99-13968. Baker Atlas, Headquartered in Houston, TX; Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29890-29891]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-13968]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    
    Employment and Training Administration
    [TA-W-35, 434]
    
    
    Baker Atlas, Headquartered in Houston, TX; Negative Determination 
    Regarding Application for Reconsideration
    
        By application bearing the postmark date April 14, 1999, the 
    petitioners requested administrative reconsideration of the 
    Department's negative determination regarding eligibility for workers 
    and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment 
    Assistance (TAA). The denial notice applicable to workers of Baker 
    Atlas, headquartered in Houston, Texas, was signed on February 24, 
    1999, and published in the Federal Register on April 6, 1999 (63 FR 
    16753).
        Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
    the following circumstances:
        (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
    that the determination complained of was erroneous;
        (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
    a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
        (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
    misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
    the decision.
        The petition was filed on behalf of workers of the subject firm 
    headquarters and oilfield equipment production facility in Houston, 
    Texas. The investigation was expanded to include workers of the subject 
    firm engaged in the exploration and drilling of crude oil in Texas, 
    Louisiana, California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Colorado (TA-W-
    35, 434A-E). The Baker Atlas workers at the field locations were 
    certified eligible to apply for TAA and are not subject of the 
    application for reconsideration. The investigation applicable to the 
    headquarters and oilfield equipment production workers resulted in a 
    negative determination based on the finding that the workers did not 
    meet the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility requirement of 
    section 222(3) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. The oilfield 
    equipment produced by workers at Baker Atlas in Houston was used 
    exclusively by the subject firm drilling and exploration operations in 
    Texas and five other States. Other findings of the investigation 
    revealed that the United States is a net exporter of oilfield 
    equipment.
    
    [[Page 29891]]
    
        The petitioners contend that the Department based its negative TAA 
    determination for headquarters and oilfield equipment production staff 
    on the mistaken premise that the workers could be certified only if the 
    imports of oilfield equipment have contributed importantly to worker 
    separations. The petitioners maintain that since the oilfield equipment 
    produced in Houston is used predominantly by Baker Atlas at its own 
    exploration and drilling sites, increased imports of crude oil did 
    contribute to closing those exploration and drilling sites.
        The 1988 Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act amendments to the 
    Trade Act of 1974 extended coverage to service workers engaged in 
    exploration and drilling for crude oil and natural gas. Therefore, the 
    workers at the Baker Atlas field locations met the ``contributed 
    importantly'' criterion of the group eligibility requirements of the 
    Trade Act. The same consideration cannot be given to those workers 
    producing oilfield equipment for Baker Atlas in Houston, Texas. U.S. 
    imports of crude oil cannot be considered like or directly competitive 
    with imports of oilfield equipment.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
    conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
    or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
    of Labor's prior decisions. Accordingly, the application is denied.
    
        Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of May 1999.
    Grant D. Beale,
    Acting Director Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 99-13968 Filed 6-2-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/03/1999
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-13968
Pages:
29890-29891 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
TA-W-35, 434
PDF File:
99-13968.pdf