99-16018. 2004 Power Marketing Plan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 34417-34433]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-16018]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Western Area Power Administration
    
    
    2004 Power Marketing Plan
    
    AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
    
    ACTION: Notice of the final 2004 Power Marketing Plan.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Western Area Power Administration (Western), a Federal power 
    marketing administration of DOE, announces its 2004 Power Marketing 
    Plan (Marketing Plan) for the Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region 
    (Sierra Nevada Region). On December 31, 2004, all of the Sierra Nevada 
    Region's long-term firm Central Valley Project (CVP) power sales 
    contracts will expire. This notice responds to the comments received on 
    the Proposed 2004 Power Marketing Plan (Proposed Plan) and sets forth 
    the final Marketing Plan. The Marketing Plan specifies the terms and 
    conditions under which Western will market power from the CVP and the 
    Washoe Project beginning January 1, 2005. This Marketing Plan 
    supersedes all previous marketing plans for these projects.
        Western plans to amend existing customers' power sales contracts to 
    provide them with the right to purchase a percentage of the Sierra 
    Nevada Region's power resources beginning January 1, 2005. After 
    Western more fully develops products and services, it will offer new 
    contracts for the sale of power under the Marketing Plan. Western will 
    request entities who meet the criteria defined in the Marketing Plan, 
    and who wish to apply for a new allocation of power from Western, to 
    submit formal applications. Application procedures will be set forth in 
    the Call for 2005 Resource Pool Applications in a separate Federal 
    Register notice.
    
    DATES: The Marketing Plan will become effective July 26, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Power Marketing Manager, Western Area 
    Power Administration, Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region, 114 
    Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 95630, telephone (916) 353-4416.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Authorities
    
        The Marketing Plan for marketing power after 2004 by the Sierra 
    Nevada Region is being established pursuant to the Department of Energy 
    Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101-7352); the Reclamation Act of June 17, 
    1902 (ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388) as amended and supplemented by subsequent 
    enactments, particularly section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 
    1939 (43 U.S.C. 485(c)); and other acts specifically applicable to the 
    projects involved.
    
    Development of the 2004 Power Marketing Plan
    
        Western began developing the Marketing Plan with a series of three 
    informal public information meetings. These meetings helped Western 
    identify pertinent issues and possible marketing options, including 
    types of products and services, and eligibility and allocation 
    criteria. During that process, Western evaluated several options for 
    marketing power after existing contracts expire.
        Western began the Administrative Procedure Act process with its 
    Notice of Proposed Plan in the Federal Register (62 FR 8710, February 
    26, 1997). Western held a public information forum on April 8, 1997, to 
    present the Proposed Plan and answer questions. On April 24, 1997, 
    Western held a public comment forum to accept verbal comments on the 
    Proposed Plan. In addition, Western accepted written comments from the 
    public through May 27, 1997. Western considered the comments received 
    in developing the Marketing Plan.
        In a separate public process, Western explored the impact of 
    electric utility industry restructuring on Western's power allocation 
    policies. A Notice of Inquiry for this process was published in the 
    Federal Register (63 FR 66166, December 1, 1998). Western held a public 
    comment forum on January 6, 1999, and accepted written comments through 
    January 15, 1999. The results of this process will be published in a 
    separate Federal Register notice.
        Western opened an additional comment period focused solely on the 
    size of project-specific resource pools because several Native American 
    tribes commented on the size of these pools. The Notice of Public 
    Process on Resource Pool Size was published in the Federal Register (64 
    FR 4646, January 29, 1999). Western held informational meetings on its 
    resource pool size proposals and the requirements for receiving an 
    allocation of power in Phoenix, Arizona, on February 3, 1999; 
    Albuquerque, New Mexico, on February 5, 1999; and Folsom, California, 
    on February 9, 1999. Western accepted written comments from the public 
    through March 1, 1999. Western also considered the comments related to 
    the Sierra Nevada Region's resource pool received during this comment 
    period in developing the Marketing Plan.
        Western will market the Sierra Nevada Region's power resources 
    consistent with the Power Marketing Initiative under the Energy 
    Planning and Management Program (EPAMP) (60 FR 54151, October 20, 
    1995). Western will initially offer 96 percent of the Sierra Nevada 
    Region's power resources to existing customers and allocate, under a 
    separate process, the remaining resources using the criteria in the 
    Marketing Plan. Under a separate process, Western will reduce all 
    customers' allocation percentages by up to 2 percent and establish a 
    2015 Resource Pool. The Marketing Plan provides a balance between 
    existing and new customers, including Native American tribes, while 
    meeting Western's contractual obligations that continue beyond 2004. If 
    unexpected circumstances cause early termination of existing electric 
    service contracts, Western may market its power resources under the 
    Marketing Plan before January 1, 2005.
    
    Background
    
        CVP power facilities include 11 powerplants with a maximum 
    operating capability of about 2,044 megawatts (MW), and an estimated 
    average annual generation of 4.6 million megawatthours (MWh). Western 
    markets and transmits the power available from the CVP.
        Western owns the 94 circuit-mile Malin-Round Mountain 500-kilovolt 
    (kV) transmission line (an integral section of the Pacific Northwest-
    Pacific Southwest Intertie (Pacific Intertie)), 803 circuit miles of 
    230-kV transmission line, 7 circuit miles of 115-kV transmission line, 
    and 44 circuit miles of 69-kV and below transmission line. Western also 
    has part ownership in the 342-mile California-Oregon Transmission 
    Project. Many of Western's existing customers have no direct access to 
    Western's transmission lines and receive service over transmission 
    lines owned by other utilities.
        The Washoe Project, Stampede Powerplant, has a maximum operating 
    capability of 3.65 MW with an estimated annual generation of 10,000 
    MWh. Sierra Pacific Power Company owns and operates the only 
    transmission system available for access to Stampede Powerplant.
        The following table lists estimates of CVP power resources and 
    adjustments. This table is for informational purposes only, and does 
    not imply that the power resources and adjustments shown will
    
    [[Page 34418]]
    
    be the actual amounts available or adjustments applied.
    
                                      Estimated CVP Power Resources and Adjustments
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Power resources/adjustment                                       Range/value
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Annual energy generation........................  2,400,000-8,600,000 MWh.
    Monthly energy generation.......................  100,000-1,100,000 MWh.
    Monthly capacity................................  1,100-1,900 MW.
    Annual project use..............................  670,000-1,670,000 MWh.
    Monthly project use.............................  10,000-180,000 MWh.
    Monthly project use (on peak)...................  30-230 MW.
    Monthly maintenance.............................  0-300 MW.
    Reserves--hydro.................................  Minimum 5% of monthly capacity
    CVP transmission and transformation losses from   1.8% (currently).
     the generator bus to a 230-kV load bus.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Legal Analysis
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.), 
    requires Federal agencies to perform a regulatory flexibility analysis 
    if a final rule is likely to have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities and there is a legal requirement 
    to issue a general notice of proposed rulemaking. Western has 
    determined that this action does not require a regulatory flexibility 
    analysis since it is a rulemaking of particular applicability involving 
    services applicable to public property.
    
    Environmental Compliance
    
        In compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 
    U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA 
    implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), and DOE NEPA 
    implementing regulations (10 CFR part 1021), Western completed an 
    environmental impact statement (EIS) on EPAMP. The Record of Decision 
    was published in the Federal Register (60 FR 53181, October 12, 1995). 
    Western also completed the 2004 Power Marketing Program EIS (2004 EIS), 
    and the Record of Decision was published in the Federal Register (62 FR 
    22934, April 28, 1997). The Marketing Plan falls within the range of 
    alternatives considered in the 2004 EIS. This NEPA review identified 
    and analyzed environmental effects related to the Marketing Plan.
        Marketable CVP and Washoe Project electrical capacity and energy is 
    influenced by available reservoir storage and water releases controlled 
    by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation 
    (Reclamation). Pursuant to the CVP Improvement Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 
    102-575, Title 34) (CVPIA), Reclamation prepared a programmatic EIS 
    (PEIS) addressing improvements to fish and wildlife habitat stipulated 
    therein, and potential changes in CVP operations and water allocations 
    to meet those obligations. Actions based on the PEIS may result in 
    modifications to CVP facilities and operations that would affect the 
    timing and quantity of electric power generated by the CVP. Such 
    changes may, in turn, affect electric power products and services to be 
    marketed by Western. The Marketing Plan is designed to accommodate 
    these changes. Western is a cooperating agency in Reclamation's PEIS.
    
    Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 
    3501, et seq.), Western has received approval from the Office of 
    Management and Budget for the collection of customer information in 
    this rule, under control number 1910-0100.
    
    Determination Under Executive Order 12866
    
        Western has an exemption from centralized regulatory review under 
    Executive Order 12866; accordingly, no clearance of this notice by the 
    Office of Management and Budget is required.
    
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
    
        Western has determined that this rule is exempt from congressional 
    notification requirements under 5 U.S.C. 801 because the action is a 
    rulemaking of particular applicability relating to services and 
    involves matters of procedure.
    
    Responses to Comments Received on the Notice of Proposed Plan (62 
    FR 8710, February 26, 1997)
    
        During the public consultation and comment period, Western received 
    26 letters commenting on the Proposed Plan. In addition, 12 customer 
    and interested party representatives commented during the April 8 and 
    April 24, 1997, public forums. Western reviewed and considered all 
    comments received by the end of the public consultation and comment 
    period, May 27, 1997, in preparing the Marketing Plan.
        The following is a summary of the comments received during the 
    consultation and comment period, and Western's responses to those 
    comments. Comments are grouped by subject and paraphrased for brevity. 
    Specific comments are used for clarification where necessary.
    
    I. Public Participation and Process Implementation
    
        Comment: Commentors supported the process Western used in 
    developing the Marketing Plan. One comment expressed concern about the 
    lack of opportunity for public participation.
        Response: Western provided opportunities for public participation 
    in preparing the Marketing Plan, 2004 EIS, and EPAMP, as described in 
    this notice.
        Comment: Some commentors said that since the contracts do not 
    expire until 2004, Western should delay the Marketing Plan process. 
    This delay would allow time to resolve uncertainty about the future of 
    the industry, and allow other interests time to make arrangements to 
    share power revenues with environmental and clean power goals. Other 
    comments supported developing the Marketing Plan on the proposed 
    schedule to provide customers with lead time for planning purposes.
        Response: Because electric utility industry restructuring is 
    already underway, delaying decisions may foreclose options for Western 
    and its customers. To be an active participant in the newly 
    restructured industry, Western needs to identify and work with its 
    future customers to develop specific products to meet their needs. For 
    many of Western's customers, Federal hydropower is a critical component 
    of their resource mix, and knowledge of CVP resource availability is 
    crucial to planning strategies for
    
    [[Page 34419]]
    
    dealing with utility restructuring. It is important that the Marketing 
    Plan is not delayed because it takes time to develop contracts and 
    arrange for transmission service. Western recognizes the need for 
    flexibility in the changing utility industry and will offer Custom 
    Products, such as firming power and ancillary services, to meet 
    customers' needs. The Marketing Plan will not impact existing 
    arrangements concerning funding of environmental restoration or 
    advancement of clean power goals. These items are discussed more 
    thoroughly in our responses to other comments.
    
    II. Environmental Issues
    
        Comment: Commentors stated that there are unresolved environmental 
    issues associated with the operation of CVP dams, and that 
    environmental protection mechanisms are insufficient or outdated. A 
    commentor stated that if a contract extension decision is part of the 
    Marketing Plan, new environmental protection mechanisms must be 
    developed. Western was urged to create a trust fund(s) in which a 
    portion of Western's existing power revenues would be set aside to 
    mitigate environmental damage associated with operation of the Federal 
    dams and to support the development of energy efficiency and renewable 
    energy. Also, questions were raised as to whether Western has complied 
    with NEPA in developing the Marketing Plan.
        Response: Western completed the 2004 EIS in accordance with NEPA, 
    the Council on Environmental Quality NEPA implementing regulations, and 
    DOE's NEPA implementing regulations. The 2004 EIS examined the 
    environmental impacts and identified no significant impacts to the 
    human environment from marketing power from the CVP and Washoe Project. 
    The Marketing Plan falls within the parameters analyzed in the 2004 
    EIS. The operation of CVP dams is dictated by other authorized project 
    purposes such as flood control, navigation, water supply, and fish and 
    wildlife. Environmental issues associated with the operation of CVP 
    dams are being addressed by the CVPIA PEIS, including direct and 
    indirect impacts on all fish, wildlife, and habitat restoration actions 
    and the potential renewal of existing CVP water contracts. Western is a 
    cooperating agency in Reclamation's PEIS process.
        CVP power customers contribute significant revenue to the 
    Restoration Fund, established under the CVPIA, which is designed to 
    mitigate environmental consequences of the operation of Federal dams. 
    Western supports renewable energy through its Policy for the Purchase 
    of Non-Hydropower Renewable Resources (61 FR 43051, August 20, 1996). 
    In accordance with the Energy Policy Act of 1992, Western encourages 
    energy efficiency by requiring all firm power customers to prepare and 
    keep current integrated resource plans.
    
