99-16238. Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 34237-34243]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-16238]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [PF-788A and PF-848A; FRL-6076-9]
    
    
    Notice of Filing of Pesticide Petitions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the amendment of pesticide petitions 
    1F3989, and 7F4900, proposing the
    
    [[Page 34238]]
    
    establishment of regulations for residues of certain pesticide 
    chemicals in or on various food commodities.
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-788A, and 
    PF-848A, must be received on or before July 26, 1999.
    ADDRESSES: By mail submit written comments to: Information and Records 
    Integrity Branch, Public Information and Services Divison (7502C), 
    Office of Pesticides Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person bring comments to: Rm. 119, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by following 
    the instructions under ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.'' No confidential 
    business information should be submitted through e-mail.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 119 at the 
    address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Giles-Parker, Registration 
    Support Branch, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Rm. 
    247, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 
    22202, (703) 305-7740; e-mail: giles-parker.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received a pesticide petition as 
    follows proposing the establishment and/or amendment of regulations for 
    residues of certain pesticide chemical in or on various food 
    commodities under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Comestic 
    Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that this petition 
    contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in 
    section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency 
    of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports 
    granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA 
    rules on the petition.
        The official record for this notice of filing, as well as the 
    public version, has been established for this notice of filing under 
    docket control number [PF-788A], and [PF-848A] (including comments and 
    data submitted electronically as described below). A public version of 
    this record, including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, 
    which does not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for 
    inspection from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
    legal holidays. The official record is located at the address in 
    ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comment and data 
    will also be accepted on disks in Wordperfect 5.1/6.1 file format or 
    ASCII file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be 
    identified by the docket control number (PF-788A), and (PF-848A) and 
    appropriate petition number. Electronic comments on this notice may be 
    filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Food additives, 
    Feed additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Dated: June 9, 1999.
    
    James Jones,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    Summary of Petition
    
        The petitioner summary of the pesticide petition is printed below 
    as required by section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA. The summary of the 
    petition was prepared by the petitioner and represents the views of the 
    petitioner. EPA is publishing the petition summaries verbatim without 
    editing them in any way. The petition summary announces the 
    availability of a description of the analytical methods available to 
    EPA for the detection and measurement of the pesticide chemical 
    residues or an explanation of why no such method is needed.
    
    Rohm and Haas Company
    
    PP 1F3989 and 7F4900
    
    Amended Petitions
    
        In the Federal Registers of January 30, 1998 (63 FR 4631) (FRL-
    5766-2), and December 7, 1998 (63 FR 67476) (FRL-6047-2), EPA issued a 
    notice of filing announcing that it had received pesticide petitions 
    (PP) 1F3989, and 7F4900 from Rohm and Haas Company, 100 Independence 
    Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-2399, pursuant to section 408(d) of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d) 
    proposing to amend 40 CFR part 180. In petition 1F3989, Rohm and Haas 
    Company proposed among other things, to establish a time-limited 
    tolerance for residues of fenbuconazole (-(2-[4-chlorophenyl]-
    ethyl)--phenyl-3-(1H-1,2,4-triazole)-1-propanenitrile] in or 
    on stone fruits (except plums and prunes) at 2.0 ppm. In petition 
    7F4900, Rohm and Haas Company proposed, among other things, to 
    establish permanent tolerances for fenbuconazole in or on grapefruit at 
    1.0 ppm, citrus oil (grapefruit) at 35.0 ppm, and grapefruit pulp, 
    dried at 4.0 ppm.
        Today's notice of filing announces the receipt of pesticide 
    petitions from Rohm and Haas Company proposing to amend PP 1F3989 and 
    7F4900 by establishing tolerances for residues of fenbuconazole 
    (-(2-[4-chlorophenyl]-ethyl)--phenyl-3-(1H-1,2,4-
    triazole)-1-propanenitrile] plus RH-9129 and RH-9130, the 
    diastereomeric lactone metabolites of fenbuconazole [5-(4-
    chlorophenyl)-dihydro-3-phenyl-3-(methyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-yl)-2-3H-
    furanone) in or on the raw agricultural commodities plums at 2.0 parts 
    per million (ppm), plums, dried (prunes) at 7.0 ppm (PP 1F3989), and 
    for oranges at 1.0 ppm, orange, dry pulp at 4.0 ppm, and orange, citrus 
    oil at 16 ppm (7F4900). EPA has determined that the petition contains 
    data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 
    408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the 
    sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data 
    support granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before 
    EPA rules on the petition.
    
