95-15975. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding for a Petition to List the Queen Charlotte Goshawk as Endangered  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 125 (Thursday, June 29, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 33784-33785]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-15975]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 17
    
    
    Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding 
    for a Petition to List the Queen Charlotte Goshawk as Endangered
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition finding.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces a 12-month 
    finding for a petition to list the Queen Charlotte goshawk (Accipiter 
    gentilis laingi) under the Endangered Species Act, as amended. After a 
    review of all available scientific information the Service find that 
    listing this species is not warranted at this time.
    
    DATES: The finding announced in this document was made on May 19, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Data, information, comments, or questions concerning this 
    petition should be submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
    3000 Vintage Blvd., Suite 201, Juneau, Alaska 99801. The petition 
    finding, supporting data, and comments are available for public 
    inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above 
    address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    John Lindell, Endangered Species Biologist, Ecological Services (see 
    ADDRESSES section) (907/586-7240).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Background
    
        Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as 
    amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that the Service make a 
    finding within 12 months of the date of the receipt of a valid petition 
    on whether the petitioned action is (a) not warranted, (b) warranted, 
    or (c) warranted but precluded from immediate proposal by other pending 
    proposals of higher priority.
        On November 21, 1991, the Service published in the Federal Register 
    (56 FR 58804) a notice of review for an updated list of animal taxa 
    that are being reviewed for possible addition to the List of Endangered 
    and Threatened Wildlife. Among the species included as Category 2 
    candidates was the northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). By inclusion 
    as a subspecies, the Queen Charlotte goshawk was also designated a 
    Category 2 species at that time.
        On May 9, 1994, the Service received a petition dated May 2, 1994, 
    from the Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, the Greater Gila 
    Biodiversity Project, the Biodiversity Legal Foundation, Greater 
    Ecosystem Alliance, Save the West, Save America's Forests, Native 
    Forest Network, Native Forest Council, Eric Holle, and Don Muller to 
    list the Queen Charlotte goshawk (Accipiter gentilis laingi) as 
    endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. On August 26, 1994, 
    (59 FR 44124) the Service announced a 90-day finding that the petition 
    presented substantial information indicating that the requested action 
    may be warranted and opened a comment period until November 25, 1994. 
    On January 4, 1995, (60 FR 425) the Service extended the comment period 
    until February 9, 1995. On February 24, 1995 (60 FR 10344) the Service 
    extended the comment period until February 28, 1995.
    
    [[Page 33785]]
    
        The Service has reviewed the petition, the literature cited in the 
    petition, and other literature and information available in the 
    Service's files, and contacted persons knowledgeable about this 
    species. On the basis of the best scientific and commercial information 
    available, the Service findings the petition is not warranted at this 
    time.
        In the 90-day finding the Service recognized the petitioners' 
    concerns for the long-term survival of the Queen Charlotte goshawk. The 
    Service continues to share those concerns. The U.S. Forest Service is 
    evaluating its land management practices through the development of 
    interim management guidelines to maintain viable populations of native 
    wildlife, and considering long-term management actions through revision 
    of the Tongass National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. The 
    Service believes there is opportunity to manage for the long-term 
    viability of the goshawk through the implementation of these guidelines 
    and the management plan. However, it is clear that without significant 
    changes to the existing Tongass National Forest Land and Resource 
    Management Plan, the long-term viability of the Queen Charlotte goshawk 
    may be seriously imperiled. The Queen Charlotte goshawk will therefore 
    be retained on the Service's list as a Category 2 candidate species. If 
    additional data become available, the Service may reassess the need to 
    list this species.
    
    Author
    
        The primary author of this document is John Lindell, Endangered 
    Species Biologist, Ecological Services (see ADDRESSES section) 
    (telephone 907/586-7240).
    
    Authority
    
        The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act (16 
    U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
    
        Dated: May 19, 1995.
    Mollie H. Beattie,
    Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-15975 Filed 6-28-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/29/1995
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of 12-month petition finding.
Document Number:
95-15975
Dates:
The finding announced in this document was made on May 19, 1995.
Pages:
33784-33785 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-15975.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 17