    III. Products and Services
    
    A. Base Resource
        Comment: Several commentors requested that Western reconsider its 
    proposal to market power on an as-available basis. Suggestions were 
    made that the Base Resource be further developed, including evaluation 
    of purchasing energy, especially in dry years, to provide some minimum 
    level of firm power and maximize use of the transmission assets 
    available to Western, including the Pacific Intertie. Comments included 
    requests for more information on firm availability, pricing, timing of 
    commitment to purchase the Base Resource, and reliability of the Base 
    Resource.
        Response: CVP generation is expected to vary hourly, daily, 
    monthly, and annually, based on hydrological conditions and other 
    constraints that govern CVP operations; therefore, Western cannot 
    accurately predict future availability. However, Western is willing to 
    purchase energy to maintain some firm level of service to all 
    customers. The amount of firming and the use of Western's transmission 
    resources will be further developed by Western through a collaborative 
    process with customers prior to product commitment by a customer. 
    Because Western's rates will be determined through a separate public 
    process, product pricing is outside the scope of the Marketing Plan. 
    However, the costs associated with the hydropower system may be 
    discussed during the collaborative process.
        Comment: A commentor stated that the Base Resource concept will 
    require a new and much closer working relationship with Reclamation, 
    Federal water users, and other stakeholders.
        Response: Western will continue to develop close working 
    relationships with Reclamation, Federal water users, and other 
    stakeholders.
        Comment: One commentor asked if Western will include reserves or 
    other ancillary services in the Base Resource.
        Response: The Base Resource may be used in a manner the customer 
    deems most beneficial, within operational constraints. Operating 
    reserves and other ancillary services will be consistent with industry 
    standards or may be provided with the Base Resource or the Custom 
    Product on an as-requested basis. Provision of ancillary services, 
    including reserves, will be developed with customer input.
    B. Custom Product
        Comment: Commentors suggested that Western develop some 
    ``standardized'' Custom Products to allow customers to select a more 
    firm service, similar to what is currently marketed. A commentor stated 
    that negotiating with customers individually for firming the Base 
    Resource would be more difficult, less transparent, and would increase 
    risk. One commentor questioned whether the design of Custom Products 
    would potentially cause cost-shifting among customers.
        Response: Western designed the Marketing Plan to provide maximum 
    flexibility to its customers. Development of ``standardized'' Custom 
    Products for a customer or group of customers is not precluded by the 
    Marketing Plan. The Marketing Plan was designed with this possibility 
    in mind. Prior to product commitments, using a collaborative process, 
    Western will develop Custom Products that most closely match customer 
    needs. Using this collaborative approach will help ensure that 
    information about Custom Product options will be available to everyone 
    to minimize the risk of inequities. Also, by considering the needs of 
    all similarly situated customers, due to economies of scale, Western 
    may obtain better prices in the electric utility market when making 
    firming purchases or obtaining other related services. Because all 
    customers will equitably share in the cost of the Base Resource and 
    each customer will pay only for the Custom Products which it 
    specifically requests, any potential for cost-shifting is minimal.
        Comment: A commentor suggested that Western needs to consider 
    potential ramping rates if a customer chooses to schedule power 
    deliveries.
        Response: Under the Marketing Plan, all customers will be required 
    to schedule power deliveries. Information on ramping rates applicable 
    to the hydropower system will be made available prior to beginning 
    service.
        Comment: One commentor stated that preference customers should be 
    allowed to help provide the products and services needed to firm the 
    Base Resource for other customers wanting a firm Custom Product.
        Response: The Marketing Plan does not preclude Western or customers 
    from purchasing products and services from any supplier.
    
    [[Page 34420]]
    
    C. Exchange Program
        Comment: Commentors supported and recommended further development 
    of the concept of the Western-managed exchange program.
        Response: Western will complete development of the exchange program 
    through a collaborative process with customers.
    D. Energy Banking Arrangements
        Comment: A commentor said Western should begin planning now for 
    termination of existing banking arrangements with Pacific Gas & 
    Electric Company (PG&E) under Contract 14-06-200-2948A. If the existing 
    account is ``cashed out,'' the benefits should be shared with all 
    customers. Commentors suggested that Western pursue energy banking and 
    firming arrangements beyond 2004, even though it may be difficult.
        Response: Since existing banking arrangements will expire on 
    December 31, 2004, they are outside the scope of the Marketing Plan. 
    Western is willing to explore banking arrangements and other options 
    during further development of the exchange program and Custom Products.
    
    IV. Proposed Resource Percentages/Pools
    
    A. Allocation Methodology
        Comment: A commentor requested that Western accommodate the 
    seasonal nature of agricultural loads.
        Response: The Base Resource depends on the generation pattern of 
    the CVP, which is similar to the pattern of agricultural loads. If the 
    Base Resource does not accommodate the seasonal nature of agricultural 
    loads, Western will work with customers to develop Custom Products that 
    will meet the customers' needs to the extent possible.
        Comment: One commentor stated the Marketing Plan should not affect 
    its contractual rights through 2004 to increase its contract rate of 
    delivery (CRD) up to 50 MW.
        Response: The Marketing Plan does not affect current contractual 
    rights. If necessary, Western will accommodate these CRD increases and 
    will effectuate related CRD decreases as provided for in certain 
    existing contracts.
        Comment: A suggestion was made that both energy and capacity should 
    be used to determine customer resource extensions instead of the 
    proposed CRD methodology. A comment further suggested that not using 
    energy penalized customers with higher load factors for maintaining 
    good load shapes. If rates are to be based on a split between capacity 
    and energy, then the allocation should be based on capacity and energy.
        Response: Existing customers' current allocations are based on 
    capacity. Western believes that it is equitable to base the existing 
    customers' resource allocation percentages on existing capacity 
    commitments because, under existing contracts, Western's capacity 
    obligation is fixed but the energy obligation is not. Many customer CVP 
    energy purchases are based on economics, not on their load shape or 
    energy entitlement. Unlike the current allocation methodology, the 
    resources available under the Marketing Plan are based on generation 
    rather than load. Basing the right to purchase generation output, which 
    is limited by the capacity of the plants, on a CRD does not penalize 
    customers with high load factors, rather it gives them no greater 
    consideration. Allocating the power resources based on a rate design is 
    not appropriate because the rate design for power sold under the 
    Marketing Plan has not been determined and may be different from 
    today's rate design.
    B. Allocation Amounts
        Comment: Western was requested to increase the 2005 Resource Pool 
    percentage. Another comment requested withholding application of the 
    Power Marketing Initiative, particularly during the period from 2005 
    through 2014 (when the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) 
    settlement is in effect).
        Response: Comments received did not provide rationale for changing 
    the resource pool percentages. However, Western considered many factors 
    in determining the magnitude of the resource pools. Those factors 
    included: (1) The loads of preference entities that applied for but did 
    not receive power under the 1994 Power Marketing Plan; (2) impacts of 
    restructuring and open transmission access; (3) the potential for new 
    loads, including those of Native American tribes; and, (4) existing 
    customer loads with limited Federal power compared to their needs. 
    After careful consideration, Western determined that the combined 
    resource pools in 2005 and 2015, totaling up to 6 percent of the Base 
    Resource, would be equitable for potential new customers as well as 
    existing customers. Withholding application of the Power Marketing 
    Initiative (establishment of the resource pools) would potentially 
    eliminate the ability of Western to serve new customers that may 
    benefit from a Federal power allocation.
        Comment: Some commentors stated that Western should maximize the 
    global value of its Base Resource by minimizing both reductions and 
    increases in the allocations that Western's current customers receive.
        Response: The Marketing Plan provides for minimal increases or 
    reductions in the pro rata amount of the power resources available to 
    existing customers. However, due to the expiration of Contract 14-06-
    200-2948A with PG&E, and the associated firming arrangements, the 
    Sierra Nevada Region may not be able to market power at the same level 
    as in the past. Under the Marketing Plan allocation method, each 
    allottee will receive a percentage of actual generation. The amount of 
    power associated with an allocation percentage will vary, based on 
    hydrological conditions and other constraints that govern CVP 
    operations. The Marketing Plan attempts to mitigate reductions in 
    availability or usability of the power resources for meeting customers' 
    loads by offering the Custom Product, which could include a level of 
    firming purchases.
        Comment: A comment requested that allocation amounts reflect a 
    customer's CRD as opposed to actual load.
        Response: Western has decided that an existing customer's 
    allocation percentage will be based on the customer's extension CRD. 
    Western will adjust the existing customer's percentage if its actual 
    load is less than the extension CRD. This criteria was adopted because 
    Western does not believe it is sound business practice to allocate 
    power based on a historical CRD that has never been fully used.
        Comment: Commentors requested that temporary allocation increases 
    remain with the current recipients.
        Response: Contracts implementing the temporary reallocations 
    provide that the original CRD be returned to the original customer.
        Comment: One commentor suggested that the minimum load requirement 
    for the resource pools be 500 kW instead of 1 MW.
        Response: To avoid precluding smaller entities from receiving 
    allocations from the resource pools, Western has modified the Marketing 
    Plan to allow requests to serve loads that are less than 1 MW, but at 
    least 500 kW, if they can be aggregated so Western can schedule and 
    deliver to a minimum load of 1 MW.
        Comment: A commentor objected to Western's approach regarding 
    SMUD's rights under the 1983 Settlement Agreement in the Proposed Plan. 
    The commentor urged Western to reach an accommodation with SMUD that 
    would provide for SMUD's resource extension to be made on the same 
    basis as all other existing customers, and questioned the logical basis 
    for the fraction 360/1,152.
    