    A. Residue Chemistry
    
        1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of fenbuconazole in plants 
    (wheat, peaches, and sugar beets) is adequately understood for the 
    purpose of these tolerances. The metabolism of fenbuconazole in all 
    crops was similar and involves oxidation of the benzylic position alpha 
    to the chlorophenyl ring. The metabolites which result from this
    
    [[Page 34239]]
    
    path are the benzylic alcohols and their conjugates, including sulfates 
    and glucuronides, the iminolactones, the lactones, and the ketoacid, 
    all resulting from intramolecular cyclization. A second pathway is 
    oxidation of the unchlorinated ring to produce the 3- and 4-phenols and 
    their conjugates. Combinations of the above two pathways produce 
    phenol-lactones and their conjugates. A third pathway is cleavage of 
    the triazole moiety, which produces free triazole and its conjugates.
        2. Analytical method. An adequate enforcement method is available 
    to enforce the established and proposed tolerances. Quantitation of 
    fenbuconazole residues (parent plus lactones) at an analytical 
    sensitivity of 0.01 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) is accomplished by 
    soxhlet extraction of samples in methanol, partitioning into methylene 
    chloride, redissolving in toluene, clean up on silica gel, and gas 
    liquid chromatography using nitrogen specific thermionic detection.
        3. Magnitude of residues. Field residue trials were conducted with 
    an aqueous flowable formulation of fenbuconazole in geographically 
    representative regions of the United States. The results from these 
    studies support the proposed tolerances, and clearly indicate that the 
    lactone metabolites (RH-9129 and RH-9130) are minor contributors to the 
    total residue.
        i. Oranges. A total of 16 field residue trials were conducted in 
    oranges. Three applications were made at 0.25 pounds active ingredient/
    acre (lb ai/A), twice the maximum use rate of 0.125 lb ai/A, and whole 
    fruit was harvested on the same day as the last application. The 
    highest field residue value in whole fruit was 0.752 ppm. The average 
    field residue value in whole fruit was 0.276 ppm. The highest field 
    residue value in the edible pulp from five field trials was 0.0104 ppm. 
    The average field residue value in pulp was 0.005 ppm. Residues were 
    measured in orange process fractions including, juice, dried pulp, and 
    cold press (citrus) oil. In the processing study, three applications 
    were made at 0.25 lb ai/A, twice the maximum use rate of 0.125 lb ai/A, 
    and the fruit were harvested seven days after the last application. 
    Fruit was processed into multiple components. No residues (<0.01 ppm)="" were="" detected="" in="" juice,="" thus="" were="" was="" no="" concentration="" of="" residues="" in="" fresh="" juice.="" the="" average="" residues="" in="" dried="" pulp="" (cattle="" feed)="" and="" citrus="" oil="" (defined="" as="" a="" non-ready-to-eat="" processed="" commodity)="" were="" 4.1-="" and="" 32.1-times="" the="" amount="" of="" residues="" in="" fresh="" oranges,="" respectively.="" ii.="" plums.="" a="" total="" of="" 10="" field="" residue="" trials="" were="" conducted="" in="" plums.="" six="" to="" nine="" applications="" were="" made="" at="" the="" maximum="" use="" rate="" of="" 0.1="" lb="" ai/a,="" and="" whole="" fruit="" was="" harvested="" on="" the="" same="" day="" as="" the="" last="" application.="" the="" highest="" field="" residue="" value="" in="" whole="" fruit="" was="" 0.315="" ppm;="" the="" next="" highest="" field="" residue="" value="" was="" 0.071="" ppm.="" the="" average="" field="" residue="" value="" in="" whole="" fruit="" was="" 0.062="" ppm.="" residues="" were="" measured="" in="" dried="" plums="" (prunes)="" in="" three="" residue="" trials.="" six="" applications="" were="" made="" at="" the="" maximum="" use="" rate="" of="" 0.1="" lb="" ai/a,="" and="" whole="" fruit="" was="" harvested="" on="" the="" same="" day="" as="" the="" last="" application.="" dried="" plums="" contained="" residues="" of="" 0.0244,="" 0.04,="" and="" 0.139="" ppm.="" b.="" toxicological="" profile="" 1.="" acute="" toxicity.="" fenbuconazole="" is="" practically="" non-toxic="" after="" administration="" by="" the="" oral="" and="" dermal="" routes,="" and="" was="" not="" significantly="" toxic="" to="" rats="" after="" a="" 4-hour="" inhalation="" exposure.