2017-11831. Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

    ACTION:

    Final rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM) from large confined animal facilities (LCAFs). We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

    DATES:

    These rules will be effective on July 10, 2017.

    ADDRESSES:

    The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0318. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov,, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972 3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the EPA.

    Table of Contents

    I. Proposed Action

    II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    III. EPA Action

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    I. Proposed Action

    On December 9, 2016 (81 FR 89024), the EPA proposed to approve the following rules into the California SIP.

    Local agencyRule No.Rule TitleAdopted/ amended/ revisedSubmitted
    ICAPCD217Large Confined Animal Facilities (LCAF) Permits Required02/09/201604/21/2016
    ICAPCD101Definitions02/09/201604/21/2016
    ICAPCD202Exemptions02/09/201604/21/2016

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rules and our evaluation.

    II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We received no comments during this period.

    III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP.Start Printed Page 26595

    IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the ICAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

    V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

    • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
    • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
    • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
    • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
    • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
    • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
    • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
    • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
    • does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 7, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    • Environmental protection
    • Air pollution control
    • Incorporation by reference
    • Intergovernmental relations
    • Ozone
    • Particulate matter
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Volatile organic compounds
    End List of Subjects Start Signature

    Dated: January 11, 2017.

    Alexis Strauss,

    Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    End Signature

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    End Authority

    Subpart F—California

    Start Amendment Part

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(351)(i)(A)( 5), (c)(442)(i)(A)(4), and (c)(485) to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part
    Identification of plan—in part.
    * * * * *

    (c) * * *

    (351) * * *

    (i) * * *

    (A) * * *

    (5) Previously approved on May 9, 2011 in paragraph (c)(351)(i)(A)(4) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(485)(i)(A)(2), Rule 202, “Exemptions,” revised on October 10, 2006.

    * * * * *

    (442) * * *

    (i) * * *

    (A) * * *

    (4) Previously approved on October 2, 2014 in paragraph (c)(442)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(485)(i)(A)(1), Rule 101, “Definitions,” revised on October 22, 2013.

    * * * * *

    (485) New and amended regulations were submitted on April 21, 2016 by the Governor's designee.

    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Imperial County Air Pollution Control District.

    (1) Rule 101, “Definitions,” revised February 9, 2016.

    (2) Rule 202, “Exemptions,” revised February 9, 2016.

    (3) Rule 217, “Large Confined Animal Facilities (LCAF) Permits Required,” revised February 9, 2016.

    End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2017-11831 Filed 6-7-17; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/10/2017
Published:
06/08/2017
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
2017-11831
Dates:
These rules will be effective on July 10, 2017.
Pages:
26594-26595 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0318, FRL-9960-07-Region 9
Topics:
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds
PDF File:
2017-11831.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST.CA SIP 2016.04.21
» Executive Order S-16-004
» Enclosure A
» E-5. EPA comments IC 217 2016 Feb8
» E-4. EPA comments on Draft Rule 217 Rv7 (Aug 19 2015)
» E-3. Email 2015-09-04 RE_ Draft Rule 217 - Tri-Agency - Informal Comments
» E-2. EPA comments IC 217 May21 2015
» E-1. Email 5-21-2015 EPA comments on Imperial County APCD draft Rule 217
» D-4. Addendum to General Preamble
» D-3. General Preamble
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.220