    [[Page 34421]]
    
    Public participation and joinder in regard to the SMUD settlement were 
    also questioned. Further, it was recommended that if SMUD does not 
    voluntarily agree to a reasonable accommodation, Western should recoup 
    the over-allocation during the second 10-year period. Another commentor 
    supported Western's approach.
        Response: Contract DE-MS65-83WP59070 (Settlement Agreement) between 
    Western and SMUD, dated April 15, 1983, provides that SMUD has a right 
    to purchase 360/1,152 of all power allocated or sold by Western on or 
    after January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2014. This Settlement 
    Agreement was reached to resolve a lawsuit, United States of America v. 
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Civil No. S-75-277, United 
    States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The 
    Marketing Plan is designed to mitigate the impacts of the Settlement 
    Agreement on other customers by offering an Optional Purchase, which is 
    equal to the additional amount of power allocated to SMUD. Western will 
    adjust SMUD's percentage of the available resources after 2014 to put 
    it on the same basis as other existing customers. The adjustment will 
    include the amount that would have been contributed to the 2005 
    Resource Pool by SMUD in absence of the Settlement Agreement. Western 
    does not agree that SMUD will receive an over-allocation for the first 
    10 years under the Marketing Plan because SMUD's percentage allocation 
    is specified in the Settlement Agreement. Therefore, SMUD should not be 
    penalized during the second 10 years of the Marketing Plan. The 
    fraction 360/1,152 referenced in the Settlement Agreement represents 
    SMUD's CRD of 360 MW and Western's maximum simultaneous load level of 
    1,152 MW at the time of the settlement.
        Allowing public participation in litigation would severely 
    undermine Western's ability to protect the Government's interest. 
    Western is not required to join every preference customer or every 
    potential preference customer in a lawsuit in which Western is a party. 
    Upon proper motion, the court determines when and if joinder of a 
    person is needed for just adjudication.
    C. Allocations Due to Special Circumstances
        Comment: Commentors requested that CVP power continue to be 
    available at cost to long-term customers. If these customers do not 
    receive a power allocation under the Marketing Plan, the economic 
    consequences would be significant.
        Response: Western will offer the greater portion of the CVP 
    resources to existing customers. The economic analyses done for the 
    2004 EIS showed that the greatest socioeconomic benefits would be 
    expected to occur if Western's existing customers continued to receive 
    power from Western.
        Comment: A few commentors stated that Federal hydroelectric power 
    should be used to benefit the public. They suggested that Western give 
    priority to those who meet certain additional criteria, including, 
    demonstrating environmental responsibility in mitigating any damages 
    associated with Federal dams; developing and/or integrating solar and 
    other renewable energy and energy efficiency into their resource mix; 
    supporting educational institutions; and not requiring supplemental 
    purchases.
        Response: Western markets power in a manner that will encourage the 
    most widespread use at the lowest possible rates consistent with sound 
    business principles. Within broad statutory guidelines and operational 
    constraints of the CVP, Western has wide discretion as to whom and 
    under what terms it will contract for the sale of Federal power, as 
    long as preference is accorded to statutorily defined public bodies. 
    Western cannot measure the value of the public benefits provided by an 
    entity when allocating its power and, therefore, will not base an 
    allocation on an entity's mission. Although not specifically addressed 
    in the Marketing Plan, Western supports programs for the public good.
        Western supports renewable energy through its Policy for the 
    Purchase of Non-Hydropower Renewable Resources, and encourages energy 
    efficiency by requiring all firm power customers to prepare and keep 
    current integrated resource plans. Further, CVP power customers 
    contribute significant revenue to the Restoration Fund, established 
    under the CVPIA, which is designed to mitigate environmental 
    consequences of the operation of Federal dams.
        Comment: A comment suggested that priority be given to entities 
    with longstanding requests.
        Response: Previous requests were considered in determining the size 
    of the resource pool. Western receives numerous requests for power and 
    does not believe a previous request should be given a higher priority 
    over requests by qualified entities that have not applied previously.
        Comment: A commentor suggested Western give higher priority to 
    entities that can readily accept an allocation.
        Response: The Marketing Plan includes eligibility criteria 
    requiring that all applicants requesting power must be ready, willing, 
    and able to receive and use or distribute Federal power.
        Comment: Western was requested to extend the spirit and concept of 
    the National Defense Authorization (NDA) Act. Several comments 
    requested that the definition of extension CRD be modified so that NDA 
    Act power used for economic development is not excluded. By doing so, 
    entities receiving allocations of NDA Act power for economic 
    development purposes would be eligible for resource extensions under 
    the Marketing Plan. One comment stated that the definition of extension 
    CRD violates the provisions of the NDA Act because the legislation 
    requires that NDA Act power be reserved for allocation for a 10-year 
    period (commencing November 30, 1993). This commentor contends that the 
    legislation provides for allocations made during this 10-year period to 
    extend past December 31, 2004. Commentors requested that NDA Act power 
    extend through the completion of economic development. Another 
    commentor requested that Western not extend the provisions of the NDA 
    Act past December 31, 2004.
        Response: The Proposed Plan is consistent with the NDA Act. 
    However, Western has reconsidered its position regarding allocations 
    for NDA Act customers. Western has decided to extend the spirit and 
    concepts of the NDA Act to those existing customers receiving NDA Act 
    power for economic development purposes, provided those customers 
    continue to meet the eligibility requirements for an allocation under 
    the Marketing Plan. The Marketing Plan has been modified to reflect 
    this change.
    
    V. General Criteria and Contract Principles
    
        Comment: A commentor suggested that, under take-or-pay provisions, 
    the resale (remarketing) prohibition should be eliminated. Other 
    commentors stated that, in the competitive environment, Western will 
    not be able to enforce the resale prohibition, and customers will 
    receive an unfair advantage with the ability to ``profiteer'' in 
    regional electricity markets.
        Response: Western is not convinced that the prohibition on 
    reselling Federal power should be eliminated due to the take-or-pay 
    provisions. Customers' loads are expected to be sufficient to use all 
    available Western power most of the time. Western realizes that, at 
    times, due to the variability of CVP generation,
    
    [[Page 34422]]
    
    some customers may not be able to use their full power allocation. 
    Therefore, Western will establish and manage an exchange program. Any 
    Western power that cannot be used on a real-time basis must be offered 
    to Western or to other preference customers under this program.
        Comment: A comment suggested Western consider marketing a portion 
    of CVP capacity to the California Power Exchange or other marketers.
        Response: Western markets power first to preference entities under 
    Reclamation laws. However, if Western is unable to market all of its 
    power to preference entities, it may be sold to others.
        Comment: Many commentors supported the 20-year contract term, 
    citing the additional value of a long-term contract which allows 
    customers who purchase Federal power greater stability in planning for 
    future resources than would exist with a shorter contract term.
        Other comments objected to a 20-year contract term citing reasons 
    for a shorter contract term. One commentor suggested contract terms of 
    no more than 5 years or auctioning contracts to qualified bidders.
        Response: The 20-year contract term provides greater resource 
    certainty for Western customers in a restructured industry, and greater 
    certainty of revenues for project repayment by Western. Shorter 
    contract terms degrade the marketability of the resource and create an 
    administrative burden. An EIS, which included a significant amount of 
    analysis as well as a public involvement process, was conducted on the 
    provisions of EPAMP, including a 20-year term. The EPAMP EIS found that 
    longer contract terms were positive for the environment, as customers 
    were more likely to invest in renewable resources if they had a stable 
    foundation of Federal hydropower. Short-term contracts could lead 
    customers to develop resources that are cheaper in the short term but 
    more environmentally adverse. Future load requirements are not a 
    significant consideration as Western is a partial requirements provider 
    and is generally not responsible for meeting customer load growth.
        Contract extensions would not preclude any Congressional or 
    administrative actions because contracts or rate changes could be 
    included as part of a sale or restructuring package. The Marketing Plan 
    does not impact or preclude future operational changes at Federal dams 
    because Western will market only the available power generation. 
    Because Western is required to market power at cost-based rates, 
    auctioning contracts is not practical. Power must be sold to preference 
    entities first and not just to the highest bidder. Western has included 
    the 20-year contract term in the Marketing Plan.
    
    VI. First Preference
    
        Comment: A comment supported using 20-year average historical 
    generation to calculate the maximum entitlement of first preference 
    customers (MEFPC), rather than a 5-year average. Other commentors 
    stated using 20-year average historical generation to calculate the 
    MEFPC is inappropriate because it does not account for generation lost 
    due to fishery restoration operations and other environmental factors, 
    would unfairly penalize other preference customers, and would exceed 
    statutory requirements. A commentor stated that first preference 
    customers should not be immune to the vagaries of generation. Some 
    comments requested a floor MEFPC be established, based on generation 
    prior to CVPIA operations. Using all historic generation before fishery 
    restoration was also suggested.
        Response: The New Melones Project provisions of the Flood Control 
    Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173, 1191-1192) and the Trinity River Division 
    (TRD) Act (69 Stat. 719) (Acts) specify that first preference customers 
    are entitled to up to 25 percent of the power generated as a result of 
    the construction of the New Melones Project and the Trinity River 
    Division (first preference projects). Under its discretionary 
    authority, Western determines how the entitlements are to be 
    calculated. Western believes the most recent 20-year average historical 
    generation is consistent with the Acts because it accounts for 
    generation resulting from the first preference projects under a variety 
    of hydrological conditions, and takes into consideration impacts of 
    changing operations such as those contemplated under the CVPIA. The 
    Acts do not guarantee a minimum amount of power to the counties of 
    origin; therefore, Western does not believe a floor MEFPC is 
    appropriate.
        Comment: A commentor requested more information on the calculations 
    used to determine the MEFPC.
        Response: The Marketing Plan specifies the data to be used and how 
    the MEFPC will be calculated.
        Comment: A commentor questioned why the MEFPC will only be adjusted 
    if, upon recalculation, it is 10 percent above or below the currently 
    effective MEFPC.
        Response: To eliminate minor or short-term fluctuations, Western 
    has decided to adjust only for a 10 percent or greater difference in 
    the MEFPC.
        Comment: Comments were received both in favor of and in opposition 
    to the first preference customers' full requirements option at the Base 
    Resource rate, without the take-or-pay provision. One commentor stated 
    that all customers should be treated economically the same.
        Response: The full requirements option will be supplied from the 
    same power resources as the Base Resource; therefore, it is reasonable 
    to apply the Base Resource rate. It is not appropriate to apply the 
    take-or-pay provision to the full requirements option because the first 
    preference customers will not have a fixed percentage amount under this 
    option. Western will continue to offer the full requirements option to 
    the first preference customers.
        Comment: A commentor said he assumed that the load factor referred 
    to in the full requirements option is intended to apply only to those 
    first preference customers who cannot measure their demand.
        Response: In the future it may be necessary to determine a maximum 
    capacity from the MEFPC. This calculation will require use of a load 
    factor for each first preference customer. However, it will not be 
    necessary to provide a load factor in the contracts, and the Marketing 
    Plan now reflects this clarification.
        Comment: Some commentors who opposed the full requirements option 
    stated that it is beyond Western's statutory requirements and is unfair 
    to the other customers. It was suggested that a daily entitlement be 
    established based on actual generation. First preference customers 
    should be provided with the Base Resource and should pay the cost of 
    creating a Custom Product in the same manner as all other customers.
        Response: The Acts specify that first preference customers are 
    entitled to receive up to 25 percent of the additional power generated 
    as a result of construction of the first preference projects. Western 
    has discretion in how it fulfills the requirements of the Acts. When 
    Congress authorized construction of the first preference projects, it 
    balanced the concerns of the counties of origin and the benefits the 
    first preference projects would have to the entire CVP. Western 
    believes that Congress attempted to provide a fair remedy to all 
    parties involved. It is within the spirit of the Acts to make the 
    maximum amount of the MEFPC available to the first preference
    
    [[Page 34423]]
    
    customers to the extent it can be used to meet their loads. Power 
    deliveries under this option would be nearly identical to what they are 
    today. Western believes this arrangement will have minimal impact on 
    the other customers; therefore, we will continue to offer the full 
    requirements option.
        Comment: Comments requested that first preference customers who 
    choose the percentage option be allowed to participate in the exchange 
    program, using some or all of their MEFPC.
        Response: Under the percentage option, first preference customers 
    would be allowed to participate in the exchange program to the same 
    extent as the other customers.
        Comment: A commentor suggested that the Marketing Plan should 
    provide for first preference customers to receive 25 percent of the 
    energy generated from the TRD, exactly as the legislation provides, at 
    the cost to produce that energy.
        Western was requested to provide additional options that would 
    allow first preference customers to schedule up to 25 percent of the 
    energy produced as a result of the first preference projects, at prices 
    that reflect the cost to produce first preference project energy. 
    Options should provide for first preference customers to call upon 
    historic generation that they did not use during times when 25 percent 
    of first preference project energy is less than their load. If first 
    preference customers are not allowed to call upon historic generation 
    that they did not use, Western should allow them to trade or bank some 
    of the 25 percent of what is produced by the first preference projects 
    in the future.
        Other comments recommended that the Marketing Plan should reflect 
    past legal resolution of issues regarding use and pricing of first 
    preference power.
        Response: The Acts do not provide for Western to furnish more power 
    than can actually be used by the first preference customers within the 
    counties of origin. First preference customers are not entitled to 
    historic generation they were unable to use. Also, the Acts do not 
    provide for energy banking arrangements. With respect to providing the 
    energy at the cost to generate power at the first preference projects, 
    both Acts state,
    
    * * * contracts for the sale and delivery of the additional electric 
    energy available from the Central Valley Project power system as a 
    result of the construction of the plants * * *
    