="" fenbuconazole="" is="" classified="" as="" not="" irritating="" to="" skin="" and="" inconsequentially="" irritating="" to="" the="" eyes.="" it="" is="" not="" a="" skin="" sensitizer.="" 2.="" genotoxicity.="" fenbuconazole="" was="" negative="" (non-mutagenic)="" in="" an="" ames="" assay="" with="" and="" without="" hepatic="" enzyme="" activation.="" fenbuconazole="" was="" negative="" in="" a="" hypoxanthine="" guanine="" phosphoribosyl="" transferase="" (hgprt)="" gene="" mutation="" assay="" using="" chinese="" hamster="" ovary="" (cho)="" cells="" in="" culture="" when="" tested="" with="" and="" without="" hepatic="" enzyme="" activation.="" in="" isolated="" rat="" hepatocytes,="" fenbuconazole="" did="" not="" induce="" unscheduled="" dna="" synthesis="" (uds)="" or="" repair.="" fenbuconazole="" did="" not="" produce="" chromosome="" effects="" in="" rats="" in="" vivo.="" on="" the="" basis="" of="" the="" results="" from="" this="" battery="" of="" tests,="" it="" is="" concluded="" that="" fenbuconazole="" is="" not="" mutagenic="" or="" genotoxic.="" 3.="" reproductive="" and="" developmental="" toxicity--i.="" rat="" developmental="" toxicity.="" in="" the="" developmental="" study="" in="" rats,="" the="" maternal="" (systemic)="" no-observed="" adverse="" effect="" level="" (noael)="" was="" 30="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" decreases="" in="" body="" weight="" (bwt)="" and="" body="" weight="" gain="" at="" the="" lowest-="" observed="" adverse="" effect="" level="" (loael)="" of="" 75="" mg/kg/day.="" the="" developmental="" (fetal)="" noael="" was="" 30="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" an="" increase="" in="" post="" implantation="" loss="" and="" a="" significant="" decrease="" in="" the="" number="" of="" live="" fetuses="" per="" dam="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 75="" mg/kg/day.="" ii.="" rabbit="" developmental="" toxicity.="" in="" the="" developmental="" study="" in="" rabbits,="" the="" maternal="" (systemic)="" noael="" was="" 10="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" decreased="" bwt="" gain="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 30="" mg/kg/day.="" the="" developmental="" (fetal)="" noael="" was="" 30="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" increased="" resorptions="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 60="" mg/kg/day.="" iii.="" rat="" reproduction.="" in="" the="" 2-generation="" reproduction="" toxicity="" study="" in="" rats,="" the="" maternal="" (systemic)="" noael="" was="" 4="" mg/kg/day="" based="" on="" decreased="" bwt="" and="" food="" consumption,="" increased="" number="" of="" dams="" delivering="" nonviable="" offspring,="" and="" increases="" in="" adrenal="" and="" thyroid="" weights="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 40="" mg/kg/day.="" the="" reproductive="" (pup)="" noael="" was="" 40="" mg/kg/="" day,="" the="" highest="" dose="" tested="" (hdt).="" 4.="" subchronic="" toxicity--i.="" rat="" 90-day="" oral="" study.="" a="" subchronic="" feeding="" study="" in="" rats="" conducted="" for="" 13-weeks="" resulted="" in="" a="" noael="" of="" 20="" ppm="" (1.3="" and="" 1.5="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively).="" minimal="" liver="" hypertrophy="" was="" observed="" in="" males="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 80="" ppm.="" increased="" liver="" weight,="" hepatic="" hypertrophy,="" thyroid="" hypertrophy,="" and="" decreased="" bwt="" were="" observed="" at="" the="" higher="" doses="" (400="" and="" 1,600="" ppm).="" ii.="" mouse="" 90-day="" oral="" study.="" a="" subchronic="" feeding="" study="" in="" mice="" conducted="" for="" 13-weeks="" resulted="" in="" a="" noael="" of="" 60="" ppm="" (11.1="" and="" 17.6="" mg/="" kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively).="" increased="" liver="" weight,="" hypertrophy="" in="" the="" liver="" (males),="" and="" increases="" in="" clinical="" chemistry="" parameters="" (males)="" were="" observed="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 180="" ppm.="" these="" effects="" were="" all="" observed="" in="" females="" at="" 540="" ppm="" in="" addition="" to="" males.="" iii.="" dog="" 90-day="" oral="" study.="" a="" subchronic="" feeding="" study="" in="" dogs="" conducted="" for="" 13-weeks="" resulted="" in="" a="" noael="" of="" 100="" ppm="" (3.3="" and="" 3.5="" mg/="" kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively).