98-16959. Special Conditions: Eurocopter Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' Helicopters, Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34786-34789]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-16959]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 27
    
    [Docket No. SW001; Special Conditions No. 27-001-SC]
    
    
    Special Conditions: Eurocopter Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' 
    Helicopters, Full Authority Digital Engine Control (FADEC)
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final special condition; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This special condition is issued for the Eurocopter Model AS-
    350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' helicopters. These helicopters will have a novel or 
    unusual design feature associated with the Full Authority Digital 
    Engine Control
    
    [[Page 34787]]
    
    (FADEC). The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain 
    adequate or appropriate safety standards to protect systems that 
    perform critical control functions, or provide critical displays, from 
    the effects of high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF). This special 
    condition contains the additional safety standards that the 
    Administrator considers necessary to ensure that critical functions of 
    systems will be maintained when exposed to HIRF.
    
    DATES: The effective date of this special condition is April 30, 1998. 
    Comments must be received on or before August 25, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments on this special condition may be mailed in 
    duplicate to: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. SW001, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-
    0007 or deliver in duplicate to the Office of the Regional Counsel at 
    2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137. Comments must be marked: 
    Rules Docket No. SW001. Comments may be inspected in the Rules Docket 
    weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carroll Wright, FAA, Rotorcraft 
    Directorate, Regulations Group, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0111; telephone 
    817-222-5120, fax 817-222-5961.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and 
    opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because 
    these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the design 
    approval and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, 
    notice and opportunity for prior public comment are unnecessary since 
    the substance of these special conditions has been subject to the 
    public comment process in several prior instances with no substantive 
    comments received. The FAA therefore finds that good cause exists for 
    making this special condition effective upon issuance.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, 
    or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the 
    regulatory docket or special condition number and be submitted in 
    duplicate to the address specified above. All communications received 
    on or before the closing date for comments will be considered by the 
    Administrator. The special condition may be changed in light of the 
    comments received. All comments received will be available in the Rules 
    Docket for examination by interested persons, both before and after the 
    closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public 
    contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in 
    the docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their 
    comments submitted in response to this special condition must include a 
    self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is 
    made: ``Comments to Rules Docket No. SW001.'' The postcard will be date 
    stamped and returned to the commenter.
    
    Background
    
        On June 18, 1997, Eurocopter applied for an amendment to Type 
    Certificate (TC) No. H9EU to include the new Model AS-350 B3 
    ``Ecureuil'' helicopter. The Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' helicopter, 
    which is a derivative of the AS-350 B/B1/B2 versions currently approved 
    under TC No. H9EU, is a normal category five-passenger helicopter 
    powered by a Turbomeca Arriel 2B engine with FADEC. The Model AS-350 B3 
    is derived from the Model AS-350 B2 with the following main 
    modifications: (1) Turbomeca Arriel 2B engine with digital engine 
    control system; (2) Powerplant instruments on Liquid Crystal Display; 
    and (3) AS-355 N type tail rotor.
    
    Type Certification Basis
    
        Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Eurocopter must show that 
    the Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' helicopter meets the applicable 
    provisions of the regulations incorporated by reference in TC No. H9EU 
    or the applicable regulations in effect on the date of application for 
    the change to the Model AS-350 B3. The regulations incorporated by 
    reference in the type certificate are commonly referred to as the 
    ``original type certification basis.'' The regulations incorporated by 
    reference in H9EU are as follows: Sec. 21.29 and 14 CFR part 27, 
    effective February 1, 1965, plus Amendments 27-1 through 27-10. In 
    addition, the certification basis includes certain special conditions 
    and equivalent safety findings that are not relevant to this special 
    condition.
        If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
    regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for 
    these helicopters because of a novel or unusual design feature, special 
    conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
        In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special 
    conditions, the Model AS-350 B3 must comply with the noise 
    certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a 
    finding of regulatory adequacy pursuant to section 611 of Public Law 
    92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
        Special conditions, as appropriate, are issued in accordance with 
    Sec. 11.49, as required by Secs. 11.28 and 11.29(b), and become part of 
    the type certification basis in accordance with Sec. 21.101(b)(2).
        Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
    they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended 
    later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or 
    unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on 
    the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or 
    unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the 
    other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
    
    Novel or Unusual Design Features
    
        The Eurocopter Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' helicopters will 
    incorporate the following novel or unusual design features: Electrical, 
    electronic, or combination of electrical electronic (electrical/
    electronic) systems, such as FADEC, that will be performing functions 
    critical to the continued safe flight and landing of the helicopter. 
    FADEC is an electronic device that performs the functions of engine 
    control.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Eurocopter Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' helicopter, at the time 
    of application, was identified as having modifications that incorporate 
    one and possibly more electrical/electronic systems, such as FADEC. 
    After the design is finalized, Eurocopter will provide the FAA with a 
    preliminary hazard analysis that will identify any other critical 
    functions, required for safe flight and landing, performed by the 
    electrical/electronic systems.
        Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in 
    aircraft designs of advanced electrical/electronic systems that perform 
    critical functions. These advanced systems respond to the transient 
    effects of induced electrical current and voltage caused by HIRF 
    incident on the external surface of the helicopter. These induced 
    transient currents and voltages can degrade the performance of the 
    electrical/ electronic systems by damaging the components or by 
    upsetting the systems' functions.
        Furthermore, the electromagnetic environment has undergone a 
    transformation not envisioned by the current application of 
    Sec. 27.1309(a).
    
