[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 125 (Thursday, June 29, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33730-33734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-15957]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[ME-23-1-6827a; ME-4-1-6848; A-1-FRL-5214-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maine; Gasoline Marketing Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maine on July 6, 1994. This revision consists
of several regulations which require the implementation of reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for controlling volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from gasoline marketing operations. The
intended effect of this action is to approve the gasoline marketing
regulations submitted by Maine on July 6, 1994 into the Maine SIP. Some
of these regulations are being approved as a direct final action, while
others are being approved as a final rulemaking action. This action is
being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.
DATES: Section 52.1020(c)(35) will become effective July 31, 1995.
Section 52.1020(c)(36) and the amendments to Secs. 52.1022 and 52.1031
will become effective August 28, 1995, unless notice is received by
July 31, 1995 that adverse or critical comments will be submitted. If
the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Comments on Section 52.1020(c)(36) may be mailed to Susan
Studlien, Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal
Building, Boston, MA 02203. Copies of the documents relevant to this
action are available for public inspection during normal business
hours, by appointment at the Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, One Congress
Street, 10th floor, Boston, MA; Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street,
S.W., (LE-131), Washington, D.C. 20460; and the Bureau of Air Quality
Control, Department of Environmental Protection, 71 Hospital Street,
Augusta, ME 04333.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne E. Arnold, (617) 565-3166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 11, 1994, EPA received a formal
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from the Maine Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) containing the following regulations:
Chapter 100 ``Definitions Regulation''
Chapter 112 ``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery''
Chapter 118 ``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control''
Chapter 120 ``Gasoline Tank Truck Tightness Self-Certification''
Chapter 133 ``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery at Bulk
Gasoline Plants''
These regulations had been recently adopted (or amended) pursuant
to the requirements of Sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b)(1)(B) of the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
Background
Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act, ozone nonattainment areas were
required to adopt RACT rules for sources of VOC emissions. EPA issued
three sets of control technique guidelines (CTGs) documents,
establishing a ``presumptive norm'' for RACT for various categories of
VOC sources. The three sets of CTGs were (1) Group I--issued before
January 1978 (15 CTGs); (2) Group II--issued in 1978 (9 CTGs); and (3)
Group III--issued in the early 1980's (5 CTGs). Those sources not
covered by a CTG were called non-CTG sources. EPA determined that the
area's SIP-approved attainment date established which RACT rules the
area needed to adopt and implement. Under Section 172(a)(1), ozone
nonattainment areas were generally required to attain the ozone
standard by December 31, 1982. Those areas that submitted an attainment
demonstration projecting attainment by that date were required to adopt
RACT for sources covered by the Group I and II CTGs. Those areas that
sought an extension of the attainment date under Section 172(a)(2) to
as late as December 31, 1987 were required to adopt RACT for all CTG
sources and for all major (i.e., 100 ton per year or more of VOC
emissions) non-CTG sources.
Under the pre-amended Clean Air Act, portions of Maine were
designated as rural nonattainment (i.e., the Metropolitan Portland
Intrastate Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) and the Androscoggin
Valley Interstate AQCR) and, therefore, were required to adopt
[[Page 33731]]
regulations pursuant to the Group I and Group II CTGs for major
sources. Based on monitored ozone exceedances in Maine, EPA notified
the Governor of Maine on May 25, 1988 and November 8, 1988 that
portions of the SIP were inadequate to attain and maintain the ozone
standard and requested that deficiencies in the existing SIP be
corrected (EPA's SIP-Call). On November 15, 1990, amendments to the
1977 CAA were enacted. Pub. L. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42
U.S.C. Secs. 7401-7671q. In amended Section 182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA,
Congress statutorily adopted the requirement that pre-enactment ozone
nonattainment areas that retained their designation of nonattainment
and were classified as marginal or above fix their deficient RACT rules
for ozone by May 15, 1991. Pursuant to the amended CAA, two counties in
Maine were classified as marginal (these two counties constitute one
marginal ozone nonattainment area) and seven counties in Maine were
classified as moderate (these seven counties constitute three moderate
ozone nonattainment areas). 56 FR 56694 (Nov. 6, 1991). In response to
the RACT fix-up requirement, Maine submitted revisions to its SIP and
EPA approved these revisions on February 3, 1992 and March 22, 1993 (57
FR 3946 and 58 FR 15281).
