99-16707. Magnetic Therapeutic Technologies, Inc., et al.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 126 (Thursday, July 1, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 35663-35665]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-16707]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [File No. 9823150]
    
    
    Magnetic Therapeutic Technologies, Inc., et al.; Analysis To Aid 
    Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
    violations of federal law prohibiting unfair or
    
    [[Page 35664]]
    
    deceptive acts or practices or unfair methods of competition. The 
    attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations 
    in the draft complaint that accompanies the consent agreement and the 
    terms of the consent order--embodied in the consent agreement--that 
    would settle these allegations.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 30, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to: FTC/Office of the Secretary, 
    Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christa V.A. Vecchi, FTC/H-263, 600 
    Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3166.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
    Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 721, 15 U.S.C. 46, and Section 2.34 of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given 
    that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order 
    to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to 
    final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record 
    for a period of sixty (60) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public 
    Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the 
    allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of 
    the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page 
    (for June 24, 1999), on the World Wide Web, at ``http://www.ftc.gov/os/
    actions97.htm.'' A paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public 
    Reference Room, Room H-130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
    20580, either in person or by calling (202) 326-3627.
        Public comment is invited. Comments should be directed to: FTC/
    Office of the Secretary, Room 159, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
    Washington, DC 20580. Two paper copies of each comment should be filed, 
    and should be accompanied, if possible, by a 3\1/2\ inch diskette 
    containing an electronic copy of the comment. Such comments or views 
    will be considered by the Commission and will be available for 
    inspection and copying at its principal office in accordance with 
    Section 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission's Rules of Practice (16 CFR 
    4.9(b)(6)(ii)).
    
    Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
    
        The Federal Trade Commission has accepted, subject to final 
    approval, an agreement to a proposed Consent Order (``proposed order'') 
    from Magnetic Therapeutic Technologies, Inc. (``MTT'') and Jim B. 
    Richardson, the President of the corporation.
        The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for 
    sixty (60) days for the reception of comments by interested persons. 
    Comments received during this period will become part of the public 
    record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the 
    agreement and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement 
    or make final the agreement's proposed order.
        This matter concerns Internet, print, and catalogue advertisements 
    disseminated directly to consumers, and print advertisements provided 
    to distributors and retail stores, including health food stores and 
    pharmacies, for dissemination directly to consumers, for proposed 
    respondents' magnetic therapy products. These products contain magnets 
    that purportedly treat and alleviate a variety of medical problems, 
    including cancer, high blood pressure, HIV, diabetic neuropathy, and 
    Multiple Sclerosis. Proposed respondents' magnetic products include an 
    assortment of devices, such as Magnetic Knee Supports and Magnetic 
    Sleep Pads.
        The Commission's complaint charges that the proposed respondents 
    engaged in deceptive advertising in violation of section 5 and 12 of 
    the FTC Act by making unsubstantiated claims that its magnetic therapy 
    products: (1) Are effective in treating cancer, including lung and 
    breast cancers, diabetic ulcers, arthritis, and degenerative joint 
    conditions; (2) lower high blood pressure; (3) stabilize or increase 
    the T-cell count of HIV patients; (4) reduce muscle spasms in persons 
    with Multiple Sclerosis; (5) reduce nerve spasms associated with 
    diabetic neuropathy; (6) increase bone density, immunity, and 
    circulation; and (7) are as effective as prescription pain medicine in 
    alleviating severe pain caused by conditions such as arthritis, carpal 
    tunnel syndrome, and back pain.
        The complaint further alleges that proposed respondents represented 
    that testimonials from consumers appearing in the advertisements or 
    promotional materials for proposed respondents' products reflect the 
    typical or ordinary experience of members of the public who use the 
    products. The proposed complaint alleges that respondents lack 
    substantiation for this claim.
        This proposed order contains provisions designed to remedy the 
    violations charged and to prevent proposed respondents from engaging in 
    similar acts in the future.
        Paragraph I of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents 
    from representing that their magnetic therapy products (defined as any 
    product that contains a magnet of any kind purporting to relieve the 
    symptoms of, treat, mitigate, cure, relieve, heal or alleviate any 
    disease or health condition): (1) Are effective in treating cancer, 
    including lung and breast cancers, diabetic, ulcers, arthritis, or 
    degenerative joint conditions; (2) lower high blood pressure; (3) 
    stabilize or increase the T-cell count of HIV patients; (4) reduce 
    muscle spasm in persons with Multiple Sclerosis; (5) reduce nerve 
    spasms associated with diabetic neuropathy; (6) increase bone density, 
    immunity, or circulation; or (7) are comparable or superior to 
    prescription pain medicine, unless, at the time the representation is 
    made, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable 
    scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.
        Paragraph II of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents 
    from representing that the experience represented by any user 
    testimonial or endorsement of any product or program represents the 
    typical or ordinary experience of members of the public who use the 
    product or program, unless the representation is true, and competent 
    and reliable scientific evidence substantiates that claim, or 
    respondents clearly and prominently disclose either: (1) What the 
    generally expected results would be for product or program 
    participants; or (2) the limited applicability of the endorser's 
    experience to what consumers may generally expect to achieve, that is, 
    that consumers should not expect to achieve similar results.
        Paragraph III of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents 
    from making any representation about the health benefits, performance, 
    or efficacy of any product or program, unless, at the time the 
    representation is made, respondents posses and rely upon competent and 
    reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.
        Paragraph IV of the proposed order prohibits proposed respondents 
    from: (1) Disseminating to any distributor any material containing any 
    claims prohibited by the order; and (2) authorizing any distributor to 
    make any representations prohibited by the order. In addition, 
    Paragraph IV requires proposed respondents to (1) send a short notice 
    to distributors with whom they have done business since January 1, 
    1994, announcing their settlement with the FTC and the state of Texas, 
    and
    
