assigned to a specialist unit becomes a Dual Trading System issue 
    within one year of the date that the specialist unit began trading 
    the security, the security will be posted and the Committee will 
    initiate a re-assignment proceeding for such security. In the event 
    that such security becomes a Dual Trading System issue more than one 
    year after the date the specialist unit began trading the security, 
    the Committee will utilize the following guidelines in determining 
    whether the security should be posted and re-assignment proceedings 
    commenced or whether the specialist unit should be allowed to 
    continue as the specialist without posting the security:
        (A) If the specialist unit has designated the security as a Non-
    Reassignment Issue, the Committee, under normal circumstances, will 
    not post the security or initiate re-assignment proceedings. Each 
    specialist unit may designate 20% of the Nasdaq/NM securities (not 
    including the securities described in (i) above) assigned to such 
    specialist unit as Non-Reassignment Issues under this paragraph (A), 
    which designations may be changed no more than once a year.
        (B) If the specialist has not designated the issue as a Non-
    Reassignment Issue, the specialist may nonetheless designate its 
    interest to continue to trade the issue as a Dual Trading System 
    issue, and the procedures set forth in (i)(B) above shall apply to 
    such issue.
        (iii) Nothing contained in this paragraph 1(b) shall be 
    construed to limit or modify the authority of the Committee pursuant 
    to the other provisions of this Rule.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in
    
    [[Page 32871]]
    
    Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of these 
    statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        In 1987, the Commission approved the trading of Nasdaq/NM 
    Securities (previously known as NASDAQ/NMS Securities) on the Exchange 
    on a pilot basis.\2\ When these stocks were initially allocated, the 
    Exchange's Committee on Specialist Assignment and Evaluation (``CSAE'') 
    established certain guidelines for assignment on Nasdaq/NM stocks. 
    These guidelines required a firm that desired to trade these stocks to 
    assign a separate co-specialist that only trades Nasdaq/NM stocks. As a 
    result, only a small number of firms could receive allocations of 
    Nasdaq/NM stocks. In part because of this limitation, the CSAE also 
    determined to re-post any Nasdaq/NM stocks when they list on an 
    exchange.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 24407 (April 29, 
    1987), 52 FR 17349 (May 7, 1987) (Order Approving Proposed Reporting 
    Plan for National Market System Securities Traded on an Exchange); 
    24406 (April 29, 1987), 52 FR 17495 (May 8, 1987) (Order granting 
    Unlisted Trading Privileges (``UTP'') in 25 issues).
        The Commission notes that prior to the enactment of the UTP Act 
    of 1994 (``UTP Act''), Section 12(f) of the Act required exchanges 
    to apply to the Commission, and receive Commission approval of the 
    exchange's application, before extending UTP to a particular 
    security. When an exchange ``extends UTP'' to a security, the 
    exchange allows its members to trade the security as if it were 
    listed on the exchange. The Commission was required to provide 
    interested parties with at least ten days notice of the application 
    and the Commission had to determine whether the extension of UTP to 
    each security named met certain criteria. If so, the Commission 
    published an approval order in the Federal Register. Accordingly, 
    Exchange Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 1 of Article XXX 
    reflects this statutory scheme in that it references ``obtaining'' 
    UTP from the Commission. The UTP Act, however, removed the 
    application, notice, and Commission approval process from Section 
    12(f) of the Act. For this reason, the Commission requests that the 
    Exchange submit a rule proposal that approximately amends Exchange 
    Interpretation and Policy .01 of Rule 1 to reflect the current 
    statutory scheme.
        In addition, the Commission notes that NASDAQ/NMS Securities are 
    now known as Nasdaq/NM Securities and, therefore, requests that the 
    Exchange submit a rule proposal that amends all appropriate Exchange 
    Rules and Interpretation to reflect this new terminology.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Because of the recent expansion \3\ of the number (from 100 to 500) 
    of Nasdaq/NM securities that are eligible for trading on the CHX, the 
    Exchange believes that a more equitable balance is needed between the 
    ability of the current specialist firm in the Nasdaq stock to continue 
    to trade the stock after it lists on an exchange and other specialists 
    that desire to trade the stock. Thus, the purpose of the proposed rule 
    change is to amend the Exchange's allocation policy in order to achieve 
    this equitable balance.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 28146 (Jun. 26, 
    1990), 55 FR 27917 (Jul. 6, 1990) (Order Expanding the Number of 
    Eligible Securities to 100); 36102 (Aug. 14, 1995), 60 FR 43626 
    (Aug. 22, 1995) (Order Expanding the Number of Eligible Securities 
    to 500).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Under the proposed policy, the 500 Nasdaq/NM stocks that are 
    eligible for trading on the CHX would be divided into two groups: the 
    100 original issues and the 400 recently added issues.
    
