97-16866. Canadian Border Ports; Champlain, NY, and Derby Line, VT  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 124 (Friday, June 27, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 34677-34679]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16866]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    9 CFR Parts 92 and 98
    
    [Docket No. 97-014-1]
    
    
    Canadian Border Ports; Champlain, NY, and Derby Line, VT
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the animal and animal product 
    importation regulations by removing Champlain, NY, and Derby Line, VT, 
    as land border ports of entry for animals and animal germ plasm 
    imported from Canada into the United States. We want to improve the 
    efficiency of our animal inspection operations along the U.S.-Canada 
    border, and we do not believe that the current level of use of the 
    animal importation facilities at these two ports justifies the cost of 
    keeping them open. Importers may continue to use other ports along the 
    U.S-Canada border, including Highgate Springs, VT, and Buffalo and 
    Alexandria Bay, NY, to import animals and animal germ plasm from 
    Canada. We believe that new livestock inspection facilities and 
    extended hours of operation at the port at Highgate Springs, VT, will 
    enable us to handle any additional needs for inspection services caused 
    by closing the ports at Champlain, NY, and Derby Line, VT, which are 
    currently open on a part-time basis only.
    
    DATES: Consideration will be given only to comments received on or 
    before August 26, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Please send an original and three copies of your comments to 
    Docket No. 97-014-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, 
    suite 3C03, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please 
    state that your comments refer to Docket No. 97-014-1. Comments 
    received may be inspected at USDA, room 1141, South Building, 14th 
    Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing to 
    inspect comments are requested to call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to 
    facilitate entry into the comment reading room.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Chief Staff 
    Veterinarian, Import/Export Animals, National Center for Import and 
    Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 39, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231, 
    (301) 734-3276.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The regulations in 9 CFR parts 92 and 98 (referred to below as the 
    regulations) restrict the importation of specified animals and animal 
    products into the United States to prevent the introduction of 
    communicable animal diseases. The regulations designate land border 
    ports along the U.S.-Canada border having inspection facilities for the 
    importation of certain animals and animal germ plasm that require 
    inspection. Section 92.203(b) lists the border ports through which 
    poultry from Canada may be imported; Sec. 92.303(b) lists the border 
    ports through which horses from Canada may be imported; Sec. 92.403(b) 
    lists the border ports through which ruminants from Canada may be 
    imported;Sec. 92.418(c)(2) lists the border ports through which cattle 
    from Canada may be imported; and Sec. 92.503(b) lists the border ports 
    through which swine from Canada may be imported. Section 98.33(b) lists 
    the border ports through which certain animal semen from Canada may be 
    imported, and Sec. 98.6 provides that
    
    [[Page 34678]]
    