    In Trinity County Public Utilities District vs. Harrington (781 F.2d 
    163 (9th Cir. 1986)), the court held that since the first preference 
    projects are operationally and financially integrated with the CVP, the 
    first preference customers should pay rates based on the operating 
    costs of the CVP system.
        Comment: It was requested that a menu of services be offered to the 
    first preference customers, coupled with certain first preference 
    rights, like the sale of energy at first preference project cost.
        Response: First preference customers are offered two options--the 
    full requirements option and the percentage option. Under the 
    percentage option, first preference customers may choose to customize 
    their allocation with the Custom Product and participate in the 
    exchange program. See Western's response above concerning rates for 
    first preference customers.
        Comment: One commentor stated that the percentage option could not 
    be used by first preference customers to gain greater benefits than 
    would be available under the full requirements option, even though they 
    are entitled to greater benefits. The commentor suggested that, other 
    than a few differences, the percentage option makes first preference 
    customers almost equal to other customers.
        Response: The principal benefit granted to first preference 
    customers under the Acts is the first right to purchase a portion of 
    the additional generation made available to the CVP as a result of the 
    construction of the first preference projects, for use in the counties 
    of origin. Under the percentage option, the first preference customers' 
    allocations will be determined similarly to the other customers. 
    However, first preference customers' allocation percentages will be 
    based on their actual loads, not on a CRD. First preference customers 
    will not be subject to adjustments in their allocation percentages for 
    the resource pools. Additionally, first preference customers will have 
    the opportunity to adjust their allocation percentages, with a 7-month 
    notice to and approval by Western, up to their share of the MEFPC. 
    Western believes that both the percentage option and the full 
    requirements option provide the benefits required under the Acts.
        Comment: One commentor stated that 12 months of load data is not 
    reflective of actual usage, and requested that Western modify the 
    factors used in the calculation to determine a first preference 
    customer's percentage.
        Response: Western has modified the Marketing Plan to provide for 
    the maximum demand during the previous 4 years to be used in 
    determining an allocation percentage under the percentage option.
        Comment: A few commentors stated that Western is required under 
    both Acts to provide transmission services to first preference 
    customers. Additionally, Western was requested to commit to provide 
    transmission service with the basic service at the basic rate to the 
    first preference customers. One commentor suggested that first 
    preference customers should be exempt from Section V.G.
        Response: The TRD Act authorizes Western to provide electric 
    transmission facilities as may be necessary to furnish energy to 
    Trinity County. Western owns transmission facilities in Trinity County. 
    Should additional facilities be required, appropriations or customer 
    advancement of funds would be necessary before such facilities could be 
    constructed. There is no similar clause in the New Melones Project 
    provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1962 with respect to Calaveras 
    and Tuolumne Counties. Western will assist in providing transmission 
    service to the first preference customers. Although Western is willing 
    to assist, all customers are ultimately responsible to provide for the 
    delivery of Federal power to their loads. Accordingly, Section V.G, 
    requiring customers to obtain their own third-party transmission 
    service, is applicable to all customers.
        Western has voluntarily filed an Open Access Tariff consistent with 
    FERC Order No. 888. Transmission costs will be identified separately 
    from power costs, and all transmission users will bear an equitable 
    share of those costs.
        Comment: Comments were received both in favor of and in opposition 
    to the provisions of the Proposed Plan relating to the first preference 
    customers. Those in favor of the provisions stated they are appropriate 
    and encouraging. Those in opposition stated the provisions exceed 
    Western's requirements under the Acts and provide the first preference 
    customers with better products than those offered to the other 
    customers. Some first preference customers indicated dissatisfaction 
    with the benefits they are currently receiving under their respective 
    Acts in comparison to the sacrifices they made to allow construction of 
    the first preference projects.
        Response: To compensate the counties of origin for their 
    sacrifices, both Acts require Western to provide the counties of origin 
    with the amount of energy they can use, up to 25 percent of the 
    additional energy generated by the CVP as a result of the construction 
    of the respective first preference projects. Under its discretionary 
    authority, Western determines the manner in which this energy is made
    
    [[Page 34424]]
    
    available to first preference customers. Western believes it is 
    appropriate to continue to provide these customers with the opportunity 
    to choose between the two options in the Marketing Plan. This will 
    allow those customers to decide how to make the best use of the 
    benefits they are entitled to receive. Whether either of the options 
    results in a ``better'' product than that received by other customers 
    would depend on many factors outside of Western's control, such as 
    future energy prices, and is secondary to meeting the spirit and intent 
    of the Acts.
        Comment: A comment requested that Western provide a summary 
    supporting the Marketing Plan's compliance with the TRD Act.
        Response: Section 4 of the TRD Act of 1955 states,
    
        Contracts for the sale and delivery of the additional electric 
    energy available from the Central Valley Project power system as a 
    result of the construction of the plants herein authorized and their 
    integration with that system shall be made in accordance with 
    preferences expressed in the Federal reclamation laws: Provided, 
    That a first preference, to the extent of 25 per centum of such 
    additional energy, shall be given, under Reclamation law, to 
    preference customers in Trinity County, California, for use in that 
    county, who are ready, able, and willing within 12 months after 
    notice of availability by the Secretary, to enter into contracts for 
    the energy: Provided further, That Trinity County preference 
    customers may exercise their option on the same date in each 
    successive fifth year providing written notice of their intention to 
    use the energy is given to the Secretary not less than 18 months 
    prior to said date.
    
        In accordance with the TRD Act, Section VI of the Marketing Plan 
    provides that Western will calculate and make available to preference 
    customers/entities in Trinity County, to the extent they can use it 
    within that county, 25 percent of the additional energy made available 
    to the CVP as a result of the construction of the TRD. These first 
    preference customers have the right to this power before it is made 
    available to other preference customers. Both options provide that the 
    power be made available to these first preference customers to meet 
    their needs, and the amount of power can be increased until it reaches 
    the limit set forth in the TRD Act. A first preference entity may 
    exercise its rights to use a portion of the MEFPC by providing written 
    notice to Western at least 18 months prior to the anniversary date of 
    the first preference project located in its county.
        Comment: A commentor supported dividing the MEFPC from the New 
    Melones Project between Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties. That commentor 
    requested a provision be added to the Marketing Plan, allowing the 
    counties of Calaveras and Tuolumne to combine their allocations for the 
    purpose of joint load management.
        Response: Western is willing to consider combining allocations for 
    the New Melones' counties of origin if it is requested by the affected 
    parties. Such an arrangement is an operational procedure and does not 
    need to be specified in the Marketing Plan.
        Comment: A comment suggested that Western should share the revenue 
    received from sales of unused first preference power with the first 
    preference customers.
        Response: Under applicable legislation, there is no basis to share 
    revenues with the first preference customers.
        Comment: Some first preference customers stated that they are 
    assuming that they will not be charged for scheduling services. Western 
    was requested to clarify the phrase ``scheduling arrangements'' 
    (Proposed Plan Section V.C).
        Response: The phrase ``scheduling arrangement'' as used in Section 
    V.C of the Proposed Plan was included because Western anticipates that 
    power deliveries will no longer be determined after the fact, which is 
    allowed under Contract 14-06-200-2948A. Schedules will be agreed upon 
    prior to delivery. Scheduling is required under both options for the 
    first preference customers, as well as for all other customers. Under 
    the restructured electric utility industry in California, Western or 
    the customer's scheduling agent will be required to provide schedules 
    for all power deliveries within the California Independent System 
    Operator (ISO) control area. The first preference customers may perform 
    their own scheduling or contract with Western or a third party to 
    perform scheduling services. If Western is requested to perform 
    scheduling services, the cost will be borne by each customer requesting 
    such service. This cost will be identified separately from the Base 
    Resource rate.
        Comment: Commentors requested that Western clarify the phrase 
    ``power requirements'' (Proposed Plan Section VI.D.1).
        Response: The reference to ``power requirements'' as used in 
    Section VI.D.1 of the Proposed Plan means the capacity and energy 
    necessary to serve a first preference customer's load from that first 
    preference customer's share of the MEFPC. The statement concerning 
    power requirements has been clarified in the Marketing Plan.
        Comment: A commentor requested that Western clarify the statement 
    in Section VI.B of the Proposed Plan that Western may purchase power on 
    behalf of the first preference customers to compensate for any power 
    loss due to recalculation of the MEFPC.
        Response: This provision has been clarified in the Marketing Plan.
        Comment: Comments were received stating that priority should be 
    given to first preference entities that are wholly located within the 
    counties of origin. Also, if a contract extension is granted to a first 
    preference customer or a new contract is executed with a first 
    preference entity that is not entirely located within a county of 
    origin, it should be for power withdrawable to serve first preference 
    customers/entities that are wholly located within that county of 
    origin. A comment also requested the definition of a first preference 
    customer/entity include the following language,
    
    one which serves and provides a direct and measurable benefit to the 
    residents of the counties of Trinity, Calaveras, and Tuolumne.
    
        Response: The definition of a first preference customer/entity must 
    be consistent with the Acts and Reclamation law. Both Acts provide for 
    electric service to be made available to entities who qualify for 
    preference under Reclamation law and are located in their respective 
    counties. Therefore, entities located in Tuolumne, Calaveras, or 
    Trinity Counties who are preference entities qualify for first 
    preference rights. The Marketing Plan is consistent with the Acts.
        Comment: A commentor said he assumed that Section VI.E of the 
    Proposed Plan is applicable only to new first preference customers.
        Response: Section VI.E of the Proposed Plan, regarding applications 
    for first preference power, applies only to first preference entities. 
    First preference entities are entities who are qualified to use, but 
    are not currently using, preference power within a county of origin. 
    They are qualified to be first preference customers but are not yet 
    customers.
        Comment: One commentor suggested that first preference customers 
    had been inappropriately exempted from Section V.B, allocation 
    percentage adjustment clause, as referenced in Section VI.J of the 
    Proposed Plan.
        Response: Western has determined that Section V.B will be 
    applicable to the first preference customers, and the Marketing Plan 
    has been so modified.
    
    [[Page 34425]]
    
    VII. Transmission
    
        Comment: One commentor stated that Western's transmission 
    obligations under separate transmission contracts must be honored. 
    Another commentor asked how Western plans to deal with the DOE Labs' 
    100 MW entitlement on the California-Oregon Transmission Project and 
    their capacity entitlement on the Tracy Tie Line.
        Response: The Marketing Plan does not modify Western's existing 
    contractual transmission rights or obligations, including DOE's 
    entitlements.
        Comment: A commentor expressed concern that the unbundling of 
    transmission service from power services would have an adverse impact 
    on Western's customers, and Western should not require customers to go 
    through a separate process to obtain transmission. It was suggested 
    that Western make a ``delivered'' product available, or otherwise use 
    transmission assets to firm the Base Resource, particularly in dry 
    years. It was further suggested that, if customers use the transmission 
    systems of others for delivery of CVP power, they should still be 
    responsible for a portion of Western's transmission system costs.
        Response: Western is not a FERC jurisdictional utility, but has 
    agreed to comply with the spirit and intent of FERC Order No. 888, to 
    the extent it does not conflict with Western's legislative mandates. If 
    it is feasible in the restructured electric utility industry, Western 
    is willing to evaluate bundled services, including use of its 
    transmission access to the Northwest, during further development of the 
    Base Resource, Optional Purchase, and Custom Products. All customers 
    who use Western's transmission system will share cost responsibility 
    for the transmission system.
        Comment: One commentor stated that Western's current Pacific 
    Intertie transmission service level does not fully reflect Western's 
    ownership of its portion of the Pacific Intertie.
        Response: Western's current level of Pacific Intertie transmission 
    is outside the scope of the Marketing Plan.
        Comment: One commentor stated that Western needs to consider its 
    products' impacts on other customers, particularly Western's direct-
    connect customers who rely on Western's transmission system.
        Response: Western considered the potential impacts of its products 
    on all customers, including direct-connect customers. It is Western's 
    intent to offer products which are useful and beneficial to all 
    customers.
        Comment: One commentor objected to Western's proposal to assess 
    transmission losses to customers that are directly connected to 
    Western's transmission system.
        Response: Under the Marketing Plan, power will be available as a 
    system sale, not from specific points of generation. It is necessary to 
    account for the power that is lost between generation and load. 
    Therefore, all power deliveries using the CVP transmission system will 
    be subject to loss assessments.
        Comment: One commentor requested Western assume a position of 
    advocacy on its customers' behalf in regard to access and pricing of 
    third-party transmission. Western was urged to reserve sufficient 
    capacity on its transmission system to accommodate its customers' 
    requirements for wheeling of both CVP and purchased firming power. 
    Western was encouraged to explore ways in which its customers will have 
    a superior entitlement to schedule capacity on Western's transmission 
    system, while avoiding the problem of double-billing for transactions 
    utilizing both the Federal and non-Federal systems.
        Response: Access to and pricing of third-party transmission is 
    outside the scope of the Marketing Plan. Western will provide 
    transmission services as appropriate in conjunction with its power 
    sales in a manner consistent with FERC Orders and legislated mandates. 
    Use of Western's transmission resources will be determined as the 
    products and services to be provided by Western are further developed.
    