="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 400="" ppm,="" increased="" liver="" weight,="" clinical="" chemistry="" parameters,="" and="" liver="" hypertrophy="" (males)="" were="" observed.="" iv.="" rat="" 4-week="" dermal="" study.="" in="" a="" 21-day="" dermal="" toxicity="" study="" in="" the="" rat,="" the="" noael="" was="" greater="" than="" 1,000="" mg/kg/day,="" with="" no="" effects="" seen="" at="" this="" limit="" dose.="" 5.="" chronic="" toxicity--i.="" dog.="" a="" 1-year="" feeding="" study="" in="" dogs="" resulted="" in="" a="" noael="" of="" 15="" ppm="" (0.62="" mg/kg/day)="" for="" females="" and="" 150="" ppm="" (5.2="" mg/kg/day)="" for="" males.="" decreased="" bwt,="" increased="" liver="" weight,="" liver="" hypertrophy,="" and="" pigment="" in="" the="" liver="" were="" observed="" at="" the="" loael="" of="" 150="" and="" 1,200="" ppm="" in="" females="" and="" males,="" respectively.="" ii.="" mouse.="" a="" 78-week="" chronic/oncogenicity="" study="" was="" conducted="" in="" male="" and="" female="" mice="" at="" 0,="" 10,="" 200="" (males="" only),="" 650,="" and="" 1,300="" ppm="" (females="" only).="" the="" noael="" was="" 10="" ppm="" (1.4="" mg/kg/day),="" and="" the="" loael="" was="" 200="" ppm="" (26.3="" mg/kg/day)="" for="" males="" and="" 650="" ppm="" (104.6="" mg/kg/day)="" for="" females="" based="" on="" increased="" liver="" weight="" and="" [[page="" 34240]]="" histopathological="" effects="" on="" the="" liver,="" which="" were="" consistent="" with="" chronic="" enzyme="" induction.="" there="" was="" no="" statistically="" significant="" increase="" of="" any="" tumor="" type="" in="" males,="" however,="" there="" was="" a="" statistically="" significant="" increase="" in="" combined="" liver="" adenomas="" and="" carcinomas="" in="" females="" at="" the="" high="" dose="" only="" (1,300="" ppm;="" 208.8="" mg/kg/day).="" there="" were="" no="" liver="" tumors="" in="" the="" control="" females,="" and="" liver="" tumor="" incidences="" in="" treated="" females="" just="" exceeded="" the="" historical="" control="" range.="" in="" ancillary="" mode-of-action="" studies="" in="" female="" mice,="" the="" increased="" tumor="" incidence="" was="" associated="" with="" changes="" in="" several="" parameters="" in="" mouse="" liver="" following="" high="" doses="" of="" fenbuconazole,="" including="" an="" increase="" in="" p450="" enzymes="" (predominately="" of="" the="" cyp="" 2b="" type),="" an="" increase="" in="" cell="" proliferation,="" an="" increase="" in="" hepatocyte="" hypertrophy,="" and="" an="" increase="" in="" liver="" weight.="" changes="" in="" these="" liver="" parameters="" as="" well="" as="" the="" occurrence="" of="" the="" low="" incidence="" of="" liver="" tumors="" were="" non-linear="" with="" respect="" to="" dose="" (i.e.,="" were="" observed="" only="" at="" high="" dietary="" doses="" of="" fenbuconazole).="" similar="" findings="" have="" been="" shown="" with="" several="" pharmaceuticals,="" including="" phenobarbital="" which="" is="" not="" carcinogenic="" in="" humans.="" the="" non-linear="" dose="" response="" relationship="" observed="" with="" respect="" to="" liver="" changes="" (including="" the="" low="" incidence="" of="" tumors)="" in="" the="" mouse="" indicates="" that="" these="" findings="" should="" be="" carefully="" considered="" in="" deciding="" the="" relevance="" of="" high-dose="" animal="" tumors="" to="" human="" dietary="" exposure.="" iii.="" rat.="" a="" 24-month="" chronic/oncogenicity="" study="" in="" male="" and="" female="" rats="" was="" conducted="" at="" 0,="" 8,="" 80,="" and="" 800="" ppm="" fenbuconazole,="" and="" a="" second="" 24-month="" chronic/oncogenicity="" was="" conducted="" in="" male="" rats="" at="" 0,="" 800,="" and="" 1,600="" ppm.="" the="" noael="" was="" 80="" ppm="" (3="" and="" 4="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively),="" and="" the="" loael="" was="" 800="" ppm="" (31="" and="" 43="" mg/kg/day="" in="" males="" and="" females,="" respectively)="" based="" on="" decreased="" bwt,="" increased="" liver="" and="" thyroid="" weights,="" and="" liver="" and="" thyroid="" hypertrophy.="" fenbuconazole="" produced="" a="" minimal="" but="" statistically="" significant="" increase="" in="" the="" incidence="" of="" combined="" thyroid="" follicular="" cell="" benign="" and="" malignant="" tumors.="" these="" findings="" occurred="" only="" in="" male="" rats="" following="" life-time="" ingestion="" of="" very="" high="" levels="" (800="" and="" 1,600="" ppm="" in="" the="" diet)="" of="" fenbuconazole.