In addition, Section 182(b)(2) of the amended Act requires States
to adopt RACT rules for all areas designated nonattainment for ozone
and classified as moderate or above. There are three parts to the
Section 182(b)(2) RACT requirement: (1) RACT for sources covered by an
existing CTG--i.e., a CTG issued prior to the enactment of the CAAA of
1990; (2) RACT for sources covered by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) all
major sources not covered by a CTG, i.e., non-CTG sources. This RACT
requirement requires nonattainment areas that previously were exempt
from certain RACT requirements to ``catch up'' to those nonattainment
areas that became subject to those requirements during an earlier
period. In addition, it requires newly designated ozone nonattainment
areas to adopt RACT rules consistent with those for previously
designated nonattainment areas. As previously mentioned, the State of
Maine contains three moderate ozone nonattainment areas. These areas
are thus subject to the Section 182(b)(2) RACT catch-up requirement.
Also, the State of Maine is located in the Northeast Ozone
Transport Region (OTR). The entire State is, therefore, subject to
Section 184(b) of the amended CAA. Section 184(b) requires that RACT be
implemented in the entire state for all VOC sources covered by a CTG
issued before or after the enactment of the CAAA of 1990 and for all
major VOC sources (defined as 50 tons per year for sources in the OTR).
Since Maine had previously submitted regulations for only bulk
gasoline terminals, fixed roof petroleum tanks, and paper coating
sources pursuant to the RACT fix-up requirement, in order to meet the
RACT catch-up requirement, the State must, therefore, adopt regulations
(or affirm that no sources exist) for the remaining 26 CTG categories
as well as adopt rules for all major non-CTG sources. (Rules for non-
CTG sources are not part of this SIP revision. These rules will
addressed in a separate action and, therefore, will not be further
discussed in this document.)
In response to the RACT catch-up requirement, on May 14, 1992 and
June 12, 1992, Maine submitted negative declarations for 15 CTG
categories. Maine then proceeded with the process of adopting
regulations to control the remaining CTG categories which included
surface coating processes, solvent metal cleaning, graphic arts
operations, the use of cutback asphalt, and gasoline marketing
operations. On January 13, 1993, Maine submitted a SIP submittal
containing regulations for surface coating processes, solvent metal
cleaning, graphic arts operations, and the use of cutback asphalt.
These regulations were approved into the Maine SIP on June 16, 1994 (59
FR 31154). Maine's gasoline marketing RACT catch-up regulations were
not included in the State's January 13, 1993 submittal. On July 6,
1994, Maine submitted a formal SIP revision containing its gasoline
marketing regulations. EPA's evaluation of this SIP submittal is
summarized below.
EPA's Evaluation of Maine's Submittal
In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate
the rule for consistency with the requirements of the Act and EPA
regulations, as found in Section 110 and Part D of the Act and 40 CFR
Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements,
which forms the basis for today's action, appears in various EPA policy
guidance documents. For the purpose of assisting State and local
agencies in developing RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control
Technique Guidelines (CTG) documents. The CTGs are based on the
underlying requirements of the Act and specify the presumptive norms
for RACT for specific source categories. EPA has not yet developed CTGs
to cover all sources of VOC emissions. Further interpretations of EPA
policy are found in: (1) Those portions of the proposed Post-1987 ozone
and carbon monoxide policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24,
1987); (2) the document entitled ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations, Clarification to Appendix D of
November 24, 1987 Federal Register Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of
availability was published in the Federal Register on May 25, 1988);
(3) the existing CTGs; and (4) the ``Model Volatile Organic Compound
Rules for Reasonably Available Control Technology'' issued as a staff
working draft in June of 1992. In general, these guidance documents
have been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are fully enforceable and
strengthen or maintain the SIP.