    VIII. Pricing and Rates
    
        Comment: Commentors expressed concerns that, in order to commit to 
    a long-term Marketing Plan, a clear idea of prices and availability of 
    power is needed. They stated that the bulk power market is often 
    trading below Western's current price range, and uncertainties such as 
    the Restoration Fund make it even more unattractive to choose Western.
        Response: Western will sell the Base Resource at a cost-based rate, 
    and the Custom Product at a pass-through cost. The ratemaking process 
    is separate from the Marketing Plan; however, as in all Administrative 
    Procedure Act processes, public participation will be encouraged. Costs 
    and availability will be more clearly identified by the time 
    commitments are required for the Base Resource.
        Western has no control over Restoration Fund costs; however, 
    Western is striving to minimize Western components of power costs and 
    customize products in an attempt to provide the best possible service 
    at the lowest possible rates consistent with sound business principles. 
    Western expects its prices to be at or below the bulk market by the 
    time the Marketing Plan goes into effect.
        Comment: Although the take-or-pay method was commented upon 
    favorably, some commentors stated take-or-pay contracts require details 
    on prices and products, and are unrealistic unless they are for short 
    terms. A comment was received favoring cost-of-service ratemaking with 
    a take-or-pay provision for ``must-run power.''
        Response: The take-or-pay approach is expected to provide adequate 
    revenues to ensure project repayment. The Base Resource will be sold at 
    a cost-based rate that will be developed in a public process in which 
    customers and interested parties may participate. Other products will 
    be sold on a pass-through-cost basis. By the time product commitments 
    are required, individual customer need and pricing and availability 
    information will be more clearly defined.
        Comment: A commentor requested that Western negotiate for firming 
    resources on behalf of its entire customer base so that certain 
    customers will not be competing in the bulk power market against 
    Western.
        Response: The Marketing Plan reflects the option for Western to 
    negotiate for firming as part of the Custom Product on behalf of its 
    entire customer base, a group of customers, or individual customers, if 
    requested by those customers.
        Comment: Western should postpone a decision on Washoe Project cost 
    recovery until more definitive information can be provided.
        Response: Western believes all necessary information concerning the 
    marketing of Washoe Project power is available and has been considered. 
    Western sees no benefit in delaying the decision to market Washoe 
    Project power with the CVP resource.
    
    IX. Industry Restructuring
    
        Comment: A commentor stated that restructuring has changed the 
    rules of the game to the point that Western's proposals are 
    inconsistent with public interests. Another commentor encouraged 
    Western to retain flexibility to accommodate changes in the industry.
        Response: Western believes it is in the public interest to provide 
    some resource certainty to its customers and to protect the Federal 
    investment in project facilities. The Marketing Plan is designed to be 
    flexible enough to respond to changes in CVP operations and the 
    industry, and to provide the
    
    [[Page 34426]]
    
    greatest value to customers and the Federal Government.
        Comment: A commentor asked if joining the California ISO will pose 
    any problems for Western.
        Response: Whether Western will join the California ISO is a 
    separate decision from development of the Marketing Plan. The Marketing 
    Plan does not preclude Western's participation in the California ISO.
        Comment: A commentor suggested that Western should recognize the 
    new competitive market and help its preference customers wherever 
    possible with competition transition charge problems.
        Response: Western designed the Marketing Plan to be flexible to 
    respond to changes in the industry and provide the greatest value to 
    its customers. Products and services available under the Marketing Plan 
    can be customized to meet individual customer's needs in the new 
    competitive market.
        Competition transition charges are outside the scope of the 
    Marketing Plan.
    
    Responses to Comments Received on the Notice of Public Process on 
    Resource Pool Size (64 FR 4646, January 29, 1999)
    
        During the public consultation and comment period, Western received 
    five letters commenting on the Sierra Nevada Region's resource pool 
    size. No comments were received during the February 9, 1999, public 
    meeting in Folsom, California. Western reviewed and considered all 
    comments received by the end of the public consultation and comment 
    period, March 1, 1999, in preparation of the Marketing Plan.
        The following is a summary of the comments received during the 
    consultation and comment period, and Western's responses to those 
    comments.
        Comment: Some comments stated that the proposed sizes of the 
    resource pools were adequate to meet the needs of new customers, 
    including the fair share needs of eligible Native American tribes.
        Response: Western considered the needs of new customers, including 
    Native American tribes, when determining the sizes of the resource 
    pools during development of the Marketing Plan. Western concurs with 
    this comment.
        Comment: A commentor stated that a larger allocation percentage, 
    such as 30 percent, would be necessary for certain Native American 
    tribes in Southern California. That commentor also suggested that an 
    allocation be set aside for them and dedicated to tribal economic 
    development.
        Response: Southern California is outside the primary marketing area 
    of the Sierra Nevada Region. The Desert Southwest Customer Service 
    Region of Western serves Southern California and will develop its 
    marketing program prior to the expiration of its current electric 
    service contracts.
        Comment: As Western's Marketing Plan becomes more definitive, it 
    would be beneficial for PG&E to review the Marketing Plan in advance to 
    assure consistency with any possible post-Contract 14-06-200-2948A 
    (integration contract with PG&E) contractual relationship.
        Response: Under the Administrative Procedure Act, Western cannot 
    discuss the final Marketing Plan with any entities prior to 
    publication.
        Comment: In determining the level of benefits to Native Americans, 
    Western should take into account the benefits currently received 
    through rural electric cooperatives serving the reservations. Western 
    should attempt to fairly distribute the benefits of low-cost Federal 
    hydropower, ensuring equity among all eligible tribes and existing 
    customers.
        Response: The allocation and eligibility criteria in the Marketing 
    Plan were developed to ensure the benefits of Federal power were 
    equitably distributed among new customers, including eligible Native 
    American tribes, and existing customers.
        Comment: Power could be provided to a utility to serve a tribe; 
    however, the tribe would actually hold the allocation. By way of a bill 
    crediting system, the Federal power benefits could be passed on to the 
    tribe through a credit on its utility bill.
        Response: Western intends to allocate power directly to any 
    eligible Native American tribes that apply for power. The Sierra Nevada 
    Region will work with tribes to receive power under the California 
    direct access rules or other applicable arrangements, which may include 
    bill crediting.
        Comment: If a Native American tribe establishes a utility and seeks 
    an allocation from the resource pool, that tribal utility should be 
    treated as a utility applicant and subject to the same qualifications 
    and provisions to which all Federal power customers are subject.
        Response: Native American tribal utility applicants will be treated 
    similarly to other utility applicants.
    
    Summary of Revisions to the Proposed Plan
    
        Western revised the Marketing Plan as a result of the comments 
    received during the comment period and public forums. Additionally, 
    some changes have been made to more clearly define the intent, but do 
    not change the original proposal. The major revisions are summarized as 
    follows.
        The definitions of administrator, curtailable power, diversity 
    power, load factor, long-term, NDA Act power, peaking, power marketing 
    initiative, unbundled, and withdrawable have been deleted. These 
    definitions were deleted because they are not necessary terms in the 
    final Marketing Plan. The definition of customer was deleted and will 
    be used as a generic term to refer to new allottees and/or existing 
    customers. A definition for the Optional Purchase was added to assist 
    in understanding that product. These modifications appear in Section I, 
    and are used throughout the Marketing Plan.
        In the formulas in Section IV.A.1 and IV.A.2, Western will base an 
    existing customer's allocation percentage on its extension CRD as of 
    December 31, 2003, rather than December 31, 2001. Western will adjust 
    an existing customer's percentage on December 31, 2003, if its maximum 
    monthly peak load for the previous 3 years is less than its extension 
    CRD, rather than basing the existing customer's extension CRD on 104 
    percent of its load during the previous 4 years. This modification also 
    appears in Appendix A.
        Extension CRD was modified to include NDA Act power used for 
    economic development. This modification appears in Section I and 
    Appendix A.
        Western has decided not to market unused first preference power on 
    a withdrawable basis. Unused first preference power will be included as 
    part of the Base Resource and available to all other customers. 
    Sections I and III were modified. Section V.F of the Proposed Plan has 
    been deleted.
        The commitment date has been changed to December 31, 2000, for the 
    Base Resource and Optional Purchase, and to December 31, 2002, for the 
    Custom Product. Additionally, Western may extend the commitment dates 
    for the Base Resource, Optional Purchase, and Custom Product if Western 
    determines it is in the best interest of Western and the customers. 
    This modification appears in Sections III and V.
        Unused power resources may be marketed outside the primary 
    marketing area. This modification appears in Section III.
        Existing customers must commit to the Optional Purchase for a 10-
    year period, from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2014, rather 
    than an annual or greater period. This modification appears in Section 
    III.
        The Call for Resource Pool Applications will be published in a
    
    [[Page 34427]]
    
    separate Federal Register notice. This modification appears in Section 
    IV.B.2.e.
        Existing customers may apply for a resource pool allocation if 
    their extension CRD is not more than 15 percent of their peak load in 
    the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications, rather than 
    calendar year 1996. This modification appears in Section IV.B.2.g.
        Requests to serve new loads that are less than 1 MW, but at least 
    500 kW, will be allowed if they can be aggregated so Western can 
    schedule and deliver to a minimum load of 1 MW. This modification 
    appears in Section IV.B.2.h.
        Western will base a resource pool allocation on an applicant's peak 
    demand during the calendar year prior to publication of the Call for 
    Applications. The amount used to determine a resource pool allottee's 
    allocation percentage will not be rounded up to the nearest 100 kW. 
    This modification appears in Section IV.B.3.b.
        Eligible Native American entities will receive greater 
    consideration for an allocation of up to 65 percent of their peak load 
    in the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications. This 
    modification appears in Section IV.B.3.e.
        First preference customers will be subject to Section V.B, which 
    clarifies that allocation percentages provided for in the Marketing 
    Plan and the electric service contracts shall be subject to adjustment. 
    This modification appears in Sections V.B and VI.K.
        Contracts will include a clause specifying criteria that customers 
    must meet on an ongoing basis to be eligible to continue receiving 
    electric service from Western. This modification appears in Section 
    V.F.
        Although Western may assist, each customer will be responsible for 
    obtaining its own delivery arrangements to its load. This modification 
    appears in Section V.G.
        Western may reduce or rescind a customer's allocation percentage, 
    upon 90-days notice, if Western determines that the customer is not 
    using the power to serve its own loads or the allocation amount is 
    consistently greater than the customer's maximum peak load. This 
    modification appears in Section V.K.
        Contracts may include a clause providing for alternative funding 
    arrangements, including net billing, bill crediting, reimbursable 
    financing, and advance payment. This modification appears in Section 
    V.N.
        The initial recalculation of the MEFPC pertaining to this Marketing 
    Plan will be completed by June 1, 2004. This modification appears in 
    Section VI.A.
        The commitment date for first preference customers to commit to the 
    percentage option has been changed to December 31, 2002. This 
    modification appears in Section VI.D.
        Under the full requirements option, if there is more than one first 
    preference customer in a county of origin, or a first preference entity 
    in that county makes a request for power, Western reserves the right to 
    establish a maximum amount of power available to each first preference 
    customer from the MEFPC. This modification appears in Section VI.D.1.
        For first preference customers, Western will use the maximum demand 
    during the previous 4 years, rather than the last 12 months, in 
    determining an allocation percentage under the percentage option. This 
    modification appears in Section VI.D.2.
        A first preference customer's request for an increase in its 
    allocation percentage under the percentage option must be accompanied 
    by justification for the increase. This modification appears in Section 
    VI.D.2.c.
        First preference customers will be subject to Section V.L, which 
    states that any power not under contract may be allocated at any time, 
    at Western's sole discretion, or sold as deemed appropriate by Western. 
    This modification appears in Section VI.K.
        Western will provide bundled or unbundled transmission services 
    with its power sales, consistent with FERC Orders, legislated mandates, 
    or California ISO Agreements. This modification appears in Section VII.
        Appendix A was updated to reflect new customers and changes in CRD.
    