    [[Page 35665]]
    
    requiring distributors to submit all proposed promotional and marketing 
    materials to proposed respondents for approval prior to their 
    dissemination; (2) send, for a period of three years, the same notice 
    to future distributors with whom proposed respondents to business; (3) 
    monitor distributors' promotional activities; (4) terminate, as 
    appropriate, the right of any distributor to market MTT products or 
    programs who continues to use promotional materials or make oral 
    representations that violate the order; (5) provide the FTC all 
    relevant information about the distributors who continue to engage in 
    activities that violate the order; and (6) approve all marketing 
    materials before distributors disseminate them to the public.
        Paragraph V contains record keeping requirements for the 
    notification letters sent to distributors, communications between 
    respondents and distributors referring or relating to the requirements 
    of Paragraph IV of the order, and any other materials created pursuant 
    to Paragraph IV.
        Paragraph VI of the proposed order contains record keeping 
    requirements for materials that substantiate, qualify, or contradict 
    covered claims and requires the proposed respondents to keep and 
    maintain all advertisements and promotional materials containing any 
    representation covered by the proposed order. In addition, Paragraph 
    VII requires distribution of a copy of the consent decree to current 
    and future officers and agents. Further, Paragraph VIII provides for 
    Commission notification upon a change in the corporate respondents. 
    Paragraph IX requires proposed respondent Jim B. Richardson to notify 
    the Commission when he discontinues his current business or employment 
    and of his affiliation with any new business or employment. The 
    proposed order, in Paragraph X, also requires the filing of a 
    compliance report.
        Finally, Paragraph XI of the proposed order provides for the 
    termination of the order after twenty years under certain 
    circumstances.
        The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
    proposed order, and it is not intended to constitute an official 
    interpretation of the agreement and proposed order, or to modify in any 
    way their terms.
    
        By direction of the Commission.
    Benjamin I. Berman,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-16707 Filed 6-30-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/01/1999
Department:
Federal Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed consent agreement.
Document Number:
99-16707
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before August 30, 1999.
Pages:
35663-35665 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
File No. 9823150
PDF File:
99-16707.pdf