="" ancillary="" mode-of-action="" studies="" demonstrated="" that="" the="" increased="" incidence="" of="" thyroid="" tumors="" was="" secondary="" to="" increased="" liver="" metabolism="" and="" biliary="" excretion="" of="" thyroid="" hormone="" in="" the="" rat.="" this="" mode="" of="" action="" is="" a="" non-linear="" phenomenon="" in="" that="" thyroid="" tumors="" occur="" only="" at="" high="" doses="" where="" there="" is="" an="" increase="" in="" liver="" weight="" and="" metabolic="" capacity="" of="" the="" liver.="" at="" lower="" doses="" of="" fenbuconazole="" in="" rats,="" the="" liver="" is="" unaffected="" and="" there="" is="" no="" occurrence="" of="" the="" secondary="" thyroid="" tumors.="" worst-case="" estimates="" of="" dietary="" intake="" of="" fenbuconazole="" in="" human="" adults="" and="" children="" indicate="" effects="" on="" the="" liver="" or="" thyroid,="" including="" thyroid="" tumors,="" will="" not="" occur,="" and="" that="" there="" is="" a="" reasonable="" certainty="" of="" no="" harm.="" in="" support="" of="" the="" findings="" above,="" epa's="" science="" advisory="" board="" has="" approved="" a="" final="" thyroid="" tumor="" policy,="" confirming="" that="" it="" is="" reasonable="" to="" regulate="" chemicals="" on="" the="" basis="" that="" there="" exists="" a="" threshold="" level="" for="" thyroid="" tumor="" formation,="" conditional="" upon="" providing="" plausible="" evidence="" that="" a="" secondary="" mode="" of="" action="" is="" operative.="" this="" decision="" supports="" a="" widely-held="" and="" internationally="" respected="" scientific="" position.="" the="" reference="" dose="" (rfd)="" of="" 0.03="" mg/kg/day="" was="" established="" by="" the="" agency="" based="" on="" the="" noael="" of="" 3.0="" mg/kg/day="" in="" the="" chronic="" rat="" feeding="" study="" and="" an="" uncertainty="" factor="" of="" 100.="" the="" carcinogenicity="" peer="" review="" committee="" (cprc)="" of="" the="" health="" effects="" division="" (hed)="" of="" epa="" has="" classified="" fenbuconazole="" as="" a="" group="" c="" tumorigen="" (possible="" human="" carcinogen="" with="" limited="" evidence="" of="" carcinogenicity="" in="" animals).="" the="" committee="" has="" decided="" that="" it="" is="" appropriate="" to="" use="" a="" low-dose="" extrapolation="" model="" based="" on="" the="" mouse="" data="" with="" the="">1* of 0.359 x 10-2 (mg/kg/
    day)-1 and surface area estimated by (bwt)3/4. 
    All estimates of dietary oncogenic risk are based on this risk factor.
        6. Animal metabolism. The absorption, distribution, excretion, and 
    metabolism of fenbuconazole in rats, goats, and hens were investigated. 
    Following oral administration, fenbuconazole was completely and rapidly 
    absorbed, extensively metabolized by oxidation/hydroxylation and 
    conjugation, and rapidly and essentially completely excreted 
    predominately in the feces. Fenbuconazole did not accumulate in 
    tissues.
        7. Metabolite toxicology. Common metabolic pathways for 
    fenbuconazole have been identified in both plants (wheat, peaches, and 
    sugar beets) and animals (rat, goat, and hen). The metabolic pathway 
    common to both plants and animals involves oxidation of the benzylic 
    position alpha to the chlorophenyl ring. The metabolites which result 
    from this path are the benzylic alcohols and their conjugates, 
    including sulfates and glucuronides, the iminolactones, the lactones, 
    and the ketoacid, all resulting from intramolecular cyclization. A 
    second pathway is oxidation of the unchlorinated ring to produce the 3- 
    and 4-phenols and their conjugates. Combinations of the above two 
    pathways produce phenol-lactones and their conjugates. A third pathway 
    is cleavage of the triazole moiety, which produces free triazole and 
    its conjugates. Extensive degradation and elimination of polar 
    metabolites occurs in animals such that residues are unlikely to 
    accumulate in humans or animals exposed to these residues through the 
    diet.
        8. Endocrine disruption. The mammalian endocrine system includes 
    estrogen and androgens as well as other hormonal systems. Fenbuconazole 
    is not known to interfere with reproductive hormones; thus, 
    fenbuconazole should not be considered to be estrogenic or androgenic. 
    There are no known instances of proven or alleged adverse reproductive 
    or developmental effects to people, domestic animals, or wildlife as a 
    result of exposure to fenbuconazole or its residues.
    
