98-17290. Medical Devices; Retention of Three Preamendment Class III Devices in Class III  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 35516-35517]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-17290]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Parts 868, 884, and 890
    
    [Docket No. 94N-0418]
    
    
    Medical Devices; Retention of Three Preamendment Class III 
    Devices in Class III
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is retaining the 
    following three preamendments class III devices in class III: Lung 
    water monitor, powered vaginal muscle stimulator for therapeutic use, 
    and stair-climbing wheelchair. The agency is taking this action because 
    insufficient information exists to determine that special controls 
    would provide reasonable assurance of their safety and effectiveness, 
    and/or these devices present a potential unreasonable risk of illness 
    or injury.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: July 30, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet L. Scudiero, Center for Devices 
    and Radiological Health (HFZ-410), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
    Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1184.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        In the Federal Register of June 18, 1997 (62 FR 33044), FDA issued 
    a proposed rule to retain the lung water monitor, the powered vaginal 
    muscle stimulator for therapeutic use, and the stair-climbing 
    wheelchair in class III. This proposed retention in class III was based 
    on a lack of information submitted in response to the section 515(i) of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360e(i)) 
    order to determine whether or not special controls could be established 
    to reasonably assure the safety and effectiveness of these devices.
        Interested persons were given until September 16, 1997, to comment 
    on the proposed rule. During the comment period, FDA received no 
    comments on the proposed rule.
    
    II. FDA's Conclusion
    
        FDA has concluded that insufficient information exists to establish 
    special controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and 
    effectiveness of the lung water monitor, the powered vaginal muscle 
    stimulator for therapeutic use, and the stair-climbing wheelchair and/
    or that these devices present a potential unreasonable risk of illness 
    or injury.
    
    III. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) that this action is 
    of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
    effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
    assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
    
    [[Page 35517]]
    
    IV. Analysis of Impacts
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive 
    Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354), as 
    amended by subtitle D of the Small Business Regulatory Fairness Act of 
    1996 (Pub. L. 104-121) and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all 
    costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when 
    regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
    net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
    health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and 
    equity). The agency believes that this final rule is consistent with 
    the regulatory philosophy and principles identified in the Executive 
    Order. In addition, the final rule is not a significant regulatory 
    action as defined by the Executive Order and so is not subject to 
    review under the Executive Order.
        If a rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to 
    analyze regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact 
    of a rule on small entities. Because FDA believes that there is little 
    or no interest in marketing these devices, and because this rule 
    retains these devices as previously classified, the agency certifies 
    that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Therefore, under the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, no further analysis is required.
    
    V. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    
        This rule contains no collections of information. Therefore, 
    clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
        This final rule is issued under sections 513, 515(i), and 701(a) of 
    the act (21 U.S.C. 360c, 360e(i), and 371(a)) and under authority of 
    the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
    
        Dated: June 17, 1998.
    D.B. Burlington,
    Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
    [FR Doc. 98-17290 Filed 6-29-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/30/1998
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-17290
Dates:
July 30, 1998.
Pages:
35516-35517 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94N-0418
PDF File:
98-17290.pdf
CFR: (3)
21 CFR 868
21 CFR 884
21 CFR 890