96-13853. Papayas Grown in Hawaii; Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 4, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 28000-28002]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-13853]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 928
    
    [Docket No. FV96-928-1-IFR]
    
    
    Papayas Grown in Hawaii; Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This interim final rule establishes an assessment rate for the 
    Papaya Administrative Committee (Committee) under Marketing Order No. 
    928 for the 1996-97 and subsequent fiscal periods. The Committee is 
    responsible for local administration of the marketing order which 
    regulates the handling of papayas grown in Hawaii. Authorization to 
    assess papaya handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that are 
    reasonable and necessary to administer the program.
    
    DATES: Effective on July 1, 1996. Comments received by July 5, 1996, 
    will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent in triplicate to the Docket 
    Clerk, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 
    2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456, FAX (202) 720-5698. Comments should 
    reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue 
    of the Federal Register and will be available for public inspection in 
    the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kate Nelson, Marketing Assistant, 
    California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, 
    USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721, 
    telephone (209) 487-5901, FAX (209) 487-5901, or Charles L. Rush, 
    Marketing Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2523-S, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456, telephone (202) 720-5127, FAX (202) 720-5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 928 and Order No. 928, both as amended (7 CFR part 928), 
    regulating the handling of papayas grown in Hawaii, hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are 
    effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as 
    amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, handlers of 
    papayas grown in Hawaii are subject to assessments. Funds to administer 
    the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the 
    assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable 
    papayas beginning July 1, 1996, and continuing until amended, 
    suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local 
    laws,
    
    [[Page 28001]]
    
    regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 400 producers of papayas in the production 
    area and approximately 60 handlers subject to regulation under the 
    marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been defined by the 
    Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those having annual 
    receipts less than $500,000, and small agricultural service firms are 
    defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. The 
    majority of papaya producers and handlers may be classified as small 
    entities.
        The papaya marketing order provides authority for the Committee, 
    with the approval of the Department, to formulate an annual budget of 
    expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 
    program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of 
    papayas grown in Hawaii. They are familiar with the Committee's needs 
    and with the costs for goods and services in their local area and are 
    thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment 
    rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public 
    meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to 
    participate and provide input.
        The Committee met on April 26, 1996, and unanimously recommended 
    1996-97 expenditures of $485,300 and an assessment rate of $0.0059 per 
    pound of papayas. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were 
    $435,800.
        The assessment rate of $0.0059 is the same as last year's 
    established rate. Major expenditures recommended by the Committee for 
    the 1996-97 year include $160,000 for the marketing and promotion 
    program, $130,000 for research and development, and $67,000 for 
    salaries. Budgeted expenses for these items in 1995-96 were $165,500, 
    $115,000, and $67,000 respectively.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of papayas grown in 
    Hawaii. Papaya shipments for the year are estimated at 30 million 
    pounds which should provide $177,000 in assessment income. Income 
    derived from handler assessments, the Hawaii Department of Agriculture, 
    the USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service, the County of Hawaii, and the 
    Japanese Inspection program, along with interest income and funds from 
    the Committee's authorized reserve, will be adequate to cover budgeted 
    expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept within the maximum 
    permitted by the order.
        While this rule will impose some costs on handlers, the costs are 
    in the form of uniform assessments on all handlers. Some of the costs 
    may be passed on to producers.
        However, these costs should be offset by the benefits derived by 
    the operation of the marketing order.
        Based on available information, the Agricultural Marketing Service 
    has determined that this rule will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other available information.
        Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite 
    period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
    fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
    recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
    times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or the 
    Department. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested 
    persons may express their views at these meetings. The Department will 
    evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to 
    determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 
    Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 
    1996-97 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed 
    and, as appropriate, approved by the Department.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good 
    cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public 
    interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into 
    effect, because: (1) The Committee needs to have sufficient funds to 
    pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the 
    1996-97 fiscal period begins on July 1, 1996, and the marketing order 
    requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to 
    all assessable papayas handled during such fiscal period; (3) handlers 
    are aware of this action which was unanimously recommended by the 
    Committee at a public meeting and is similar to other assessment rate 
    actions issued in past years; and (4) this interim final rule provides 
    a 30-day comment period, and all comments timely received will be 
    considered prior to finalization of this rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 928
    
        Marketing agreements, Papayas, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 928 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 928--PAPAYAS GROWN IN HAWAII
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 928 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. Section 928.226 is added to read as follows:
    
        Note: This section will appear in the Code of Federal 
    Regulations.
    
    
    Sec. 928.226  Assessment rate.
    
        On and after July 1, 1996, an assessment rate of $0.0059 per pound 
    is
    
    [[Page 28002]]
    
    established for papayas grown in Hawaii.
    
        Dated: May 29, 1996.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 96-13853 Filed 6-3-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/1/1996
Published:
06/04/1996
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
96-13853
Dates:
Effective on July 1, 1996. Comments received by July 5, 1996, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
28000-28002 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV96-928-1-IFR
PDF File:
96-13853.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 928.226