    C. Aggregate Exposure
    
        1. Dietary exposure--i. Food. Permanent tolerances have been 
    established (40 CFR 180.480) or proposed for the residues of 
    fenbuconazole in or on a variety of raw agricultural commodities:
    
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Commodity                         Tolerance (ppm)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Almond nutmeat......................                         0.05 (P)\1\
    Almond hulls........................                             3.0 (P)
    Apples..............................                             0.4 (P)
    Apple pomace, wet...................                             1.0 (P)
    Banana (whole fruit)................                                 4.0
    Banana (pulp).......................                                0.05
    
    [[Page 34241]]
    
     
    Blueberry...........................                             0.3 (P)
    Cattle, fat.........................                         0.05 (P)\3\
    Cattle, liver.......................                          0.1 (P)\4\
    Citrus oil (grapefruit).............                            35.0 (P)
    Grapefruit..........................                             1.0 (P)
    Grapefruit juice....................                                N/R2
    Molasses (beet).....................                              0.4\5\
    Pecans..............................                                 0.1
    Pulp, dried (beet)..................                                 1.0
    Pulp, dry (grapefruit)..............                             4.0 (P)
    Refined sugar.......................                                N/R2
    Stone Fruit (except plum/prune).....                                 2.0
    Sugar beet (root)...................                             0.2 (P)
    Sugar beet (top)....................                             9.0 (P)
    Wheat (grain).......................                            0.05 (P)
    Wheat (straw).......................                            10.0 (P)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ (P): Proposed tolerance;
    \2\ Tolerance not required because concentration factor is < 1="" in="" processing="" study;="" \3\="" an="" identical="" tolerance="" is="" pending="" for="" fat="" in="" poultry,="" hogs,="" horses,="" sheep,="" and="" goats;="" \4\="" an="" identical="" tolerance="" is="" pending="" for="" liver="" in="" poultry,="" hogs,="" horses,="" sheep,="" and="" goats;="" \5\="" for="" livestock="" feed;="" not="" a="" human="" dietary="" component.="" risk="" assessments="" were="" conducted="" by="" rohm="" and="" haas="" to="" assess="" dietary="" exposures="" and="" risks="" from="" fenbuconazole="" as="" follows:="" a.="" acute="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" no="" acute="" endpoint="" was="" identified="" for="" fenbuconazole,="" and="" no="" acute="" risk="" assessment="" is="" required.="" b.="" chronic="" exposure="" and="" risk.="" risk="" associated="" with="" chronic="" dietary="" exposure="" from="" fenbuconazole="" was="" assessed="" on="" four="" levels.="" in="" the="" first="" assessment,="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" were="" assumed.="" in="" the="" second="" assessment,="" tolerance="" level="" residues="" and="" rohm="" and="" haas="" company's="" conservative="" estimates="" of="" the="" highest="" achievable="" percent="" crop="" treated="" refinements="" were="" assumed.="" rohm="" and="" haas="" company's="" percent="" of="" crop="" treated="" estimates="" used="" in="" the="" assessments="" are="" almonds="50%," blueberry="30%," grapefruit="30%," bananas="20%," apples="15%," oranges="15%," pecans="11%," sugar="" beets="3%," and="" wheat="0.3%." in="" the="" third="" assessment,="" average="" field="" trial="" (anticipated)="" residues="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" were="" assumed.="" in="" the="" fourth="" assessment,="" average="" field="" trial="" residues="" and="" rohm="" and="" haas="" company's="" percent="" of="" crop="" treated="" estimates="" indicated="" above="" were="" assumed.="" rohm="" and="" haas="" company's="" processing="" factors="" for="" apple,="" orange,="" and="" grapefruit="" juice="" were="" assumed="" in="" all="" four="" assessments.="" one="" hundred="" percent="" crop="" treated="" was="" assumed="" when="" calculating="" the="" dietary="" burden="" from="" which="" secondary="" residue="" tolerances="" in="" meat="" and="" fat="" were="" derived.="" a="" 12.8%="" crop="" treated="" refinement="" was="" used="" for="" stone="" fruit="" in="" all="" four="" assessments="" june="" 10,="" 1998="" (fr="" 63="" 31636)="" (frl="" 5791-5).="" the="" anticipated="" residue="" contribution="" (arc)="" from="" all="" proposed="" and="" existing="" food="" uses="" of="" fenbuconazole="" was="" assessed.="" the="" rfd="" used="" for="" the="" chronic="" dietary="" analysis="" is="" 0.03="" mg/kg/day.="" potential="" chronic="" exposures="" were="" estimated="" using="" novigen's="" dietary="" exposure="" evaluation="" model="">TM, Version 5.31), which uses 
    USDA food consumption data from the 1989-1992 survey. The existing and 
    proposed fenbuconazole tolerances, and average fenbuconazole residues 
    result in ARCs that are equivalent to the following percentages of the 
    RfD:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    DEEM\1\      DEEM\2\      DEEM\3\      DEEM\4\
                         Population Subgroup                          %RfD         %RfD         %RfD         %RfD
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    U.S. Population (48 States).................................          2.7          0.9          0.4          0.1
    Non-Hispanic Other than Black or White......................          3.5          1.0          0.5          0.2
    All Infants (< 1-year="" old)..................................="" 6.1="" 3.5="" 1.0="" 0.4="" nursing="" infants="">< 1-year="" old)..............................="" 2.2="" 0.8="" 0.5="" 0.1="" non-nursing="" infants="">< 1-year="" old)..........................="" 7.7="" 4.7="" 1.3="" 0.5="" children="" (1-6="" years="" old)....................................="" 6.4="" 1.8="" 1.1="" 0.3="" children="" (7-12="" years="" old)...................................="" 4.2="" 1.2="" 0.7="" 0.2="" females="" (13+="" nursing).....................................="" 3.2="" 0.8="" 0.5="" 0.1="" ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------="" \1\="" assumes="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" tolerance="" levels="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" stone="" fruit);="" \2\="" assumes="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" tolerance="" levels="" and="" includes="" percent="" crop="" treated="" refinements;="" \3\="" assumes="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" their="" average="" field="" trial="" residue="" levels="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" stone="" fruit);="" and="" \4\="" assumes="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" their="" average="" field="" trial="" residue="" levels,="" and="" includes="" percent="" crop="" treated="" refinements.="" c.="" aggregate="" cancer="" risk="" for="" u.s.="" population.="" fenbuconazole="" has="" been="" classified="" as="" a="" group="" c="" carcinogen="" with="" a="">1* value of 
    0.00359 mg/kg/day-1. Cancer risk assessments for all 
    existing and proposed food uses for the U.S. population are as follows:
    