    2004 Power Marketing Plan
    
        This Marketing Plan addresses: (1) The power to be marketed after 
    December 31, 2004, which is the termination date for all Central Valley 
    Project (CVP) electric service contracts; (2) the general terms and 
    conditions under which the power will be marketed; (3) the resources 
    available to existing customers; and (4) the criteria to determine who 
    will receive allocations from the resource pools.
        The Western Area Power Administration (Western) will continue a 
    collaborative process in implementing the terms set forth in this 
    Marketing Plan.
        Within broad statutory guidelines and operational constraints of 
    the CVP and the Washoe Project, Western has wide discretion as to whom 
    and under what terms it will contract for the sale of Federal power, as 
    long as preference is accorded to statutorily defined public bodies. 
    Western markets power in a manner that will encourage the most 
    widespread use at the lowest possible rates consistent with sound 
    business principles. All products and services provided under this 
    Marketing Plan will be subject to operational requirements and 
    constraints of the CVP and Washoe Project, transmission availability, 
    purchase power limitations, and Federal authorities.
    I. Acronyms and Definitions
        As used herein, the following acronyms and terms, whether singular 
    or plural, shall have the following meanings:
        Allocation: An offer from Western to sell Federal power for a 
    certain period of time, that will convert to a right to purchase after 
    execution of a contract.
        Allocation Criteria: Conditions applied to all applicants who 
    receive an allocation.
        Allottee: An entity receiving an allocation percentage under this 
    Marketing Plan.
        Ancillary Services: Those services necessary to support the 
    transfer of electricity while maintaining reliable operation of the 
    transmission provider's transmission system in accordance with good 
    utility practice. Ancillary services are generally described in Federal 
    Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Order No. 888 (Docket Nos. RM95-8-
    000 and RM94-7-001), issued April 24, 1996.
        Base Resource: CVP and Washoe Project power output and existing 
    power purchase contracts extending beyond 2004, determined by Western 
    to be available for marketing, after meeting the requirements of 
    project use and first preference customers, and any adjustments for 
    maintenance, reserves, transformation losses, and certain ancillary 
    services.
        Capacity: The electrical capability of a generator, transformer, 
    transmission circuit or other equipment.
        Central Valley Project (CVP): A multipurpose Federal water 
    development project extending from the Cascade Range in northern 
    California to the plains along the Kern River, south of the City of 
    Bakersfield.
        Contract Principles: Provisions of the electric service contracts, 
    including Western's General Power Contract Provisions.
        Contract Rate of Delivery (CRD): The maximum amount of capacity 
    made available to a customer for a period specified under a contract.
        Custom Product: A combination of products and services, excluding
    
    [[Page 34428]]
    
    provisions for load growth, which may be made available by Western per 
    customer request, using the customer's Base Resource and supplemental 
    purchases made by Western.
        Eligibility Criteria: Conditions that must be met to qualify for an 
    allocation.
        Energy: Measured in terms of the work it is capable of doing over a 
    period of time; electric energy is usually measured in kilowatthours or 
    megawatthours.
        Existing Customer: A preference customer with a contract to 
    purchase firm power, offered under a previous allocation process or 
    marketing plan, that extends through December 31, 2004.
        Extension CRD: An existing customer's CRD exclusive of diversity 
    and curtailable power, and peaking/excess capacity, as it may be 
    adjusted in accordance with this Marketing Plan.
        Firm: A type of product and/or service that is available to a 
    customer at the times it is required.
        First Preference Customer/Entity: A preference customer and/or a 
    preference entity (an entity qualified to use, but not using preference 
    power) within a county of origin (Trinity, Calaveras, and Tuolumne) as 
    specified under the Trinity River Division Act (69 Stat. 719) and the 
    New Melones project provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
    Stat. 1173, 1191-1192).
        General Power Contract Provisions (GPCP): Standard terms and 
    conditions which are included in Western's electric service contracts.
        Integrated Resource Plan (IRP): A process and framework within 
    which the costs and benefits of both demand and supply-side resources 
    are evaluated to develop the least total cost mix of utility resource 
    options.
        Kilowatt (kW): A unit measuring the rate of production of 
    electricity; one kilowatt equals one thousand watts.
        Marketing Plan: Western's final 2004 Power Marketing Plan for the 
    Sierra Nevada Region.
        Megawatt (MW): A unit measuring the rate of production of 
    electricity; one megawatt equals one million watts.
        National Defense Authorization Act (NDA Act): Section 2929 of the 
    National Defense Authorization Act, Pub. L. 103-160, 107 Stat. 1547, 
    1935 (1993), which provides that, for a 10-year period (starting in 
    1993), the CVP electric power allocations to military installations in 
    the State of California, which have been closed or approved for 
    closure, shall be reserved for sale through long-term contracts to 
    preference entities which agree to use such power to promote economic 
    development at the military installations closed or approved for 
    closure.
        Optional Purchase: An additional increment of power purchased by 
    the Sierra Nevada Region at the request of an eligible existing 
    customer on a pass-through-cost basis. Such power will be made 
    available as a replacement for the Base Resource that is unavailable to 
    that existing customer due to the Sacramento Municipal Utility 
    District's (SMUD) percentage right of 360/1,152 of the Base Resource 
    provided for under the SMUD Settlement Agreement. The Optional Purchase 
    will terminate on December 31, 2014.
        Power: Capacity and energy.
        Preference: The requirements of Reclamation law which provide that 
    preference in the sale of Federal power be given to certain entities, 
    such as municipalities and other public corporations or agencies and 
    also to cooperatives and other nonprofit organizations financed in 
    whole or in part by loans made pursuant to the Rural Electrification 
    Act of 1936 (Reclamation Project Act of 1939, section 9(c), 43 U.S.C. 
    485h(c)).
        Primary Marketing Area: The area which generally encompasses 
    northern and central California extending from the Cascade Range to the 
    Tehachapi Mountains, and west-central Nevada.
        Project Use: Power as defined by Reclamation law and/or used to 
    operate CVP and Washoe Project facilities.
        Reclamation Law: Refers to a series of Federal laws with a lineage 
    dating back to the turn of the century. Viewed as a whole, those laws 
    create the framework under which Western markets power.
        Sierra Nevada Region: The Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region of 
    the Western Area Power Administration.
        Washoe Project: A Federal water project located in the Lahontan 
    Basin in west-central Nevada and east-central California.
        Western: Western Area Power Administration, United States 
    Department of Energy, a Federal power marketing administration 
    responsible for marketing and transmitting of Federal power pursuant to 
    Reclamation law and the DOE Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101-7352).
    
    II. Base Resource
    
        The Base Resource, as defined in Section I, will include CVP and 
    Washoe Project generation supported by certain power purchases. CVP 
    generation (energy and capacity) will vary hourly, daily, monthly, and 
    annually, because it is subject to hydrological conditions and other 
    constraints that may govern CVP operations. CVP generation must be 
    adjusted for project use, maintenance, reserves, transformation losses, 
    and certain ancillary services before CVP generation is available for 
    marketing. The power resources will be further adjusted for 
    transmission losses to the point of delivery. The power resources may 
    also be adjusted for first preference customers, when first preference 
    customers' needs increase, up to the maximum entitlement of first 
    preference customers.
        Western will market part of the 3.65 MW and estimated annual energy 
    generation of 10,000 MWh available from the Washoe Project as part of 
    the Base Resource. The U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and 
    Wildlife Service Lahontan National Fish Hatchery and Marble Bluff Fish 
    Facility are project use loads of the Washoe Project and have first 
    call on those power resources. The generation available after serving 
    the Fish and Wildlife Service needs will be marketed with the CVP power 
    resources. The Washoe Project is subject to the same variability and 
    constraints as the CVP.
        Western will also include any power available from existing power 
    purchase contracts with terms extending beyond 2004 in the Base 
    Resource. Currently, Western has a contract with Enron Power Marketing, 
    Inc., that has a final termination date of December 31, 2014.
        The adjustments and variables discussed above will influence the 
    amount of Base Resource available to customers. During some critically 
    dry months, purchases may be required to meet project use and 
    obligations to first preference customers, and only a minimal amount of 
    Base Resource will be available during such months. The usability of 
    the Base Resource for meeting customers' loads will be directly related 
    to the amount of firming provided by Western and a customer's ability 
    to integrate this power resource into its power resource mix.
    
    III. Products and Services
    
        Western will market its Base Resource alone or in combination with 
    the Optional Purchase and/or Custom Product, which could include 
    purchasing some level of firming power on behalf of all customers, a 
    group of customers, or individual customers. All costs incurred by 
    Western in providing additional services to customers will be paid by 
    those customers using the services. The degree to which Western 
    continues to purchase power will depend on customer requests and 
    Federal authorities. After the effective date of this Marketing Plan, 
    Western will determine, in a collaborative process with the customers, 
    the best use of Western's power and transmission
    
    [[Page 34429]]
    
    resources to provide the Base Resource, Optional Purchase, and Custom 
    Products.
        Each allottee will be allocated a percentage of the Base Resource. 
    All customers will be required to commit to the Base Resource no later 
    than December 31, 2000.
        Upon request, Western will provide a qualified existing customer 
    with the Optional Purchase. Commitments to the Optional Purchase must 
    be made by December 31, 2000. Existing customers requesting the 
    Optional Purchase must commit to the Optional Purchase at the time a 
    commitment is made for the Base Resource, through December 31, 2014.
        Upon request, Western may develop a Custom Product for any 
    customer. A Custom Product may include ancillary services, reserves, 
    etc., or may include Western purchasing additional resources, including 
    firming power, to provide some of these services. Commitments to 
    purchase a Custom Product must be made by December 31, 2002, for a 
    period of no less than 5 years of service, beginning January 1, 2005. 
    Thereafter, the Custom Product will be offered for periods as agreed to 
    by Western.
        Western may extend the commitment dates for the Base Resource, 
    Optional Purchase, and Custom Product if Western determines it is in 
    the best interest of Western and the customers.
        Any unused power resources may be marketed under terms and 
    conditions and for periods of time as determined by Western, and may be 
    marketed outside the primary marketing area.
        Western will establish and manage an exchange program to allow all 
    customers to fully and efficiently use their power allocations. The 
    exchange program will be further developed by Western through a 
    collaborative process with all customers. Specific criteria for the 
    exchange program will be included in electric service contracts. Any 
    power under contract that cannot be used on a real-time basis, due to a 
    customer's load profile, must be offered under this exchange program to 
    Western or other preference customers.
    
