94-16903. Cooperative Demonstration Program (Correctional Education); Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1995  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-16903]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: July 13, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    [CFDA No.: 84.199D]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    
     
    
    Cooperative Demonstration Program (Correctional Education); 
    Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1995
    
        Note to Applicants: This notice is a complete application package. 
    Together with the statute authorizing the program and applicable 
    regulations governing the program, including the Education Department 
    General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), the notice contains all of 
    the information, application forms, and instructions needed to apply 
    for a grant under this competition.
        Purpose of Program: The Cooperative Demonstration Program 
    (Correctional Education) provides financial assistance for the 
    development of model projects that would demonstrate successful 
    cooperation between the private sector and public agencies in 
    vocational education programs that serve criminal offenders under the 
    supervision of the criminal justice system.
        Eligible Applicants: (1) State educational agencies; (2) local 
    educational agencies; (3) postsecondary educational institutions; (4) 
    institutions of higher education; and (5) other public and private 
    agencies, organizations, and institutions.
        Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: September 2, 1994.
        Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: November 1, 1994.
        Available Funds: $2,000,000.
        Estimated Range of Awards: $300,000- $600,000.
        Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000 for project period.
        Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
    
        Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
    notice.
    
        Project Period: Up to 24 months.
        Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
    Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as follows:
        (1) 34 CFR Part 74 (Administration of Grants to Institutions of 
    Higher Education, Hospitals and Nonprofit Organizations).
        (2) 34 CFR Part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).
        (3) 34 CFR Part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department 
    Regulations).
        (4) 34 CFR Part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of 
    Education Programs and Activities).
        (5) 34 CFR Part 80 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants 
    and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments).
        (6) 34 CFR Part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).
        (7) 34 CFR Part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
        (8) 34 CFR Part 85 (Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension 
    (Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free 
    Workplace (Grants)).
        (9) 34 CFR Part 86 (Drug-Free Schools and Campuses).
        (b) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR Parts 400 and 426.
    
    Priorities
    
        The priorities in the notice of final priority, required 
    activities, and selection criteria for the Cooperative Demonstration 
    Program (Correctional Education), as published elsewhere in this issue 
    of the Federal Register, apply to this competition.
    
