94-13463. Notice Regarding Section 602 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992 Inclusion of Outpatient Hospital Facilities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 106 (Friday, June 3, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-13463]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: June 3, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Public Health Service
    
     
    
    Notice Regarding Section 602 of the Veterans Health Care Act of 
    1992 Inclusion of Outpatient Hospital Facilities
    
    AGENCY: Public Health Service, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Section 602 of Public Law 102-585, the ``Veterans Health Care 
    Act of 1992'' (the ``Act''), enacted section 340B of the Public Health 
    Service Act (``PHS Act''), ``Limitation on Prices of Drugs Purchased by 
    Covered Entities.'' Section 340B provides that a manufacturer who sells 
    covered outpatient drugs to eligible entities must sign a 
    pharmaceutical pricing agreement (the ``Agreement'') with the 
    Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, in which the 
    manufacturer agrees to charge a price for covered outpatient drugs that 
    will not exceed the amount determined under a statutory formula.
        Section 340B(a)(4) lists the entities eligible to receive discount 
    outpatient drug pricing (i.e., certain disproportionate share hospitals 
    (DSHs) and PHS grantees). The definition of a disproportionate share 
    hospital found in section 340B(a)(4)(L) provides criteria to determine 
    which such hospitals are eligible to participate in the program. 
    However, the definition does not include criteria to determine which 
    outpatient facilities (including off-site or satellite clinics) working 
    in conjunction with the eligible hospital would be considered part of 
    the hospital for purposes of eligibility for section 340B drug 
    discounts. The Office of Drug Pricing, which administers this program 
    with PHS, is proposing certain procedures to determine which outpatient 
    hospital facilities are included as part of an eligible 
    disproportionate share hospital.
    
    DATES: The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed 
    procedures by July 5, 1994. Subject to consideration of the comments 
    submitted, the Department intends to publish a final notice regarding 
    these procedures.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments to Ms. Alvarez at the address listed below.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marsha Alvarez, R. Ph., Chief Pharmacy 
    Officer, Attn: Drug Pricing Program, Bureau of Primary Health Care, 
    East West Towers rm. 10-3A1, Bethesda, MD 20814, Tel: (301) 594-4354.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 340B(a)(4) of the PHS Act lists the 
    various groups of entities eligible to receive the section 340B 
    discount pricing. Section 340B(a)(4)(L)1 describes a subset of 
    ``hospitals'' as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) of the Social 
    Security Act as eligible to participate in the program. Because section 
    1886 addresses Medicare payment for hospital inpatient services only, 
    the scope of the term ``hospital'' has been limited to the hospital 
    inpatient services. However, section 340B deals exclusively with 
    outpatient drugs. Although Congress clearly intended that this narrow 
    definition be used to identify Medicare disproportionate share 
    hospitals which are eligible for section 340B drug discounts, we do not 
    believe it is reasonable to use this same definition to limit where the 
    section 340B outpatient drug can be used. Some disproportionate share 
    hospitals offer outpatient services in off-site or satellite outpatient 
    facilities. Further, the movement of nonprofit hospitals in recent 
    years has been to reorganize and offer a variety of services other than 
    traditional inpatient hospital services through separate divisions, 
    lines of business, or entities. Therefore, for purposes of section 340B 
    drug discounts, a more inclusive interpretation of ``hospital'' is 
    needed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Section 340B(a)(4)(L) of the PHS Act defines as a covered 
    entity--
        ``A subsection (d) hospital (as defined in section 1886(d)(1)(B) 
    of the Social Security Act) [42 U.S.C. section 1396ww(d)(1)(B)] 
    that--(i) is owned or operated by a unit of State or local 
    government, is a public or private non-profit corporation which is 
    formally granted governmental powers by a unit of State or local 
    government, or is a private non-profit hospital which has a contract 
    with a State or local government to provide health care services to 
    low income individuals who are not entitled to benefits under title 
    XVIII of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C.A. section 1395, et seq.] 
    or eligible for assistance under the State plan under this title; 
    (ii) for the most recent cost reporting period that ended before the 
    calendar quarter involved, had a disproportionate share adjustment 
    percentage (as determined under section 1886(d)(5)(F) of the Social 
    Security Act) [42 U.S.C.A. section 1395ww(d)(5)(F)] greater than 
    11.75 percent or was described in section 1886(d)(5)(F)(i)(II) of 
    such Act [42 U.S.C.A. 1395ww (d)(5)(F)(i)(II)]; and (iii) does not 
    obtain covered outpatient drugs through a group purchasing 
    organization or other group purchasing arrangement.''
        The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) submitted to the 
    Office of Drug Pricing a list of hospitals that met the first two 
    requirements (i.e., 340B(a)(4)(L)(i) and (ii)). HCFA will update 
    this list periodically.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Office of Drug Pricing Program is proposing to recognize as 
    part of an eligible DSH outpatient facilities (including off-site and 
    satellite clinics) which meet the following standard:
        The outpatient facility is considered an integral part of the 
    ``hospital'' and therefore eligible for section 340B drug discounts if 
    it is a reimbursable facility included on the hospital's Medicare cost 
    report.
        For example, if a hospital with one Medicare provider number meets 
    the disproportionate share criteria and this hospital has associated 
    outpatient clinics whose costs are listed on the Medicare cost report, 
    these clinics would also be eligible for section 340B drug discounts. 
    However, free-standing clinics of the hospital that submit their own 
    cost reports using a different Medicare number (not under the single 
    hospital Medicare provider number) would not be eligible for this 
    benefit.
        This test, using the single Medicare provider number, is proposed 
    for three reasons. First, Congress referred to section 1886 of the 
    Social Security Act, part of the Medicare statute, for the definition 
    of a DSH in section 340B(a)(4)(L) of the PHS Act. We believe, 
    therefore, that it is reasonable to utilize existing Medicare rules to 
    determine eligibility for the drug discount program. The proposed 
    Medicare cost report test was developed by Medicare officials and is 
    used, in part, to determine whether a facility is part of a hospital. 
    If an outpatient facility does not share in the hospital cost report, 
    it is properly viewed as an independent, free-standing facility.
        Second, the relative administrative burden of the proposed test 
    (i.e., obtaining sufficient documentation to verify the inclusion of 
    these off-site facilities) should be minimal. Hospitals seeking 
    Medicare reimbursement are required to submit annual cost reports 
    including all hospital units (e.g., on site and off-site clinics); 
    therefore, the information necessary to determine facility eligibility 
    is available and needs no further analysis by the Office of Drug 
    Pricing.
        Third, the test incorporates criteria (i.e., the Medicare cost 
    report) that form an independent and objective basis upon which to 
    determine eligibility. Therefore, this test should provide fair and 
    easy administration.
        If DSHs have difficulty accessing PHS pricing for eligible 
    outpatient clinics, they should contact the Office of Drug Pricing (not 
    HCFA) for assistance. If manufacturers have questions concerning the 
    eligibility of certain DSH outpatient clinics, they should also contact 
    the Office of Drug Pricing for a determination of eligibility.
    
        Dated: May 27, 1994.
    Ciro V. Sumaya,
    Administrator, Health Resources and Services Administration.
    [FR Doc. 94-13463 Filed 6-2-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/03/1994
Department:
Public Health Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-13463
Dates:
The public is invited to submit comments on the proposed procedures by July 5, 1994. Subject to consideration of the comments submitted, the Department intends to publish a final notice regarding these procedures.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: June 3, 1994