2024-12343. Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin From the Sultanate of Oman: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

    SUMMARY:

    The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that OCTAL SAOC FZC (OCTAL), the sole respondent subject to this administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate resin (PET resin) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman), did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of this administrative s review.

    DATES:

    Applicable June 5, 2024.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Jeff Pedersen or Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769 and (202) 482-3518, respectively.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    Based on timely requests for review, in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), on July 6, 2023, Commerce initiated an administrative review of the AD order on PET resin from the Oman with respect to OCTAL covering the POR.[1] On January 24, 2024, Commerce extended the deadline for these preliminary results to May 30, 2024.[2]

    For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this review, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[3] A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

    Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order is PET resin having an intrinsic viscosity of at least 0.70, but not more than 0.88, deciliters per gram. The merchandise subject to the Order is properly classified under subheadings 3907.60.00.30, 3907.61.0000, 3907.61.0010, 3907.61.0050, 3907.69.0000, 3907.69.0010, and 3907.69.0050 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).[4] Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by the Order is dispositive. For a full description of the scope of the Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

    Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751 (a)(1)(B) the Act. We calculated export and constructed export prices and NV in accordance with sections 772 and 773 of the Act, respectively. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results of review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

    Preliminary Results of Review

    We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margin to the company listed below for the period May 1, 2022, through April 30, 2023:

    Producer/exporterWeighted-average dumping margin (percent)
    OCTAL SAOC FZC0.00

    Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose its calculations for the preliminary results of review to parties to the proceeding within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public Start Printed Page 48154 announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

    Verification

    Commerce received a timely request from DAK Americas LLC, Indorama Ventures USA, Inc., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America (collectively, the petitioners) to verify the information submitted in this administrative review, pursuant to 19 CFR 307(b)(1)(iv).[5] Commerce does not intend to verify the information submitted by the mandatory respondent in the course of this administrative review.

    Public Comment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register .[6] Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.[7] Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review must submit: (1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of authorities.[8]

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.[9] Further, we request that interested parties limit their executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).[10]

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Requests for a hearing should contain: (1) the requesting party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of individuals associated with the requesting party that will attend the hearing and whether any of those individuals is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the issues that the party intends to discuss at the hearing. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the case and rebuttal briefs. An electronically filed hearing request must be received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register . If a hearing is requested, Commerce will announce the date and time of the hearing. Parties should confirm the date and time of the hearing two days before the scheduled hearing date.

    Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results of review in the Federal Register , pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.[11]

    Assessment Rates

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by this review shall be based on the final results of the review.[12] Therefore, upon issuance of the final results of this review, Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by this review in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).

    We will calculate importer-specific assessment rates for OCTAL, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).[13] Because OCTAL reported entered values for its sales, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the company by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for all reviewed U.S. sales to the importer by the total entered value of the merchandise sold to the importer.[14]

    Where either OCTAL's ad valorem weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis,[15] we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.

    Pursuant to a refinement to Commerce's assessment practice, where sales of subject merchandise that was produced or exported by an individually examined respondent were not reported in the U.S. sales data submitted by the respondent, but the merchandise was entered for consumption in the United States during the POR, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of such merchandise at the all-others rate ( i.e., 7.62 percent) [16] if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.[17]

    Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be in effect for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the notice of the final results of this administrative review in the Federal Register , as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for OCTAL will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established for the company in the final results of this review, except if the weighted-average dumping margin Start Printed Page 48155 is less than 0.50 percent, and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed companies that are not covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company's cash deposit rate from the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which it was examined; (3) if the exporter is not covered by this review, and does not have a cash deposit rate from a completed segment of this proceeding, but the producer of the subject merchandise does have a cash deposit rate, then the cash deposit rate will be the producer's cash deposit rate from the most recently completed segment of the proceeding in which it was examined; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 7.62 percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.[18] These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

    Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.

    Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Start Signature

    Dated: May 30, 2024.

    Abdelali Elouaradia,

    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    End Signature

    Appendix

    List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

    I. Summary

    II. Background

    III. Scope of the Order

    IV. Discussion of the Methodology

    V. Currency Conversion

    VI. Recommendation

    End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.   See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,88 FR 44262, 44267 (July 12, 2023) ( Initiation); see also Certain Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from Canada, the People's Republic of China, India, and the Sultanate of Oman: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination (Sultanate of Oman) and Antidumping Duty Orders,81 FR 27979 (May 6, 2016) ( Order). While Commerce initiated this administrative review with respect to OCTAL and OCTAL Inc., OCTAL Inc. is OCTAL's affiliated U.S. importer, and as such, Commerce should not have included OCTAL Inc. in the Initiation. See OCTAL's Letter, “Section A Response of OCTAL SAOC-FZC,” dated September 5, 2023, at 8.

    Back to Citation

    2.   See Memorandum, “Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated January 24, 2024.

    Back to Citation

    3.   See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 2022-2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from the Sultanate of Oman,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).

    Back to Citation

    4.  Commerce added HTSUS subheadings 3907.61.0000, 3907.69.0000, 3907.61.0010, 3907.61.0050, 3907.69.0010, and 3907.69.0050 to the scope after issuing the Order. See Polyethylene Terephthalate Resin from the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020-2021,87 FR 75594 (December 9, 2022).

    Back to Citation

    5.   See Petitioners' Letter, “Petitioners' Verification Request,” dated October 18, 2023.

    Back to Citation

    6.   See19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).

    Back to Citation

    7.   See19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) ( APO and Service Final Rule).

    Back to Citation

    8.   See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).

    Back to Citation

    9.  We use the term “issue” here to describe an argument that Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

    Back to Citation

    10.   See APO and Service Final Rule, 88 FR at 67070.

    Back to Citation

    11.   See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Back to Citation

    12.   See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.

    Back to Citation

    13.  We applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification,77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).

    Back to Citation

    16.   See Order, 81 FR at 27982.

    Back to Citation

    17.  For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).

    Back to Citation

    18.   See Order, 81 FR at 27982.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2024-12343 Filed 6-4-24; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Document Information

Published:
06/05/2024
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2024-12343
Dates:
Applicable June 5, 2024.
Pages:
48153-48155 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-523-810
PDF File:
2024-12343.pdf