    [[Page 34242]]
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assumptions/Refinements                All Crops           Orange & Proc. Frac.         Plums/Prunes
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tolerance residue levels and 100%                     2.90E-06                 1.05E-06                 1.46E-07
     crop treated (12.8% stone fruit)
     assumed:............................
    Tolerance residue levels and percent                  9.24E-07                 1.57E-07                 1.46E-07
     crop treated refinements assumed:...
    Anticipated residue levels and 100%                   4.65E-07                  1.6E-08                    3E-09
     crop treated (12.8% stone fruit)
     assumed:............................
    Anticipated residue levels and                        1.44E-07                    2E-09                    3E-09
     percent crop treated refinements
     assumed:............................
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. Drinking water. Fenbuconazole has minimal tendency to 
    contaminate groundwater or drinking water because of its adsorptive 
    properties on soil, solubility in water, and degradation rate. Computer 
    modeling of laboratory and field dissipation data using EPA's Pesticide 
    Root Zone Model (PRZM) and USDA's Groundwater Loading Effects of 
    Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS) models predict that 
    fenbuconazole will not leach into groundwater, even if heavy rainfall 
    is simulated. The modeling predictions are consistent with the data 
    from environmental studies in the laboratory and the results of actual 
    field dissipation studies. There is no established Maximum 
    Concentration Level (MCL) for residues of fenbuconazole in drinking 
    water. No drinking water health advisory levels have been established 
    for fenbuconazole. There is no entry for fenbuconazole in the 
    ``Pesticides in Groundwater Database'' (EPA 734-12-92-001; September, 
    1992).
        3. Non-dietary exposure. Fenbuconazole is not currently registered 
    for any indoor or outdoor residential uses; therefore, no non-dietary 
    residential exposure is anticipated.
    
    D. Cumulative Effects
    
        The potential for cumulative effects of fenbuconazole with other 
    substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity was considered. 
    Fenbuconazole belongs to the class of fungicide chemicals known as 
    triazoles, which have demethylase inhibition capability. The 
    toxicological effects of fenbuconazole are related to its effects on 
    rodent thyroid and liver. Extensive data are available on the 
    biochemical mode of action by which fenbuconazole produces animal 
    tumors in rats and mice. These data indicate that the initiating events 
    do not occur below a given dose, and that the processes are reversible. 
    There are no data which suggest that the mode of action by which 
    fenbuconazole produces these animal tumors or any other toxicological 
    effect is common to all fungicides of this class. In fact, the closest 
    structural analog to fenbuconazole among registered fungicides of this 
    class is not tumorigenic in animals even at maximally tolerated doses 
    and has a different spectrum of toxicological effects.
    
