94-15613. Philadelphia Electric Company  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page ]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-15613]
    
    
    [Federal Register: June 28, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-277]
    
    
    Philadelphia Electric Company
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from the requirements of Sections 
    III.D.2.(a) and III.D.3 of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50, to 
    Philadelphia Electric Company, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, 
    Delmarva Power and Light Company, and Atlantic City Electric Company 
    (the licensee), for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Unit 
    2, located at the licensee's site in York County, Pennsylvania.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would grant an exemption from10 CFR Part 50, 
    Appendix J, Sections III.D.2.(a) and III.D.3. Section III.D.2.(a) 
    states, in part: ``Type B tests, except tests for air locks, shall be 
    performed during reactor shutdown for refueling, or other convenient 
    intervals, but in no case at intervals greater than 2 years.'' Section 
    III.D.3 states: ``Type C tests shall be performed during each reactor 
    shutdown for refueling but in no case at intervals greater than 2 
    years.'' The exemption would allow a one-time 60-day extension of the 
    2-year requirement. Hence, this one-time exemption would allow the 
    licensee to perform the testing in Sections III.0.2.(a) and III.d.3 
    during Unit 2's Cycle 10 refueling outage scheduled to begin no later 
    than September 24, 1994.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated April 18, 1994.
    
    Need for the Proposed Action
    
        BAPS, Unit 2 is utilizing a new core design which allows the 
    intervals between reactor shutdowns for refueling to extend the maximum 
    allowable 2-year interval. Prior to the current operating cycle, local 
    leak rate tests were performed in conjunction with an operating cycle 
    of 18 months. Use of extended cycle core designs has been recognized as 
    a growing trend in the industry as discussed in the staff's Generic 
    Letter 91-04, ``Changes in Technical Specification Surveillance 
    Intervals to Accommodate a 24-Month Fuel Cycle,'' dated April 2, 1991. 
    The staff previously granted the licensee license amendments to allow 
    PBAPS, Unit 2 to perform selected surveillances on a 24-month interval 
    (see Amendment 169 dated August 19, 1992, and Amendment 179 dated 
    August 2, 1993). However, the regulations cited by the licensee in the 
    exemption request have not been revised to reflect the use of a 24-
    month operating cycle. Therefore, the licensee has requested an 
    exemption in order to avoid a premature shutdown which would be needed 
    to accomplish the testing and to properly schedule the testing during 
    the refueling outage.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed the evaluation of the proposed 
    exemption and concludes that this action would not significantly 
    increase the probability or amount of expected primary containment 
    leakage; hence, the containment integrity would be maintained.
        Based on the information presented in the licensee's application, 
    the proposed extended test interval would not result in a non-
    detectable leakage rate in excess of the value established by 10 CFR 
    Part 50, Appendix J, or in any changes to the containment structure or 
    plant systems. Consequently, the probability of accidents would not be 
    increased, nor would the post-accident radiological releases be greater 
    than previously determined. Neither would the proposed exemption 
    otherwise affect radiological plant effluents. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that this proposed action would result in no 
    significant radiological environmental impact.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    exemption does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no 
    other environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that 
    there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed exemption.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission concluded that there are no measurable 
    environmental effects that would result from the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be 
    evaluated.
        The principal alternative would be to deny the requested exemption. 
    This would not reduce environmental impacts of plant operation and 
    would result in reduced operational flexibility.
    
    Alternate Use of Resources
    
        This proposed action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the final Environmental Statements for the 
    Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, dated April 1973.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        The staff consulted with the State of Pennsylvania regarding the 
    environmental impact of the proposed action.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental 
    impact statement for the proposed exemption.
        Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for exemption dated April 18, 1994, which is available for 
    public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, and at the local 
    public document room located at Government Publications Section, State 
    Library of Pennsylvania, (Regional Depository) Education Building, 
    Walnut Street and Commonwealth Avenue, Box 1601, Harrisburg, 
    Pennsylvania 17105.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day of June 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Charles L. Miller,
    Director, Project Directorate I-2, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-15613 Filed 6-27-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/28/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-15613
Pages:
0-0 (None pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 28, 1994, Docket No. 50-277