95-13566. North Star Inc. Mine Operating Plan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 107 (Monday, June 5, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 29546-29547]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-13566]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Notices
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
    or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
    and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
    delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
    statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
    appearing in this section.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 107 / Monday, June 5, 1995 / 
    Notices
    
    [[Page 29546]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    North Star Inc. Mine Operating Plan
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
    statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the United States Forest Service 
    will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to assess the 
    potential environmental impacts that may be associated with development 
    of the proposed North Star Project. North Star, Inc., previously known 
    as Right Star, Inc. a California Corporation, has filed a plan of 
    operation with the Big Bear Ranger Station, San Bernardino National 
    Forest to expand and develop a high grade locatable limestone deposit 
    in San Bernardino County, California. The North Star Project is located 
    approximately 80 miles due east of Los Angeles, and approximately 3.5 
    miles northeast of Big Bear City. The Project will ultimately affect 
    approximately 37 acres, and includes the following activities: mining, 
    limestone trucking, vegetation and soil removal, blasting, loading, 
    crushing, screening, and reclamation of disturbed land. The quarry will 
    extend to a depth of approximately 40 feet below the level of Forest 
    Road 3N03. Access to the site is via State Highway 18 and Forest Road 
    3N03. Approximately 200 tons of limestone per day would be transported 
    to markets in California and Arizona. The USDA Forest Service is the 
    lead Federal Agency for NEPA compliance in the preparation of the 
    Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed project. The 
    following issues have been preliminarily identified for analysis: 
    Visual quality, cultural resources, traffic, recreation, threatened, 
    endangered and sensitive plant and wildlife species, health and safety, 
    economics, mineral development, air quality, and other land uses. In 
    accordance with the National Environmental Quality Act requirements, 
    the EIS will also consider alternatives to the proposed action. 
    Alternatives and additional issues may be identified as a result of the 
    public scoping process.
        This notice is a request for environmental information that you or 
    your organization feels should be addressed in the EIS. Detailed 
    information may be included in your response. Written comments should 
    be sent to the address below no later than June 30, 1995.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Mining Law of 1872 (May 10, 
    1872) as amended, authorizes the location and extraction of minerals, 
    including limestone, subject to regulations prescribed by law.
        Mining regulations for the Forest Service are found in 36 CFR Part 
    228, Subpart A, first issued on August 28, 1974.
        In preparing the environmental impact statement, the Forest Service 
    will identify and consider a range of alternatives for this site. One 
    of these will be no development of the site. Other alternatives will 
    consider the company proposal, and environmentally modified proposal 
    and an environmentally constrained proposal. Alternative locations for 
    overburdened dumps, roads, and support facilities also will be 
    considered.
        Gene Zimmerman, Forest Supervisor, San Bernardino National Forest, 
    San Bernardino, California is the responsible official.
        Public participation will be especially important at several points 
    during the analysis. The first point is during the scoping process (40 
    CFR 1501.7). The Forest Service will be seeking information, comments, 
    and assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and other 
    individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected by 
    the proposed action. This input will be used in preparation of the 
    draft environmental impact statement (DEIS). The scoping process 
    includes:
        1. Identifying potential issues.
        2. Identifying issues to be analyzed in depth.
        3. Eliminating insignificant issues or those which have been 
    covered by a relevant previous environmental analysis.
        4. Exploring additional alternatives.
        5. Identifying potential environmental effects of the proposed 
    action and alternatives (i.e. direct, indirect, and cumulative effects 
    and connected actions).
        6. Determining potential cooperating agencies and task assignments.
        The mining of limestone is a significant activity on the north 
    slope of the San Bernardino Mountains and is important to the economy 
    of the Lucerne Valley Community. In excess of 3.5 million tons of 
    limestone material are removed annually from quarries on both private 
    and Federal lands. An additional 1.8 million tons of un-economic 
    materials are removed but re-deposited in waste dumps. The limestone 
    mining operations on the northslope have been carried on for many years 
    through various approvals (Plans of Operations and a variety of 
