97-14649. Regulatory Reform for Small and Mid-Size Local Exchange Carriers Subject to Rate-of-Return Regulation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 109 (Friday, June 6, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 31003-31005]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-14649]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 61
    
    [CC Docket No. 92-135, FCC 97-41]
    
    
    Regulatory Reform for Small and Mid-Size Local Exchange Carriers 
    Subject to Rate-of-Return Regulation
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In this Order, the Commission considers petitions for 
    reconsideration and clarification concerning regulatory reform for 
    local exchange carriers subject to rate of return regulations (Small 
    Telco Reform Order). In particular, the Order eliminates the two year 
    notice period that local exchange carriers must provide before exiting 
    the incentive plan, clarifies the rules consistent with the Small Telco 
    Reform Order, and amends the rules and clarifies several matters raised 
    by the petitioners. The Commission's action is intended to eliminate 
    any ambiguities and inconsistencies in the Commission's rules and the 
    Small Telco Reform Order.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: July 7, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Abeyta, (202) 418-1538.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order 
    On Reconsideration in CC Docket No. 92-135 (FCC 97-41) adopted on 
    February 10, 1997 and released on February 18, 1997. The full text of 
    this Order on Reconsideration is available for inspection and copying 
    during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 
    1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037.
        The complete text may also be obtained through the World Wide Web, 
    at http:/www.fcc.gov/Bureau/Common/Carrier/Order/fcc9741.wp or may be 
    purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
    Transcription Services, Inc. (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, N.W., Suite 
    140, Washington, D.C. 20037.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
    
        No significant impact.
    
    [[Page 31004]]
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        No significant impact.
    
    Synopsis of Report and Order
    
        On February 18, 1997, after reviewing petitions for reconsideration 
    and clarification filed by American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 
    the National Exchange Carriers Association, and the United States 
    Telephone Association (hereinafter, Petitioners), the Commission 
    released an Order on Reconsideration in CC Docket No. 92-135. 
    Petitioners sought reconsideration and clarification of several issues 
    addressed in the Small Telco Reform Order. Petitioners (1) request that 
    the Commission reconsider reducing the two year notice period that LECs 
    must provide before exiting the incentive plan; (2) argue that the 
    prohibition against reentry into the pools violates pool neutrality and 
    the voluntary nature of pools; (3) seek reconsideration of the 
    provision in the incentive plan that allows LECs rate adjustments of 
    10% within each service category over each two-year tariff period 
    because Petitioners believe the rule could be interpreted to allow LECs 
    using the incentive plan to recover 110% of their costs; (4) request 
    that the incentive plan's streamlined filing requirements for new 
    services be extended to apply to new services in territories where the 
    ``geographically closest'' (but not bordering) price cap LEC offers the 
    same service; and (5) request that the Commission delete the 
    infrastructure reporting requirements for the incentive plan, arguing 
    that such reports are not required for voluntary price cap LECs and 
    should not be required for incentive plan LECs. In response to these 
    requests for revisions, the Commission eliminated the two-year exit 
    notice requirement, but otherwise declined to make the requested 
    revisions to the Small Telco Reform Order.
        The Petitioners also sought clarification of several issues 
    addressed in the Small Telco Reform Order. Petitioners argued that the 
    rules embodying the common line rate structures for the incentive plan 
    and small company rules are inconsistent with the text of the Small 
    Telco Reform Order, and should be clarified. In response, the 
    Commission believes the rules are consistent with the Small Telco 
    Reform Order, but nonetheless has redrafted the rules as formulae to 
    eliminate any inconsistencies in the Small Telco Reform Order's 
    application. Petitioners requested that we add a clarifying statement 
    concerning the relative burden on incentive plan participants that seek 
    to increase their rates by making mid-term corrections to their 
    tariffs. The Commission believes the Small Telco Reform Order is clear 
    and therefore denies this request for clarification. Petitioners 
    requested that the Commission codify the incentive plan's mechanism for 
    exogenous cost adjustment. The Commission agrees, and amends its rules 
    to codify the Small Telco Reform Order's provisions that incentive plan 
    LECs may adjust their rates (either in the biennial tariff filing or 
    during the two-year tariff period) to reflect exogenous cost changes 
    for costs deemed exogenous for price cap LECs. Finally, Petitioners 
    requested that to remove potential ambiguities, the Commission should 
    make certain minor, non-substantive revisions to the sections of the 
    Small Telco Reform Order concerning voluntary biennial filings, the 
    base period for end user common line calculations, and rate change 
    indexes. This Order on Reconsideration amends the Small Telco Reform 
    Order to clarify those matters.
    
    List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 61
    
        Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    Shirley S. Suggs,
    Chief, Publications Branch.
    
