95-13998. Proposed Finding Against Federal Acknowledgment of the Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 110 (Thursday, June 8, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 30430-30431]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-13998]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 30429]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IV
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Bureau of Indian Affairs
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Proposed Finding Against Federal Acknowledgment of the Golden Hill 
    Paugussett Tribe; Notice
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 1995 / 
    Notices  
    [[Page 30430]] 
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Bureau of Indian Affairs
    
    
    Proposed Finding Against Federal Acknowledgment of the Golden 
    Hill Paugussett Tribe
    
    May 24, 1995.
    AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed finding.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.10(e), of the revised Federal 
    acknowledgment regulations, which became effective March 28, 1994, 
    notice is hereby given that the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs 
    (Assistant Secretary) proposes to decline to acknowledge that the 
    Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe, P.O. Box 1645, Bridgeport, Connecticut 
    06601-1645 exists as an Indian tribe within the meaning of Federal law. 
    This notice is based on a determination that the Golden Hill Paugussett 
    Tribe does not meet one of the seven mandatory criteria set forth in 25 
    CFR 83.7, specifically, criterion 83.7(e). Therefore, the Golden Hill 
    Paugussett Tribe does not meet the requirements necessary for a 
    government-to-government relationship with the United States.
    
    DATES: As provided by 25 CFR 83.10(e)(1) and 83.10(h) through 83.10(l), 
    any individual or organization wishing to challenge the proposed 
    finding may submit factual or legal arguments and evidence to rebut or 
    support the evidence relied upon. This material must be submitted on or 
    before December 5, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed finding and/or requests for a copy 
    of the report of evidence should be addressed to the Office of the 
    Assistant Secretary, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240, 
    Attention: Branch of Acknowledgment and Research. Mail Stop 2611-MIB.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Reckord, Chief, Branch of 
    Acknowledgment and Research, (202) 208-3592.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published in the exercise of 
    authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant 
    Secretary by 209 DM 8.
        In order to meet criterion 83.7(e), the petitioner must demonstrate 
    Indian ancestry through descent from a historical tribe, or from tribes 
    which combined and functioned as a single entity. When documenting 
    descent from members of the historical tribe or tribes, the petitioner 
    must show that: (1) The persons claimed as Indian ancestors were of 
    Indian descent from a particular tribe; and (2) Indian descent must be 
    derived from more than one Indian person.
        The Federal acknowledgment process is not intended to recognize 
    single individuals or single extended families of Indian descent, even 
    if of Indian ancestry. Nor is it intended to recognize the descendants 
    of single individuals or families, no matter how large a body of such 
    descendants exit. Criterion e is one of the criteria which is intended 
    to insure continuous existence as a tribal body. Descent from a single 
    Indian ancestor does not meet this requirement.
        The petitioner does not meet criterion e for the following reasons: 
    (1) The petitioner's single common ancestor, William Sherman, has not 
    been documented conclusively to have Indian ancestry from the historic 
    Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe or from any other historic Indian tribe; 
    and (2) even if William Sherman were shown to have Indian ancestry, 
    from the historic Golden Hill Paugussett or from any other historic 
    Indian tribe, the present group would be descended from a single Indian 
    individual. It, therefore, would not meet the requirements of criterion 
    e, which requires ancestry as a tribe, not simply Indian ancestry.
        The Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe's petition for Federal 
    acknowledgment claims that, ``The Golden Hill Paugussett tribe has 
    existed in the State of Connecticut since time immemorial, and has 
    maintained its autonomy and unity as an American Indian tribe while 
    interacting with non-Indian populations since the Colonial period.''
        The Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe's petition for Federal 
    acknowledgment also maintains that as long as a single Golden Hill 
    Paugussett descendant remains alive, the tribal entity continues to 
    exist. This does not accord with the definition of tribal existence in 
    25 CFR part 83, and the underlying precedents in Federal law and 
    judicial decisions.
        A substantial body of documentation was available on the 
    petitioning group and its ancestors. This extensive evidence does not 
    demonstrate either the Paugussett Indian tribal ancestry claimed in the 
    petition or other Indian tribal ancestry. Furthermore, had Indian 
    ancestry been documented, Indian descent would remain from only one 
    individual. One individual Indian ancestor does not qualify the group 
    for Federal recognition as an Indian Tribe. Based on this factual 
    determination, we conclude that the Golden Hill Paugussett tribe should 
    not be granted Federal acknowledgment under 25 CFR part 83.
        As provided by 25 CFR 83.10(h) of the revised regulations, a report 
    summarizing the evidence, reasoning, and analyses that are the basis 
    for the proposed decision will be provided to the petitioner and 
    interested parties, and is available to other parties upon written 
    request. Comments on the proposed finding and/or requests for a copy of 
    the report of evidence should be addressed to the Office of the 
    Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC 20240, Attention; Branch of Acknowledgment and Research, 
    Mail Stop 2611-MIB. Third parties must simultaneously supply copies of 
    their comments to the petitioner in order for them to be considered by 
    the Department of the Interior.
        During the response period, the Assistant Secretary shall provide 
    technical advice concerning the proposed finding and shall make 
    available to the petitioner in a timely fashion any records used for 
    the proposed finding not already held by the petitioner, to the extent 
    allowable by Federal law (83.10(j)(1)). In addition, the Assistant 
    Secretary shall, if requested by the petitioner or any interested 
    party, hold a formal meeting for the purpose of inquiring into the 
    reasoning, analyses, and factual bases for the proposed finding. The 
    proceedings of this meeting shall be on the record. The meeting record 
    shall be available to any participating party and become part of the 
    record considered by the Assistant Secretary in reaching a final 
    determination (83.10(j)(2)).
        If third party submissions are received during the regular response 
    period, the petitioner shall have a minimum of 60 days to respond to 
    these submissions. This period may be extended at the Assistant 
    Secretary's discretion if warranted by the nature and extent of the 
    comments (83.10(k)).
        At the end of the response periods for comment on this proposed 
    finding, the Assistant Secretary shall consider the written arguments 
    and evidence submitted during the response periods and issue a final 
    determination. The Assistant Secretary shall consult with the 
    petitioner and interested parties to determine an equitable timeframe 
    for preparation of the final determination and notify the petitioner 
    and interested parties of the date such consideration begins 
    (83.10(l)). The Assistant Secretary may conduct any necessary 
    additional research and may request additional information from the 
    petitioner and commenting parties (83.10(l)(1)). A summary of the final 
    determination will be published in the Federal Register within 60 days 
    from the date on which the consideration of the written arguments and 
    evidence [[Page 30431]] rebutting or supporting the proposed finding 
    begins, as provided in 25 CFR 83.10 (l)(2).
    Ada E. Deer,
    Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 95-13998 Filed 6-7-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
06/08/1995
Department:
Indian Affairs Bureau
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of proposed finding.
Document Number:
95-13998
Dates:
As provided by 25 CFR 83.10(e)(1) and 83.10(h) through 83.10(l), any individual or organization wishing to challenge the proposed finding may submit factual or legal arguments and evidence to rebut or support the evidence relied upon. This material must be submitted on or before December 5, 1995.
Pages:
30430-30431 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-13998.pdf