    amendments to those plans). The need for a consolidation of plans and 
    amendments and a need to emphasize reclamation and advanced planning 
    has been identified.
        North Star, Inc., has been bulk-sample mining at the edge of the 11 
    acre site. Approximately .6 of an acre has been mined to date. Mining 
    equipment (e.g. drills, crushers, loaders) has not been left on the 
    site. North Star proposes to expand from the current bulk sample to an 
    anticipated 200,000 tons of product in the next 5 years, based upon 
    market demands.
        North Star Minerals, Inc., a California corporation, holds leases 
    for Smart Ranch Carbonate Placer Mining Claims 11 and 16 from Don Fife 
    and Associates in Lone Valley, Big Bear Ranger District (Sec 32, T3N, 
    R2E, SBBM) all within San Bernardino County. Right Star proposes to 
    develop a quarry on the 11 acres and conduct operations that will yield 
    high quality screened limestone products. Access to the site is via SH 
    18 and Forest road 3N03. Approximately 8 trucks per day would transport 
    200 tons of limestone to markets in the Lucerne Valley area. The 11 
    acres will be used for soil stockpiles, processing facility and a 
    benched quarry. Operations will include vegetation and soil removal, 
    blasting, loading, hauling, crushing and screening. The quarry will 
    extend to a depth of approximately 40 feet below the level of FS 3N03. 
    Waste material would also be deposited on-site. Electrical power would 
    be supplied by [[Page 29547]] a diesel generator. The staging area 
    would be set up to accommodate a guard's camper trailer and chemical 
    toilet for the crew. A 20 foot air-sea cargo container (for storage of 
    small tools) and a 500 gallon diesel fuel storage tank would be in the 
    same general location.
        During a preliminary environmental analysis, it was determined that 
    an area of Forest Service sensitive plants and their habitat exists on 
    the North Star limestone area, and that the plants and habitat would be 
    impacted by any developmental alternative. For the reason, it was 
    determined that the proposal could have significant effects on the 
    environment, and an EIS is needed.
        The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for public review by 
    September 1995. At that time EPA will publish a notice of availability 
    of the draft EIS in the Federal Register.
        The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date 
    that the EPA's notice of availability appears in the Federal Register. 
    It is very important that those interested in the management of the 
    north slope of the San Bernardino Mountains participate at that time. 
    To be the most helpful, comments on the draft EIS should be as specific 
    as possible and may address the adequacy of the statement or the merits 
    of the alternatives discussed (see The Council on Environmental Quality 
    Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3). In addition, Federal court 
    decisions have established that reviewers of draft EISs must structure 
    their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that 
    it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewers' position and 
    contentions, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    553 (1978), and that environmental objections that could have been 
    raised at the draft stage may be waived if not raised until after 
    completion of the final environmental impact statement. Wisconsin 
    Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334 (E.D. Wis. 1980). The 
    reason for this is to ensure that substantive comments and objections 
    are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can 
    meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final.
        After the comment period ends on the draft EIS, the comments will 
    be analyzed and considered by the Forest Service in preparing the final 
    environmental impact statement. The final EIS is scheduled to be 
    completed by December 1995. In the final EIS, the Forest Service is 
    required to respond to the comments received (40 CFR 1503.4). The 
    responsible official will consider the comments, responses, 
    environmental consequences discussed in the EIS, and applicable laws, 
    regulations, and policies in making a decision regarding this proposal. 
    The responsible official will document the decision and reasons for the 
    decision in the Record of Decision. That decision will be subject to 
    appeal under 36 CFR 211.18.
    
    DATES: Comments are requested on this notice concerning the scope of 
    the analysis of the draft EIS. Comments must be received within 30 days 
    of the publication date of this notice.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions concerning the scope 
    of the analysis to Gene Zimmerman, Forest Supervisor, San Bernardino 
    National Forest, 1824 S. Commercenter Circle, San Bernardino, CA 92408-
    3430.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Raj Daniel, District Minerals Officer, San Bernardino National Forest, 
    Mill Creek Station, 34701 Mill Creek Road, Mentone, CA 92359, 
    telephone: (909) 794-1123.
    
        Dated: May 26, 1995.
    Gene Zimmerman,
    Forest Supervisor.
    [FR Doc. 95-13566 Filed 6-2-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/05/1995
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
95-13566
Dates:
Comments are requested on this notice concerning the scope of the analysis of the draft EIS. Comments must be received within 30 days of the publication date of this notice.
Pages:
29546-29547 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-13566.pdf