97-16595. Exemption of Records Systems Under the Privacy Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34169-34170]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16595]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    28 CFR Part 16
    
    [AAG/A Order No. 137-97]
    
    
    Exemption of Records Systems Under the Privacy Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Justice.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act system of 
    records from subsections (c) (3) and (4); (d); (e) (1), (2), (3), (5) 
    and (8); and (g) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This system of 
    records is maintained by the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
    (INS) and is entitled ``Office of Internal Audit Investigations Index 
    and Records, JUSTICE/INS-002.'' Information in this system relates to 
    official Federal investigations and law enforcement matters of the 
    Office of Internal Audit of the INS, pursuant to the Inspector General 
    Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App., as amended by the Inspector General Act 
    amendments of 1988. The exemptions are necessary to avoid interference 
    with certain internal law enforcement functions of the INS for which 
    records falling within the scope of subsections (j)(2) and (k)(2) may 
    be generated. Specifically, the exemptions are necessary to prevent 
    subjects of investigations from frustrating the investigatory process; 
    to preclude the disclosure of investigative techniques; to protect the 
    identities and physical safety of confidential informants and of law 
    enforcement personnel; to ensure OIA's ability to obtain information 
    from information sources; and to protect the privacy of third parties.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: June 25, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia E. Neely--202-616-0178.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 7, 1997 (62 FR 10495) a proposed 
    rule was published in the Federal Register with an invitation to 
    comment. No comments were received.
        This order relates to individuals rather than small business 
    entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order 
    will not have ``a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities.''
    
    List of Subjects in Part 16
    
        Administrative Practices and Procedures, Courts, Freedom of 
    Information Act, Government in the Sunshine Act, Privacy Act.
    
        Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 
    U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, 
    28 CFR part 16 is amended as set forth below.
    
        Dated: June 6, 1997.
    Stephen R. Colgate,
    Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
    
        1. The authority for Part 16 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 553; 18 U.S.C. 
    4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534, 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.
    
        2. 28 CFR 16.99 is amended by adding paragraphs (g) and (h) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 16.99  Exemption of the Immigration and Naturalization Service 
    Systems-limited access.
    
    * * * * *
        (g) The Office of Internal Audit Investigations Index and Records 
    (Justice/INS-002) system of records is exempt under the provisions of 5 
    U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d); (e)(1), (2), 
    (3), (5) and (8); and (g), but only to the extent that this system 
    contains records within the scope of subsection (j)(2), and to the 
    extent that records in the system are subject to exemption therefrom. 
    In addition, this system of records is also exempt under the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) from subsections (c)(3); (d); and (e)(1), but 
    only to the extent that this system contains records within the scope 
    of subsection (k)(2), and to the extent that records in the system are 
    subject to exemption therefrom.
        (h) The following justification apply to the exemptions from 
    particular subsections:
        (1) From subsection (c)(3) because the release of the disclosure 
    accounting for disclosure could permit the subject of an actual or 
    potential criminal or civil investigation to obtain valuable 
    information concerning the existence and nature of the investigation, 
    the fact that individuals are subjects of the investigation, and 
    present a serious impediment to law enforcement.
        (2) From subsection (c)(4) to the extent that the exemption from 
    subsection (d) is applicable. Subsection (c)(4) will not be applicable 
    to the extent that records in the system are properly withholdable 
    under subsection (d).
        (3) From the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d) 
    because access to the records contained in this system of records could 
    inform the subject of a criminal or civil investigation of the 
    existence of that investigation; of the nature and scope of the 
    information and evidence obtained as to their activities; of the 
    identity of confidential sources, witnesses and law enforcement 
    personnel; and of
    
    [[Page 34170]]
    
    information that may enable the subject to avoid detection or 
    apprehension. Such disclosures would present a serious impediment to 
    effective law enforcement where they prevent the successful completion 
    of the investigation; endanger the physical safety of confidential 
    sources, witnesses, and law enforcement personnel; and/or lead to the 
    improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the 
    fabrication of testimony. In addition, granting access to these records 
    could result in a disclosure that would constitute an unwarranted 
    invasion of the privacy of third parties. Amendment of the records 
    would interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement 
    activities and impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring 
    investigations to be continuously reinvestigated.
        (4) From subsection (e)(1) because in the course of criminal or 
    civil investigations, the Immigration and Naturalization Service often 
    obtains information concerning the violation of laws other than those 
    relating to violations over which INS has investigative jurisdiction, 
    in the interests of effective law enforcement, it is necessary that INS 
    retain this information since it can aid in establishing patterns of 
    criminal activity and provide valuable leads for those law enforcement 
    agencies that are charged with enforcing other segments of the criminal 
    law.
        (5) From subsection (e)(2) because in a criminal investigation, the 
    requirement that information be collected to the greatest extent 
    possible from the subject individual would present a serious impediment 
    to law enforcement in that the subject of the investigation would be 
    placed on notice of the existence of the investigation and would 
    therefore be able to avoid detection or apprehension.
        (6) From subsection (e)(3) because the requirement that individuals 
    supplying information be provided with a form stating the requirements 
    of subsection (e)(3) would constitute a serious impediment of criminal 
    law enforcement in that it could compromise the existence of a 
    confidential investigation, reveal the identify of confidential sources 
    of information and endanger the life or physical safety of confidential 
    informants.
        (7) From subsection (e)(5) because in the collection of information 
    for criminal law enforcement purposes it is impossible to determine in 
    advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. 
    With the passage of time, seemingly irrelevant or untimely information 
    may acquire new significance as further investigation brings new 
    details to light and the accuracy of such information can only be 
    determined in a court of law. The restrictions of subsection (e)(5) 
    would restrict the ability of trained investigators and intelligence 
    analysts to exercise their judgment in reporting on investigations and 
    impede the development of criminal intelligence necessary for effective 
    law enforcement.
        (8) From subsection (e)(8) because the individual notice 
    requirements of subsection (e)(8) could present a serious impediment to 
    criminal law enforcement as this could interfere with the Immigration 
    and Naturalization Service's ability to issue administrative subpoenas 
    and could reveal investigative techniques and procedures.
        (9) From subsection (g) for those portions of this system of 
    records that were compiled for criminal law enforcement purposes and 
    which are subject to exemption from the access provisions of 
    subsections (d) pursuant to subsection (j)(2).
    
    [FR Doc. 97-16595 Filed 6-24-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/25/1997
Published:
06/25/1997
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-16595
Dates:
June 25, 1997.
Pages:
34169-34170 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
AAG/A Order No. 137-97
PDF File:
97-16595.pdf
CFR: (1)
28 CFR 16.99