    100 Original Issues
    
        A specialist unit that traded one or more of the original 100 
    Nasdaq/NM issues would be permitted to designate up to 5 of these 
    issues as ``Non-Reassignment Issues.'' In the event that a Non-
    Reassignment Issue became listed, i.e., a Dual Trading System 
    issues,\4\ CSAE under normal circumstances would not post the issue for 
    reassignment. Instead, the existing Nasdaq/NM specialist unit would be 
    permitted to continue to trade the issue assuming the proposed co-
    specialist for the issue is qualified. A specialist unit could change 
    the issues it designates as Non-Reassignment Issues once a year. Every 
    time a Non-Reassignment Issue becomes a Dual Trading System issue, 
    however, the total number of stocks that the specialist unit can 
    designate as a Non-Reassignment Issue is decremented.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ According to the Exchange, Dual Trading System Issues are 
    issues that are traded on the CHX and listed on either the New York 
    Stock Exchange or American Stock Exchange. Telephone conversation on 
    June 5, 1996 between David T. Rusoff, Attorney, Foley & Lardner, and 
    George A. Villasana, Attorney, Division of Market Regulation, SEC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For all other Nasdaq/NM issues that are part of the initial 100 
    issues, a specialist unit can nonetheless designate its interest to 
    continue trading the issue as a Dual Trading System issue. This 
    designation can only be made at the time that an issue becomes a Dual 
    Trading System issue and can only be made for one out of every three 
    issues that the specialist unit trades that becomes a Dual Trading 
    System issue. If the designation is made, the CSAE, under normal 
    circumstances, will not post the issue or initiate reassignment 
    proceedings. If a designation is not made, the issue will be posted and 
    reassignment proceedings will commence. The specialist unit that traded 
    the issue will not be eligible to apply for the security in these 
    proceedings. Finally, if the specialist unit does not make this 
    designation for any of three consecutive issues that become Dual 
    Trading System issues, he or she cannot carry forward the unused 
    designation.
    
    Other Nasdaq/NM Securities
    
        A specialist unit that trades Nasdaq/NM securities that are not 
    part of the original 100 issues will be permitted to designate 20% of 
    the Nasdaq/NM securities assigned to that specialist unit (excluding 
    the original 100 Nasdaq/NM securities) as Non-Reassignment Issues.
        For all other Nasdaq/NM securities, the specialist can designate 
    its interest to continue trading the issue as a Dual Trading System 
    issue. This designation can also only be made at the time an issue 
    becomes a Dual Trading System issue and can also only be made for one 
    out of every three issues that the specialist unit trades that becomes 
    a Dual Trading System issue. This designation will operate in the same 
    manner as the similar designation described above for the original 100 
    issues.
        Finally, this proposed rule change does not limit or modify the 
    authority of the CSAE granted to the CSAE under any other provision of 
    Rule 1 of Article XXX.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the 
    Act in that it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of 
    trade, to remove impediments and to perfect the mechanism of a free and 
    open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect 
    investors and the public interest.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any inappropriate burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others
    
        No written comments were either solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    
    [[Page 32872]]
    
        (A) by order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the principle office of the 
    Exchange. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-96-15 and 
    should be submitted by July 16, 1996.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-16165 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/25/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-16165
Pages:
32870-32872 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37327, File No. SR-CHX-96-15
PDF File:
96-16165.pdf