The VOC regulations that are included in Maine's July 6, 1994 SIP
submittal are briefly summarized below.
Chapter 100: Definitions Regulation
This regulation was amended by adding or revising definitions of
the following terms: bulk gasoline plant, gasoline, leak, tank truck,
and vapor control system.
Chapter 112: Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery
This regulation requires bulk gasoline terminals which load tank
trucks and have a daily throughput of greater than 20,000 gallons to
install a vapor control system. This regulation also prohibits bulk
terminals from loading gasoline into a tank truck unless the truck has
been certified as vapor-tight pursuant to the requirements in Maine's
Chapter 120. Chapter 112 was amended to no longer exempt tank trucks
with a total capacity of less than or equal to 3500 gallons.
Chapter 118: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control
This regulation requires gasoline dispensing facilities with a
throughput of 10,000 gallons or more per month to install and operate a
Stage I vapor balance system. Also, all gasoline dispensing facilities,
regardless of throughput, must install submerged fill pipes.
Chapter 120: Gasoline Tank Truck Tightness Self-Certification
This regulation requires gasoline tank trucks to undergo annual
vapor tightness testing.
[[Page 33732]]
Chapter 133: Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery at Bulk Gasoline
Plants
This regulation requires bulk gasoline plants with a throughput of
4000 gallons or more per day to install and operate a vapor balance
system.
EPA has evaluated Maine's gasoline marketing regulations and has
found that they are consistent with EPA model regulations and the
following CTG documents: ``Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck
Gasoline Loading Terminals'' (EPA-450/2-77-026); ``Control of Volatile
Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection
Systems'' (EPA-450/2-78-051); ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions
from Bulk Gasoline Plants'' (EPA-450/2-77-035); and ``Hydrocarbon
Control Strategies for Gasoline Marketing Operations'' (EPA-450/3-78-
017). As such, EPA believes that the submitted rules constitute RACT
for the applicable sources.
Maine's gasoline marketing regulations and EPA's evaluation are
detailed in a memorandum, dated December 29, 1994, entitled ``Technical
Support Document--Maine--Gasoline Marketing Regulations.'' Copies of
that document are available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
EPA's Previous NPR
Previously, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for
Maine's Chapter 120 tank truck regulation (57 FR 12791). EPA's NPR
proposed approval of Chapter 120 on the condition that Maine address
certain outstanding issues prior to final rulemaking. The issues
outlined in EPA's NPR and Maine's response are summarized below.
1. The NPR noted that the term ``vapor control system'' was not
used consistently throughout Chapter 120. Chapter 120(3)(B)
alternatively used the term ``vapor recovery system'' which was not
defined. The NPR stated that the State should change this term to
``vapor control system'' or define the term ``vapor recovery system.''
In response to this issue, Maine has revised Chapter 120 so that the
term ``vapor control system'' is used consistently throughout the
regulation.
2. The NPR noted that Chapter 120(3)(A)(2) stated that the
certification test approval expires June 1 of the year following the
test. In some cases, the June 1 date would allow trucks to go longer
then 12 months without a test. As stated in the NPR, such a provision
is inconsistent with Maine's Chapter 112(3)(A) which requires that the
truck has been certified within the last 12 months. The June 1
expiration date is also inconsistent with Chapter 120(4)(B) which
requires that a certified tank truck must remain leak-tight for the 12
months following the certification test. For these reasons, EPA's NPR
stated that Maine must either amend Chapter 120(3)(A)(2) to read
``expires 12 months after the certification test,'' or the State must
change the above referenced sections which are inconsistent with the
June 1 expiration date. In response to this issue, Maine has amended
Section 3(A)(2) of Chapter 120 to read ``expires 12 months after the
certification test.''
