97-16574. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Temporary Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Trading Differentials for Equity Securities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 34334-34336]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16574]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-38744; File No. SR-NYSE-97-20]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Temporary Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change by 
    the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Trading Differentials for 
    Equity Securities
    
    June 18, 1997.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on June 16, 1997, the New 
    York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the 
    Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
    have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization (``SRO''). The 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
    proposed rule change from interested persons and to grant accelerated 
    approval on a temporary basis to the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The proposed rule change consists of amendments to Exchange Rules 
    62, 95.30, 118, 127, and 440B to provide flexibility in determining 
    minimum trading variations. The Exchange is proposing to implement 
    these rule changes on a temporary accelerated basis.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item III below. The self-regulatory 
    organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C 
    below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    [[Page 34335]]
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        Exchange Rule 62 currently provides fixed minimum trading 
    variations for stocks traded on the Exchange. For example, the rule 
    currently states that ``Bids or offers in stocks above one dollar per 
    share shall not be made at a less variation than \1/8\ of one dollar 
    per share.'' In order to provide greater flexibility to adjust trading 
    variations as may be appropriate, the Exchange is proposing to amend 
    Rule 62 so that the minimum trading variation may be changed from time 
    to time.
        This increased flexibility would allow the Exchange to determine 
    trading variations on an expedited basis, without undergoing the delays 
    inherent in the regulatory approval process. This would put the 
    Exchange in a comparable regulatory position with respect to minimum 
    trading variations with other exchanges that are able to change 
    variations at any time.
        In addition, the amendment to Rule 62 will provide flexibility so 
    that the Exchange could permit its members to trade at increments 
    smaller than NYSE-established trade variations in order to match other 
    markets' bids or offers for the purpose of preventing Intermarket 
    Trading System (``ITS'') trade-throughs. For example, assume that the 
    established minimum trading variation is one-sixteenth of a dollar, and 
    the best bid on the Exchange for a particular stock is 10, but there is 
    a bid for that stock on the ITS at 10\1/32\. The Exchange specialist, 
    or broker in the Crowd with a ``not held'' order, could execute a 
    marketable limit order or market order to sell at 10\1/32\ in order to 
    match the ITS bid. However, the specialist could not accept an order 
    with a limit of 10\1/32\ because it is not the minimum variation at 
    which trading is effected on the Exchange.
        The Exchange initially intends to set a minimum variation of one-
    sixteenth of one dollar.
        In addition to Rule 62, several other Exchange rules incorporate 
    specific references to minimum trading variations. These rules, viz., 
    Rule 95.30, Rule 118, Rule 127, and Rule 440B, would be amended to 
    remove references to specific minimum trading variations of one-eighth 
    of one dollar.
        The Exchange intends to implement the proposed rule change on a 
    temporary accelerated basis for a 90-day period, during which the 
    Commission will consider the Exchange's request for permanent approval 
    of the proposed rule change.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 6(b) \2\ of the Act in general and furthers the objectives of 
    Section 6(b)(5) \3\ in particular in that it is designed to remove 
    impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market, to 
    promote just and equitable principles of trade and, in general, to 
    protect investors and the public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will not impose any 
    burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
    furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments.
    
    III. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
    D.C. 20549. Also, copies of such filing will be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the NYSE. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-97-20 and should be 
    submitted by July 16, 1997.
    
    IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
    the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange and, in 
    particular, with the requirements of Section 6 and Section 11A of the 
    Act.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b) and 78k-1. In approving this rule change, 
    the Commission notes that it has considered the proposal's impact on 
    efficiency, competition, and capital formation, consistent with 
    Section 3 of the Act. Id. section 78c(f).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Recently, there has been a movement within the industry to reduce 
    the minimum trading and quotation increments imposed by the various 
    SROs. Both the American Stock Exchange (``Amex'') and The Nasdaq Stock 
    Market (``Nasdaq'') have recently reduced their minimum increments.\5\ 
    In addition, several third market makers have begun quoting securities 
    in increments smaller than the primary markets. The proposed rule 
    change will allow the NYSE the flexibility it needs to address this 
    development and remain competitive with these markets. Nevertheless, 
    the Commission notes that any further change in the minimum increments 
    constitutes (1) a change in a stated policy, practice, or 
    interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or 
    enforcement of an existing rule of the NYSE, or (2) a change in an 
    existing order-entry or trading system of an SRO, or (3) both. 
    Therefore, the Exchange is still obligated to file such proposed 
    changes with the Commission.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38571 (May 5, 1997) 
    (approving Amex proposal to reduce the minimum trading increment 
    from \1/8\ to \1/16\ for Amex-listed equity securities priced at or 
    above $10.00); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38678 (May 27, 
    1997), 62 FR 30363 (June 6, 1997) (approving a proposed rule change 
    by Nasdaq to reduce the minimum quotation increment from \1/8\ to 
    \1/16\ for Nasdaq-listed securities whose bid price is equal to or 
    greater than $10.00).
        \6\ These changes, however, may become effective upon filing if 
    they meet certain statutory requirements. See 15 U.S.C. 
    78s(b)(3)(A)(i) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also believes the proposed rule change will likely 
    enhance the quality of the market for the affected NYSE-listed 
    securities. The Exchange currently only allows quotes in eighths for 
    equity securities that are above $1.00, sixteenths for equity 
    securities that are below $1.00 but above $0.50, and thirty-seconds in 
    stocks below $0.50.\7\ Allowing the NYSE to quote all securities in 
    finer increments will facilitate quote competition.\8\ This
    
    [[Page 34336]]
    
    should help produce more accurate pricing of such securities and can 
    result in tighter quotations.\9\ In addition, if the quoted markets are 
    improved by reducing the minimum increment, the change could result in 
    added benefits to the market such as reduced transaction costs.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ NYSE Rule 62.
        \8\ The rule change is consistent with the recommendation of the 
    Division of Market Regulation (``Division'') in its Market 2000 
    Study, in which the Division noted that the \1/8\ minimum variation 
    can cause artificially wide spreads and hinder quote competition by 
    preventing offers to buy or sell at prices inside the prevailing 
    quote. See SEC, Division of Market Regulation, Market 2000: An 
    Examination of Current Equity Market Developments 18-19 (Jan. 1994).
        \9\ A study that analyzed the reduction in the minimum tick size 
    from \1/8\ to \1/16\ for securities listed on the Amex priced 
    between $1.00 and $5.00 found that, in general, the spreads for 
    those securities decreased significantly while trading activity and 
    market depth were relatively unaffected. See Hee-Joon Ahn, Charles 
    Q. Chao, and Hyuk Choe, Tick Size, Spread, and Volume, 5 J. Fin. 
    Intermediation 2 (1996).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
    change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of 
    notice thereof in the Federal Register.\10\ The proposal provides the 
    NYSE with the ability to quickly modify its trading increment to meet 
    changing market conditions. This will enable the NYSE to quote 
    competitively with other markets. Waiting the full statutory review 
    period for the proposed rule change could place the NYSE at a 
    significant competitive disadvantage to other markets. At the same 
    time, the proposal is effective for only ninety days. This will provide 
    the Commission with a sufficient period to receive and assess comments 
    on the NYSE's proposal before it is adopted on a permanent basis.\11\ 
    Therefore, the Commission believes it is consistent with Section 
    6(b)(5) and Section 19(b)(2) of the Act to grant accelerated approval 
    on a temporary basis to the proposed rule change.\12\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ A prior proposal by another exchange to reduce its minimum 
    fractional change was published for the full statutory comment 
    period without any comments being received by the Commission. 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 38571 (May 5, 1997) (approving a 
    proposed rule change by the Amex to reduce the minimum trading 
    differential from \1/8\ to \1/16\ for equity securities priced at or 
    above $10.00).
        \11\ The Exchange has submitted a companion filing that requests 
    permanent approval of the procedures described herein. See 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-38745 (June 18, 1997) 
    (publishing notice of File No. SR-NYSE-97-21).
        \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) and 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    V. Conclusion
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-97-20) is hereby 
    approved on an accelerated basis through September 16, 1997.
    
        \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ 17 C.F.R. 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-16574 Filed 6-24-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/25/1997
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-16574
Pages:
34334-34336 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-38744, File No. SR-NYSE-97-20
PDF File:
97-16574.pdf