99-14296. Little Boulder Harvest and Fire Restoration Project; Butte and Jefferson Ranger Districts; Little Boulder Harvest and Fire Restoration Project; Butte Field Office; Jefferson County, MT  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 30303-30304]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-14296]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Land Management
    
    
    Little Boulder Harvest and Fire Restoration Project; Butte and 
    Jefferson Ranger Districts; Little Boulder Harvest and Fire Restoration 
    Project; Butte Field Office; Jefferson County, MT
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA and Bureau of Land Management, USDI.
    
    ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will 
    prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to disclose the 
    environmental impacts of a proposed action to manipulate forest and 
    range vegetation on about 12,950 acres. The manipulation includes 
    timber harvest and prescribed burning. The Forest Service will be lead 
    agency for this EIS (40 CFR 1501.5). The purpose is to restore and 
    maintain aspen, open Douglas-fir forests, and shrub/grass cover. The 
    proposed action includes approximately 58 acres of regeneration 
    harvest, 4,815 acres of commercial tree thinning (some followed by 
    burning and some not), 7,303 acres of prescribed burning without timber 
    harvest, and 775 acres of conifer removal around aspen clones.
    
    DATES: Initial comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be 
    received in writing no later than July 9, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Mike Paterni, Acting Forest 
    Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 1820 Meadowlark, 
    Butte, MT 59701.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Lee Harry, Environmental Analysis Team Leader, Butte Ranger District, 
    1820 Meadowlark, Butte, MT 59701, or phone: (406) 494-2147.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service and BLM goals are to 
    restore aspen, open-grown Douglas-fir forests, and shrub/grass 
    vegetation. Prescribed burning would be applied on a total of 10,173 
    acres, both as a single treatment (7,303 acres), and following timber 
    harvest (2,870 acres). Of the total of 4,870 acres of harvest, 2,000 
    acres of harvest would not be followed by underburning. Commercial 
    thinning in lodgepole, Douglas-fir and around aspen clones would be the 
    primary harvest technique. A small part of the harvest would be for 
    regeneration of lodgepole pine, and one proposed unit of
    
    [[Page 30304]]
    
    regeneration harvest would exceed 40 acres.
        The analysis area lies between Butte, Boulder, and Whitehall, 
    Montana. It includes several tributaries to Boulder River. Some 
    included tributaries are: Bison Creek; Kleinsmith Gulch; Galena Gulch; 
    Little Galena Gulch; North Fork Little Boulder River; and Little 
    Boulder Creek. (T4N,R5W; T5N,R4W; T5N,R5W; T5N,R6W; T6N,R4W; T6N,R5W; 
    T6N,R6W). The project area encompasses approximately 69,000 acres.
        Potential issues identified are the effects of the proposal on 
    watershed function, visual quality, fish and wildlife, noxious weeds, 
    and roadless character.
        Public participation is important to the analysis. Part of the goal 
    of public involvement is to identify additional issues and to refine 
    the general, tentative issues identified above. People may visit with 
    Forest Service and BLM officials at any time during the analysis and 
    prior to the decision. Two periods are specifically designated for 
    comments on the analysis: (1) During the scoping process and (2) during 
    the draft EIS comment period.
        During the scoping process, the Forest Service and BLM are seeking 
    information and comments from Federal, State, and local agencies and 
    other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected 
    by the proposed action. The agencies invite written comments and 
    suggestions on this action, particularly in terms of identification of 
    issues and alternative development.
        Analysis of this proposed action began in an environmental 
    assessment (EA). Public involvement for the EA started in October 1998 
    with a scoping letter to interested parties and legal notice in the 
    Montana Standard. Since then, the public has participated in 
    formulating issues and developing alternatives through responding to 
    large mailings and attending periodic public meetings and field trips.
        The Forest Service and BLM will continue to jointly involve the 
    public and will inform interested and affected parties as to how they 
    may participate and contribute to the final decision. Another formal 
    opportunity for response will be provided following completion of a 
    draft EIS.
        The draft EIS should be available for the review in December, 1999. 
    The final EIS is scheduled for completion in March, 1999.
        The comment period on the draft EIS will be 60 days from the date 
    the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of 
    availability in the Federal Register. It is very important that those 
    interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 60-
    day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made 
    available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully 
    consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact 
    statement.
        To assist the Forest Service and BLM in identifying and considering 
    issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft 
    environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is 
    also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the 
    draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft 
    environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives 
    formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
    to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
        The Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest Supervisor and the Butte Field 
    Manager are the responsible officials who will make the decision. They 
    will decide on this proposal after considering comments and responses, 
    environmental consequences discussed in the Final EIS, and applicable 
    laws, regulations, and policies. The decision and reasons for the 
    decision will be documented in a Record of Decision.
    
        Dated: June 1, 1999.
    Mike Paterni,
    Acting Forest Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest.
        Dated: June 1, 1999.
    Merle Good,
    Field Manager, BLM Butte Field Office.
    [FR Doc. 99-14296 Filed 6-4-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/07/1999
Department:
Land Management Bureau
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice; intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
99-14296
Dates:
Initial comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received in writing no later than July 9, 1999.
Pages:
30303-30304 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-14296.pdf