Z8-11851. Paul H. Volkman; Denial of Application

Correction

In notice document E8-11851 beginning on page 30630 in the issue of Wednesday, May 28, 2008 make the following correction:

On page 30641, in the third column, “³⁶ No footnote.” should read “³⁶ At the time he submitted his renewal and modification applications, Respondent's registration had been immediately suspended. It would make no sense to construe this provision as excusing a registrant who is under an immediate suspension (and who has been preliminarily found to pose an imminent danger to public health and safety) from compliance with the 45-day requirement for timely filing of a renewal application. Of course, even when a registrant under an immediate suspension complies with the 45-day rule, his registration does not continue in effect past the expiration date.”

Correction

In proposed rule document E8-10742 beginning on page 29294, in the issue of Tuesday, May 20, 2008, make the following corrections:

(1) On page 29300, in the second column, in paragraph (3) in the first line “TX 0910” should read “TX-10”.

(2) On the same page, in the same column, in the same paragraph, in lines 6, 9, and 18 “TX 0910C and TX 0910 C” are corrected to read “TX-10C”.

(3) On the same page, in the third column, in paragraph (4) in the first line, “TX 0914” should read “TX-14”.

(4) On the same page, in the same column, in paragraph (5) “TX 0917” should read “TX-17”.

(5) On the same page, in the same column, in the last paragraph, lines 13 and 14 should read “vacated until TX-17 is not described because we are not proposing that it be”.

Correction

In rule document 08-1105 beginning on page 19350 in the issue of Wednesday, April 9, 2008 make the following corrections:

1. On page 19357, in the third column, in the first paragraph, in the last line, “§601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)” should read “§601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)”.

§1.937-2

[Corrected]

2. On page 19373, in §1.937-2(k) at Example 1. (ii), the equation is being reprinted correctly as set forth below.