    embryos regulated under subpart A of part 98 may be imported at ports 
    of entry listed in Sec. 92.303 for horses, Sec. 92.403 for ruminants, 
    and Sec. 92.503 for swine.
        The ports of Champlain, NY, and Derby Line and Highgate Springs, 
    VT, are currently listed in all of the sections of parts 92 and 98 
    listed above and, therefore, are authorized ports of entry for the 
    importation of poultry, horses, swine, cattle, other ruminants, and 
    certain animal germ plasm from Canada. The animal importation 
    facilities at these ports are open on a part-time basis only: The 
    facilities at Champlain are open 1 day a week for 8 hours, the 
    facilities at Derby Line are open 1 day a week for 4 hours, and the 
    facilities at Highgate Springs are open 4 days a week for a total of 32 
    hours. Along the U.S.-Canada border, Highgate Springs is located 
    between Champlain and Derby Line; Champlain is approximately 18 miles 
    west of Highgate Springs, and Derby Line is approximately 48 miles east 
    of Highgate Springs.
        The amount of animals and animal germ plasm imported annually 
    through Derby Line, VT, is extremely low compared to the amount 
    imported annually through other U.S.-Canada border ports. The amount of 
    animals and animal germ plasm imported annually through Highgate 
    Springs, VT, and Champlain, NY, are roughly similar to each other and, 
    although higher than the amount imported annually through Derby Line, 
    still relatively low when compared to other ports. To illustrate, in 
    fiscal years (FY) 1995 and 1996 and the first 4 months of FY 1997, the 
    three ports processed a total of 245,588 poultry (chicks and hatching 
    eggs)--a far higher number of importations than any other species. 
    Bovine importations (cattle and bison) were next highest with 19,236 
    bovines imported through the three ports during the same 28-month 
    period. By comparison, the port at Alexandria Bay, NY, processed 
    457,607 imported poultry and 122,607 imported bovines during that 
    timeframe. Therefore, the total number of poultry imported through 
    Derby Line, Highgate Springs, and Champlain combined was about 54 
    percent the number imported through Alexandria Bay. The total number of 
    bovines imported through these three ports was less than 16 percent the 
    number imported through Alexandria Bay.
        We do not believe that the level of use of these three ports 
    justifies the cost of keeping all of them open. The Animal and Plant 
    Health Inspection Service (APHIS) funds import activities through user 
    fees. In recent years, the user fees generated through these three 
    ports have not covered their operating expenses. Moreover, we do not 
    believe that the relatively low level of use of these ports can be 
    attributed solely to the fact that they are open on a part-time basis 
    only. Over the years, we have found that the scheduled hours of 
    operation at these ports have met the needs of the local industry who 
    use them. In other words, we do not believe that increasing the hours 
    of operation at these ports would greatly increase their use by 
    importers.
        As a result, we are considering closing the animal importation 
    facilities at Derby Line, VT, and Champlain, NY, and extending the 
    hours of operation at Highgate Springs, VT, so that the animal 
    importation facilities there are open full time during normal business 
    hours Monday through Friday. We anticipate that the port at Highgate 
    Springs operating on a full-time basis would be able to handle all 
    animal importations that would otherwise have gone through Derby Line 
    and Champlain. Therefore, we are proposing to amend 9 CFR parts 92 and 
    98 to remove Champlain, NY, and Derby Line, VT, from the lists of land 
    border ports for the importation of animals and animal germ plasm from 
    Canada.
        The Federal Government and U.S. taxpayers would benefit from the 
    positive budgetary effect of closing these ports. The physical plants 
    in Champlain and Derby Line are old and becoming expensive to maintain. 
    A new livestock inspection facility at Highgate Springs is expected to 
    open in August 1997. Veterinary medical officers travel from other 
    official duty stations to these three ports to conduct inspections of 
    imported animals on the days the animal importation facilities are 
    open. Total travel time for the veterinary medical officers is 7\1/2\ 
    hours per week. We plan to establish a full-time position for a 
    veterinary medical officer at Highgate Springs when the new livestock 
    inspection facility opens, so the travel time and expenses for our 
    employees will be eliminated. In addition to Highgate Springs, VT, the 
    land border ports of Alexandria Bay and Buffalo, NY, and two land 
    border ports in Maine would continue to serve livestock importers in 
    the Northeastern United States.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. 
    For this action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its 
    review process required by Executive Order 12866.
        In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an Initial 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, which is set out below, regarding the 
    impact of this proposed rule on small entities. However, we do not 
    currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive analysis 
    of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Therefore, we 
    are inviting comments on potential effects. In particular, we are 
    interested in determining the number and kind of small entities that 
    may incur benefits or costs from the implementation of this proposed 
    rule.
        The Secretary of Agriculture has the authority under 21 U.S.C. 102-
    105, 111, 134a, 134c, 136a, and 31 U.S.C. 9701 to regulate the 
    importation of animals and animal germ plasm to prevent the 
    introduction of foreign animal diseases and to collect user fees to 
    cover the costs of conducting associated inspection services.
        The proposed rule would close the land border ports of Derby Line, 
    VT, and Champlain, NY, for the importation of animals and animal germ 
    plasm from Canada. APHIS uses these facilities primarily for conducting 
    inspections of animals and animal germ plasm imported from Canada, 
    although minimal export services are also performed at these 
    facilities. These ports are being considered for closure because the 
    cost of keeping them open does not appear justified by the minimal 
    level of import activity they support. If the two facilities are 
    closed, U.S. importers would still have access to import inspection 
    services at other entry points from Canada, including Highgate Springs, 
    VT, Buffalo and Alexandria Bay, NY, and Houlton and Jackman, ME. 
    Highgate Springs is 18 miles from Champlain and 48 miles from Derby 
    Line along the U.S.-Canada border.
        The proposed rule is intended to improve APHIS' operating 
    efficiency. APHIS currently maintains part-time inspection facilities 
    at Champlain, Derby Line, and Highgate Springs. These facilities are 
    within close proximity of one another, and none is self-supporting; at 
    each facility, user fees generated from import and export services are 
    inadequate to cover the costs of providing those services. The total 
    user fee deficit (including both import and export user fees) in New 
    England for FY 1996 was $85,296. Of that amount, $73,795 was attributed 
    to Vermont. The fact that the facilities are open on a part-time basis 
    only is not considered to be a factor in the level of import activity. 
    In other words, increasing the facilities' hours would not increase 
    their use by importers. Nor are future user fee increases likely to 
    eliminate the deficit.
        APHIS is currently considering closing the Champlain and Derby Line
    