    Selection Criteria
    
        For the FY 1995 grant competition (for awards to be made in FY 1995 
    using FY 1994 funds) under the Cooperative Demonstration Program 
    (Correctional Education), the Secretary uses the following selection 
    criteria to evaluate applications for new grants for this competition. 
    The maximum score for all of these criteria is 100 points. The maximum 
    score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses.
        (a) Program factors. (25 points) The Secretary reviews the 
    application to assess the quality of the proposed project, including 
    the extent to which the proposed project will provide--
        (1) Integrated academic and vocational activities that reflect 
    current and projected labor market trends and are based upon the 
    Secretary of Labor's Commission on Achievement of Necessary Skills 
    (SCANS) report recommendations;
        (2) Transition from correctional education programs to productive 
    employment including one or more of the following:
        (i) Work experience or apprenticeship projects.
        (ii) Transitional worksite job training for vocational education 
    students that is related to their occupational goals and closely linked 
    to classroom and laboratory instruction provided by an eligible 
    recipient.
        (iii) Placement services in occupations that the students are 
    preparing to enter.
        (iv) If practical, projects that will benefit the public, such as 
    the rehabilitation of public schools or housing in inner cities or 
    economically depressed rural areas.
        (v) Employment-based learning programs.
        (3) Post-sentence transitional services and follow-up assistance;
        (4) Interdisciplinary staff in-service education that includes 
    security personnel;
        (5) Inmate assessment that addresses academic, vocational and 
    special learning needs;
        (6) Ongoing occupational counseling to assist with the development 
    of an individual vocational plan;
        (7) Coordination with community agencies that furnish transitional 
    supportive services to criminal offenders such as individual and family 
    counseling, housing assistance, transportation, and social and cultural 
    activities;
        (8) Coordination with the State Occupational Information 
    Coordinating Committee or State Labor Market Information Unit in 
    determining State and local labor shortages; and
        (9) Adequate and appropriate involvement and cooperation of the 
    public and private sectors in the projects, including--
        (i) A clear identification of the public and private sector 
    involvement in the planning of the project;
        (ii) A description of public and private sector involvement in the 
    planning of the project including letters of commitment; and
        (iii) A description of public and private sector involvement in the 
    operation of the project.
        (b) Educational significance. (10 points) The Secretary reviews 
    each application to determine the extent to which the applicant 
    proposes--
        (1) Project objectives that contribute to the improvement of 
    education for criminal offenders;
        (2) To use unique and innovative techniques to produce benefits 
    that address educational problems and needs that are of national 
    significance; and
        (3) To base the proposed project on successfully designed, 
    established, and operated model vocational education programs that 
    include components similar to the components required by this program, 
    as evidenced by empirical data that demonstrate impact from those 
    programs in factors such as--
        (i) Student performance and achievement;
        (ii) GED completion; and
        (iii) Post-sentence employment or enrollment in education or 
    training programs or both.
        (c) Plan of operation. (15 points) The Secretary reviews each 
    application to determine the quality of the plan of operation for the 
    project, including--
        (1) The quality of the project design, especially the establishment 
    of measurable objectives for the project that are based on the 
    project's overall goals;
        (2) The extent to which the plan of management is effective and 
    ensures proper and efficient administration of the project over the 
    award period;
        (3) How well the objectives of the project relate to the purpose of 
    the program;
        (4) The quality of the applicant's plan to use its resources and 
    personnel to achieve each objective; and
        (5) How the applicant will ensure that project participants who are 
    otherwise eligible to participate are selected without regard to race, 
    color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
        (d) Evaluation plan. (15 points) The Secretary reviews each 
    application to determine the quality of the project's evaluation plan, 
    including the extent to which the plan--
        (1) Is clearly explained and is appropriate to the project;
        (2) To the extent possible, is objective and will produce data that 
    are quantifiable;
        (3) Identifies expected outcomes of the participants and how those 
    outcomes will be measured;
        (4) Includes activities during the formative stages of the project 
    to help guide and improve the project, as well as a summative 
    evaluation that includes recommendations for replicating project 
    activities and results;
        (5) Will provide a comparison between intended and observed 
    results, and lead to the demonstration of a clear link between the 
    observed results and the specific treatment of project participants; 
    and
        (6) Will yield results that can be summarized and submitted to the 
    Secretary for review by the Department's Program Effectiveness Panel as 
    defined in 34 CFR 400.4(b).
        (e) Demonstration and dissemination. (10 points) The Secretary 
    reviews each application for information to determine the effectiveness 
    and efficiency of the plan for demonstrating and disseminating 
    information about project activities and results throughout the project 
    period, including--
        (1) High quality in the design of the demonstration and 
    dissemination plan and procedures for evaluating the effectiveness of 
    the dissemination plan;
        (2) Disseminating the results of the project in a manner that would 
    meet the requirement in 34 CFR 426.31.
        (3) Identification of target groups and provisions for publicizing 
    the project at the local, State, and national levels by conducting or 
    delivering presentations at conferences, workshops, and other 
    professional meetings and by preparing materials for journal articles, 
    newsletters, and brochures;
        (4) Provisions for demonstrating the methods and techniques used by 
    the project to others interested in replicating these methods and 
    techniques, such as by inviting them to observe project activities;
        (5) A description of the types of materials the applicant plans to 
    make available to help others replicate project activities and the 
    methods for making the materials available; and
        (6) Provisions for assisting others to adopt and successfully 
    implement the project or methods and techniques used by the project.
        (f) Key personnel. (10 points)
        (1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the quality 
    of key personnel the applicant plans to use on the project, including--
        (i) The qualifications, in relation to project requirements, of the 
    project director;
        (ii) The qualifications, in relation to project requirements, of 
    each of the other key personnel to be used in the project;
        (iii) The appropriateness of the time that each person referred to 
    in paragraphs (f)(1) (i) and (ii) of this section will commit to the 
    project; and
        (iv) How the applicant, as part of its nondiscriminatory employment 
    practices, will ensure that its personnel are selected for employment 
    without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, age, or 
    disability.
        (2) To determine personnel qualifications under paragraphs (f)(1) 
    (i) and (ii) of this section, the Secretary considers--
        (i) The experience and training of key personnel in project 
    management and in fields related to the objectives of the project; and
        (ii) Any other qualifications that pertain to the quality of the 
    project.
        (g) Budget and cost effectiveness. (10 points) The Secretary 
    reviews each application to determine the extent to which the budget--
        (1) Is cost effective and adequate to support the project 
    activities;
        (2) Contains costs that are reasonable and necessary in relation to 
    the objectives of the project; and
        (3) Proposes using non-Federal resources available from appropriate 
    employment, training, and education agencies in the State to provide 
    project services and activities and to acquire project equipment and 
    facilities.
        (h) Adequacy of resources and commitment. (5 points)
        (1) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the extent 
    to which the applicant plans to devote adequate resources to the 
    project. The Secretary considers the extent to which the--
        (i) Facilities that the applicant plans to use are adequate; and
        (ii) Equipment and supplies that the applicant plans to use are 
    adequate.
        (2) The Secretary reviews each application to determine the 
    commitment to the project, including whether the--
        (i) Uses of non-Federal resources are adequate to provide project 
    services and activities, especially resources of community 
    organizations and State and local educational agencies; and
        (ii) Applicant has the capacity to continue, expand, and build upon 
    the project when Federal assistance under this part ends.
    