3. Chapter 120(5) requires that the Department be informed at least
24 hours in advance of each certification test. EPA's NPR stated that
DEP should require earlier notification of the intent to test, so that
the State can have the opportunity to monitor the test. The NPR also
noted that EPA's model rules suggest that the State be notified in
writing at least 10 days in advance of the test. Maine did not revise
Chapter 120 to require earlier notification, however, the revised rule
does require that the person conducting the test be registered with the
DEP. The State and industry both report that this arrangement is
working well. EPA, therefore, considers the testing requirements of
Maine's revised Chapter 120 regulation approvable.
4. Finally, EPA's NPR noted that when Maine adopts a bulk gasoline
plant regulation, Chapter 120 must be amended to apply to trucks that
exclusively service bulk plants. Since the publication of EPA's NPR,
Maine has adopted a bulk gasoline plant rule and the State has made the
necessary changes to Chapter 120 so that it also applies to tank trucks
that exclusively service bulk plants.
As outlined above, Maine has satisfactorily addressed the
outstanding issues listed in EPA's previous NPR.
In addition, EPA received two comment letters pursuant to the
publication of the Chapter 120 NPR. A summary of the comments received
and EPA's response are outlined below.
The Maine Oil Dealers Association (MODA) submitted comments
regarding Maine's Chapter 120 certification testing requirements. As
previously noted, EPA's NPR stated that Maine should require earlier
than 24 hour notification of the intent to test, so that the DEP can
have an opportunity to monitor the test. The NPR also noted that EPA's
model rules suggest that the State be notified in writing at least 10
days in advance of the test. MODA commented that the 24 hour notice
required by Maine's Chapter 120 is adequate notice and that, because of
the day to day variations in market demand, it is both unusual and
difficult to schedule tank truck testing 10 days in advance.
As previously mentioned, Maine did not revise Chapter 120 to
require earlier notification, however, the revised rule included in the
State's July 6, 1994 SIP submittal does require that the person
conducting the test be registered with the DEP. The State and industry
both report that this arrangement is working well. EPA is, therefore,
approving the testing requirements of Maine's revised Chapter 120
regulation.
The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) also submitted
comments pursuant to EPA's NPR. The SBA commented that in EPA's
proposal of Maine's Chapter 120 compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act was inadequate. SBA noted that, although the NPR stated
the proposed action would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the notice did not provide an
explanation for such a certification. SBA also had expressed similar
concerns with Federal Register notices prepared by other EPA Regional
Offices. In response to SBA's comments, this issue was addressed
nationally by EPA's Regional Operations Branch. EPA's justification is
addressed fully at the end of this notice. However, the central
rationale for the above-mentioned certification is that SIP approvals
under Section 110 and subchapter I, Part D of the CAA do not create any
new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is
already imposing. Therefore, because the federal SIP-approval does not
impose any new requirements, it does not have a significant impact on
any small entities affected.
As stated above, Maine has satisfactorily addressed the issues
raised in EPA's NPR and comments received pursuant to the NPR have also
been addressed. EPA is, therefore, approving Maine's Chapter 120 tank
truck tightness regulation as a revision to the Maine SIP.
In addition, as was previously stated, EPA has also evaluated the
other gasoline marketing regulations included in Maine's July 6, 1994
SIP submittal and has found that they are consistent with EPA model
regulations and the applicable CTG documents. EPA is, therefore,
approving Maine's Chapters 100, 112, 118, and 133 without prior
proposal because the Agency views these rules as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in a separate
document in this Federal Register publication, EPA is proposing to
[[Page 33733]]
approve these rules should adverse or critical comments be filed.
Approval of these rules will be effective August 28, 1995 unless by
July 31, 1995 adverse or critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, approval of Maine's Chapters
100, 112, 118, and 133 will be withdrawn before the effective date by
publishing a subsequent document that will withdraw the final action.
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent
final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. The EPA
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. If
no such comments are received, the public is advised that this action
will be effective on August 28, 1995.