    [[Page 34679]]
    
    facilities and opening the Highgate Springs facility on a full-time 
    basis. It is estimated that by closing both the Champlain and Derby 
    Line facilities, APHIS will be able to cut its operating costs by 
    approximately $24,000 annually. In 1996, a total of $1.4 million was 
    collected in user fees for entry of live animals at ports (excluding 
    Mexican border ports, which have different fees.) Presumably, the lost 
    user fee revenue at Champlain and Derby Line would be made up at the 
    other nearby ports, especially Highgate Springs.
        APHIS considered several alternatives to the proposed rule to help 
    reduce the user fee deficit and increase operating efficiency at these 
    ports, including increasing import user fees and staffing the ports 
    with lesser paid employees than veterinary medical officers. These 
    alternatives were rejected because of the potential for adverse 
    economic impacts on small entities and increased risk to the health of 
    the U.S. animal population. In addition, APHIS originally considered 
    closing only the port at Derby Line, VT, but that alternative was 
    rejected because the cost savings achieved would not be significant 
    enough to increase operating efficiency greatly at the ports.
        In proposing to keep one of the three facilities open, APHIS is 
    attempting to strike a balance between the agency's needs for cost 
    savings and the industry's needs for continued nearby inspection 
    services. The proposal to keep the Highgate Springs facility open and 
    not one of the others is due to cost considerations. The cost of 
    maintaining the physical plant at Highgate Springs is lower than the 
    costs associated with maintaining the facilities at Champlain or Derby 
    Line, where the physical plants are aging. Moreover, because Highgate 
    Springs is located between Champlain and Derby Line, it is the logical 
    choice to keep open in trying to inconvenience the fewest number of 
    importers in the area.
        The proposed rule should have little or no impact on U.S. consumers 
    because animals and animal germ plasm that currently enter the United 
    States at Champlain and Derby Line would still be available through 
    alternative ports of entry. The proposed rule would not restrict or 
    otherwise limit those imports.
        The Champlain and Derby Line facilities are used mostly by 
    livestock dealers. It is estimated that about 25 dealers use the Derby 
    Line facility on a regular basis. The number of livestock dealers using 
    Champlain is not available, but combined data for Champlain and 
    Highgate Springs is available and show that about 50 dealers regularly 
    use Champlain or Highgate Springs. The number of these livestock 
    dealers who are considered small entities under the U.S. Small Business 
    Administration's (SBA) standards is unknown because information as to 
    the size of the dealers' businesses (in terms of the number of 
    employees) is not available. However, it is reasonable to assume that 
    most are small, based on aggregate data for providers of the same or 
    similar services in the United States. In 1992, 99 percent of all 1,992 
    firms in SIC 5154 (which includes livestock dealers) had fewer than 100 
    employees, the SBA's current small-entity size standard.
        In terms of driving distance, Champlain and Derby Line are 
    approximately 31 miles and 55 miles, respectively, from Highgate 
    Springs. Therefore, as a result of the proposed rule, dealers who use 
    Champlain and Derby Line would have to travel at most an additional 62 
    miles and 110 miles per round-trip, respectively. And, assuming 
    Champlain and Derby Line users make one round-trip per week, they would 
    incur additional transportation costs of, at most, $967 and $1,716 
    annually, assuming a per-mile cost of $0.30. These costs are relatively 
    insignificant, given that the per-firm average receipts for all firms 
    in SIC 5154 in 1992 was $13.8 million. The additional transportation 
    costs ($967 and $1,716) represent less than 1 percent of the per-firm 
    average receipts.
        As mentioned previously, comments on the economic impact of the 
    proposed rule on small entities are invited. There are no reporting or 
    recordkeeping requirements associated with this proposed rule.
    
    Executive Order 12372
    
        This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
    Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, 
    which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local 
    officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State 
    and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule 
    will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this 
    rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before 
    parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposed rule contains no information collection or 
    recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
    (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    List of Subjects
    
    9 CFR Part 92
    
        Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products, 
    Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
    9 CFR Part 98
    
        Animal diseases and Imports.
    
        Accordingly, 9 CFR parts 92 and 98 would be amended as follows:
    
    PART 92--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY, AND 
    CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS 
    OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 92 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622; 19 U.S.C. 1306; 21 U.S.C. 102-105, 
    111, 114a, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134d, 134f, 135, 136, and 136a; 31 
    U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
    Secs. 92.203, 92.303, 92.403, 92.418, and 92.503  [Amended]
    
        2. Sections 92.203(b), 92.303(b), 92.403(b), 92.418(c)(2), and 
    92.503(b) would be amended by removing the words ``,Buffalo, and 
    Champlain,'' and adding ``and Buffalo,'' in their place; and removing 
    the words ``Derby Line and''.
    
    PART 98--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMAL EMBRYOS AND ANIMAL SEMEN
    
        3. The authority citation for part 98 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622; 19 U.S.C. 1306; 21 U.S.C. 103-105, 
    111, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134d, 134f, 136, and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 
    CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
    Sec. 98.33  [Amended]
    
        4. In Sec. 98.33, paragraph (b) would be amended by removing the 
    words ``, Buffalo, and Champlain,'' and adding ``and Buffalo,'' in 
    their place; and removing the words ``Derby Line and''.
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of June 1997.
    Terry L. Medley,
    Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-16866 Filed 6-26-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/27/1997
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
97-16866
Dates:
Consideration will be given only to comments received on or before August 26, 1997.
Pages:
34677-34679 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-014-1
PDF File:
97-16866.pdf
CFR: (1)
9 CFR 98.33