    Cost Sharing
    
        A recipient of an award under this competition must provide not 
    less than 25 percent of the total cost (the sum of the Federal and non-
    Federal shares) of the project it conducts. The non-Federal share may 
    be in the form of cash or in-kind contributions, including the fair 
    market value of facilities, overhead, personnel, and equipment.
    
    Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
    
        This program is subject to the requirements of Executive Order 
    12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) and the 
    regulations in 34 CFR Part 79.
        The objective of the Executive order is to foster an 
    intergovernmental partnership and to strengthen federalism by relying 
    on State and local processes for State and local government 
    coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
        Applicants must contact the appropriate State Single Point of 
    Contact to find out about, and to comply with, the State's process 
    under Executive Order 12372. Applicants proposing to perform activities 
    in more than one State should immediately contact the Single Point of 
    Contact for each of those States and follow the procedure established 
    in each State under the Executive Order. If you want to know the name 
    and address of any State Single Point of Contact, see the list 
    published in the Federal Register on May 3, 1994 (59 FR 22904-22905).
        In States that have not established a process or chosen a program 
    for review, State, areawide, regional, and local entities may submit 
    comments directly to the Department.
        Any State Process Recommendation and other comments submitted by a 
    State Single Point of Contact and any comments from State, areawide, 
    regional, and local entities must be mailed or hand-delivered by the 
    date indicated in this notice to the following address: The Secretary, 
    E.O. 12372--CFDA# 84.199D, U.S. Department of Education, Room 4161, 400 
    Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202-0125.
        Proof of mailing will be determined on the same basis as 
    applications (see 34 CFR 75.102). Recommendations or comments may be 
    hand-delivered until 4:30 p.m. (Washington, D.C. time) on the date 
    indicated in this notice.
        Please note that the above address is not the same address as the 
    one to which the applicant submits its completed application. Do not 
    send applications to the above address.
    
    Instructions for Transmittal of Applications
    
        (a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant 
    shall--
        (1) Mail the original and six copies of the application on or 
    before the deadline date to: U.S. Department of Education, Application 
    Control Center, Attention: (CFDA# 84.199D), Washington, D.C. 20202-4725 
    or
        (2) Hand deliver the original and six copies of the application by 
    4:30 p.m. (Washington, D.C. time) on the deadline date to: U.S. 
    Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention: (CFDA# 
    84.199D), Room 3633, Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D Streets, 
    S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202-4725.
        (b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of 
    mailing:
        (1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
        (2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the 
    U.S. Postal Service.
        (3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial 
    carrier.
        (4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
        (c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service, 
    the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of 
    mailing:
        (1) A private metered postmark.
        (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
    
        Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a 
    dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should 
    check with its local post office.
    
