99-14023. Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.; Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 106 (Thursday, June 3, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29858-29859]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-14023]
    
    
    
    [[Page 29858]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP99-242-000]
    
    
    Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co.; Application
    
    May 27, 1999.
        Take notice that on March 8, 1999, as supplemented May 19, 1999, 
    Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company (Williston) 200 North Third 
    Street, Suite 300, Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, filed an application 
    pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of 
    public convenience and necessity for authorization to install and 
    operate a leased gas compressor unit at the Billy Creek Compressor 
    Station, Johnson County, Wyoming to enable Williston to transport 
    natural gas to current and potential pipeline interconnection points, 
    all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with 
    the Commission and open to public inspection. This filing may be viewed 
    on the web at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 
    for assistance).
        Specifically, Williston proposes to install and operate a 1,478 
    horsepower Waukesha Model L7042GSI V-12 engine coupled with an Ariel 
    JGK-4 compressor unit. Williston indicates that the compressor unit 
    lease rental for this compressor unit is $150,000 per year and the 
    compressor unit will be installed, operated, and maintained by 
    Williston personnel. Williston estimates the cost of the project to be 
    $298,321 excluding the $150,000 per year to lease the compressor unit. 
    Williston requests that the Commission grant rolled-in rate treatment 
    for the proposed facilities.
        Williston claims that producers in the Powder River Basin have 
    undertaken extensive drilling programs for the production of coal seam 
    gas. Williston states that it believes the installation and operation 
    of the proposed leased compressor will enable Williston Basin's 
    existing pipeline capacity to be more fully utilized through increased 
    throughput, will allow producers and shippers an avenue to move Powder 
    River Basin coal seam gas production to pipelines interconnecting with 
    Williston Basin's system in the most economical and environmentally 
    sensitive manner, and will attract additional supply sources to its 
    isolated Billy Creek-Sheridan system.
        Williston indicates that on February 5, 1999, Williston posted a 
    notice on its Electronic Bulletin Board and held an open season from 
    February 8, 1999, through February 22, 1999, to solicit interest from 
    shippers in utilizing the additional transportation capacity on the 
    Billy Creek-Sheridan line section which capacity will become available 
    as a result of the installation of the proposed leased compressor. 
    Williston states that as of the date of the filing of its application, 
    Williston has not consummated any definitive commitments for the 
    additional transportation capacity that will be available as a result 
    of the proposed compressor installation.
        By letter filed May 19, 1999, Williston supplemented its 
    application, stating that it has consummated a precedent agreement for 
    some of the transportation capacity that will be available as a result 
    of the proposed compressor installation. Williston's filing included 
    copies of the precedent agreement which Williston requests be given 
    confidential treatment under 18 CFR 388.112 because it is competitively 
    sensitive. Williston marked the precedent agreement ``Contains 
    Privileged Information--Do Not Release''.
        Williston states that while the precedent agreement may not 
    represent a commitment for a substantial amount of the project's 
    capacity and may not meet the Commission's threshold test for project 
    capacity commitment, there are several reasons why the Commission 
    should proceed with its review and processing of Williston's 
    application. Williston's first reason is the minor nature of the 
    project and the fact that it will have little economic or environmental 
    impact. Williston's second reason is the fact that the revenue 
    generated in the first year from the firm transportation contract to be 
    executed based on the precedent agreement is more that 77% of the 
    estimated first year cost of service. Williston next states that it 
    believes that the proposal will produce system benefits by more fully 
    utilizing its existing Bill Creek-Sheridan line section and by 
    increasing system reliability by attracting additional gas supply 
    sources to its pipeline system. Williston cites, as a fourth reason, 
    its belief that the transportation market in Billy Creek-Sheridan area 
    will continue to grow and generate additional firm and interruptible 
    transportation revenues fully recovering the incremental cost of 
    service associated with the project.
        Any person desiring to participate in the hearing process or to 
    make any protest with reference to said amendment should on or before 
    June 17, 1999, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
    First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene or a 
    protest in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's rules 
    of practice and procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the 
    Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests 
    filed with the Commission will be considered by it in determining the 
    appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to make the 
    protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
    party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any hearing 
    therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
    Commission's Rules.
        A person obtaining intervenor status will be placed on the service 
    list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive 
    copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by every one of the 
    intervenors. An intervenor can file for rehearing of any Commission 
    order and can petition for court review of any such order. However, an 
    intervenor must submit copies of comments or any other filing it makes 
    with the Commission to every other intervenor in the proceeding, as 
    well as 14 copies with the Commission.
        A person does not have to intervene, however, in order to have 
    comments considered. A person, instead, may submit two copies of 
    comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Commenters will be placed 
    on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of 
    environmental documents and will be able to participate in meetings 
    associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
    Commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on 
    all other parties. However, commenters will not receive copies of all 
    documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission and will 
    not have the right to seek rehearing or appeal the Commission's final 
    order to a federal court.
        The Commission will consider all comments and concerns equally, 
    whether filed by commenters or those requesting intervenor status.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by section 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    Commission's rules of practice and procedure, a hearing will be held 
    without further notice before the Commission or its designee on this 
    application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time required 
    herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter finds that a 
    grant of the certificate is required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or
    
    [[Page 29859]]
    
    if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for Williston to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-14023 Filed 6-2-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/03/1999
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-14023
Pages:
29858-29859 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP99-242-000
PDF File:
99-14023.pdf