[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 111 (Friday, June 9, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30580-30581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-13901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Application
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) on the Proposed Issuance of an Incidental Take Permit
for Desert Tortoises in Clark County, Nevada.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed issuance of an incidental take
permit for desert tortoises in Clark County, Nevada is available. The
Record of Decision will be published no sooner than 30 days from this
notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dolores Savignano, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1500 North Decatur Boulevard, #01, Las Vegas, Nevada
89108 or Carlos Mendoza, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4600 Kietzke
Lane, Building C, Room 125, Reno, Nevada 89502.
Individuals wishing copies of this Final EIS should immediately
contact Christine Robinson, Clark County Manager's Office, 225 Bridger
Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89155. Copies of the Final EIS have been sent
to all agencies and individuals who previously received copies of the
Draft EIS and to all others who have already requested copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On April 2, 1990, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)
issued a final rule (55 FR 12178) that determined the desert tortoise
to be a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). That regulation became effective on the date of its
publication in the Federal Register. Because of its listing as a
threatened species, the desert tortoise is protected by the Act's
prohibition against ``taking.'' The Act defines ``take'' to mean: to
harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture or
collect, or to attempt to engage in such conduct. ``Harm'' is further
defined by regulation as any act that kills or injures wildlife
including significant habitat modification or degradation where it
actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential
behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR
17.3).
The Service, however, may issue permits to carry out otherwise
lawful activities involving take of endangered and threatened wildlife
under certain circumstances. Regulations governing permits are in 50
CFR 17.22, 17.23, and 17.32. For threatened species, such permits are
available for scientific purposes, enhancing the propagation or
survival of the species, economic hardship, zoological exhibition or
educational purposes, incidental taking, or special purposes consistent
with the purposes of the Act.
Clark County; the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson,
Mesquite, and Boulder City; and Nevada Department of Transportation
(NDOT) (Applicants) submitted an application to the Service for a
permit to incidentally take desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii),
pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, in association with various
proposed public and private projects in Clark County, Nevada. The
proposed permit would allow incidental take of desert tortoises for a
period of 30 years, resulting from development on up to 113,900 acres
of private lands within Clark County, Nevada. The permit application
was received September 28, 1994, and was accompanied by the Clark
County Desert Conservation Plan (CCDCP), which serves as the
Applicant's habitat [[Page 30581]] conservation plan and details their
proposed measures to minimize, monitor, and mitigate the impacts of the
proposed take on the desert tortoise.
The Applicants propose to expend $1.35 million per year, and up to
$1.65 million per year for the first 10 years, to minimize and mitigate
the potential loss of desert tortoise habitat. It is anticipated that
the majority of these funds will be used to implement mitigation
measures as described in the CCDCP. In addition, funds will be provided
to State and Federal resource managers for implementing desert tortoise
recovery measures recommended in the Desert Tortoise (Mojave
Population) Recovery Plan, and for planning and managing lands both
within and outside of desert wildlife management areas. The desert
tortoise is only part of the desert ecosystem, and unless the various
species of plants and animals which co-inhabit that system are likewise
preserved, the status of the desert tortoise is likely to decline.
Therefore, the needs of other plant and wildlife resources will be
addressed, possibly avoiding the need to list these species as
threatened or endangered under the Act in the future. The Applicants
also propose to purchase a conservation easement that preserves,
protects, and assures the management and study of the conservation
values, and in particular the habitat of the desert tortoise, of more
than 85,000 acres of non-Federal land in Clark County.
To minimize the impacts of take, the Applicants propose to provide
a free pick-up and collection service for desert tortoises encountered
in harm's way within Clark County. These desert tortoises will be made
available for beneficial uses such as translocation studies and
programs, research, education, zoos, museums, or other programs
approved by the Service and Nevada Division of Wildlife. Sick or
injured desert tortoises will be humanely euthanized. NDOT will
incorporate specific measures into its operations to avoid or minimize
impacts to desert tortoises. Clark County will also implement a public
information and education program to benefit the desert tortoise and
the desert ecosystem.
Clark County or the cities would approve the issuance of land
development permits for otherwise lawful public and private project
proponents during the 30-year period in which the proposed Federal
permit would be in effect. Clark County or the cities would impose, and
NDOT would pay, a fee of $550 per acre of habitat disturbance to fund
the measures to minimize and mitigate the impacts of the proposed
action on desert tortoises.
The underlying purpose or goal of the proposed action is to develop
a program designed to ensure the continued existence of the species,
while resolving potential conflicts that may arise from otherwise
lawful private and public improvement projects.
B. Development of the Final EIS
This Final EIS has been developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service. In the development of this Final EIS, the Service initiated
action to assure compliance with the purpose and intent of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA). Scoping activities
were undertaken preparatory to developing a Draft EIS with a variety of
Federal, State, and local entities. A Notice of Intent to prepare a
Draft EIS was published February 4, 1994 (59 FR 5439); a public scoping
meeting was held February 14, 1994; and a Notice of Availability of a
Draft EIS and Receipt of an Application for an Incidental Take Permit
for Desert Tortoises in Clark County, Nevada was published February 10,
1995 (60 FR 8058).
Potential consequences, in terms of adverse impacts and benefits
associated with the implementation of each alternative selected for
detailed analysis, were described in the Draft EIS. The Service
received 13 letters of comment on the Draft EIS which focused on the
following subject areas: (1) Survey and removal of desert tortoises;
(2) translocation of tortoises to a sanctuary; (3) euthanasia of
tortoises; (4) measurable criteria for short-term and long-term
conservation goals; (5) tortoise adoption; (6) effects to other species
and resources; and (7) financing implementation of the CCDCP.
Appendix A of the Final EIS contains copies of all comments
received and responses to all comments received. The Final EIS was
revised where appropriate based on public comment and review. Issues
and potential consequences have remained identical from the draft to
the final EIS.
C. Alternatives Analyzed in the Final EIS
Two alternatives were considered. Issuance of the permit with the
mitigating, minimizing, and monitoring measures outlined in the CCDCP
is the Service's preferred action and is discussed above. The Draft EIS
outlined alternative measures that were considered by the Service prior
to issuance of the permit. The other alternative selected for detailed
evaluation was a No Action alternative. The No Action alternative would
benefit individual desert tortoises on private lands in the short-term,
however, it has been determined that viable populations of desert
tortoises will not persist in the urban areas over the long-term. The
No Action alternative would, therefore, not provide the benefits of the
long-term recovery efforts for the desert tortoise identified in the
CCDCP. The No Action alternative was not identified as the preferred
alternative because it would diffuse existing regional conservation
planning efforts for the desert tortoise and possibly concentrate
activity on individual project needs, not meet the purpose and needs of
the Applicants, and not provide the long-term benefits to the desert
tortoise. Additionally, the No Action alternative could result in
adverse impacts to the social environment within Clark County due to
constraints on land-use activities that would impact the desert
tortoise.
Dated: June 1, 1995.
Thomas Dwyer,
Deputy Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 95-13901 Filed 6-8-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