Final Action
EPA is approving Maine's Chapter 100 ``Definitions Regulation,''
Chapter 112 ``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery,'' Chapter 118
``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control,'' Chapter 120
``Gasoline Tank Truck Tightness Self-Certification,'' and Chapter 133,
``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery at Bulk Gasoline Plants''
as meeting the requirements of Sections 182(b)(2) and 184(b) of the CAA
for the following categories of VOC sources: gasoline bulk terminals,
gasoline tank trucks, gasoline bulk plants, and gasoline dispensing
facilities. EPA is also revising a section of the code, Section
52.1022, that is outdated due to the enactment of the CAAA of 1990.
This action has been classified as a Table 2 action by the Regional
Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993
memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. A future document will inform the general public of
these tables. The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et. seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under Section 110 and subchapter I, Part D of the CAA
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the federal SIP-
approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does
not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover,
due to the nature of the federal-state relationship under the CAA,
preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute
federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds.
Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct. 1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any State Implementation Plan. Each request for revision to
the State Implementation Plan shall be considered separately in light
of specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in
relation to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 28, 1995. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, and Ozone.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation
Plan for the State of Maine was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
Dated: May 19, 1995.
John P. DeVillars,
Regional Administrator, Region I.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q
Subpart U--Maine
2. Section 52.1020 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(35) and
(c)(36) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(35) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Maine Department of Environmental Protection on June 3, 1991, November
25, 1991, and July 6, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letters from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
dated June 3, 1991, November 25, 1991, and July 6, 1994 submitting a
revision to the Maine State Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 120 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Gasoline Tank Truck Tightness Self-Certification,''
effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
(36) Revisions to the State Implementation Plan submitted by the
Maine Department of Environmental Protection on July 6, 1994.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
dated July 6, 1994 submitting a revision to the Maine State
Implementation Plan.
(B) Chapter 100 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Definitions,'' effective in the State of Maine on July
11, 1994, with the exception of the definitions of the following terms:
``curtailment,'' ``federally enforceable,'' ``major modification,'' ``
major source,'' ``nonattainment pollutant,'' ``shutdown,''
``significant emissions,'' and ``significant emissions increase.''
(C) Chapter 112 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery,'' effective
in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(D) Chapter 118 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vapor Control,''
effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(E) Chapter 133 of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection
Regulations, ``Petroleum Liquids Transfer Vapor Recovery at Bulk
Gasoline Plants,'' effective in the State of Maine on July 11, 1994.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Nonregulatory portions of the submittal.
[[Page 33734]]
Sec. 52.1022 [Amended]
3. Section 52.1022 is amended by removing all of the text in this
section, with the exception of the first sentence.
4. In Sec. 52.1031, Table 52.1031 is amended by adding new entries
to existing state citations for Chapter 100 and Chapter 112 and by
adding new state citations for Chapter 118, Chapter 120 and Chapter 133
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1031 EPA-Approved Maine Regulations.
* * * * *
Table 52.1031.--EPA-Approved Rules and Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
State citation Title/Subject adopted by Date approved by Federal Register 52.1020
State EPA citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
100............. Definitions..... 6/22/94 June 29, 1995... [Insert FR 36 Gasoline
citation from marketing
published date]. definitions
added
* * * * * *
*
112............. Petroleum 6/22/94 June 29, 1995... [Insert FR 36 Deleted
liquids citation from exemption for
transfer published date]. tank trucks
recover. less than 3500
gallons
* * * * * *
*
118............. Gasoline 6/22/94 June 29, 1995... [Insert FR 36 ................
Dispensing citation from
Facilities. published date.
* * * * * *
*
120............. Gasoline Tank 6/22/94 June 29, 1995... [Insert FR 35 ................
Trucks. citation from
published date].
* * * * * *
*
133............. Gasoline Bulk 6/22/94 June 29, 1995... [Insert FR 36 ................
Plants. citation from
published date].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 95-15957 Filed 6-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