    Rule Changes
    
        Accordingly part 61 of title 47 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 61--TARIFFS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 1, 4(i), 4(j), 201-205, and 403 of the 
    Communications Act of 1934, as amended; 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 
    154(j), 210-205, and 403, unless otherwise noted.
    
        2. Section 61.39 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(3)(i), 
    (b)(3)(ii), (b)(4)(i) and (b)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 61.39  Optional supporting information to be submitted with 
    letters of transmittal for Access Tariff filings effective on or after 
    April 1, 1989, by local exchange carriers serving 50,000 or fewer 
    access lines in a given study area that are described as subset 3 
    carriers in Sec. 69.602.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (3) * * *
        (i) For the first biennial filing, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be determined by a cost of service study for the most 
    recent 12-month period. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost 
    and demand data for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be 
    determined by the following formula: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.008
    
    where: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.009
    
    And where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line revenue requirement for the most 
    recent 12-month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 12-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = CCL MOUb; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
    
        (ii) For subsequent biennial filings, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be determined by a cost of service study for the most 
    recent 24-month period. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost 
    and demand data for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be 
    determined by the following formula: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.010
    
    Where: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.011
    
    And where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line revenue requirement for the most 
    recent 24-month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 24-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
    
        (4) * * *
        (i) For the first biennial filings, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be determined by the local exchange carrier's most 
    recent annual Common Line settlement from the National Exchange Carrier 
    Association. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost and demand 
    data for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be determined 
    by the following formula: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.012
    
    Where: 
    
    [[Page 31005]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.013
    
    
    And where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line settlement for the most recent 12-
    month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 12-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = CCL MOUb; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
    
        (ii) For subsequent biennial filings, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be an amount calculated to reflect the average 
    schedule pool settlements the carrier would have received if the 
    carrier had continued to participate in the carrier common line pool, 
    based upon the average schedule Common Line formulas developed by the 
    National Exchange Carrier Association for the most recent 24-month 
    period. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost and demand data 
    for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be determined by 
    the following formula: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.014
    
    Where: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.015
    
    And where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line settlement for the most recent 24-
    month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 24-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 12-month period; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
    
    * * * * *
        3. Section 61.50 is amended by revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (k) 
    and adding new paragraphs (h)(3) and (i)(3) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 61.50  Scope: Optional incentive regulation for rate of return 
    local exchange carriers.
    
    * * * * *
        (h)(1) In connection with any optional incentive plan tariff filing 
    proposing rate changes, the carrier must calculate an index for each 
    affected basket as determined by the Common Carrier Bureau.
    * * * * *
        (3) Local exchange carriers subject to this section shall file 
    tariff revisions that reflect rate changes due to exogenous costs, as 
    defined in Sec. 61.45(d)(1), either in the biennial tariff filing or at 
    the time the event causing the exogenous costs occurs during the two-
    year period.
        (i) * * *
        (3) All filings for new services other than those described in 
    paragraph (i) shall be supported using prospective data, as required by 
    Sec. 61.38 of these rules.
    * * * * *
        (k) For a tariff change, a local exchange carrier that is a cost 
    schedule carrier must propose Common Line rates based on the following:
        (1) For the first biennial filing, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be determined by a cost of service study for the most 
    recent 12-month period. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost 
    and demand data for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be 
    determined by the following formula: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.016
    
    Where: 
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.017
    
    And where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line settlement for the most recent 12-
    month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 12-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = CCL MOUb; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
    
        (2) For the subsequent biennial filings, the common line revenue 
    requirement shall be determined by a cost of service study for the most 
    recent 24-month period. Subscriber line charges shall be based on cost 
    and demand data for the same period. Carrier common line rates shall be 
    determined by the following formula:
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.018
    
    where:
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR06JN97.019
    
    and where:
    
    CCL Rev Req = carrier common line revenue requirement for the most 
    recent 24-month period;
    CCL MOUb = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 24-month period;
    CCL MOU1 = carrier common line minutes of use for the most 
    recent 12-month period; and
    CCL MOU0 = carrier common line minutes of use for the 12-
    month period preceding the most recent 12-month period.
        (3) For End User Common Line charges included in a tariff pursuant 
    to this section, the local exchange carrier must provide supporting 
    information for the two-year historical period with its letter of 
    transmittal in accordance with Sec. 61.38.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-14649 Filed 6-5-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/7/1997
Published:
06/06/1997
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; petition for reconsideration.
Document Number:
97-14649
Dates:
July 7, 1997.
Pages:
31003-31005 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CC Docket No. 92-135, FCC 97-41
PDF File:
97-14649.pdf
CFR: (3)
47 CFR 61.38
47 CFR 61.39
47 CFR 61.50