    [[Page 34788]]
    
    Higher energy levels radiate from operational transmitters currently 
    used for radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters 
    has increased significantly.
        Existing aircraft certification requirements are inappropriate in 
    view of these technological advances. In addition, the FAA has received 
    reports of some significant safety incidents and accidents involving 
    military aircraft equipped with advanced electrical/electronic systems 
    when they were exposed to electromagnetic radiation.
        The combined effects of the technological advances in helicopter 
    design and the changing environment have resulted in an increased level 
    of vulnerability of the electrical/electronic systems required for the 
    continued safe flight and landing of the helicopter. Effective measures 
    to protect these helicopters against the adverse effects of exposure to 
    HIRF will be provided by the design and installation of these systems. 
    The following primary factors contributed to the current conditions: 
    (1) increased use of sensitive electronics that perform critical 
    functions, (2) reduced electromagnetic shielding afforded helicopter 
    systems by advanced technology airframe materials, (3) adverse service 
    experience of military aircraft using these technologies, and (4) an 
    increase in the number and power of radio frequency emitters and the 
    expected increase in the future.
        The FAA recognizes the need for aircraft certification standards to 
    keep pace with the developments in technology and environment and, in 
    1986, initiated a high priority program to (1) determine and define 
    electromagnetic energy levels; (2) develop and describe guidance 
    material for design, test, and analysis; and (3) prescribe and 
    promulgate regulatory standards.
        The FAA participated with industry and airworthiness authorities of 
    other countries to develop internationally recognized standards for 
    certification.
        The FAA and airworthiness authorities of other countries have 
    identified two levels of the HIRF environment that a helicopter could 
    be exposed to, one environment for VFR operations and a different 
    environment for IFR operations. While the HIRF rulemaking requirements 
    are being finalized, the FAA is adopting a special condition for the 
    certification of aircraft that employ electrical/electronic systems 
    that perform critical control functions, or provide critical displays. 
    The accepted maximum energy levels that civilian helicopter system 
    installations must withstand for safe operation are based on surveys 
    and analysis of existing radio frequency emitters. This special 
    condition will require the helicopters' electrical/electronic systems 
    and associated wiring to be protected from these energy levels. These 
    external threat levels are believed to represent the worst-case 
    exposure for a helicopter operating under VFR or IFR.
        Compliance with HIRF requirements will be demonstrated by tests, 
    analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or a combination of 
    these methods. Service experience alone will not be acceptable since 
    such experience in normal flight operations may not include an exposure 
    to HIRF. Reliance on a system with similar design features for 
    redundancy, as a means of protection against the effects of external 
    HIRF, is generally insufficient because all elements of a redundant 
    system are likely to be concurrently exposed to the radiated fields.
        This special condition will require the systems that perform 
    critical control functions, or provide critical displays as installed 
    in the aircraft, to meet certain standards based on either a defined 
    HIRF environment or a fixed value using laboratory tests. Control 
    system failures and malfunctions can more directly and abruptly 
    contribute to a catastrophic event than display system failures and 
    malfunctions. Therefore it is considered appropriate to require more 
    rigorous HIRF verification methods for critical control systems than 
    for critical display systems.
        The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and operational 
    capabilities of the installed electrical/electronic systems that 
    perform critical functions are not adversely affected when the aircraft 
    is exposed to the defined HIRF test environment.
        The FAA has determined that the test environment defined in Table 1 
    is acceptable for critical control functions in helicopters. The test 
    environment defined in Table 2 is acceptable for critical display 
    systems in helicopters.
        The applicant may also demonstrate by a laboratory test that the 
    electrical/electronic systems that perform critical control, or provide 
    critical displays can withstand a peak electromagnetic field strength 
    in a frequency range of 10 KHz to 18 GHz. If a 
    laboratory test is used to show compliance with the defined HIRF 
    environment, no credit will be given for signal attenuation due to 
    installation. A level of 100 volts per meter (v/m) is appropriate for 
    critical display systems. A level of 200 v/m is appropriate for 
    critical control functions. Laboratory test levels are defined 
    according to RTCA/DO-160D Section 20 Category W (100 v/m and 150 mA) 
    and Category Y (200 v/m and 300 mA). As defined in DO-160D Section 20, 
    the test levels are defined as the peak of the root means squared (rms) 
    envelope. As a minimum, the modulations required for RTCA/DO-160D 
    Section 20 Categories W and Y will be used. Other modulations should be 
    selected for the signal most likely to disrupt the operation of the 
    system under test, based on its design characteristics. For example, 
    flight control systems may be susceptible to 3 Hz square 
    wave modulation while the video signals for electronic display systems 
    may be susceptible to 400 Hz sinusoidal modulation. If the 
    worst-case modulation is unknown or cannot be determined, default 
    modulations may be used. Suggested default values are a 1 
    KHz sine wave with 80 percent depth of modulation in the 
    frequency range from 10 KHz to 400 MHz and 1 
    KHz square wave with greater than 90 percent depth of 
    modulation from 400 MHz to 18 GHz. For 
    frequencies where the unmodulated signal would cause deviations from 
    normal operation, several different modulating signals with various 
    waveforms and frequencies should be applied.
        Applicants must perform a preliminary hazard analysis to identify 
    electrical/electronic systems that perform critical functions. The term 
    ``critical'' means those functions whose failure would contribute to or 
    cause an unsafe condition that would prevent the continued safe flight 
    and landing of the helicopters. The systems identified by the hazard 
    analysis as performing critical functions are required to have HIRF 
    protection. A system may perform both critical and noncritical 
    functions. Primary electronic flight display systems and their 
    associated components perform critical functions such as attitude, 
    altitude, and airspeed indications. HIRF requirements would apply only 
    to the systems that perform critical functions, including control and 
    display.
        Acceptable system performance would be attained by demonstrating 
    that the critical function components of the system under consideration 
    continue to perform their intended function during and after exposure 
    to required electromagnetic fields. Deviations from system 
    specifications may be acceptable but must be independently assessed by 
    the FAA on a case-by-case basis.
    
