99-16375. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, Siskiyou County Air Pollution Control District, Tehama County Air Pollution Control ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 30, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 35106-35107]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-16375]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CA 210-0103b; FRL-6365-2]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; 
    California State Implementation Plan Revision, Modoc County Air 
    Pollution Control District, Siskiyou County Air Pollution Control 
    District, Tehama County Air Pollution Control District, and Tuolumne 
    County Air Pollution Control District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the California State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP). This action is an administrative change 
    which revises the definitions in Modoc County Air Pollution Control 
    District (MCAPCD), Siskiyou County Air Pollution Control District 
    (SCAPCD), Tehama County Air Pollution Control District (TCAPCD), and 
    Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District (TUCAPCD).
        The intended effect of approving this action is to incorporate 
    changes to the definitions for clarity and consistency and to update 
    the Exempt Compound list in TCAPCD definition's rule to be consistent 
    with the revised federal and state VOC definitions. EPA is proposing 
    approval of these revisions to be incorporated into the California SIP 
    for the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards 
    (NAAQS) under title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). In the 
    Final Rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the 
    state's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
    because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision and 
    anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for this approval 
    is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
    received, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse 
    comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
    comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
    this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. 
    Any parties interested in commenting should do so at this time.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received by July 30, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Andrew Steckel, Chief, 
    Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
        Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each 
    rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region 9 office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revisions 
    are also available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
    Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, 202 West 4th Street, 
    Alturas, CA 96101-3915
    Siskiyou County Air Pollution Control District, 1855 Placer Street, 
    Ste. 101, Redding, CA 96001-1759
    Tehama County Air Pollution Control District, P.O. Box 38 (1750 Walnut 
    St.), Red Bluff, CA 96080-0038
    Tuolumne County Air Pollution Control District, 22365 Airport, 
    Columbia, CA 95310
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, Rulemaking Office 
    (Air-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 
    75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415) 
    744-1189.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns MCAPCD Rule 1.2, 
    Definitions and 7.1, Definitions (Agricultural Burning); SCAPCD Rule 
    7.1, Agricultural Burning Definitions; TCAPCD Rule 1:2, Definitions; 
    and TUCAPCD Rules 101, Title; 102, Definitions; and Regulation III, 
    Open Burning, Rule 300, General Definitions. These rules were submitted 
    to EPA on March 26, 1990 (Tuolumne), December 31, 1990 (Modoc and 
    Siskiyou), and May 13, 1991 (Tehama) by the California Air Resources 
    Board. For further information, please see the information provided in 
    the direct final action that is located in the rules section of this 
    Federal Register.
    
    
    [[Page 35107]]
    
    
        Dated: June 8, 1999.
    Nora L. McGee,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    [FR Doc. 99-16375 Filed 6-29-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/30/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
99-16375
Dates:
Written comments must be received by July 30, 1999.
Pages:
35106-35107 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA 210-0103b, FRL-6365-2
PDF File:
99-16375.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52