        (2) The Application Control Center will mail a Grant Application 
    Receipt Acknowledgement to each applicant. If an applicant fails to 
    receive the notification of application receipt within 15 days from 
    the date of mailing the application, the applicant should call the 
    U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202) 
    708-9494.
        (3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not 
    provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for 
    Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number--and suffix 
    letter, if any--of the competition under which the application is 
    being submitted.
    
    Application Instructions and Forms
    
        To apply for an award under this program competition, applications 
    must be organized in the following order and include the following five 
    parts:
        Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev. 
    4-88)).
        Part II: Budget Information.
        Part III: Budget Narrative.
        Part IV: Program Narrative.
        Part V: Additional Assurances and Certifications:
        a. Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
        b. Certification regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and 
    Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED 
    80-0013) and Instructions.
        c. Certification regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and 
    Voluntary Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014, 9/90) 
    and Instructions. (NOTE: ED 80-0014 is intended for the use of grantees 
    and should not be transmitted to the Department.)
        d. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL-A) (if 
    applicable) and Instructions, and Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 
    Continuation Sheet (Standard Form LLL-A).
        All forms and instructions are included as Appendix A of this 
    notice.
        To assist potential applicants, questions and answers pertaining to 
    this program are included as Appendix B.
        All applicants must submit ONE original signed application, 
    including ink signatures on all forms and assurances and six copies of 
    the application. Please mark each application as original or copy. 
    Local or State agencies may choose to submit two copies with the 
    original.
        No grant may be awarded unless a completed application form has 
    been received. (20 U.S.C. 1241-1391)
        For Further Information Contact: Gail M. Schwartz, U.S. Department 
    of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW. (Room 4512--MES), Washington, DC 
    20202-7242. Telephone (202) 205-5621. Individuals who use a 
    telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
    Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
    p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
        Information about the Department's funding opportunities, including 
    copies of application notices for discretionary grant competitions, can 
    be viewed on the Department's electronic bulletin board (ED Board), 
    telephone (202) 260-9950; or on the Gopher Server at GOPHER.ED.GOV 
    (under announcements, Bulletins and Press Releases). However, the 
    official application notice for a discretionary grant competition is 
    the notice published in the Federal Register.
    
        Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 2420(a).
    
        Dated: July 6, 1994.
    Augusta Souza Kappner,
    Assistant Secretary, Office of Vocational and Adult Education.
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
    
    Appendix A
    
    TN13JY94.014
    
    
    TN13JY94.015
    
    
    TN13JY94.016
    
    
    TN13JY94.017
    
    
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-C
    
    Instructions for Part III--Budget Narrative
    
        Prepare a detailed Budget Narrative for the first year of the 
    project that justifies, and/or clarifies the budget figures shown in 
    Section A. Explain:
        1. How personnel costs are calculated--provide yearly and/or hourly 
    rates; for other than full-time staff, provide hours per day, week, 
    month, and year.
        2. The basis used to estimate certain costs (professional 
    personnel, consultants, travel, indirect costs) and any other cost that 
    may appear unusual;
        3. How the major cost items relate to the proposed project 
    activities (refer to application page);
        4. The costs of the project's evaluation component;
        5. What matching occurs in each budget category; and provide 
    estimated budget totals for the second, third, fourth, and fifth years 
    of the project.
    