               Table 1.--VFR Rotorcraft Field Strength Volts/meter          
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Frequency                         Peak     Average
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    10-100 KHz..........................................       150       150
    
    [[Page 34789]]
    
                                                                            
    100-500.............................................       200       200
    500-2000............................................       200       200
    2-30 MHz............................................       200       200
    30-100..............................................       200       200
    100-200.............................................       200       200
    200-400.............................................       200       200
    400-700.............................................       730       200
    700-1000............................................      1400       240
    1-2 GHz.............................................      5000       250
    2-4.................................................      6000       490
    4-6.................................................      7200       400
    6-8.................................................      1100       170
    8-12................................................      5000       330
    12-18...............................................      2000       330
    18-40...............................................      1000       420
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
               Table 2.--IFR Rotorcraft Field Strength Volts/meter          
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Frequency                         Peak     Average
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    10-100 KHz..........................................        50        50
    100-500.............................................        50        50
    500-2000............................................        50        50
    2-30 MHz............................................       100       100
    30-70...............................................        50        50
    70-100..............................................        50        50
    100-200.............................................       100       100
    200-400.............................................       100       100
    400-700.............................................       700        50
    700-1000............................................       700       100
    1-2 GHz.............................................      2000       200
    2-4.................................................      3000       200
    4-6.................................................      3000       200
    6-8.................................................      1000       200
    8-12................................................      3000       300
    12-18...............................................      2000       200
    18-40...............................................       600       200
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Applicability
    
        As previously discussed, this special condition is applicable to 
    the Model AS-350 B3 helicopter. Should Eurocopter apply at a later date 
    for a change to the type certificate to include another model 
    incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, the special 
    condition would apply to that model as well under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
    
    Conclusion
    
        This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
    on one model helicopter. It is not a rule of general applicability and 
    affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these 
    features on the helicopter.
        The substance of this special condition has been subjected to the 
    notice and comment procedure in several prior instances and has been 
    derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is 
    unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change 
    from the substance contained herein. For this reason and because a 
    delay would significantly affect the certification of the helicopter, 
    which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and 
    comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for 
    adopting this special condition upon issuance. The FAA is requesting 
    comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have 
    been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment 
    described above.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Parts 21 and 27
    
        Aircraft, Air transportation, Aviation safety, Rotorcraft, Safety.
    
        The authority citation for this special condition is as follows: 42 
    U.S.C. 7572; 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40105, 40113, 44701-44702, 44704, 44709, 
    44711, 44713, 44715, 45303.
    
    The Special Condition
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the following special condition is issued as part of the 
    type certification basis for Eurocopter Model AS-350 B3 ``Ecureuil'' 
    helicopters.
    
    Protection for Electrical and Electronic Systems from High Intensity 
    Radiated Fields
    
        Each system that performs critical functions must be designed and 
    installed to ensure that the operation and operational capabilities of 
    these critical functions are not adversely affected when the helicopter 
    is exposed to high intensity radiated fields external to the 
    helicopter.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 30, 1998.
    Eric Bries,
    Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-16959 Filed 6-25-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/30/1998
Published:
06/26/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final special condition; request for comments.
Document Number:
98-16959
Dates:
The effective date of this special condition is April 30, 1998. Comments must be received on or before August 25, 1998.
Pages:
34786-34789 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. SW001, Special Conditions No. 27-001-SC
PDF File:
98-16959.pdf
CFR: (3)
14 CFR 27.1309(a)
14 CFR 21.101(a)(1)
14 CFR 11.49