[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-15898]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: June 30, 1994]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 101-6
Fire Protection Engineering
AGENCY: Public Buildings Service (PBS), GSA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The General Services Administration has proposed a regulation
to further define the term equivalent level of safety (59 FR 26768, May
24, 1994). The Federal Fire Safety Act of 1992 amended the Fire
Prevention and Control Act of 1974 to require sprinklers or an
equivalent level of safety in certain types of Federal Employee office
buildings, Federal employee housing units, and Federally assisted
housing units. This regulation establishes certain criteria which
alternative approaches must satisfy to be judged equivalent. These
criteria have been selected to provide the level of life safety
prescribed in the Act.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments must be received at the
address, as provided below, no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 25, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Mail comments to the following address: General Services
Administration, Safety and Environmental Management Division (PMS),
Federal Fire Safety Act Comments, 18th & F Streets, NW, Washington, DC
20405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald G. Bathurst, (202) 501-1271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the request of the Department of Defense,
the period for public comments on the proposed rule further defining an
equivalent level of safety is being extended. The public will have
until July 25, 1994, to comment on the regulation.
A survey of individuals involved in fire protection, conducted by
the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, indicated a number of people
were unaware of the proposed rule and the request for public comments.
A thirty-day extension of the public comment period should provide
sufficient time for interested individuals to respond. Consideration of
all substantive issues is important is ensuring that the rule reflects
sound state-of-the-art fire protection engineering principles, fosters
science and technological advancements, and provides reasonable
flexibility.
Dated: June 22, 1994.
David L. Bibb,
Acting Commissioner, Public Buildings Service.
[FR Doc. 94-15898 Filed 6-29-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-23-M
