94-16057. Milk in the Eastern Ohio-Western Pennsylvania Marketing Area; Proposed Revision of Certain Provisions of the Order  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-16057]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 1, 1994]
    
    
                                                       VOL. 59, NO. 126
    
                                                   Friday, July 1, 1994
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 1036
    
    [DA-94-14]
    
     
    
    Milk in the Eastern Ohio-Western Pennsylvania Marketing Area; 
    Proposed Revision of Certain Provisions of the Order
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed revision of rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document invites written comments on a proposal to lower 
    the percentage of a cooperative's milk that must be delivered to fluid 
    milk plants to qualify a reserve processing plant operated by the 
    cooperative as a pool plant under the Eastern Ohio-Western Pennsylvania 
    Federal milk order. The applicable percentage would be reduced by 10 
    percentage points, from 35 percent to 25 percent.
    
    DATES: Comments are due no later than August 1, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments (two copies) should be sent to USDA/AMS/Dairy 
    Division, Order Formulation Branch, room 2971, South Building, P.O. Box 
    96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance M. Brenner, Marketing 
    Specialist, USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, room 
    2971, South Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456, (202) 
    720-2357.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
    601-612) requires the Agency to examine the impact of a proposed rule 
    on small entities. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator of 
    the Agricultural Marketing Service has certified that this proposed 
    rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. This rule would lessen the regulatory impact 
    of the order on certain milk handlers and would tend to ensure that 
    dairy farmers will continue to have their milk priced under the order 
    and thereby receive the benefits that accrue from such pricing.
        The Department is issuing this proposed rule in conformance with 
    Executive Order 12866.
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have a retroactive 
    effect. If adopted, this proposed rule will not preempt any state or 
    local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
    irreconcilable conflict with the rule.
        The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 
    U.S.C. 601-674), provides that administrative proceedings must be 
    exhausted before parties may file suit in court. Under section 
    608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler subject to an order may file with 
    the Secretary a petition stating that the order, any provisions of the 
    order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in 
    accordance with law and request a modification of an order or to be 
    exempted from the order. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a 
    hearing on the petition. After a hearing, the Secretary would rule on 
    the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United 
    States in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has 
    its principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the provisions of the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act and the provisions of 
    Sec. 1036.7(f) of the order, the revision of certain provisions of the 
    order regulating the handling of milk in the Eastern Ohio-Western 
    Pennsylvania marketing area is being considered for the period 
    September 1, 1994, through December 31, 1995.
        All persons who desire to submit written data, views or arguments 
    about the proposed revision should send two copies of their views to 
    USDA/AMS/Dairy Division, Order Formulation Branch, room 2971, South 
    Building, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456 by the 30th day 
    after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
        All written submissions made pursuant to this notice will be made 
    available for public inspection in the Dairy Division during regular 
    business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).
    
     Statement of Consideration
    
        The provision proposed for revision is the delivery percentage 
    required of a cooperative association operating a reserve processing 
    pool plant pursuant to section 1036.7(d) of the Eastern Ohio-Western 
    Pennsylvania order (Order 36). As proposed, the percentage of a 
    cooperative's producer milk that must be delivered to fluid milk plants 
    if the cooperative's plant is to be considered a pool plant would be 
    decreased by the maximum allowable 10 percentage points, from 35 
    percent to 25 percent, for the months of September 1994 through 
    December 1995.
        Section 1036.7(f) allows the Director of the Dairy Division to 
    reduce or increase a cooperative's minimum delivery requirement by up 
    to 10 percentage points to prevent uneconomic milk shipments or to 
    assure an adequate supply of milk for fluid use. The order also 
    provides that the minimum pooling standard may be met on the basis of 
    deliveries in the current month or during the preceding 12 months.
        Milk Marketing Inc. (MMI), a dairy farmer cooperative that supplies 
    milk to Order 36 fluid milk plants, requested that an earlier reduction 
    of the delivery requirement be continued. The cooperative states that 
    milk production pooled under the order has increased markedly in recent 
    months, while Class I use has declined. According to the cooperative, 
    increases in production without corresponding increases in Class I 
    usage create a greater-than-normal need to move reserve supplies of 
    milk to manufacturing facilities. MMI points out that this problem has 
    been exacerbated by the reduction in Class I use, creating a tremendous 
    burden on the cooperative to maintain cooperative supply plant status 
    under the order.
        In view of the current supply and demand relationship, it may be 
    necessary to continue the reduction in delivery requirements for 
    cooperative associations operating reserve processing plants under 
    Order 36 as quickly as possible, as proposed, to provide for the 
    efficient and economic marketing of milk during the period September 1, 
    1994 through December 31, 1995.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1036
    
        Milk marketing orders.
    
        The authority citation for 7 CFR Part 1036 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        Dated: June 27, 1994.
    Silvio Capponi, Jr.,
    Acting Director, Dairy Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-16057 Filed 6-30-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/01/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed revision of rule.
Document Number:
94-16057
Dates:
Comments are due no later than August 1, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 1, 1994, DA-94-14
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 1036.7(f)