    Instructions for Part IV--Program Narrative
    
        The program narrative will comprise the largest portion of your 
    application. This part is where you spell out the who, what, when, 
    where, why, and how of your proposed project.
        Although you will not have a form to fill out for your narrative, 
    there is a format. This format is the selection criteria. Because your 
    application will be reviewed and rated by a review panel on the basis 
    of the selection criteria, your narrative should follow the order and 
    format of the criteria.
        Before preparing your application, you should carefully read the 
    legislation and regulations of the program, eligibility requirements, 
    information on any priority set by the Secretary, and the selection 
    criteria for this competition.
        Your program narrative should be clear, concise, and to the point. 
    Begin the narrative with a one page abstract or summary of your 
    proposed project. Then describe the project in detail, addressing each 
    selection criterion in order.
        The Secretary strongly requests you limit the program narrative to 
    no more than 30 double-spaced, typed pages (on one side only), although 
    the Secretary will consider your application if it is longer. Be sure 
    to number consecutively ALL pages in your application.
        You may include supporting documentation as appendices. Be sure 
    that this material is concise and pertinent to this program 
    competition.
        You are advised that:
        (a) The Department considers only information contained in the 
    application in ranking applications for funding consideration. Letters 
    of support sent separately from the formal application package are not 
    considered in the review by the technical review panels. (EDGAR Sec. 
    75.217)
        (b) The technical review panel evaluates each application solely on 
    the basis of the established technical review criteria. Letters of 
    support contained in the application will strengthen the application 
    only insofar as they contain commitments which pertain to the 
    established technical review criteria, such as commitment and 
    resources.
    
    Estimated Public Reporting Burden
    
        Under terms of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, as amended, and 
    the regulations implementing that Act, the Department of Education 
    invites comment on the public reporting burden in this collection of 
    information. Public reporting burden for this collection of information 
    is estimated to average 90 hours per response, including the time for 
    reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 
    maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    collection of information. You may send comments regarding this burden 
    to the U.S. Department of Education, Information Management and 
    Compliance Division, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651; and to the Office of 
    Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, OMB 1830-0013, 
    Washington, D.C. 20503.
    (Information collection approved under OMB control number 1830-0013. 
    Expiration date: 2/28/95.)
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
    