    IV. Resource Available to Existing Customers and Resource Pool 
    Allocations
    
        Western will allocate a portion of the Base Resource to existing 
    customers and set aside a portion for new allocations. Effective 
    January 1, 2015, Western will reduce all customers' allocation 
    percentages by up to 2 percent to establish a 2015 Resource Pool. 
    Initially, an existing customer, except first preference customers and 
    the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), will be allocated 96 
    percent of its pro rata share of the Base Resource based on the ratio 
    of the existing customer's extension CRD to the total existing 
    customers' extension CRD. First preference customers are subject to 
    specific legislation and are addressed in Section VI. SMUD will have a 
    specific allocation through 2014 based on a prior settlement agreement.
        Effective January 1, 2015, Western will recalculate the percentages 
    for all existing customers, including SMUD and customers receiving an 
    allocation from the 2005 Resource Pool. Western will derive each 
    customer's new percentage based on the change in SMUD's percentage 
    described later in this section and the reduction for the 2015 Resource 
    Pool. The new percentages will be applicable from 2015 through 2024.
    A. Resource Available to Existing Customers
        Existing customers, excluding SMUD, will have a right to purchase a 
    percentage of the Base Resource based on the ratio of each existing 
    customer's extension CRD to the total of all existing customers' 
    extension CRD, excluding SMUD, under the terms of this section. Current 
    extension CRD are set forth in appendix A. From 2005 through 2014, SMUD 
    will have a right to purchase 360/1,152 of the Base Resource, as 
    referenced in the Settlement Agreement with SMUD, Contract DE-MS65-
    83WP59070, dated April 15, 1983. All other existing customers have a 
    right to purchase the Base Resource amount remaining after Western 
    adjusts it to accommodate SMUD's rights and the 2005 Resource Pool. 
    After 2014, Western will adjust SMUD's right to purchase the Base 
    Resource to reflect the ratio of SMUD's extension CRD to the total of 
    all existing customers' extension CRD. SMUD's right will also be 
    adjusted by 4 percent (2005 Resource Pool adjustment) and up to an 
    additional 2 percent to accommodate the 2015 Resource Pool.
        Due to the diversity among existing customers' loads, including 
    SMUD's load, existing customers' total extension CRD exceeds the 1,152 
    MW referenced in the SMUD Settlement Agreement. This Marketing Plan 
    will result in SMUD receiving a proportionately greater share of the 
    Base Resource than other existing customers if the total extension CRD 
    remains at a level greater than 1,152 MW. Therefore, existing 
    customers, excluding SMUD and first preference customers, have the 
    right to request the Optional Purchase.
        The following extension formulas are used to determine existing 
    customers' purchase rights to the Base Resource. Application of these 
    formulas also determines each existing customer's right to the Optional 
    Purchase. No allocation percentage will be based on an extension CRD 
    greater than an existing customer's load.
        1. For the period 2005 through 2014, existing customers' purchase 
    rights to the CVP resource are calculated as follows:
    
    a. SMUD's purchase right = (360/1,152)  x  BR
    b. Other existing customers' purchase rights = (A/B)  x  ABR
    
    Where:
    
    A = An individual existing customer's extension CRD. Western may adjust 
    ``A'', if Western determines that, as of December 31, 2003, the 
    extension CRD is greater than the existing customer's maximum monthly 
    peak load for the previous 3 years or if the existing customer's 
    extension CRD has been changed from the amount set forth in Appendix A 
    of this Marketing Plan.
    B = The sum of all values for ``A'', excluding SMUD.
    BR = Base Resource.
    ABR = Adjusted Base Resource = {BR--[(360/1,152)  x  BR]}  x  (100%--
    RP%). After 2014, the SMUD adjustment of [(360/1,152)  x  BR] will be 
    deleted.
    RP% = 2005 Resource Pool percentage.
    
        2. Existing customers' rights to the Optional Purchase will be 
    calculated as follows:
    
    Individual existing customer's Optional Purchase = (A/B)  x  TOP
    
    Where:
    
    TOP = Total Optional Purchase = [(360/1,152)--(361/C)]  x  BR  x  
    (100%--RP%).
    C = The sum of all existing customers' extension CRD, including SMUD.
    B. Resource Pool Allocations
        Western will reserve a portion of the power available after 2004 
    for allocation to eligible applicants.
        1. Resource Pool Amount:
        The 2005 Resource Pool consists of up to 4 percent of the power 
    resources available after 2004. Western will also establish a 2015 
    Resource Pool. The 2015 Resource Pool will consist of up to 2 percent 
    of the power resource available after 2014, plus a portion of the 
    resource that becomes available from adjusting SMUD's percentage. That 
    portion will be equal to what SMUD would have been required to 
    contribute to the 2005 Resource Pool. SMUD will also be subject to the 
    2015 Resource Pool adjustment of up to 2 percent.
    
    [[Page 34430]]
    
        Western will, at its discretion, allocate a percentage of the 2005 
    Resource Pool to each applicant that meets the eligibility and 
    allocation criteria. This allocation percentage will be multiplied by 
    the 2005 Resource Pool percentage to determine the applicant's 
    percentage of the Base Resource. Allocations from the 2015 Resource 
    Pool will be determined through a separate public process conducted 
    prior to 2015.
        2. Eligibility Criteria:
        Western will apply the following eligibility criteria to all 
    applicants seeking a resource pool allocation under this Marketing 
    Plan.
        a. Applicants must meet the preference requirements of Reclamation 
    law.
        b. Applicants should be located within Sierra Nevada Region's 
    primary marketing area. If the Sierra Nevada Region's power resources 
    are not fully subscribed, Western may market its resource outside the 
    primary marketing area.
        c. Applicants that require power for their own use must be ready, 
    willing, and able to receive and use Federal power. Federal power shall 
    not be resold to others.
        d. Applicants that provide retail electric service must be ready, 
    willing, and able to receive and use the Federal power to provide 
    electric service to their customers, not for resale to others.
        e. Applicants must submit an application in response to the Call 
    for Resource Pool Applications under a separate Federal Register 
    notice.
        f. Native American applicants must be a Native American tribe as 
    defined in the Indian Self Determination Act of 1975 (25 U.S.C. 450b, 
    as amended).
        g. Existing customers may apply for a resource pool allocation if 
    their extension CRD, set forth in Appendix A, is not more than 15 
    percent of their peak load in the calendar year prior to the Call for 
    Applications, and not more than 10 MW.
        h. Western will normally not allocate power to applicants with 
    loads of less than 1 MW; however, allocations to applicants with loads 
    which are at least 500 kW may be considered, provided the loads can be 
    aggregated with other allottees' loads to schedule and deliver to a 
    minimum load of 1 MW.
        3. Allocation Criteria:
        Western will apply the following allocation criteria to all 
    applicants receiving a resource pool allocation under this Marketing 
    Plan.
        a. Allocations will be made in amounts as determined solely by 
    Western in exercise of its discretion under Reclamation law and 
    considered to be in the best interest of the U.S. Government.
        b. Allocations will be based on the applicant's peak demand during 
    the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications or the amount 
    requested, whichever is less.
        c. An allottee will have the right to purchase power from Western 
    only upon the execution of an electric service contract between Western 
    and the allottee, and satisfaction of all conditions in that contract.
        d. All customers, including those receiving an allocation from the 
    2005 Resource Pool, will be subject to the 2015 Resource Pool 
    adjustment.
        e. Eligible Native American entities will receive greater 
    consideration for an allocation of up to 65 percent of their peak load 
    in the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications.
    
    V. General Criteria and Contract Principles
    
        Western will initially offer existing customers a contract 
    amendment for the right to purchase a percentage of the Base Resource 
    after 2004. After allocations are final, resource pool allottees will 
    be offered a contract to set forth their allocation percentage. In 
    order to finalize the electric service arrangements, new contracts will 
    be offered to new and existing customers subsequent to the date product 
    commitments are required, as set forth in this Marketing Plan. The 
    following criteria and contract principles will apply to all contracts 
    executed under this Marketing Plan, except that certain criteria may 
    not apply to first preference customers' contracts and 2015 Resource 
    Pool allottees' contracts:
        A. Electric service contracts and amendments shall be executed 
    within 6 months of a contract offer, unless otherwise agreed to in 
    writing by Western.
        B. Allocation percentages provided for in this Marketing Plan and 
    the electric service contracts shall be subject to adjustment.
        C. All power supplied by Western will be delivered pursuant to a 
    scheduling arrangement.
        D. All power will be provided on a take-or-pay basis. All costs 
    associated with the products and services provided, including costs 
    associated with ancillary services, Optional Purchases, Custom 
    Products, and transmission will be passed on to the customer(s) using 
    the product or service.
        E. Contract amendments and contracts shall require a written 
    commitment to a percentage of the Base Resource and the Optional 
    Purchase on or before December 31, 2000, and the Custom Product on or 
    before December 31, 2002. Western may extend the final commitment dates 
    for the Base Resource, Custom Product, and Optional Purchase.
        F. Contracts will include a clause specifying criteria that 
    customers must meet on a continuous basis to be eligible to receive 
    electric service from Western.
        G. Upon request, Western shall provide, or assist each new and 
    existing customer in obtaining, transmission arrangements for delivery 
    of power marketed under this Marketing Plan; nonetheless, each entity 
    is ultimately responsible for obtaining its own delivery arrangements 
    to its load. Transmission service over the CVP system will be provided 
    in accordance with Section VII of this Marketing Plan.
        H. Contracts shall provide for Western to furnish electric service 
    effective January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2024.
        I. Specific products and services may be provided for periods of 
    time as agreed to in the electric service contract.
        J. Contracts shall incorporate Western's standard provisions for 
    electric service contracts, integrated resource plans, and General 
    Power Contract Provisions, as determined by Western.
        K. Contracts will include a clause that allows Western to reduce or 
    rescind a customer's allocation percentage, upon 90-days notice, if 
    Western determines that (1) the customer is not using this power to 
    serve its own loads, except as otherwise specified in Section III; or 
    (2) the allocation amounts are consistently greater than the customer's 
    maximum peak load.
        L. Any power not under contract may be allocated at any time, at 
    Western's sole discretion, or sold as deemed appropriate by Western.
        M. Contracts will include a clause providing for Western to adjust 
    the customers' allocation percentage for the 2015 Resource Pool.
        N. Contracts may include a clause providing for alternative funding 
    arrangements, including net billing, bill crediting, reimbursable 
    financing, and advance payment.
    
    VI. First Preference Entitlement and Allocation
    
        The Trinity River Division Act and the New Melones Project 
    provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Acts) specify that 
    contracts for the sale and delivery of the additional electric energy, 
    available from the CVP power system as a result of the construction of 
    the plants authorized by these Acts and their integration into the CVP 
    system,
    
    [[Page 34431]]
    