    E. Safety Determination
    
        1. U.S. population--i. Acute exposure and risk. Since no acute 
    endpoint was identified for fenbuconazole, no acute risk assessment is 
    required.
        ii. Chronic exposure and risk. Using the conservative exposure 
    assumptions described above and taking into account the completeness 
    and reliability of the toxicity data, the percentage of the RfD that 
    will be utilized by dietary (food only) exposure to residues of 
    fenbuconazole from existing, pending, and proposed tolerances is 2.7% 
    for the U.S. population, assuming residues are present at their 
    tolerance levels and 100% crop treated (12.8% for stone fruit). 
    Aggregate exposure is not expected to exceed 100%. EPA generally has no 
    concern for exposures below 100% of the RfD because the RfD represents 
    the level at or below which daily aggregate dietary exposure over a 
    lifetime will not pose appreciable risks to human health. Rohm and Haas 
    concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result 
    from aggregate exposure to fenbuconazole residues to the U.S. 
    population.
        2. Infants and children--Safety factor for Infants and children--i. 
    General. In assessing the potential for additional sensitivity of 
    infants and children to residues of fenbuconazole, data from 
    developmental toxicity studies in the rat and rabbit, and 2-generation 
    reproduction studies in the rat are considered. The developmental 
    toxicity studies are designed to evaluate adverse effects on the 
    developing organism resulting from maternal pesticide exposure during 
    gestation. Reproduction studies provide information relating to effects 
    from exposure to the pesticide on the reproductive capability of mating 
    animals and data on systemic toxicity.
        ii. Developmental toxicity studies--a. Rat. In the developmental 
    study in rats, the maternal (systemic) NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day based on 
    decreases in bwt and bwt gain at the LOAEL of 75 mg/kg/day. The 
    developmental (fetal) NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day based on an increase in 
    post implantation loss and a significant decrease in the number of live 
    fetuses per dam at the LOAEL of 75 mg/kg/day.
        b. Rabbit. In the developmental study in rabbits, the maternal 
    (systemic) NOAEL was 10 mg/kg/day based on decreased bwt gain at the 
    LOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day. The developmental (fetal) NOAEL was 30 mg/kg/day 
    based on increased resorptions at the LOAEL of 60 mg/kg/day.
        iii. Reproductive toxicity study. In the 2-generation reproduction 
    toxicity study in rats, the maternal (systemic) NOAEL was 4 mg/kg/day 
    based on decreased bwt and food consumption, increased number of dams 
    delivering nonviable offspring, and increases in adrenal and thyroid 
    weights at the LOAEL of 40 mg/kg/day. The reproductive (pup) NOAEL was 
    40 mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested (HDT).
        iv. Pre- and Post-Natal sensitivity. The pre- and post-natal 
    toxicology database for fenbuconazole is complete with respect to 
    current toxicological data requirements. There is a 10-fold difference 
    between the developmental NOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day from the rat and rabbit 
    developmental toxicity studies and the NOAEL of 3 mg/kg/day from the 
    chronic rat feeding study which is the basis of the RfD. It is further 
    noted that in the rabbit and rat developmental toxicity studies, the 
    developmental NOAELs are similar to or greater than the respective 
    maternal NOAELs. In the rat reproduction study, the maternal NOAEL (4 
    mg/kg/day) was ten times lower than the developmental (pup) and 
    reproductive NOAEL (40 mg/kg/day, the HDT). These studies indicate that 
    there is no additional sensitivity for infants and children in the 
    absence of maternal toxicity for fenbuconazole.
        v. Acute risk. No acute dietary risk has been identified for 
    fenbuconazole.
        vi. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described above, 
    the exposure to fenbuconazole from food will utilize 7.7% (non-nursing 
    infants < [[page="" 34243]]="" 1-year="" old)="" and="" 2.2%="" (nursing="" infants="">< 1-year="" old)="" of="" the="" rfd="" assuming="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" tolerance="" levels="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" for="" stone="" fruit),="" and="" will="" utilize="" 1.3%="" (non-nursing="" infants="">< 1-year="" old)="" and="" 0.5%="" (nursing="" infants="">< 1-year="" old)="" of="" the="" rfd="" assuming="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" their="" average="" field="" residue="" levels="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" for="" stone="" fruit).="" the="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd="" that="" will="" be="" used="" by="" the="" food="" exposure="" for="" children="" 1-6="" years="" old="" is="" 6.4="" and="" 1.1%="" assuming="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" tolerance="" and="" average="" field="" residue="" levels,="" respectively,="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" for="" stone="" fruit).="" the="" percent="" of="" the="" rfd="" that="" will="" be="" used="" by="" the="" food="" exposure="" for="" children="" 7-12="" years="" old="" is="" 4.2="" and="" 0.7%="" assuming="" residues="" are="" present="" at="" tolerance="" and="" average="" field="" residue="" levels,="" respectively,="" and="" 100%="" crop="" treated="" (12.8%="" for="" stone="" fruit).="" epa="" generally="" has="" no="" concern="" for="" exposures="" below="" 100%="" of="" the="" rfd="" because="" the="" rfd="" represents="" the="" level="" at="" or="" below="" which="" daily="" aggregate="" dietary="" exposure="" over="" a="" lifetime="" will="" not="" pose="" appreciable="" risks="" to="" human="" health.="" vii.="" conclusion.="" it="" is="" concluded="" that="" reliable="" and="" complete="" data="" support="" the="" use="" of="" the="" 100-fold="" uncertainty="" factor,="" and="" that="" an="" additional="" 10-fold="" factor="" is="" not="" needed="" to="" ensure="" the="" safety="" of="" infants="" and="" children="" from="" dietary="" exposure.="" f.="" international="" tolerances="" there="" are="" no="" codex="" maximum="" residue="" levels="" (mrls)="" for="" fenbuconazole,="" but="" the="" fenbuconazole="" database="" was="" evaluated="" by="" the="" world="" health="" organization="" (who)="" and="" the="" food="" and="" agriculture="" organization="" (fao)="" expert="" panels="" at="" the="" joint="" meeting="" on="" pesticide="" residues="" (jmpr)="" in="" september="" 1997.="" an="" allowable="" daily="" intake="" (adi="" (same="" as="" the="" rfd)="" of="" 0.03="" mg/kg/day="" and="" a="" total="" of="" 32="" codex="" mrls="" were="" proposed="" in="" the="" jmpr="" report.="" [fr="" doc.="" 99-16238="" filed="" 6-24-99;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 6560-50-f="">

Document Information

Published:
06/25/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
99-16238
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-788A, and PF-848A, must be received on or before July 26, 1999.
Pages:
34237-34243 (7 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-788A and PF-848A, FRL-6076-9
PDF File:
99-16238.pdf