    TN13JY94.018
    
    
    TN13JY94.019
    
    
    TN13JY94.020
    
    
    TN13JY94.021
    
    
    TN13JY94.022
    
    
    TN13JY94.023
    
    
    TN13JY94.024
    
    
    TN13JY94.025
    
    
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-C
    
    Appendix B
    
        Potential applicants frequently direct questions to officials of 
    the Department regarding application notices and programmatic and 
    administrative regulations governing various direct grant programs. To 
    assist potential applicants the Department has assembled the following 
    most commonly asked questions.
        Q. Can we get an extension of the deadline?
        A. No. A closing date may be changed only under extraordinary 
    circumstances. Any change must be announced in the Federal Register and 
    apply to all applications. Waivers for individual applications cannot 
    be granted regardless of the circumstances.
        Q. How many copies of the application should I submit and must they 
    be bound?
        A. Our new policy calls for an original and six copies to be 
    submitted. The binding of applications is optional.
        Q. We just missed the deadline for the XXX competition. May we 
    submit under another competition?
        A. Yes, however, the likelihood of success is not good. A properly 
    prepared application must meet the requirements of the competition to 
    which it is submitted.
        Q. I'm not sure which competition is most appropriate for my 
    project. What should I do?
        A. We are happy to discuss any questions with you and provide 
    clarification on the unique elements of the various competitions.
        Q. Will you help us prepare our application?
        A. We are happy to provide general program information. Clearly, it 
    would not be appropriate for staff to participate in the actual writing 
    of an application, but we can respond to specific questions about 
    application requirements, evaluation criteria, and the priorities. 
    Applicants should understand that this previous preapplication 
    consultation is not required, nor will it in any way influence the 
    success of an application.
        Q. When will I find out if I'm going to be funded?
        A. You can expect to receive notification within 3 to 4 months of 
    the application closing date, depending on the number of applications 
    received and the number of competitions with closing dates at about the 
    same time.
        Q. Once my application has been reviewed by the review panel, can 
    you tell me the outcome?
        A. No. Every year we are called by a number of applicants who have 
    legitimate reasons for needing to know the outcome of the review prior 
    to official notification. Some applicants need to make job decisions, 
    some need to notify a local school district, etc. Regardless of the 
    reason, because final funding decisions have not been made at that 
    point, we cannot share information about the review with anyone.
        Q. Will my application be returned if I am not funded?
        A. We no longer return unsuccessful applications. Thus, applicants 
    should retain at least one copy of the application.
        Q. Can I obtain copies of reviewers' comments?
        A. Upon written request, reviewers' comments will be mailed to 
    unsuccessful applicants.
        Q. Is travel allowed under these projects?
        A. Travel associated with carrying out the project is allowed. 
    Because we will request the project directors and evaluators of funded 
    projects to attend an annual project directors meeting, you should 
    include annual trips for each to Washington, DC., in the travel budget. 
    Travel to conferences is sometimes allowed when it is for purposes of 
    dissemination.
        Q. If my application receives high scores from the reviewers, does 
    that mean that I will receive funding?
        A. Not necessarily. It is often the case that the number of 
    applications scored highly by the reviewers exceeds the dollars 
    available for funding projects under a particular competition. The 
    order of selection, which is based on the scores of all the 
    applications and other relevant factors, determines the applications 
    that can be funded.
        Q. What happens during negotiations?
        A. During negotiations technical and budget issues may be raised. 
    These are issues that have been identified during the panel and staff 
    reviews that require clarification. Sometimes issues are stated as 
    ``conditions.'' These are issues that have been identified as so 
    critical that the award cannot be made unless those conditions are met. 
    Questions may also be raised about the proposed budget. Generally, 
    these issues are raised because there is inadequate justification or 
    explanation of a particular budget item, or because the budget item 
    seems unimportant to the successful completion of the project. If you 
    are asked to make changes that you feel could seriously affect the 
    project's success, you may provide reasons for not making the changes 
    or provide alternative suggestions. Similarly, if proposed budget 
    reductions will, in your opinion, seriously affect the project 
    activities, you may explain why and provide additional justification 
    for the proposed expenses. An award cannot be made until all 
    negotiation issues have been resolved.
        Q. How do I provide an assurance?
        A. Except for SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs,'' 
    simply state in writing that you are meeting a proscribed requirement.
        Q. Where can copies of the Federal Register, program regulations, 
    and Federal statutes be obtained?
        A. Copies of these materials can usually be found at your local 
    library. If not, they can be obtained from the Government Printing 
    Office by writing to: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government 
    Printing Office, Washington, DC. 20402. Telephone: (202) 783-3238. When 
    requesting copies of regulations or statutes, it is helpful to use the 
    specific name, public law number, or part number. The material 
    referenced in this notice should be referred to as follows:
        (1) Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act 
    (Perkins Act) (Public Law 101-392, 104 Stat. 753 (1990)).
        (2) State Vocational and Applied Technology Education Programs and 
    National Discretionary Programs of Vocational Education Final 
    Regulations, 34 CFR Parts 400 and 426.
        (3) Education Department General Administrative Regulations, 34 CFR 
    Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, and 86.
        Q. What are the Department of Education's Program Effectiveness 
    Panel and National Diffusion Network?
        A. The Program Effectiveness Panel (PEP) is the Department of 
    Education's primary mechanism for validating the effectiveness of 
    educational programs developed by schools, universities, and other 
    agencies. The National Diffusion Network (NDN) is a Federally funded 
    dissemination system that helps public and private schools, colleges, 
    and other educational institutions improve by sharing successful 
    education programs, products, and processes.
        Regulations governing PEP and NDN are codified at 34 CFR Parts 785-
    789. For information about PEP, prospective applicants may wish to read 
    Making the Case: Evidence of Effectiveness in Schools and Classrooms, 
    which contains criteria and guidelines for submitting project results 
    to PEP. This publication, as well as information about NDN, is 
    available from RMC Research Corporation, 1000 Market Street, 
    Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801. Telephone 1-800-258-0802. RMC Research 
    Corporation can also provide information about consultants who have 
    conducted evaluations that have been approved by PEP.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-16903 Filed 7-12-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
07/13/1994
Department:
Education Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-16903
Dates:
2/28/95.) BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: July 13, 1994, CFDA No.: 84.199D