    shall be made in accordance with preferences expressed in Federal 
    Reclamation laws. These Acts also provide that a first preference of up 
    to 25 percent of the additional energy shall be given, under 
    Reclamation law, to preference customers in the counties of origin 
    (Trinity, Tuolumne, and Calaveras), for use in those counties, who are 
    ready, willing, and able to enter into contracts for the energy.
        To meet the requirements of the Acts, Western published the Final 
    Withdrawal Procedures (51 FR 7702, March 5, 1986). This Marketing Plan 
    supersedes the Final Withdrawal Procedures, or any successor 
    procedures, as of January 1, 2005.
        Western will calculate and allocate the maximum entitlements of 
    first preference customers (MEFPC). The MEFPC is the maximum amount of 
    energy available to first preference customers/entities, in accordance 
    with the following:
        A. The MEFPC will be calculated separately for the New Melones 
    Project, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties, and the Trinity River 
    Division (TRD), Trinity County (first preference projects). To 
    determine the 25 percent of additional energy made available to the CVP 
    as a result of the construction of each of these projects, Western will 
    use the average of the previous 20 years of historical annual 
    generation. The TRD MEFPC includes generation from Trinity, Carr, and 
    Spring Creek Powerplants and a portion of the Keswick Powerplant 
    generation. The MEFPC will be recalculated every 5 years, with the 
    initial recalculation pertaining to this Marketing Plan completed by 
    June 1, 2004.
        B. Upon recalculation, if the MEFPC from a first preference project 
    is 10 percent above or below the currently effective MEFPC from that 
    first preference project, the MEFPC will be adjusted to reflect that 
    increase or decrease. Western will notify affected first preference 
    customers at least 6 months before making an adjustment to the MEFPC. 
    If recalculation reduces the MEFPC to an amount less than the load 
    previously served, Western may, upon request and at its discretion, 
    make purchases necessary to replace that amount of power no longer 
    available. The costs for all such purchases made on behalf of a first 
    preference customer will be passed on to that first preference 
    customer.
        C. An allocation made to a first preference customer/entity under 
    this Marketing Plan will be based on the power requirements of that 
    first preference customer/entity. The sum of allocations of first 
    preference power, including losses, shall not exceed the MEFPC from 
    each first preference project, or a county of origin's share of the 
    MEFPC, except as allowed under Section VI.G below.
        D. Western will work with each first preference customer/entity to 
    identify its power requirements and the best use of its first 
    preference entitlement. Each first preference customer/entity may elect 
    one of the product and service options set forth below. A commitment to 
    one of these options must be made in writing no later than December 31, 
    2002. If a commitment is not made by December 31, 2002, the full 
    requirements option will be deemed chosen.
        Under each option, the first preference customer will be 
    responsible for transformation and transmission losses to the first 
    preference customer delivery point. Transmission losses shall include 
    losses for CVP transmission and third-party transmission.
        1. Full Requirements: Western will provide the first preference 
    customer with its full power requirements (capacity and energy) up to 
    its right to the MEFPC at the Base Resource rate. If there is more than 
    one first preference customer in a county of origin, or a first 
    preference entity in that county makes a request for power, Western 
    reserves the right to establish a maximum amount of power available to 
    each first preference customer from the MEFPC. Payment under this 
    option will be based on usage.
        2. Percentage: Western will determine the allocation percentage in 
    a manner similar to that of the other customers receiving a power 
    allocation. The first preference customer's maximum demand during the 
    previous 4 years will be used in determining an allocation percentage 
    of the power resource under this option. Power will be provided on a 
    take-or-pay basis under this option. The following will apply to each 
    first preference customer selecting this percentage option.
        a. First preference customers will not be subject to adjustments 
    for the resource pool or the SMUD settlement, and will not be eligible 
    for the Optional Purchase. Under this option, first preference 
    customers are eligible for the Custom Product as defined in Section 
    III.
        b. The allocation percentage made available to each first 
    preference customer under this Marketing Plan will be applied to the 
    power resources which have been adjusted for project use.
        c. First preference customers will have the opportunity to have 
    their allocation percentage adjusted, as agreed to by Western. 
    Increases, up to a first preference customer's share of the MEFPC, will 
    require a written notice 7 months in advance of the first day of the 
    month in which the increase is requested to become effective. 
    Justification for the increase must accompany the request.
        E. A first preference entity may exercise its right to use a 
    portion of the MEFPC by providing written notice to Western at least 18 
    months prior to the anniversary date of the first preference project 
    located in its county. The anniversary date is the successive fifth 
    year anniversary of the date the Secretary of the Interior declared the 
    availability of power from the powerplants in the counties of origin. 
    New applications for service to begin on January 1, 2005, under this 
    Marketing Plan must be received 18 months prior to January 1, 2002 
    (i.e., July 1, 2000) for Trinity County and 18 months prior to April 5, 
    2002 (i.e., October 5, 2000) for Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties. Other 
    anniversary years applicable to this Marketing Plan are 2007, 2012, 
    2017, and 2022.
        F. If the request of a first preference customer/entity for power, 
    including adjustment for losses, is greater than the remaining MEFPC 
    from that county's first preference project, then Western will allocate 
    the remaining MEFPC to the first preference customer/entity first 
    making a request for a power allocation or a justified increase in its 
    allocation percentage.
        G. Power allocated to first preference customers/entities in 
    Tuolumne and Calaveras Counties will be subject to the following 
    additional conditions:
        1. Tuolumne and Calaveras Counties shall each be entitled to one-
    half of the New Melones Project MEFPC.
        2. If first preference customers in either Tuolumne County or 
    Calaveras County are not using their county's full one-half share, and 
    a first preference customer/entity in the other county requests power 
    in an amount exceeding that county's one-half share, then Western will 
    allocate the unused power, on a withdrawable basis, to the requesting 
    first preference customer/entity. Such power may be withdrawn for use 
    by a first preference customer/entity in the county not using its full 
    one-half share upon 6-months written notice from Western.
        H. Trinity Public Utilities District is currently the sole 
    recipient of the TRD's first preference rights.
        I. Transmission service will be provided in accordance with 
    applicable laws and Section VII of this Marketing Plan.
    
    [[Page 34432]]
    
        J. For planning purposes, first preference customers may be 
    required to provide forecasts and other information required by Western 
    as set forth in the electric service contract.
        K. The general criteria and contract principles set forth in 
    Sections V.A through C, F through L, and N of this Marketing Plan will 
    apply to first preference customers.
    
    VII. Transmission Service
    
        Western will provide bundled or unbundled transmission services as 
    appropriate in conjunction with its power sales in a manner consistent 
    with FERC Orders, legislated mandates, or California ISO Agreements, as 
    appropriate. Western will determine the use of its transmission 
    resources concurrently with further development of the products and 
    services under this Marketing Plan. Specific terms and conditions for 
    transmission will be provided for in future service agreements.
    
        Dated: June 10, 1999.
    Michael S. Hacskaylo,
    Administrator.
    
    Appendix A
    
        This Appendix lists the existing customers' CRD amounts and 
    extension percentages as of May 1, 1999. Final percentages will be 
    available after December 31, 2003.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                       Extension CRD
                                                                                       (CRD \1\ \2\    Percentage of
                           Existing customers                          CRD \1\ (kW)    less excluded   base resource
                                                                                         types of       (2005-2014)
                                                                                        power) \3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(kW)---------------------
    Air Force--Beale................................................          21,575          21,575         1.42461
    Air Force--McClellan \4\........................................          12,000          12,000         0.79237
    Air Force--Onizuka \4\..........................................           1,500           1,500         0.09905
    Air Force--Travis...............................................          12,651          12,651         0.83535
    Air Force--Travis/David Grant Medical Center \4\................           4,000           4,000         0.26412
    Air Force--Travis Wherry Housing................................           1,400           1,400         0.09244
    Alameda, City of \5\............................................          21,145          21,145         1.39622
    Arvin-Edison Water Storage District.............................          30,000          30,000         1.98092
    Avenal, City of.................................................             622             622         0.04107
    Banta-Carbona Irrigation District...............................           3,700           3,700         0.24431
    Bay Area Rapid Transit District.................................           4,000           4,000         0.26412
    Biggs, City of..................................................           4,200           4,200         0.27733
    Broadview Water District........................................             500             500         0.03302
    Byron-Bethany Irrigation District...............................           2,200           2,200         0.14527
    Calaveras Public Power Agency...................................           8,000  ..............  ..............
    California State University, Sacramento--Nimbus.................              40              40         0.00264
    Cawelo Water District...........................................             500             500         0.03302
    Corrections--California State Prison--Sacramento................           2,300           2,300         0.15187
    Corrections--Deuel Vocational Institute.........................           1,700           1,700         0.11225
    Corrections--Northern California Youth Center...................           1,700           1,700         0.11225
    Corrections--Sierra Conservation Center.........................           3,000  ..............  ..............
    Corrections--Vacaville Medical Facility.........................           1,800           1,800         0.11886
    Defense Logistics Agency--Sharpe Facility.......................           4,000           4,000         0.26412
    Defense Logistics Agency--Tracy Facility........................           3,800           3,800         0.25092
    East Bay Municipal Utility District \5\.........................           1,965           1,965         0.12975
    East Contra Costa Irrigation District...........................           2,500           2,500         0.16508
    Eastside Power Authority \5\....................................           2,961           2,961         0.19552
    Energy--Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory...................           9,000           9,000         0.59428
    Energy--Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory..................          44,711          44,711         2.95229
    Energy--Lawrence Livermore, Site 300............................           2,000           2,000         0.13206
    Energy--Stanford Linear Accelerator Center......................          21,903          12,903         0.85199
    Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District................................           3,343           3,343         0.22074
    Gridley, City of................................................           9,400           9,400         0.62069
    Healdsburg, City of \5\.........................................           3,241           3,241         0.21401
    James Irrigation District \5\...................................             987             987         0.06517
    Kern-Tulare Water District \5\..................................             987             987         0.06517
    Lassen Municipal Utility District...............................           3,000           3,000         0.19809
    Lodi, City of \5\...............................................          13,236          13,236         0.87398
    Lompoc, City of \5\.............................................           5,197           5,197         0.34316
    Lower Tule River Irrigation District \5\........................           1,965           1,965         0.12975
    Merced Irrigation District \4\..................................           5,000           5,000         0.33015
    Modesto Irrigation District \5\.................................          10,805          10,805         0.71346
    NASA--Ames Research Center......................................          80,000          80,000         5.28245
    NASA--Moffett Federal Airfield \4\..............................           5,009           5,009         0.33075
    Navy--Naval Weapons Station, Concord \4\........................           2,898           2,898         0.19136
    Navy--Naval Radio Station, Dixon................................             915             915         0.06042
    Navy--Naval Air Station, Lemoore \4\............................          23,000          23,000         1.51870
    Navy--Naval Communications Station, Stockton....................           3,700           3,700         0.24431
    Oakland Army Base...............................................           2,275           2,275         0.15022
    Oakland, Port of \4\............................................           1,000           1,000         0.06603
    Palo Alto, City of..............................................         175,000         175,000        11.55535
    Parks & Recreation, California Department of....................             100             100         0.00660
    Parks Reserve Forces Training Area..............................             500             500         0.03302
    Patterson Water District........................................           2,000           2,000         0.13206
    Pittsburg Power Company \4\.....................................           5,000           5,000         0.33015
    Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative........................          25,000          25,000         1.65076
    
    [[Page 34433]]
    
     
    Provident Irrigation District...................................             750             750         0.04952
    Rag Gulch Water District........................................             500             500         0.03302
    Reclamation District 2035.......................................           1,600           1,600         0.10565
    Redding, City of................................................         116,000         116,000         7.65955
    Roseville, City of..............................................          69,000          69,000         4.55611
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District \7\.......................         361,000         361,000        31.25000
    Sacramento Municipal Utility District...........................         100,000  ..............  ..............
    San Francisco, City and County of \4\...........................           2,600           2,600         0.17168
    San Juan Water District.........................................           1,000           1,000         0.06603
    San Luis Water District.........................................           6,650           6,650         0.43910
    Santa Clara Valley Water District \5\...........................             987             987         0.06517
    Shasta Lake, City of............................................          11,450          11,450         0.75605
    Silicon Valley Power............................................         216,532         136,532         9.01529
    Sonoma County Water Agency......................................           1,500           1,500         0.09905
    Trinity Public Utilities District...............................          17,000  ..............  ..............
    Tuolumne Public Power Agency....................................           7,000  ..............  ..............
    Turlock Irrigation District \5\.................................           3,941           3,941         0.26023
    Ukiah, City of \5\..............................................           8,773           8,773         0.57929
    University of California, Davis.................................          14,682          14,682         0.96946
    West Side Irrigation District...................................           2,000           2,000         0.13206
    West Stanislaus Irrigation District.............................           5,200           5,200         0.34336
    Westlands Water District \5\....................................          21,441          21,441         1.41576
    2005 Resource Pool \6\..........................................  ..............  ..............         2.75000
                                                                     -----------------------------------------------
        Total.......................................................       1,584,537       1,360,537      100.00000
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Notes:
    \1\ CRD temporarily laid off and temporarily allocated to other existing customers is reflected in this Appendix
      A, under both CRD and extension CRD, as being returned to the existing customer who received the original
      allocation.
    \2\ Western will reduce the extension CRD if Western determines that, as of December 31, 2003, the extension CRD
      is greater than the existing customer's load.
    \3\ Exclusions are diversity, curtailable, and first preference power; and peaking and excess capacity.
    \4\ These extension CRD could be adjusted as a result of the NDA Act procedures. Also, new NDA Act customers
      could be added through November 30, 2003.
    \5\ Westlands Water District has a right to 50 MW through December 31, 2004. Certain existing customers have
      been allocated a portion of the 50 MW, subject to withdrawal for use by Westlands Water District. Allocation
      percentages effective after December 31, 2004, will be adjusted to reflect changes made as a result of
      Westlands Water District's use and withdrawals, in accordance with Section IV.A.1.b.
    \6\ The 4 percent 2005 Resource Pool is adjusted for SMUD's non-participation due to the Settlement Agreement.
    \7\ 31.25 percent reflects the 360/1,152 ratio in the SMUD Settlement Agreement. After December 31, 2014, SMUD's
      percentage will be based on its extension CRD.
    
    [FR Doc. 99-16018 Filed 6-24-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/26/1999
Published:
06/25/1999
Department:
Western Area Power Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of the final 2004 Power Marketing Plan.
Document Number:
99-16018
Dates:
The Marketing Plan will become effective July 26, 1999.
Pages:
34417-34433 (17 pages)
PDF File:
99-16018.pdf